AnonyNymous:

Thank you for doing what your brothers have failed to do since. This is all I've been asking for. cc Seun CoolUsername

The first ever dinosaurs walked the earth before men, can you give an estimate of when? And why it is ommited in your creation story? They are cannibals, so what did they eat? And kindly quote the bible verse here.

smh....

did God itemize each animal he created? Did the Bible also say God created the horn billed platypus or the horned owl or the fruit bat or the electric eel or the mountain lion....


So your problem here is that you want to see where the Bible specifically mentioned or described dinosaurs during creation or where they are even mentioned?

ol boy go sleep abeg.

4evergod3:


smh....

did God itemize each animal he created? Did the Bible also say God created the horn billed platypus or the horned owl or the fruit bat or the electric eel or the mountain lion....


So your problem here is that you want to see where the Bible specifically mentioned or described dinosaurs during creation or where they are even mentioned?

ol boy go sleep abeg.

Please read again
He mentioned a bible verse, I told him to quote it here.
There are *carnivores among them, what did they eat in the ark for the whole year they had to be there?
There are so many species of dinosaurs. If you are pointing to 'behemoth' as a dinosaur, I'd ask you about others such as the T-rex. The adult T-Rex is almost as tall as Noah's ark supposedly was, if not taller, so things like the size of the ark or the 'tower of babel' would not be a surprise to them. What about the dinosaurs whose bones have been found exclusive to Africa? They didn't make it to the ark?

Smallville10:
D first ever dinosaurs walked the earth before men but also d bible speaks of something whixh could be a dinosaur (job 40v15:19)

It's beast!

4evergod3:


smh....

did God itemize each animal he created? Did the Bible also say God created the horn billed platypus or the horned owl or the fruit bat or the electric eel or the mountain lion....


So your problem here is that you want to see where the Bible specifically mentioned or described dinosaurs during creation or where they are even mentioned?

ol boy go sleep abeg.

How can it then omit Dinosaur? if black then purple is black well don

AnonyNymous:

Thank you for doing what your brothers have failed to do since. This is all I've been asking for. cc Seun CoolUsername

The first ever dinosaurs walked the earth before men, can you give an estimate of when? And why it is ommited in your creation story? They are cannibals, so what did they eat? And kindly quote the bible verse here.

firstly i will tell u dat d date could be millions of years before man.
Also d story of creation was majorly abt man and not dinosaurs and even if they were dinosaurs the men of old can not describe dem properly.
Also d bible doesnt speak of dinosaurs except job 40v15-19 and d creature described ate only plants

Smallville10:
firstly i will tell u dat d date could be millions of years before man.
Also d story of creation was majorly abt man and not dinosaurs and even if they were dinosaurs the men of old can not describe dem properly.
Also d bible doesnt speak of dinosaurs except job 40v15-19 and d creature described ate only plants

Do u think Dinosaur and humans Can Co-Exist? giving the fact that they weren't any technology back then?

4evergod3:



Smallville they did agreed but science also claims they also died before men existed.

Behemoth is how they are called in the bible but scientists claim that the word Behemoth found in the bible could have stood for an bigger hippopotamus or a mastodon.

dat part could be talking abt 'sauropods' a type of dinosaur

Smallville10:
firstly i will tell u dat d date could be millions of years before man.
Also d story of creation was majorly abt man and not dinosaurs and even if they were dinosaurs the men of old can not describe dem properly.
Also d bible doesnt speak of dinosaurs except job 40v15-19 and d creature described ate only plants

But, the dinosaurs existed? So are you saying that real life doesn't match with your bible?

AnonyNymous:

But, the dinosaurs existed? So are you saying that real life doesn't match with your bible?

what are u saying? They existed of cause

EyeHateGod:

Do u think Dinosaur and humans Can Co-Exist? giving the fact that they weren't any technology back then?

i think it could have been possible because for GOD to talk to job abt at unknown creature which fits d description of a 'sauropods'... They could have probably existed together and d men of old just couldnt give a description. But what could have happened to all of them? Scientists keep discoverin dinosaurs remains on earth's... Its more complicated... D creatures could have existed before man because if they existed with man they would definately still be in existence

AnonyNymous:
Without insulting my intellect, I'm asking all creationists who oppose evolution to tell me what happened to the dinosaurs.

They died in Noah's flood

Smallville10:
what are u saying? They existed of cause

Yes, they existed. But your bible points to an earth that's just about 6000 years old. And you said they existed millions of years before man but in genesis, there was nothing before the six days of creation

Muafrika2:

They died in Noah's flood

So contrary to the bible, Noah didn't put one pair of every animal on the ark? And, what about dinosaurs that live in the water?

AnonyNymous:

So contrary to the bible, Noah didn't put one pair of every animal on the ark? And, what about dinosaurs that live in the water?

