Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,207,096 members, 7,997,825 topics. Date: Friday, 08 November 2024 at 06:07 PM

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (23) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1035823 Views)

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) ... (668) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 5:09pm On Aug 28, 2016
andrewza:


Because Putin is a great manipulator. He has gotten Turky to join with Iran in fighting groups hostil to Assad. So ISIS is a target bit not a primary target.

Turkish troops enter Syria to take on ISIS, backed by U.S. warplanes
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/turkey-launches-operation-against-islamic-state-held-town-on-border/2016/08/24/4983b9d2-b71a-446e-967e-894bf4b9a845_story.html
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 5:13pm On Aug 28, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:53pm On Aug 28, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:39pm On Aug 28, 2016
the weapon below was used to great effect a few years ago, by the head hunters as the soldiers using them were nicknamed.
it was designed hundreds of years ago for the primary purpose of chopping of enemies head in a single blow.
the soldiers who carry it are keeping alive their ago old tradition of head chopping grin
unfortunately their cant keep the enemies head as war trophies like they used to do it in the past grin

the weapon is big and heavy and sharpened on one side only with a long handle as long as the blade .
it is not issued officially but the men carry them , like their fore fathers did while on head hunting missions.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 9:39am On Aug 29, 2016
U S Navy Destroyer USS Nitze Harassed by Iranian Patrol Boats

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZIA3k1HHqA

Yikes — Iranian Boats Play Chicken With U.S. Warships
Now think about what this tactic would look like if they weren’t playing around

by ROBERT BECKHUSEN
Another few sunny days in the Persian Gulf, and another several days of scarily-close encounters between Iranian boats and U.S. warships. And this time they provoked an American ship into firing warning shots.
That’s not a reassuring series of events at a time when Saudi Arabia — a U.S. ally — and Iran fight devastating proxy wars in Syria and Yemen. It’s only a little more than a year since the landmark deal between Iran and the West, while still shaky, halted Iran’s drive to develop nuclear weapons.
If the incidents in August are any indication, relations between the United States have a very long way to go before they get any better. Tehran, or at least elements within the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, seem to prefer it that way.
The first incident on Aug. 23 occurred when four IRGC boats — weapons uncovered — came within 300 yards of the destroyer USS Nitze, which fired off flares to warn the boats away, in the Strait of Hormuz.
Video of the incident is below:

The next day, Iranian boats harassed American ships on three separate occasions. The first incident on Aug. 24 occurred when three Iranian vessels approached the patrol vessels USS Tempest and USS Squall — and crossed the Tempest’s bow back and forth three times.
A few hours later, an Iranian boat played chicken with Tempest by speeding toward her head on.
“This situation presented a drastically increased risk of collision, and the Iranian vessel refused to safely maneuver in accordance with internationally recognized maritime rules of the road, despite several request and warnings via radio, and visual and audible warnings from both U.S. ships,” U.S. Fifth Fleet spokesman Cmdr. Bill Urban told USNI News.
That’s when Squall fired three .50-caliber warning shots, which apparently convinced the Iranian boat to turn around. But that wasn’t the end of it. The same boat later harassed the destroyer USS Stout.

Close encounters between Iranian patrol boats and U.S. warships are hardly unprecedented. The Iranian navy often shadows American ships as a means to signal strength and to keep its sailors steeled for a potential armed conflict.
In July, Gen. Joseph Votel — commander of all U.S. forces in the Middle East — got a first-hand look while sailing on board the amphibious transport USS New Orleans when five Iranian boats came within 500 yards. And on Aug. 15, IRGC vessels “launched rockets in exercises a few miles away from two U.S. Navy ships,” Defense News reported.
This isn’t to suggest that a naval conflict between the United States and Iran is likely, just that Tehran finds it useful to train its sailors for that possibility. And what better way to prepare for war than to scope out and engage in high-risk maneuvers in close proximity to U.S. warships?
The biggest potential downside is that someone — an Iranian or American commander — may miscalculate. The fact that the most recent set of incidents provoked an American ship into firing warning shots shows just how close both sides can come to igniting a flashpoint.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:17am On Aug 29, 2016
Indian space research organization ISRO successfully conducted its the maiden ‘short duration experimental test’ of Scramjet engine with a hypersonic flight at Mach 6.

only fourth country in the world to successful test a SCRAMJET ROCKET ENGINE.

the technology developed will be used in the future in DRDO's HSTDV (military application), if the technology demonstrations are successful, then it will ultimately be morphed into a hypersonic cruise missile which will cover 1500 km range in less than 600 seconds at Mach 8-12.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:34am On Aug 29, 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yBzMwmiggw

now its the turn of the turks to get some grin grin grin

Erdogan will create lot of problems in the region if he stays in power too long , he is dreaming of bringing the erstwhile ottoman empire online again.

will be more dangerous than the wahabis/salafists governments in middle east.

