vikspring:
In light of the series of dramatization that had its destiny tied to the famous Mr. Nairaland contest, and subsequent decisions that has led to what in opinion I see as public declaration of hate directed at the person of *Name of contestant* which undoubtedly in no degree of uncertainty contradicts what in essence for this past three years I have learnt and spent, the wholeness and image of nairaland. As known this considerations of levelled unfounded charges by cabals has resulted in the disqualification of *Name of contestant* as a participant in this contest. A case I wish to by the purpose of this letter argued before the owner of this great forum.

While there is no doubt that the levelled charges on which the person of *name of contestant* was being disqualified has a political undertone to it, yet for the sake of peace and co-dwelling which I assume is the paramount purpose for which this forum exist I will move on to examine the levelled charges with the cutlery of reasoning since that is the major argument here, the epicentre. And I hope the person concerned can see reasoning to these things.

One among charges levelled against the person of *name of contestant* is such that has to do with background threatening of certain particular person. Now, normally, if someone feels threatened supposedly by someone, fitting reasoning and action to take is seek protection from the rightful security agencies, in other words call the awareness of the police to such development but rather, our cabals would only come to nairaland to raise grounds for disqualifications. The question I will have the person the addressed to ask this cabal is, has the threatened person made effort of its claim to the appropriate security agencies? If yes, then can this person forwarded authorized evidence by appropriate agencies calling the person of *name of contestant* for questioning. If no, then it is quite obvious it was a schemed attempt to get the person of *name of contestant* disqualified from this contest. This evidence lies in their emphasis on disqualification of the person of *name of contestant* rather than the safety of the supposedly threatened. With the tabled reasons, if the supposedly threatened can not provide evidences of appropriate legal measures confirming confessions of such threats, I think then by all standard the decision of the organizing committee require a review. Since insistence would only indicate nairaland as a tool of defamation of character were the person of *name of contestant" decide to take legal measures. This of course, would tend to put nairaland in a bad light, most importantly the owner.

Another substantial charge is the issue of cultism. Of course there were supposedly pictorial evidences solidifying this specious claims. In feeble reasoning this might be enough, but if intellectualism should have its way these are hypothesis of no substantial proof. The first twin question that begs an answer is what relevancy does being a cultist has to do with Mr. Nairaland contest, and how sure are these cabals. If these cabals are indeed sure, how do they have the information since cultism by all definition is a secret order hidden from the world around it. So to know a cultist such person must be a cultist. Another thing that exposes this charge for what it is is the submission of pictorial evidences as grounds for cultism in this age of Photoshop and information misinterpretation. For all these could be, one could argue these are photoshoped works. And until these cabals can provide video evidence of the initiation of the person of *name of contestant* into this imaginary cult of theirs, these charges have no basis. And if the basis of disqualification owed to the above, then there is need for a review of decision if nairaland indeed still stand by its ethic, "Do not post unfounded information on nairaland."

Mr. Nairaland sure will come and go, but these people, us, will remain on nairaland. But if the ethics are given over to propaganda at these prime age to reason of politics, then there is much to be feared. Paramount is the love that bound the member of this forum in unity, such should not be traded at the gate of hasty conclusions. If should be the case, I enjoined the addressed to look into matter raised.

firstEVA:
Bad grammar everywhere, reminds me of someone

To spak english no be by force abeg

vikspring:


referring to who pls

firstEVA:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9qlFvlmZtc

ellacute45:

can't believe that

MUVA:
I can't believe I just wasted few minutes of my precious time reading this balderdash.

firstEVA:
Bad grammar everywhere, reminds me of someone

To spak english no be by force abeg

Ishilove:
The internet never forgets. Next time tell kinginvala not to brag about cult affiliations or threaten people because your past, both distant and near have a way of coming back to haunt you.

For every action there is a reaction. This is the consequence of his 'impure' ways.

Blayze007:
Moral Lesson: Claiming to be a cultist and threatening to riddle people's bodies with bullets does not make u a badass.. It only exposes ur ass.

OP...all dis write up will not erase his past mistakes. He needs to man up and move on. Now he knows better how NOT to behave. (Hopefully).

vikspring:
…

ShaqFu:
A lesson harshly learnt by Goodluck Jonathan and his wife, Mama Piss.

