kryptonian1987:


Neither can I too. since you claimed to understand how their budgets and box office work yet you don't know what a better leg means and how much was your so loving CW production (only) budget cost!
The pics here easily summarize almost everything about marvel fanboys...!
THEY ARE VERY "NEW" IN THE GAME, BUT STILL WANT TO CLAIM: "WE HAVE BEEN DOMINATING THEIRS EVER SINCE"!

New in the game What game might I ask? Stop throwing things around when you clearly don't know what you're talking about..
It seems you're wearing out on things to say....
Bring something fresh not the generic rubbish up there..

Guykhena:
New in the game What game might I ask? Stop throwing things around when you clearly don't know what you're talking about..
It seems you're wearing out on things to say....
Bring something fresh not the generic rubbish up there..

kryptonian1987:


HAHA!
Hoping one Day we will see Iron Man (their cash cow) in something like this...lol!!!!
That's just how popular DC is...!
#Dinneramonggreat!

my guy has ran out of things to say,so he finally accepts his destiny and results to trolling. Lmao..

And oh the irony of you depicting Supes among dead men,proving to us on how dead the Superman legacy is,no thanks to 3 failed attempts of a movie..

Guykhena:

my guy has ran out of things to say,so he finally accepts his destiny and results to trolling. Lmao..

And oh the irony of you depicting Supes among dead men,proving to us on how dead the Superman legacy is,no thanks to 3 failed attempts of a movie..

kryptonian1987:


MOS: $668M
Yet someone will come here and say garbage!
their excuse will be: "you know DC characters are more known and popular than their rival".

Characters basically unknown
GOTG: $773M+ .(Gross more than DC's most popular Superhero ,shame )

DC characters are more popular and known yet all your movies are classed under the pile of sh*t categories..
Even your cash cow(Batman) couldn't save the Extended Universe starring alongside Czar's most popular hero(I guess Batman needed more prep time )...

kryptonian1987:


but it took marvel a whole 6movies to cross that $668m you saw as mediocre gross! A WHOLE 6MOVIES!!!!
SUICIDE SQUAD IS HAVING A BETTER LEG THAN THE ALMIGHTY SELF-ACCLAIMED 90% RT MORE FAMILY LOVING MOVIE CALLED CIVIL WAR, "DOMESTICALLY"!!!! HOW COME....? OK MAYBE IT WASN'T THAT CIVIL-FRIENDLY AT ALL!!!
ALL WERE MIRAGES!!!

kryptonian1987:


MOS: $668M
IM1: $560M
IH: $200M+
IM2: $639M
CA1: $340M+
THOR1: $320M+
Yet someone will come here and say garbage!
their excuse will be: "you know DC characters are more known and popular than their rival".while this same people (contradicting themselves), in another convo, will still tell you that marvel's characters are more popular....lol! to the extent of comparing one-loose-guard character called Namor to Superman! imagine! Namor that can't even stand close to Aquaman's shoulder in terms of popularity! Na wa for people o!!!

MJBOLT:


Are you ok.iron man grossed over 500 million,incredible hulk grossed over 200,iron man 2. Grossed over 600...

MJBOLT:
dc fans show ya ugly faces
1. If marvel bribed critics to take down DCEU, how come there are still some critics who give DCEU movies positive review? Did marvel fail to bribe those guys?

2. If marvel is really bribing people to take down DCEU, why is DCEU not bribing people to take down marvel or even hype DCEU movies? Or are the critics allergic to DCEU money?

3.Bvs saw a really sharp box office decline in their second week, did marvel bribe people not to watch the movie?

4.When dc was ruling hollywood with super man and batman back in the 80s and 90s, marvels attempt(thor,hulk,captain america,punisher,daredevil,nick fury agent of shield) to catch up was severely criticized and poorly received, so why didn't y'all blame dc for marvels movie getting poor reception back then?

5. If there's nothing wrong with DCEU movies then why is there always all these reshoots,cuts and complaints in their camp? This is the third movie and they are still pointing fingers and making ultimate cuts up and down

Give it a rest with your conspiracy theories its really embarrassing.
If the movies were so ground breaking and memorable, trust me the critics would admit it

MJBOLT:
Dawn of rubbish....
1. The writing was poor.

2. The script was everywhere.

3. The performances (though interesting, especially Batfleck) were less than stellar.

4. They burned through at least seven Justice League chapters with Darkseid, Doomsday, Wonder Woman, The Flash, Aquaman, and Cyborg clustered in the movie when it's supposed to be about BATMAN and SUPERMAN.

5. The Martha scene. Unarguably the STUPIDEST, half-assed, and meaningless scene in any movie.

6. I don't watch comic book movies for the action, I go for the story and for the deeper themes and meanings behind them. What theme or story did "Batman v Superman' have? It was a complete clusterfuck.