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 10:43am On Aug 29, 2016
tdayof:
U S Navy Destroyer USS Nitze Harassed by Iranian Patrol Boats

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZIA3k1HHqA

Yikes — Iranian Boats Play Chicken With U.S. Warships
Now think about what this tactic would look like if they weren’t playing around

by ROBERT BECKHUSEN
Another few sunny days in the Persian Gulf, and another several days of scarily-close encounters between Iranian boats and U.S. warships. And this time they provoked an American ship into firing warning shots.
That’s not a reassuring series of events at a time when Saudi Arabia — a U.S. ally — and Iran fight devastating proxy wars in Syria and Yemen. It’s only a little more than a year since the landmark deal between Iran and the West, while still shaky, halted Iran’s drive to develop nuclear weapons.
If the incidents in August are any indication, relations between the United States have a very long way to go before they get any better. Tehran, or at least elements within the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, seem to prefer it that way.
The first incident on Aug. 23 occurred when four IRGC boats — weapons uncovered — came within 300 yards of the destroyer USS Nitze, which fired off flares to warn the boats away, in the Strait of Hormuz.
Video of the incident is below:

The next day, Iranian boats harassed American ships on three separate occasions. The first incident on Aug. 24 occurred when three Iranian vessels approached the patrol vessels USS Tempest and USS Squall — and crossed the Tempest’s bow back and forth three times.
A few hours later, an Iranian boat played chicken with Tempest by speeding toward her head on.
“This situation presented a drastically increased risk of collision, and the Iranian vessel refused to safely maneuver in accordance with internationally recognized maritime rules of the road, despite several request and warnings via radio, and visual and audible warnings from both U.S. ships,” U.S. Fifth Fleet spokesman Cmdr. Bill Urban told USNI News.
That’s when Squall fired three .50-caliber warning shots, which apparently convinced the Iranian boat to turn around. But that wasn’t the end of it. The same boat later harassed the destroyer USS Stout.

Close encounters between Iranian patrol boats and U.S. warships are hardly unprecedented. The Iranian navy often shadows American ships as a means to signal strength and to keep its sailors steeled for a potential armed conflict.
In July, Gen. Joseph Votel — commander of all U.S. forces in the Middle East — got a first-hand look while sailing on board the amphibious transport USS New Orleans when five Iranian boats came within 500 yards. And on Aug. 15, IRGC vessels “launched rockets in exercises a few miles away from two U.S. Navy ships,” Defense News reported.
This isn’t to suggest that a naval conflict between the United States and Iran is likely, just that Tehran finds it useful to train its sailors for that possibility. And what better way to prepare for war than to scope out and engage in high-risk maneuvers in close proximity to U.S. warships?
The biggest potential downside is that someone — an Iranian or American commander — may miscalculate. The fact that the most recent set of incidents provoked an American ship into firing warning shots shows just how close both sides can come to igniting a flashpoint.
Strap Brimstone missiles on the vessels problem solved.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:55am On Aug 29, 2016
MikeCZA:
Strap Brimstone missiles on the vessels problem solved.

hardware is not the problem,

main problem is nobody wants to escalate.

IRGC is being fool hardy , they want to set the boundaries here , or at least try.

however the regular Iranian navy is better disciplined than these IRGC
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:31pm On Aug 29, 2016
MikeCZA:
Strap Brimstone missiles on the vessels problem solved.


The Ships 30mm is even an over-kill.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:42pm On Aug 29, 2016
Myanmar FAC

1xAK 360 30 mm CIWS Gun (Stealth Version)
4xC-802 Surface-to-Surface Missiles
2x14.5 mm quad remote guns unknown type
4×SA-N-5 SAM
1xType 362 surveillance radar
1xFuruno navigation radar
1xType 347G Fire control radar
2xKolonka optronic director
4xDecoy Launcher unknown type (chaff and flare)

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:02pm On Aug 29, 2016
ZBL-08, wheeled armored fighting vehicle

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:32pm On Aug 29, 2016
Russian kalibr cruise missile

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:35pm On Aug 29, 2016
A new type of Gaz "Tiger" for VDV troops with 30mm 2a72 gun was detected recently. The gun mounted can be used remotely.