Ishilove, I tell you, "Ojukwu may be dead, but his manhood lives on".

Never forget, "stealing is not corruption".

And lastly, "My fellow widows".

Truly, the internet never forgets cos it's mainly used by busy bodies.

One among charges levelled against the person of Kinginvahala is such that has to do with background threatening of certain particular person.

vikspring:
In light of the series of dramatization that had its destiny tied to the famous Mr. Nairaland contest, and subsequent decisions that has led to what in opinion I see as public declaration of hate directed at the person of which undoubtedly in no degree of uncertainty contradicts what in essence for this past three years I have learnt and spent, the wholeness and image of nairaland. As known this considerations of levelled unfounded charges by cabals has resulted in the disqualification of Kinginvahala as a participant in this contest. A case I wish to by the purpose of this letter argued before the owner of this great forum.

While there is no doubt that the levelled charges on which the person of Kinginvahala was being disqualified has a political undertone to it, yet for the sake of peace and co-dwelling which I assume is the paramount purpose for which this forum exist I will move on to examine the levelled charges with the cutlery of reasoning since that is the major argument here, the epicentre. And I hope the person concerned can see reasoning to these things.

One among charges levelled against the person of Kinginvahala is such that has to do with background threatening of certain particular person. Now, normally, if someone feels threatened supposedly by someone, fitting reasoning and action to take is seek protection from the rightful security agencies, in other words call the awareness of the police to such development but rather, our cabals would only come to nairaland to raise grounds for disqualifications. The question I will have the person the addressed to ask this cabal is, has the threatened person made effort of its claim to the appropriate security agencies? If yes, then can this person forwarded authorized evidence by appropriate agencies calling the person of *name of contestant* for questioning. If no, then it is quite obvious it was a schemed attempt to get the person of Kinginvahala disqualified from this contest. This evidence lies in their emphasis on disqualification of the person of kinginvahala rather than the safety of the supposedly threatened. With the tabled reasons, if the supposedly threatened can not provide evidences of appropriate legal measures confirming confessions of such threats, I think then by all standard the decision of the organizing committee require a review. Since insistence would only indicate nairaland as a tool of defamation of character were the person of *name of contestant" decide to take legal measures. This of course, would tend to put nairaland in a bad light, most importantly the owner.

Another substantial charge is the issue of cultism. Of course there were supposedly pictorial evidences solidifying this specious claims. In feeble reasoning this might be enough, but if intellectualism should have its way these are hypothesis of no substantial proof. The first twin question that begs an answer is what relevancy does being a cultist has to do with Mr. Nairaland contest, and how sure are these cabals. If these cabals are indeed sure, how do they have the information since cultism by all definition is a secret order hidden from the world around it. So to know a cultist such person must be a cultist. Another thing that exposes this charge for what it is is the submission of pictorial evidences as grounds for cultism in this age of Photoshop and information misinterpretation. For all these could be, one could argue these are photoshoped works. And until these cabals can provide video evidence of the initiation of the person of Kinginvahala into this imaginary cult of theirs, these charges have no basis. And if the basis of disqualification owed to the above, then there is need for a review of decision if nairaland indeed still stand by its ethic, "Do not post unfounded information on nairaland."

Mr. Nairaland sure will come and go, but these people, us, will remain on nairaland. But if the ethics are given over to propaganda at these prime age to reason of politics, then there is much to be feared. Paramount is the love that bound the member of this forum in unity, such should not be traded at the gate of hasty conclusions. If should be the case, I enjoined the addressed to look into matter raised.



cc: seun

funlord:






Sharrap and gerrarahia with this garbage!




Your preferred candidate/lover or whatever is :


1; An inconsequential "Baggar"!


2: A baby "norseman"!


3: A low level "cultist"!



Advice him next time that "real bad boys" move in silence and do not go about displaying their ignorance by consistently "sailing" in full view on public forums all in an attempt to "shine for hoes" or "look hard" to wimps, only to turn around and try to beg and hustle for 50 grand by claiming innocence and engaging in subterfuge!



And well if you, him or anyone of his fellow "_semen" have a problem with these facts, well everybody knows how it ends when you decide to cross swords with the lord!