Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,198,257 members, 7,967,637 topics. Date: Sunday, 06 October 2024 at 12:11 AM

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (26) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1027704 Views)

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) ... (668) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 9:29pm On Sep 02, 2016
nemesis2u:
can any body guess what that structure/object is for ?

this is crazy shiit grin grin grin grin
Raping Enemy countries?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:33pm On Sep 02, 2016
pic 1 Chiron Portable Surface-to-Air Missile south korean

pic 2 skyranger AAA

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:34pm On Sep 02, 2016
Odunayaw:
Raping Enemy countries?

plz tell us as to how u came to the above pornographic conclusion . tongue
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:36pm On Sep 02, 2016
nemesis2u:
can any body guess what that structure/object is for ?

this is crazy shiit grin grin grin grin
Silencer ?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 9:36pm On Sep 02, 2016
tdayof:
A country with various SAM and Nigeria still operates Rolland.
I bliv we r stuck with it Roland for a while as we don't have threat from d sky
but I don't get ur "a country with various SAM" bro
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 9:37pm On Sep 02, 2016
nemesis2u:

plz tell us as to how u came to the above pornographic conclusion . tongue
looks like a giant phallus with its balls sling to its sides
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:38pm On Sep 02, 2016
jakeporeshenko:

Silencer ?
correct ,
a super giant silencer to mute a 155mm artillery gun. grin grin grin grin

i wonder who though of it lol
this is some crazy idea shocked shocked shocked shocked

and it worked cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:55pm On Sep 02, 2016
nemesis2u:

correct ,
a super giant silencer to mute a 155mm artillery gun. grin grin grin grin

i wonder who though of it lol
this is some crazy idea shocked shocked shocked shocked

and it worked cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy
Worked where ? Are you saying this thing has seen combat ?
And how do they even change the angle of the projectile, the whole thing looks fixed
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:03pm On Sep 02, 2016
Hanwha's 70mm MLRS

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:06pm On Sep 02, 2016
jakeporeshenko:

Worked where ? Are you saying this thing has seen combat ?
And how do they even change the angle of the projectile, the whole thing looks fixed

by worked i meant the idea worked , it silenced the noise to a large extent

and it was designed for proof of concept as far as i know .
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:47am On Sep 03, 2016
Nemesis2u, have you ever heard the story of how US apaches were struggling to keep up with chinooks in Afghanistan? Due to their superior speed.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:14am On Sep 03, 2016
jakeporeshenko:
Nemesis2u, have you ever heard the story of how US apaches were struggling to keep up with chinooks in Afghanistan? Due to their superior speed.

nah never heard of the story.

apaches struggling to keep up with chinooks ?
how is that possible , provided apache has all its systems up and running 100% and not tied to a mountain or something grin
i am very little informed on these matters especially relating to US platforms.
anyways plz share the story
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 3:50am On Sep 03, 2016
Odunayaw:
I bliv we r stuck with it Roland for a while as we don't have threat from d sky
but I don't get ur "a country with various SAM" bro
Some countries operate more than a single SAM type that's what I am trying to say.
Bro you said we don't have a threat but that's because we and our neighbouring countries are village champions.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by andrewza: 9:57am On Sep 03, 2016
tdayof:
Some countries operate more than a single SAM type that's what I am trying to say.
Bro you said we don't have a threat but that's because we and our neighbouring countries are village champions.


And what advantage does operating more than one system give Nigeria? Nigeria does not need a high cost SAM system. The Rolland, AA guns and manpads are good enough for any possible threat Nigeria could face. Though are those Rolland's still useable. Missiles do have a use by date
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 9:59am On Sep 03, 2016
nemesis2u:
can any body guess what that structure/object is for ?

this is crazy shiit grin grin grin grin

Shit these looks...... I don't even know......... angry

But it looks like a weapon used in shooting down a spy satellite, just saying grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:12am On Sep 03, 2016
bidexiii:


Shit these looks...... I don't even know......... angry

But it looks like a weapon used in shooting down a spy satellite, just saying grin

actually it was made by germany, the germans r known for outlandish attempts grin

however i could not find any details on the same.
the working principle will same as that of any other silencer/sound muffler.

i remember for emergency we were taught to tape the barrel of the semi automatic and jam in a plastic bottle filled with sand etc.
good for one shot only
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 10:31am On Sep 03, 2016
andrewza:



And what advantage does operating more than one system give Nigeria? Nigeria does not need a high cost SAM system. T[b]he Rolland, AA guns and manpads are good enough for any possible threat Nigeria could face. [/b]Though are those Rolland's still useable. Missiles do have a use by date
What I was trying to explain is some countries operate various sophisticated SAM and Nigeria still operates a damn Rolland. We are africans do not mean we should not keep up with others on technology. We do not need to start facing threat before we take actions. The rolland Nigeria operates has a low spec. Short Range,low altitude , doesn't use a sophisticated radar system. I am sorry but our Rolland will go down by just rushing some noise at its radar systems. A Mig-29 will also deliver a missile attack on our territory with the Rolland not bringing it down even at range.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by andrewza: 10:44am On Sep 03, 2016
tdayof:
What I was trying to explain is some countries operate various sophisticated SAM and Nigeria still operates a damn Rolland. We are africans do not mean we should not keep up with others on technology. We do not need to start facing threat before we take actions. The rolland Nigeria operates has a low spec. Short Range,low altitude , doesn't use a sophisticated radar system. I am sorry but our Rolland will go down by just rushing some noise at its radar systems. A Mig-29 will also deliver a missile attack on our territory with the Rolland not bringing it down even at range.