From my point of view, this would perform well in the African market.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 7:15pm On Aug 29, 2016
jakeporeshenko:
A new type of Gaz "Tiger" for VDV troops with 30mm 2a72 gun was detected recently. The gun mounted can be used remotely.

From my point of view, this would perform well in the African market.
Where in Africa?

Anyway such system already exists on the continent in the form of the Denel TRT(Tactical remote turret) unveiled in 2010 which can utilize 20mm to 30mm dual fed cannons.

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:22pm On Aug 29, 2016
MikeCZA:
Where in Africa?

Anyway such system already exists on the continent in form of the Denel TRT(Tactical remote turret) unveiled in 2010 which can utilize 20mm to 30mm dual fed cannons.
African armies facing militias or terrorists that make use of pick-up mounted HMG's or any sort of technicals.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 7:30pm On Aug 29, 2016
jakeporeshenko:

African armies facing militias or terrorists that make use of pick-up mounted HMG's or any sort of technicals.
Infantry combat vehicles and armoured fighting cars.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:12pm On Aug 29, 2016
jakeporeshenko:
A new type of Gaz "Tiger" for VDV troops with 30mm 2a72 gun was detected recently. The gun mounted can be used remotely.

From my point of view, this would perform well in the African market.

I've seen the video. In my opinion, the weapon system is too powerful for the platform.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:29pm On Aug 29, 2016
MikeCZA:
Infantry combat vehicles and armoured fighting cars.
It's still a good alternative, and it looks like it can be adapted to a variety of platforms, If it wasn't a good idea Denel wouldn't have spent money developing such.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 10:03pm On Aug 29, 2016
jakeporeshenko:

It's still a good alternative, and it looks like it can be adapted to a variety of platforms, If it wasn't a good idea Denel wouldn't have spent money developing such.
The turret can mounted on different vehicles.

But it is too big for APCs. Maybe IFVs.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:21pm On Aug 30, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:52pm On Aug 30, 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=578QUM35duA

whoaaaa shocked shocked shocked

turkish MRAP completely disintregrated

wonder how much explosives did they pack in ?

can any of u guys guess what type of IED they used ?
lets see if anybody comes to the same conclusion as me grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:26pm On Aug 30, 2016
mi35 pilot and gunner cockpit

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:42pm On Aug 30, 2016
nemesis2u:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=578QUM35duA
whoaaaa shocked shocked shocked
turkish MRAP completely disintregrated
wonder how much explosives did they pack in ?
can any of u guys guess what type of IED they used ? lets see if anybody comes to the same conclusion as me grin
Man that MRAP was completely torn to shreds!

That's a very weird question to ask.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:46pm On Aug 30, 2016
Henry240:


That's a very weird question to ask.

why ?

i was getting bored and just wrote that grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:12am On Aug 31, 2016
north korean military gal grin grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:24am On Aug 31, 2016
south korean military gal grin grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:42am On Aug 31, 2016
come on start firing grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:28am On Aug 31, 2016
Bombardier Global 5000 fitted with ELINT and SIGINT sensors for spying

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:31am On Aug 31, 2016
Tu-214R another special mission aircraft

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 4:25am On Aug 31, 2016
nemesis2u:
come on start firing grin


Someone is about to lose teeth. grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 4:33am On Aug 31, 2016
nemesis2u:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=578QUM35duA

whoaaaa shocked shocked shocked

turkish MRAP completely disintregrated

wonder how much explosives did they pack in ?

can any of u guys guess what type of IED they used ?
lets see if anybody comes to the same conclusion as me grin
The Porcupine Mk.2.

Intended for use against light to heavy vehicles. An interesting capability of these IED is that it was designed to disintegrate vehicles during the explosion and cause heavy shrapnel peppering other nearby vehicles and dismounted infantry.

You didn't know about the Porcupine don't you? grin grin grin grin grin grin grin

To find out about it on the internet your googling skills gotta be on level 1 Trillion. grin

(1) (2) (3) ... (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) ... (668) (Reply)

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live / American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 48
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.