LaRochelle:
I'm sure all of you talking never attended a female-only unity college. That girl can never cook up such story. Didn't you hear when the man told the girl that no matter who she reports to, she will be the one who leaves the school, not him? That he is protected by the Principal, or was it Vice-Principal?

Do you really think that the Ministry of Education did a thorough job? Even if they did, the fact they could not come up with some evidence doesn't mean he's guilty; after all, some criminals are adjudged "not guilty" where the opposition can't present enough evidence.

Queens' College has a large reputation. Do you honestly think they would want to taint that by providing evidence? They know public bad perception can ruin the work they have been doing for years. I am not saying that they assisted him; I am saying they might have put the truth in a more suitable form to them.

We have one of those kinds of men in female colleges. It usually takes guts to report them, and takes extra grace for students to provide enough evidence. That's how we disgraced one stupid paedophile Mr Biola, because we were able to set him up. If we hadn't, no one would have believed us.

So, I say to all of you who don't know shingbai about how these things work: keep quiet instead of saying offensive stuff. I strongly believe he is/was guilty; and yes, I'm talking with both emotion and reason.

Your head is correct.

If the ministry wanted a thorough investigation they should have handed the case over to the police or sss for serious investigation.


Mcheeewww

x240:



All these rubbish without evidence. The onus is on the accuser to provide irrefutable facts. Many men have been sent to jail by ladies who said they were raped or molested by them to cover face when it was consensual only to come confess later that they were scared of what their parents would say if they learnt they were freely having sex. I have read and seen numerous proven cases like that.

You would do well to provide evidence or STFU. This is the life of someone. Forget your biases and look at issues with a straight eye. Justice is about establishing facts not heresay and since the accuser can't bring forth the needed evidence, then they should even apologise for slandering him.

This write up works for me!

I would have decided to slander your personality here in reference to your Mr Biola, but I won't descend to that because I know you also have loved ones and you wouldn't appreciate that I'm doing that in public.

Have you forgotten that Mr Osifala has a family too. How would they be feeling about all these?

Even after you have read severally on Nairaland what many that have come across him have to say about him-most of them, guys and girls, were vouching for him.

But you have chosen to still believe this phantom parent all because of what Mr Biola did to you.

If he is guilty, at least we would have had other people who have been his victim put up supporting posts online, either anonymously or otherwise, both from Queens College and all the tutorial centres he is known.

Please don't create generalizations because of your experiences. Quit licking the wounds Mr Biola caused you. Move on and try to see other through the lens of some benefit of the doubt

LaRochelle:


I'm sorry to say but you aren't reasoning. They say there's no smoke without fire. If he was really a clean man, nobody would ever report him. And please, don't tell me it' was a conspiracy or a set-up. We both know it wasn't.

nwaanambra1:


lots of smoke without fire madam.

you are judged guilty by prove of evidence of crime - otherwise, the man is totally innocent. can you imagine how many people would av been dead if we are to believe every accusation without prove just simply because we believed there is no smoke without out fire?

Yes, that happens in courts of law where the offended can state his side. Remember the girl's mom had already withdrawn her, so, she couldn't "testify" to the panel. They might have randomly picked some girls in the school, but who wants to be a scapegoat?

starlingbawa:


When you say ''WE BOTH KNOW''.... Do you have any 'HARD FACTS' to back up such allegation?

We ought to be careful with our choice of words considering just about anyone can be sued for Slander and Libel!!!

You didn't deny that you know. Doesn't word of mouth count as "hard fact"?

logica:
Husband? This one cannot get a boyfriend talk less of husband. I know her type. If she does manage to get married, it won't last 3 months. Not cursing her; just saying as it is.

This is just rude and unneccessary.

sparkleRed:
This man is guilty, my colleague, called his female frnd whom he attended same tutorials with, e confirm d whole thing and she said he has touched her be4, buh she's married now so she won't want 2 soil her name, most qc gals I know, kept sayin d man is a pervert, they see him around hostel area @ night, the sch is just protecting him, no victim again will eva want to come out next tym he does dis, cos they believe he will still be shielded and they will be tagged victim of abuse

My colleague called his friend?? What arrant rubbish is that.

