doctortam:
Did mine today.....the medical exam wasn't as initially reported.....guess it was changed....there was just one anaesthesia question, no question on cardiomyopathy.....most questions were from the basic medical sciences like anatomy, physio and biochemistry. There were few clinical questions. Folks who are not doctors were mostly affected.... Saw scores like 2, 7, 18 etc. I had 25....I hope it ll be enough.

dexter1983:
Testing ICT with purely computer architecture(major computer engineering) without questions from networking,database,programming,security,web etc is so so wrong.

The organisers of the exams did a bad job in this regard if the test is to chose the best.

ND4Best:
Most people failed because they refused to ask questions. Most especially those that wrote the second day. In a competitive test like this, you must be friendly with people. Last year results was a bite high when compared to this year. Most people passed. NO COMPLAIN from applicants despite that fact the organization was poor. They repeated all questions last year. NDDC used Mr.Godson. he was applauded. This year, they also consulted Mr. Godson.Now, he employed the same approach used in 2015, applicants are complaining about method they once applauded. I was against this approach last year, most applicants misunderstood me. I guess they can see the adverse effect now. Any way, I wish u all success.

professorgome:


Man, just imagine a field like ICT. See those questions, the organizers decided to narrow their brains to about 4 or so topics in ICT. So bad. I've never written this kind of exam before. Computer is too broad to limit yourself to those trash called questions. And you called yourself an examiner.

dyydxx:
I agree with Jezrel90.

I was the first to do on Thursday and I scored 30. All my friends that did the next day had from 45 to 50/50. Yes I know someone that got 50/50. They had solve everything before going in. Obviously they would get called and us that score low won't go anywhere. Not fair at all.

doctortam:
Did mine today.....the medical exam wasn't as initially reported.....guess it was changed....there was just one anaesthesia question, no question on cardiomyopathy.....most questions were from the basic medical sciences like anatomy, physio and biochemistry. There were few clinical questions. Folks who are not doctors were mostly affected.... Saw scores like 2, 7, 18 etc. I had 25....I hope it ll be enough.

logho:

You are a medical Doctor,so the questions were not strange and you scored 25.Imagine those who studiedMicrobiology,Biochemistry etc.I scored 19 and i studied Microbiology

stepo707:

Did you write today or Thursday?Thursday questions were so so annoying

toprealman:
u will be fine bro.....what's ur field?

ArcJay:
Good evening house, please is there any environmental candidate that wrote on Thursday that scored as high as 28-30?

professorgome:
NDDC scholar candidates, prof wrote his exam today by 9:45am for the 8am exam. I was hearing but I saw it for myself today. I wrote for computer science, those questions came from underground. I saw BUS and address, registry, binary, cache, memory, compiler. There is no way anybody would have been able to guess these questions. I managed to score 19/50. The rate of failure was massive. You see scares like 2, 5, 7, 15, 11, 9. I saw 40, 41, 31, 30. I pray they reduce the cut-off.

professorgome:


Man, just imagine a field like ICT. See those questions, the organizers decided to narrow their brains to about 4 or so topics in ICT. So bad. I've never written this kind of exam before. Computer is too broad to limit yourself to those trash called questions. And you called yourself an examiner.

aamstih:
I scored 26, How about you?.
What's your state of origin bro?

jezrel90:
I have forwarded an email to the hierarchy of NDDC, but I will be expecting an honest review from a few of you guys to back it up. Doing so, Im sure all these will change next year. Its either the organisers sit-up or get kicked out. We cant be chanting "CHANGE" and insist on unjust ways.
So far I have compiled these observations:
1. Questions repetition (buggish-Algorithm)
2. Unfair selection process (A lot of high potential candidates will be unfairly dropped)
3. Test not standardized (This goes against standard International practices)
Lets wait and see what the selection process will be like. **fingers-crossed**

texrem:


NICE ONE BRO...ATLEAST IT HELPS MEDICAL STUDENTS TO KNOW THE DIRECTION QUESTIONS WILL BE COMING OUT FROM..

ArcJay:


24, Abia state, the guy beside me also scored 26, he said he also studied architecture, from UNN, could that be you? We were the first batch to write.

aamstih:
Wasn't me bro.

aamstih:
I observed that the first day had most of it candidates from Akwa Ibom, Cross River and Bayelsa while the second day had most of it candidates from Imo State, was the schedule designed this way or this just an unfounded observation?


Cc: stepo707, jezrel90, faith2ogesco, geobukky

ifeanyimoses:
D persons that scored 26,24, and 41. Did u guys write under computer science cos I really doubt?
N if yes dt means u all saw d questions b4 u entered d Hall. period

aamstih:
I observed that the first day had most of it candidates from Akwa Ibom, Cross River and Bayelsa while the second day had most of it candidates from Imo State, was the schedule designed this way or this just an unfounded observation?


Cc: stepo707, jezrel90, faith2ogesco, geobukky

Thermok:


Your right. I also wrote on thursday, i scored. 34 and I came upset that I didn't do well. Only for my friends to say that they hadn't seen anyone that scored above 30 and this was around 2pm on Thursday. Then were hearing higher scores the following days, which isn't a true reflection of the test. I only hope and pray that my score will see me through

engribanga:


I happened to write on the 2nd (Thursday). The questions for ICT were so narrowed into the core subjects like "Digital Logic Design, Data Structure, software engineering, fundamentals of algorithms and advance computer architecture".

At first, i was like how on earth will this guys bring this kind of questions into an exams like this... Well, i was lucky when i stumbled to get my 41/50 out of the hall after several system issues when they used IE browser to drive the exams with an incomplete browser plugins. I had to switch to FIREFOX to avoid further issues

Well i won't dispute the very fact that the questions where easy!!! Men it WAS VERY HARD. As below:
(1) Consider a max heap, represented by the following array; 40,30,20,10,15,16,17,18,4 After inserting a nodes with value 35.Which of following is the updated max heap?
(2) The boolean expression AB'CD'is?
(3) How can you define an interrupt?
(4) In which one of the following methods for resolving the priority, the device with the highest priority is placed in the first position, followed by lower-priority devices up to the device with the lowest priority, which is placed last in the series?
(5) Sieve Technique can be applied to selection problem?
(6) Some bit field members are stored: I) left to right II) right to left III) in circular array.
and so on........

All i can say is, you just need to practice very well for the interview. Because from experience, you can score the highest but you are not guarantied to get the scholar because interview is another hard phase of this marathon.

God is the only answer to all of our questions and not man. You never know that your Scored 7 can take you to where you never expected... Keep praying and believe in him. Also pray for good governance of NDDC 2016 because 2015 government was really a mess. Can you imagine i was interviewed with an IPAD+INTERNET last year? lol....

I know this year will be good and we will have a lot of lucky people. Let's all pray for Mrs. Ibim Semenitari because she's a woman of her words just like our dear Dr. Christy Atako. I wish Dr. Christy Atako was on board....


Na God WIN