7. Even if it did have positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic, I'd probably still hate it for the same number of reasons I aforementioned because I don't trust ratings.

8. This movie is called 'Batman v Superman.' It's supposed to be a three hour long movie about the two most iconic DC comics characters fighting, yet we only get a fight that lasts 8 minutes, and ends because their mothers have the same names. What kind of lazy, half-assed garbage is that?!

So, please, tell me just how "epic" this movie is. Enlighten me in a way that will cause me to throw caution to the wind and change my opinion on a movie that's total garbage.

MJBOLT:


Dc fans and their sh*t excuses,
Let's compare man of trash with iron man 3,both were released the same year

MoS 668M
IM3 1.2 billion

Guykhena:

Characters basically unknown
GOTG: $773M+ .(Gross more than DC's most popular Superhero ,shame )

DC characters are more popular and known yet all your movies are classed under the pile of sh*t categories..
Even your cash cow(Batman) couldn't save the Extended Universe starring alongside Czar's most popular hero(I guess Batman needed more prep time )...

kryptonian1987:


But SS is having a better leg than your almighty CW....lol
About to know your level of understanding concerning box office stuff....
Explain why, if at all you grab!
26%RT vs 90%RT

MJBOLT:
better leg??
Suicide squad is a joke of a movie

kryptonian1987:


please, don't say a word again since you can't explain!

But if you choosed to, then explain why those calamitous errors were so saturated in those movies I mentioned....... since you can easily spot or troll DC's own! Or you didn't notice when you watched them? Ok. probably you were carried away by their (faked) jokes...lol!...

hint: CW didn't do $1.3b!
That's why I tagged you guys as "TROLLERS"!!!

I know your type now..!!
The bla bla bla type....

MJBOLT:


Cw grossed over 1 billion
Dawn of rubbish barely made 900

MJBOLT:
Explain how suicide squad has a better leg than cw

Guykhena:
,let me just take this as a joke,you are like the only person in the world who underestimates the Technoability of Ironman. how is this a point? Do you know what Miss Romanoff is capable off? From the above statement you clearly underestimate her( maybe because she's Feminine?). If given the chance she could take down the Avengers,she's damn too talented.
And btw,Hawkeye has taken her down in the past,the only times Hawkeye lose to her it is intentional,he usually holds back due to the history they have together(she's the one who brought him into the fold,that respect is still there).

Stop judging Hawkeye based on the Movie version...

Merveille:
my friend don't even say black widow can take on the whole, have you forgotten that when hawkeye was fighting black widow, he was under the influence of loki's enchantment, so at that point in time, he knows nothing of his past, he only lives to please his master loki, that supposed to make him extra ordinarily strong, but look, little o'widow still took him down, even while she rememberd their past,which was supposed to make her weak, bt no she took him DOWN, so my man is green arrow.

kryptonian1987:


how come GoTG also did better than your beloved marvel 1st 5 movies, since those characters were more popular than GoTG?
don't forget that it also did better than marvel's best installment , The Winter Soldier (which I so much love) too....

kryptonian1987:


please, don't say a word again since you can't explain!

But if you choosed to, then explain why those calamitous errors were so saturated in those movies I mentioned....... since you can easily spot or troll DC's own! Or you didn't notice when you watched them? Ok. probably you were carried away by their (faked) jokes...lol!...

hint: CW didn't do $1.3b!
That's why I tagged you guys as "TROLLERS"!!!

I know your type now..!!
The bla bla bla type....

And we know your type,the psychopathic DC fanboys who settle for less .

MJBOLT:
Explain how suicide squad has a better leg than cw

kryptonian1987:

I need not, cause you're a troller, so you won't know/understand. But if you really want to know then take it as an assignment
hint: front loaded might help you out....

Typical DC troll response suffering from cluelessness,hehe..

Guykhena:
smh,haven't I been through this?
And you expect me to take you seriously when your knowledge of these characters is just based on what you see on tv? Worst off you're even sticking with that forgetting there have been decades worth of storytelling with these characters. Common sense should have told you that was what I was referencing..

Merveille:
are you expecting the knowledge of the film to be on the air, or in hades, or with poseidon. How do you know about the characters, was it not through what you watched. My friend think before you talk.

Guykhena:
Apparently you don't think at all. Have you heard of what is called "comic books"? (That's where the characters you see on the Big Screen are adapted from)

It seems you're from the Indomie generation.

Guykhena:
And we know your type,the psychopathic DC fanboys who settle for less .

Merveille:
is it not what is shown on the comic book, thats what is acted on the film. Comic books are more of writting, while the films are meant elaborate more on what is written. Ok answer this question: between what is written and what is seen with you two eyes, which one is more understandable?