ValentineMary:

That is one major misconception. The big bang was not an explosion. It was just spreading of matter and space. Though the singularity it started from was infinitely hot and dense, something caused it to expand but it did not explode.

Elohim1:
Oh Yeah U R Right But Do U Think Due To This Expansion The Universe Will End In A Great Freeze??

Dawdy:

You are still telling what other told you. Tell me how you measured or calculated it yourself, and how you finally reached conclusion.

ValentineMary:

There are several hypothesis about how the universe would end. The great freeze sounds the most logical. There is also another one that says that dark matter would grow and force all matter into a singularity. And the singularity would expand again after some time to form the universe (big crunch). But I would go for the big freeze.

Elohim1:
Wow But The Two Could Still Happen They Is A Possibility Lemme Stress My Brain On It

The two can't happen. In the big freeze, the universe would continue to expand until the degenerate era and the energy in the universe would reduce. Stars would die slowly and no new star would be born then in the dark era only corpse of stars would remain like black holes, neutron star, etc and the black holes would all evaporate following Hawkins radiation. Then all the particles would disintegrate. This may take as long as 10 ⁹⁴ years. As the universe would go to an almost 0 energy level. And the universe die forever.

But in the big crunch, as dark matter push matter into a singularity the universe gets hotter that even a supernova compared to it would be chilly. Stars would melt like was. After the singularity is formed, it begins to expand after some time to form the universe. So it's more like a cycle between big crunch and big bang. We might be in the 1,000,000,000,000 cycle now. Who knows

ValentineMary:

Your statement is not quite logical. In science we constantly stand on the shoulders of giants and great scientific findings. He can't make all the findings himself but he can read articles from trustworthy sites and journals. Or do you think Faraday would have invented electricity if he did not study and trust sir Humphrey work? But faith gives no room to new and innovative research since it claim to have all the answers which in reality it does not.

johnydon22:


Please what sort of life would survive and thrive without the sun and how?

Dawdy:

They say light is moving 300000 km/s did you just believe that without questioning how they arrived to that conclusion? Or yo actually know h
The speed of light yourself. You said "they are trustworthy" they are not! The people who faked moon laning are not trustworthy.

donnffd:


I would assume you havent killed someone before with a gun(if you have, more grace to your elbows).

If i asked you to take a gun, point it at your mother and shoot, would you?

why wouldn't you try it out?

you havent shot a gun before

you cant just believe what they say about guns without trying it yourself nah, can you?

Dawdy:

Your analogy is dumb. If I hadn't seen gun before and someone told me that gun killed. I had to believe him, because he told me based on the experience he might have had about the gun. Perhaps he used it himself or it was used in his presence. He didn't just assume that gun killed because he had dream that gun killed.

The reverse is the case here. They said "earth is rotating around the sun 67000 mph." though, they never saw earth rotation. just speculations. How come when we jump up on the moving earth we land on the same spot? The said if you threw something up inside the moving car, it wouldn't fall down far behind you. Is something moving straight compared to rotating object? We asked, "what makes earth rotate" they said gravity. They can't really explain how the so called force of gravity. They just assume it pulls everything down. And the only example they gave is that if you threw something up it would fall down. Why the so called gravity allowed me to throw something up in the first place? The same gravity can't pull smoke down. If the Sun's gravity is constantly pulling planets toward it, why hasn't the Earth been pulled into the Sun?

The law of gravity pull the to the earth to the sun can easily be broken whe a bird flies. They gave another excuse that gravity is the strongest and the weakest force. What make gravity strong and weak? Gravity remains unproven theory not fact at all. And if the gravity is removed in astronomy, what is left is zero.

donnffd:


Oh, now i realize...you are a troll, ddnt know, my bad...

Dawdy:

Your analogy is dumb. If I hadn't seen gun before and someone told me that gun killed. I had to believe him, because he told me based on the experience he might have had about the gun. Perhaps he used it himself or it was used in his presence. He didn't just assume that gun killed because he had dream that gun killed.

The reverse is the case here. They said "earth is rotating around the sun 67000 mph." though, they never saw earth rotation. just speculations. How come when we jump up on the moving earth we land on the same spot? The said if you threw something up inside the moving car, it wouldn't fall down far behind you. Is something moving straight compared to rotating object? We asked, "what makes earth rotate" they said gravity. They can't really explain how the so called force of gravity. They just assume it pulls everything down. And the only example they gave is that if you threw something up it would fall down. Why the so called gravity allowed me to throw something up in the first place? The same gravity can't pull smoke down. If the Sun's gravity is constantly pulling planets toward it, why hasn't the Earth been pulled into the Sun?

The law of gravity pull the to the earth to the sun can easily be broken whe a bird flies. They gave another excuse that gravity is the strongest and the weakest force. What make gravity strong and weak? Gravity remains unproven theory not fact at all. And if the gravity is removed in astronomy, what is left is zero.

Eddygourdo:
many million years ago, the meterites that brought the seas , plus the mega volcanic eruption that caused the world to freeze up , killed all life forms existent then. Yet we have humans today and other animals. This haappened because lifeforms adapted at microbial level. And lived throughout in the ice, just as we would discover on mars very soon. When the earth began to unfreeze. The microbial lifeforms true to natural laws of natural selection and genetic mutation started to evolve from these differnet microbial lifeforms existent in those areas to suit the environment. The microbes evovled over millions of years into the diverse animals and plant life you see today. Everytime the world faced a catstrophe like the type which wiped off the dinosaurs, life will return to adaptive microbial forms in a dormant state till conditions improve to allow regeneration again. Current human life and animals will all be wiped off in any catstrophe as that has happened more than 100times since the existence of our solar system.

Anymorre questions sire ?