If you don't know someone personally, shut it.

I know Mr Olaseni, he taught several people on this site; he plays alot with both male and female students but for him to be accused of molesting underage girls seems unfathomable.

You are truly quite dumb to judge someone based on your peanut sized brain

Quakertellicus1:
Welll, the accuser did not come forward......most likely because she would have been named....and unfortunately being named as a victim of sexual assault in Nigeria is very very stigmatizing to the victim.

Still....that does not make the teacher guilty. Only a Court of Law could determine guilt or innocence.

The names of the accuser and the purported victim could not be found in any of the school's records

LaRochelle:
I'm sure all of you talking never attended a female-only unity college. That girl can never cook up such story. Didn't you hear when the man told the girl that no matter who she reports to, she will be the one who leaves the school, not him? That he is protected by the Principal, or was it Vice-Principal?

Do you really think that the Ministry of Education did a thorough job? Even if they did, the fact they could not come up with some evidence doesn't mean he's guilty; after all, some criminals are adjudged "not guilty" where the opposition can't present enough evidence.

Queens' College has a large reputation. Do you honestly think they would want to taint that by providing evidence? They know public bad perception can ruin the work they have been doing for years. I am not saying that they assisted him; I am saying they might have put the truth in a more suitable form to them.

We have one of those kinds of men in female colleges. It usually takes guts to report them, and takes extra grace for students to provide enough evidence. That's how we disgraced one stupid paedophile Mr Biola, because we were able to set him up. If we hadn't, no one would have believed us.

So, I say to all of you who don't know shingbai about how these things work: keep quiet instead of saying offensive stuff. I strongly believe he is/was guilty; and yes, I'm talking with both emotion and reason.

am sorry, but you never applied reason, just emotion.

If you did, then why didn't you ask for the accuser, or is the man all that powerful and connected up to the federal level to prevent the federal Ministry of education from hammering him?

So long the phantom girl and her mother cannot be identified and termed non-existing, no one has the right to go ahead and view the man as guilty or capable of such.

Forget about how you feel towards the feminine gender. Even the silly blogger that broke the story couldn't provide the woman's email address- a pointer to the fact that such woman and her daughter don't exist and we're only made up to tarnished the teacher's image.

pls, discard your emotions and observe how students of the school protested in support of the same person you want to still believe is a rapist.

for Christ sake, the man can't be bigger than investigators from the federal level.

.

LaRochelle:


You didn't deny that you know. Doesn't word of mouth count as "hard fact"?

That's if it's substantial and can easily be corroborated by others too!

iliyande:


Your head is correct.

If the ministry wanted a thorough investigation they should have handed the case over to the police or sss for serious investigation.


Mcheeewww

stop saying things you know Nada about, cos I can see that you haven't been following the story. If you have, how come you didn't know that the police also investigated?

look, the case is not a serious one to warrant sss to step in cos the accusers don't exist.

To everyone who thinks this man is decent and doesn't molest girls, all you have to do is look for an alumnus of the school, not someone who attended a mixed lesson of his, an actual alumnus of the all girls college. Tell her to be totally honest with you, then you'll know the truth.

truthalways:


Girl, you are very silly and close to retarded

You reason with your emotions and not with your brains; you are daft.

The man told the girl...where you there when he told her...To be honest you are very senseless

"The girl cannot cook up such a story"...I pray that your husband, brothers and sons are falsely accused...would have added your father but i respect elders

"I strongly believe he is guilty"... How can you say this, you really need help.

All this for only me? I'm very touched.

truthalways:


My colleague called his friend?? What arrant rubbish is that.

If you don't know someone personally, shut it.

I know Mr Olaseni, he taught several people on this site; he plays alot with both male and female students but for him to be accused of molesting underage girls seems unfathomable.

You are truly quite dumb to judge someone based on your peanut sized brain

I dnt ve tym to trade insult wit brainwashed fellows like u, go get a life

Thank u

GuyfawkesAB:
I would have decided to slander your personality here in reference to your Mr Biola, but I won't descend to that because I know you also have loved ones and you wouldn't appreciate that I'm doing that in public.