Sure but who's Mig-29? No one in your area as a aircraft that is a threat, there are no major air powers close to Nigeria and getting a new SAM system will lead to funds being wasted. Rather get some good Aircraft than a good SAM since the SAM can do one thing and one thing only. I mean by the sounds of things you want one of the High end SAM systems like the patriot. A very costly system, that wont stop low flying targets and are pretty much stationary due to there set up time. You still going to need something along the lines of the Roland.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 11:03am On Sep 03, 2016
andrewza:



Sure but who's Mig-29? No one in your area as a aircraft that is a threat, there are no major air powers close to Nigeria and getting a new SAM system will lead to funds being wasted. Rather get some good Aircraft than a good SAM since the SAM can do one thing and one thing only. I mean by the sounds of things you want one of the High end SAM systems like the patriot. A very costly system, that wont stop low flying targets and are pretty much stationary due to there set up time. You still going to need something along the lines of the Roland.
Chad operates Mig 29. I'll agree with your post. Thanks.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 11:39am On Sep 03, 2016
tdayof:
What I was trying to explain is some countries operate various sophisticated SAM and Nigeria still operates a damn Rolland. We are africans do not mean we should not keep up with others on technology. We do not need to start facing threat before we take actions. The rolland Nigeria operates has a low spec. Short Range,low altitude , doesn't use a sophisticated radar system. I am sorry but our Rolland will go down by just rushing some noise at its radar systems. A Mig-29 will also deliver a missile attack on our territory with the Rolland not bringing it down even at range.
chad mig 29 is not a threat.with d arrival of our jf17 blk2/3. dat threat is been taken care of
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 12:00pm On Sep 03, 2016
giles14:
chad mig 29 is not a threat.with d arrival of our jf17 blk2/3. dat threat is been taken care of
I don't get you. Scrambling fighter jets that are probably not based somewhere close to the location of incoming Aircraft
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 1:03pm On Sep 03, 2016
tdayof:
Some countries operate more than a single SAM type that's what I am trying to say.
Bro you said we don't have a threat but that's because we and our neighbouring countries are village champions.
ooto ni
I just typed dat like de will at HQ(At least d former ones I know of)
I mean what is wrong in tossing them in Ogunpa River and buying pantsyr
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 1:13pm On Sep 03, 2016
giles14:
chad mig 29 is not a threat.with d arrival of our jf17 blk2/3. dat threat is been taken care of
Even if it is Rafales we get..it doesn't oust the importance of having at least a contemporary SAM system e.g pantsyr s2(16 units to replace our Roland)

And I agree with Andrew on MANPADs and AA guns at least its very useful in our neighborhood
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:19pm On Sep 03, 2016
Odunayaw:
ooto ni
I just typed dat like de will at HQ(At least d former ones I know of)
I mean what is wrong in tossing them in Ogunpa River and buying pantsyr
lol. You must be from Ibadan.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 1:35pm On Sep 03, 2016
tdayof:
I don't get you. Scrambling fighter jets that are probably not based somewhere close to the location of incoming Aircraft
dat not withstanding our incoming jf17 blk2 is more advance than d Chadian mig 29 period.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 1:40pm On Sep 03, 2016
Odunayaw:
Even if it is Rafales we get..it doesn't oust the importance of having at least a contemporary SAM system e.g pantsyr s2(16 units to replace our Roland)

And I agree with Andrew on MANPADs and AA guns at least its very useful in our neighborhood
pantsyr S2 not even S1.u are a joker.

16 haba 4 dis present era of hunger.

besides pantsyr is for low flying medium range aircraft
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 1:44pm On Sep 03, 2016
tdayof:
lol. You must be from Ibadan.
lol..am Yoruba but not from Oyo
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:45pm On Sep 03, 2016
giles14:
dat not withstanding our incoming jf17 blk2 is more advance than d Chadian mig 29 period.
lol. Did you get me at all? The Mig will be out of our territory before the JF-17 arrive.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 1:50pm On Sep 03, 2016
giles14:
pantsyr S2 not even S1.u are a joker.

16 haba 4 dis present era of hunger.

besides pantsyr is for low flying medium range aircraft
S1 o S2 o...I hope u got my drift

- we currently have 16 units of Roland...Pantsir is abt $18mil ...I am just giving oversight since I do not control the MoD
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 2:03pm On Sep 03, 2016
giles14:
pantsyr S2 not even S1.u are a joker.

16 haba 4 dis present era of hunger.

besides pantsyr is for low flying medium range aircraft

Forget it we, can afford it.

Only corruption has blinded our mind and brain.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 2:05pm On Sep 03, 2016
tdayof:
lol. Did you get me at all? The Mig will be out of our territory before the JF-17 arrive.
Maiduguri is a FAB.all jets must not b stationed at d tactical command.

above all how are we even sure d Chadian MIGs are airworthy
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:10pm On Sep 03, 2016
tdayof:
lol. Did you get me at all? The Mig will be out of our territory before the JF-17 arrive.

Not true. We have the TRACON system providing 360 all round radar coverage of Nigeria. Before they get into our Air space, the air force would have mobilised intercepts from maiduguri.

We don't yet have the JF-17, however, with the F-7s, it's still the same idea. Also bear in mind our F-7s can be armed with potent PL-9C missiles which we have in service.

1 Like

(1) (2) (3) ... (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) ... (668) (Reply)

American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . / Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 2
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.