Fidelismaria:


warris dis one saying

RedTarantula:
There is a trend on nairaland I have observed.

Whenever there is a call for Biafra or any thread about Biafra, you will notice people shouting at Igbos asking why they want another war.

Some will even say they don't want another refugee situation, bla bla bla.

My question therefore is why is a call for separate existence seen as a call for war?

If a partner in a marriage says they want a divorce how is that seen as a call to take up knives and clubs to fight?

Someone educate me please.

Where have you heard people shouting 'One Germany, One Ghana, One Canada, etc' before?

Omonigeriarere:


What do you expect when the agitators behave like hooligans?

Even online here, you will be hearing statements like "We now have enough equipment to defeat FG" "PMB will think this is still the era of using cassava stick to fight Nigerian armies" etc 'Our dilector' even solicited for guns abroad while addressing Ibos in one of the video clips I watch on YouTube.

He who brings an ant-infested wood into the compound has indirectly invited lizard to festivity: get it right

attackgat:
It is part of the propaganda the Federal Government initiated after the war in other to silence Biafra. Biafra was made to represent war. Many people, even younger generation Igbos imbibed this false ideology to the extent that just mentioning Biafra, some will say you are calling for war. Remarkably, the Biafran agitation has always been a peaceful thing right from when Ojukwu declared it on 30th May 1967 to this day. Some silly people will say that Ojukwu started the war but when you remind them that it was Nigeria that came down to the East to start fighting, they have nothing to say. It has always been Nigeria that brought violence and war into the issue of Biafra. Not one Biafra agitator has ever been found with arms, but they are the ones who are at the recieving end of bullets of the Nigerian security agencies. Since the year 1999 when Uwazuruike formed MASSOB to this day, nobody has lost their life to Biafran agitators and protesters, but many have been gunned down by the Army and Police. It has always been Nigeria that brings violence and war into the issue of Biafra, all the time.

attackgat:


This picture you posted, how do you know it is Biafran protesters? How do you know it's even in Nigeria? I have looked at that picture well and it could be anywhere in Africa.

victorvezx:
[s] Because the first Biafra led to a war and millions lost their lives. We Nigerians are simply telling u biafrans the truth, there is no way u will not leave Nigeria without war, u can keep denying the fact. We owe the igbos nothing, u surrendered unconditionally, u surrendered without any condition. We did not promise u any territory to use to build Biafra after the war. That is why the Nigeria has every legitimacy to use brute force against u people. One other reason is that Nigeria see u people as weak, we already know if there is another war, u will never win, because u will never outgun the army, the worst that will happen is that the war will be prolonged for many years. [/s]

CSTR2:
No nation can survive two civil wars. Not even the mighty soviet union.
This is 2016. A prolonged conflict due to seccession is not possible. The UN and co would sooner have a referendum than allow such madness to occur.
Just Read through your post now. You are a very ignorant human being. Talking about legitimacy and brute force against civilians.
I would see how much that brute force would help you against NATO invasion.

victorvezx:
Because the first Biafra led to a war and millions lost their lives. We Nigerians are simply telling u biafrans the truth, there is no way u will not leave Nigeria without war, u can keep denying the fact. We owe the igbos nothing, u surrendered unconditionally, u surrendered without any condition. We did not promise u any territory to use to build Biafra after the war. That is why the Nigeria has every legitimacy to use brute force against u people. One other reason is that Nigeria see u people as weak, we already know if there is another war, u will never win, because u will never outgun the army, the worst that will happen is that the war will be prolonged for many years.

The primary questions that need to be addressed are: What is the basis of this unity? Where are the terms of agreement upon which we agree to be united?

allthingsgood:
Only ignorant unintelligent and naive individuals make noise about biafra. Many have no clue about this countries history but just join the few ignorant cretins to chant biafra. Wtf is that nonsense??