Have you forgotten that Mr Osifala has a family too. How would they be feeling about all these?

Even after you have read severally on Nairaland what many that have come across him have to say about him-most of them, guys and girls, were vouching for him.

But you have chosen to still believe this phantom parent all because of what Mr Biola did to you.

If he is guilty, at least we would have had other people who have been his victim put up supporting posts online, either anonymously or otherwise, both from Queens College and all the tutorial centres he is known.

Please don't create generalizations because of your experiences. Quit licking the wounds Mr Biola caused you. Move on and try to see other through the lens of some benefit of the doubt

Okay. Thank you. Would always keep that in mind.

LaRochelle:


Yes, that happens in courts of law where the offended can state his side. Remember the girl's mom had already withdrawn her, so, she couldn't "testify" to the panel. They might have randomly picked some girls in the school, but who wants to be a scapegoat?

the girls mom withdrew because she knows what she was saying is "empty accusation" no body drops a case with hard evidence - especially igbos.

Mbe agaba - aja mbene! is a story! if u r igbo u will understand what i just typed.

Since the man was not found guilty. Why are some people still crying? If you have evidences go tender it to the ministry of education. Most especially the female folks. The person that alleged the mm didn't show up. So, if a panel wasn't setup, naso una go make the innocent man suffer. people should desist from false accusation. I herd one person saying I know he is still guilty. Whenever we want to contribute on issues like this we should put our sentiments and emotions aside. Let us allow people that are in charge should carry out their investigation. Not by Jumping into conclusion.
Am refering to the Ladies/women on this forum.

How many alumnus of QC can you trust when it comes to sexual matters. Their own personal sexual escapades is enough to doubt their allegations.

I know quite a number of them.
The world is suddenly going over the edge with this whole feministic ideals. We men wouldn't even be safe around our wives soon, not to talk of other females. We can be easily accused of anything.

LastOkpaBender:
To everyone who thinks this man is decent and doesn't assault girls, all you have to do is look for an alumnus of the school and tell her to be totally honest with you, then you'll know the truth.

LaRochelle:
I'm sure all of you talking never attended a female-only unity college. That girl can never cook up such story. Didn't you hear when the man told the girl that no matter who she reports to, she will be the one who leaves the school, not him? That he is protected by the Principal, or was it Vice-Principal?

Do you really think that the Ministry of Education did a thorough job? Even if they did, the fact they could not come up with some evidence doesn't mean he's guilty; after all, some criminals are adjudged "not guilty" where the opposition can't present enough evidence.

Queens' College has a large reputation. Do you honestly think they would want to taint that by providing evidence? They know public bad perception can ruin the work they have been doing for years. I am not saying that they assisted him; I am saying they might have put the truth in a more suitable form to them.

We have one of those kinds of men in female colleges. It usually takes guts to report them, and takes extra grace for students to provide enough evidence. That's how we disgraced one stupid paedophile Mr Biola, because we were able to set him up. If we hadn't, no one would have believed us.

So, I say to all of you who don't know shingbai about how these things work: keep quiet instead of saying offensive stuff. I strongly believe he is/was guilty; and yes, I'm talking with both emotion and reason.

Kindly come out your feminism infection. How are you so sure that the teacher commit this offence or that the acusser really exist? The problem of feminist like you is inferiority complex and unexplainable anger of sorts that you had abore.

You have passed judgement on a event that adjudged virtually non existed. I bet if you are a judge in this matter the teacher would have been judged without trial.

And do you really think the Education Ministry did not do a thorough job?

Do you know this girl or the parents? The police and NGO, and some feminists e-warriors have not been able to establish the identity of this accuser.

This case appear to me as a slander against the teacher.

