Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,206,926 members, 7,997,204 topics. Date: Friday, 08 November 2024 at 06:19 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1035655 Views)
President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30) (31) ... (668) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:04pm On Sep 07, 2016 |
jakeporeshenko: When are we going to build a large sized MALE UAV. We're long overdue for one. Beautiful drone from Turkey. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 2:25pm On Sep 07, 2016 |
nemesis2u: @Nemesis2u: Will like you to explain more the advantages the OH-58D/AVX design has over the conventional helicopter design? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:03pm On Sep 07, 2016 |
Henry240:From what I've seen, the fastest way to develop indigenous platforms is a colabo between NAF experts and what they choose to call "civilian engineers", they proved to be effective when they weaponized those alpha jets. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:54am On Sep 08, 2016 |
Seened: advantages will be (depending on the base helicopter aerodynamic profile) 1.increase in speed , it should offer 20+ % increase. 2.increase in range , again it should offer 20+ % increase . 3.increase in fuel efficiency , it should offer 30% increase in fuel efficiency. 4.increase in endurance, almost double. 5. increase in higher operational altitudes. 6. better operability in hotter environments. 7.higher top speed 8.higher cruise speed 9.better hover capability 10.increase in safety during flight operations. etc 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:50am On Sep 08, 2016 |
jakeporeshenko: one of it got shot down a few days ago |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 8:00am On Sep 08, 2016 |
Henry240:When the Airforce sees the need for it. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 8:02am On Sep 08, 2016 |
jakeporeshenko:You just said the right fact. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 5:47pm On Sep 09, 2016 |
Chinese UCAV bomber 1 Like
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:52pm On Sep 09, 2016 |
MIG-29K Cockpit
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 10:00pm On Sep 09, 2016 |
chinese8107:niceee but can c d RQ170 written all over it. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:29am On Sep 10, 2016 |
Singapore Technologies Kinetics terrex 3 1 Like
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 1:29pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
jakeporeshenko:beautiful beast |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 1:31pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
nemesis2u:Wicked! Thank you Nemesis2u. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 1:35pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
chinese8107: @Chinese8107: This UCAV made me remember China's Dark Sword. Any recent information on it? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 1:37pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
Henry240: Simulator? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 1:59pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
Seened:Drak Sword? No reliable information on it. Some rumour say it could become the first mach 3 supersonic UAV in China .but I hink F-16 may have already had drone version. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 2:05pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
chinese8107: F-16... unmanned? Tell me more Chinese8107. ***Staring at him with eyes popping out*** |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:12pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
Seened:Yup. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 2:17pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
Henry240: Not bad. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 2:18pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
Seened:Chinese media say US has converted some F-16 into drone version QF-16 for test since 2013
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 2:22pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
chinese8107: Tdayof?! Come and see this. The Americans and the Chinese are at it again.
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 4:24pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
chinese8107:makes d sign of the cross!! |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 5:14pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
@Chinese8107: So beautiful. You killing me man.
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:01pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
QF -16 is basically a TARGET DRONE for aerial combat training made from F16 salvaged from the boneyards. since f16 is a fly-by-wire aircraft, all that is needed to turn it into an unmanned target aircraft is to change the pilot input from a control stick and throttle to a telemetry receiver that will get commands from the ground. plus some modification of the FCS (Flight Control System). also some other modifications are there according to user needs . the guns and radar are removed , but the self protection suite which includes flares, chaffs dispensers are left on the aircraft to provide a realistic engagement training. it provides a realistic training to rookies for honing their combat skills because the QF -16 can be controlled/made to challenge the attacking aircraft in an undetermined reactionary manner and not in a predetermined run of the mill manner. the same was done with retired F-4 phantoms and even starfighters. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by officialdayo: 6:46pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
Seened: Yea it's true. It was used with the F35 few weeks ago. Heard one was shot down by the F35 with the AIM-120. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by officialdayo: 6:47pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
chinese8107: A UAV achieving Mach 3? Obviously a rumour. The X-43 achieved mach 7 tho but I will consider it as a flying weapon. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 7:13pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
officialdayo: |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:41pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
Miniature Air Launched Decoy (MALD) is a small unmanned air-launched flight vehicle designed and manufactured by Raytheon Missile Systems. The vehicle is currently used by the US Air Force (USAF) and the US Navy. MALD is a flexible and modular system that has the potential to keep aviators and aircraft out of harm’s way. MALD is an expendable air-launched flight vehicle that looks like a U.S. or allied aircraft to enemy integrated air defense systems (IADS). The U.S. and its allies can confuse and deceive enemy IADS by sending a formation of MALDs into hostile airspace. MALD weighs less than 300 pounds and has a range of approximately 500 nautical miles (575 statute miles). After it is launched from its host aircraft, MALD flies a preprogrammed mission. In addition to protecting valuable aircraft, MALD offers counter air operations to neutralize air defense systems that pose a threat to U.S. and allied pilots. The MALD air vehicle offers superior protection for the aviators and aircraft against air defence systems in combat operations. It also increases airborne electronic attack missions of the US and allied pilots in the battlespace. The turbojet-powered modular and programmable MALD is launched from fighters as a decoy. It is used to perform counter air operations to inactivate air defence systems. T-20 is a medium range tactical unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system designed and manufactured in the US by Arcturus-UAV for the United States armed forces. The unmanned air-launched vehicle has a length of approximately 3.04m and weighs less than 300lb. The range of the MALD vehicle is around 500nmi. The flexible and swing-wing vehicle degrades enemy radars and integrated air defence systems by accurately duplicating all combat flight profiles and radar signatures of the US and allied aircraft in the battlefield. MALD-J is the jammer variant of the basic decoy, and the first ever stand-in jammer to enter production. The unmanned MALD-J navigates and operates much closer than conventional EW to the victim radar when jamming the electronics, allowing aviators and aircraft to stay out of harm’s way. And, it is able to loiter in the target area for an extended time period – plenty of time to complete the mission. MALD-J can operate alone or in pairs, but is designed to work with and leverage other electronic warfare platforms.
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:21pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
female Kurdish soldiers oh laa laaa anyways respects to the Kurdish female brave hearts fighting the ISIS . i wanted to go there as a consultant but stupid govt. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 10:22pm On Sep 10, 2016 |
nemesis2u: ."Consultant"? Understood. ISIS will be happy you aren't "consulting" against them. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:22am On Sep 11, 2016 |
Seened: marriage consultant 1 Like |
(1) (2) (3) ... (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30) (31) ... (668) (Reply)
Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live / American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 35 |