CSTR2:
That was not a civil war in ivory coast. More like an election skirmish. Besides, ivory coast does not have very vocal secessionists.
And now more self delusion - What correlation does Nigeria have Russia? Are you as strong, powerful or even united as Russia? Can you even compare putin to Nigerian leaders? Was Nigeria even as strong as Libya that fell to NATO invasion?.
You better be careful in that country. The UK just did a referendum, and the rest of the world would not sit by and allow a third world country with a genocidal dictator slaughtering people for exercising their rights.

wizzyrich:
These questions really makes a lot of sense. Those who shouts "one Nigeria" should help answer this pls.

wizzyrich:
These questions really makes a lot of sense. Those who shouts "one Nigeria" should help answer this pls.

Igboid:


Their idea of "one Nigeria" is one built on injustice where they can achieve their selfish interests at the expense of others. It was never about patriotism to Nigeria, it's about what they stood to gain from Nigeria unity.

Ojukwu asked the same questions for Nigerian unity in Aburi. Those who stood to entrench injustice rejected all agreements reached at Aburi and went about screaming "One Nigeria".

victorvezx:

Lol, u never see anything. Everybody knows Ivory Coast fought a civil war, because thousand died. How about u test buhari, then u can judge if he is man enough like Putin, or has an army that can be good enough like Putin army. And for ur information, there is no United Russia, even in Chechnya, there low level secessionist insurgency, and also there re autonomous region in Russia that want secession, but due to fear of Putin and the Russian army, they can't even try. The Chechnya-Russian war is like an example to them of what will happen to them if they dare Putin army by trying to secede. Also, is Morocco not a third world country located in Africa? Why did NATO and U.N not intervene in the war but allowed Morocco to kill and subdue the secessionist?. And for ur information, Buhari is not a genocidist, at least, the world does not recognize him as such, it's only u brainwashed biafrans that see him like that, just because he fought in a war that was NECESSARY.

victorvezx:

U go ask that question tire. So it was until Buhari was elected president, that u now started asking this question. When Jonathan was there, u did not bother to ask on what basis would one nigerian be. Egbon, if u want Biafra, come and collect it, hahahahahahaha

Igboid:


You are silly to be comparing Russia with Nigeria. Russia is a world power capable of manufacturing military weapons, Nigeria is a failed state that imports even tooth picks.

You needed foreign support for continuous supply of weapons to suppress Biafra the last time around. You can't defeat Biafra without those foreign support as they are more determined than you.

Foreign support don't come cheap,the Caucasian powers or their Asian brothers are not father Christmas,they won't provide you with those weapons without concessions on your own part, you will need to sell off the soul of your already failed colonial entity to keep them on your side, and even with that, it won't be easy for you to put down Biafrans, but even if you succeed, you will end up with even more useless state than you have today, with your Caucasian masters squeezing tight on your neck with concessions you desperately made to them during your war time desperation. You will never realize your utopian African Giant status, but instead will remain a perpetual vassal state.

If a Second civil war don't disintegrate Nigeria, it will render her entirely useless for eternity.

victorvezx:

Lol, Ojukwu too was a selfish man, he want a Nigeria that will benefit only the easterners. The Aburi accord was more like telling other Nigerians that they have no right over the crude oil resources in the Niger delta. Ojukwu was selfish, he wanted confederation, he wanted greater autonomy over the oil resources, which means that the Nigerian government won't have any say over the crude resources.he only wanted the oil for u easterners alone . But we no agree. We all know that Nigeria will never agree to such deal. The oil resources must be shared among everyone. No wonder u people are so selfish

RedTarantula:


Read again and ask God for some understanding of English language.

victorvezx:

Lol, all what u said here is bull-shit, u are simply agreeing to the fact that Nigeria will defeat Biafra the second time again. But it will be bloody. No entity is useless as far as there are people, there is hope. just like every country that experienced war, we will start rebuilding again after war, while u biafrans will be busy burying ur dead, and getting bitter at the fact that u lost a second civil war with the same enemy.