Soseed:
If u stay in akoka and attended a tutorial center u ar bound to know olaseni. D biology teacher who can play to d extreme but i knw he cant do dis useles tin. If u stay in akoka and attended a tutorial center u ar bound to know olaseni. D biology teacher who can play to d extreme but i knw he cant do dis useles tin. If u stay in akoka and attended a tutorial center u ar bound to know olaseni. D biology teacher who can play to d extreme but i knw he cant do dis useles tin.

Na olaseni be dis?eeya I know very well..the guy made biology very interesting and fun..

x240:



All these rubbish without evidence. The onus is on the accuser to provide irrefutable facts. Many men have been sent to jail by ladies who said they were raped or molested by them to cover face when it was consensual only to come confess later that they were scared of what their parents would say if they learnt they were freely having sex. I have read and seen numerous proven cases like that.

You would do well to provide evidence or STFU. This is the life of someone. Forget your biases and look at issues with a straight eye. Justice is about establishing facts not heresay and since the accuser can't bring forth the needed evidence, then they should even apologise for slandering him.

Pray you don't find urself in such situation. What type of evidence do u expect the little girl to provide, just name 1 and tell me how you are going to provide it if you are in the girl's shoe.
Atleast with this he will be very careful now and limit the way he play with those kids guilty or not guilty.

iliyande:


Your head is correct.

If the ministry wanted a thorough investigation they should have handed the case over to the police or sss for serious investigation.


Mcheeewww

The teacher was interrogated for 13hours by the police. Due to the seriousness and publicity given to case, the police used some of their best interrogators

coolviv:


It's good they accused him even when they could not follow through. Now all eyes are on him and the school while parents are now more vigilant. Don't pray that u r loved one experiences this situation as keeping mute or going to NGOS would not even come to mind. Just murder...

Have you ever heard of slander? Or didn't you know when you accuse someone of committing a crime he didn't commit is a crime itself?

For the fact that they couldn't follow through shows that their accusation lacks merit. Plain and simple.

headboiy:


I'm a female,don't mind the moniker
Attended the school, won't say more than that

can't u say wat u kw and save a life? This man and principal have bosted that he can never be sack. Save a life, ur family member or sm1 dear to u might be the next victim. Save a life

manie:



The teacher was interrogated for 13hours by the police. Due to the seriousness and publicity given to case, the police used some of their best interrogators

Interogation? Did. I hear you say that, only? And u expect that he will say the truth?
We all know that here in Nigeria it's hard to get the truth from a mere interrogation without serious tuture.

manie:



The teacher was interrogated for 13hours by the police. Due to the seriousness and publicity given to case, the police used some of their best interrogators

Bro, to think what the nigerian police would have done to the guy makes me cringe.

I believe those who accused him should have shown their faces, so people will know what went down.

GuyfawkesAB:
How many alumnus of QC can you trust when it comes to sexual matters. Their own personal sexual escapades is enough to doubt their allegations.

I know quite a number of them.
The world is suddenly going over the edge with this whole feministic ideals. We men wouldn't even be safe around our wives soon, not to talk of other females. We can be easily accused of anything.

My sisters attended this school. I know what I'm saying. It seems you have many QC girls around you. Ask as many as possible to tell you all they know about this guy. There's no way they could all be involved in some so called "conspiracy". Trust me on this one, if you really want the truth.

chisco82:

Interogation? Did. I hear you

Yes you heard me

.

AfroKnight:
He should sue the woman who accused him. Well, that is assuming she exists.

Nobody knows the accuser, no NGO has ever seen her face; even the police don't know what she looks like. Yet the internet judged the teacher.

The stories did not add up but he was assumed guilty out of sentiments. What a wonderful world.

I followed this story. Even the school PTA made their investigation. I watched on TVC news, they said the woman is faceless. The PTA also said, the old girls association are behind this saga because they don't like the principal.
My own piece of advice is people should stop judging fast.

manie:


Yes you heard me

.

Lol! Check i modified this post.

LaRochelle:


Yes, that happens in courts of law where the offended can state his side. Remember the girl's mom had already withdrawn her, so, she couldn't "testify" to the panel. They might have randomly picked some girls in the school, but who wants to be a scapegoat?

She was invited to the panel but refused to honour the invitation, after promising to protect her identity