Obviously those that lived in the water did not need to get in the boat. And they were too big for it. They must have died for lack of food, as a direct and indirectly caused by the flood. Remember the floods killed other land animals and obviously destroyed vegetation.

Add that to a deep freezing climate immediately after the flood and you have a disaster.

DoctorAlien:


Before I answer your question, you'll answer this:

1. Anything that we dig up that is supposedly more than 250 000 years old should have absolutely no radiocarbon in it whatsoever. In the light of this, explain the popular notion that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago.

Radiometric dating isn't limited to carbon dating only. Carbon dating can be accurate up to around 50,000 years, whereas, other methods like Argon-Argon can be dated up to 4 billion years. In the case of Dinosaur fossils, it's usually easier to date volcanic rocks around them, which should have abundance of radioactive Potassium/Argon to date them.

2. If dinosaurs are really tens of millions of years old, why have scientists found dinosaur bones with soft tissue still in them, including what may have been blood vessels and cells? Confirm this here: www.nbcnews.com/id/7285683/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/scientists-recover-t-rex-tissue/#.Us3cl7SmbF0

Tissues that are isolated from air and bacteria can easily last millions of years. This is not at all spectacular.

AgentOfAllah:
Radiometric dating isn't limited to carbon dating only. Carbon dating can be accurate up to around 50,000 years, whereas, other methods like Argon-Argon can be dated up to 4 billion years. In the case of Dinosaur fossils, it's usually easier to date volcanic rocks around them, which should have abundance of radioactive Potassium/Argon to date them.

Tissues that are isolated from air and bacteria can easily last millions of years. This is not at all spectacular.

It's either you didn't read through this thread or you just want me to notice you.

Either way, go back and thoroughly read all my posts on this thread.

Thank you.

DoctorAlien:


It's either you didn't read through this thread or you just want me to notice you.

Either way, go back and thoroughly read all my posts on this thread.

Thank you.

Lol...You do have a bloated sense of your self-importance. Please, don't notice me!

Muafrika2:

Obviously those that lived in the water did not need to get in the boat. And they were too big for it. They must have died for lack of food, as a direct and indirectly caused by the flood. Remember the floods killed other land animals and obviously destroyed vegetation.

Add that to a deep freezing climate immediately after the flood and you have a disaster.

So, all the fishes of the sea survived the flood, all water animals managed to survive except the dinosaurs?

AnonyNymous:

So, all the fishes of the sea survived the flood, all water animals managed to survive except the dinosaurs?

Something like that.

Now it's not hard to see how fish can survive where dinosaurs can't. Fish can eat plankton and other microscopic animals readily in water. But a dinosaur would need to graze or hunt to survive,

I also spoke about harsh cold weather

My oga's..

DoctorAlien:


Before I answer your question, you'll answer this:

1. Anything that we dig up that is supposedly more than 250 000 years old should have absolutely no radiocarbon in it whatsoever. In the light of this, explain the popular notion that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago.

palenteology dating methods...
Radiometric methods(radio-isotopes)

2. If dinosaurs are really tens of millions of years old, why have scientists found dinosaur bones with soft tissue still in them, including what may have been blood vessels and cells? Confirm this here: www.nbcnews.com/id/7285683/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/scientists-recover-t-rex-tissue/#.Us3cl7SmbF0

www.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html


http:// www.talkreason.org/articles/DinoBlood.cfm

those are your answers..
Cc 4evergod3

4evergod3:



Guy I warned you before this thread went far now you see yourself?

"THE ANIMALS THAT SCIENTISTS HAVE CHOSEN TO CALL DINOSAURS"

Chai. So you now agree that dinosaurs couldhave been a scientific imagination.

You could say that fossils exist or DNA but how would you know who or what owns the dna when you have nothing to stand as an original sample as a comparison. If you say fossils existed then how would you be sure what it belonged to especially since the creature was still supposedly evolving.

new animals are discovered and named by scientists...
What about fossilized structures?

Smallville10:
D first ever dinosaurs walked the earth before men but also d bible speaks of something whixh could be a dinosaur (job 40v15:19)

behemoth is not a dinosaur...

Muafrika2:
They died in Noah's flood

i thought noah saved all the creatures of god?

raphieMontella:
My oga's..

palenteology dating methods...
Radiometric methods(radio-isotopes)


www.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html


http:// www.talkreason.org/articles/DinoBlood.cfm

those are your answers..

Carefully read all my posts on this thread to see the inadequacy of your radiometric dating.

AnonyNymous:

Yes, they existed. But your bible points to an earth that's just about 6000 years old. And you said they existed millions of years before man but in genesis, there was nothing before the six days of creation

maybe u should read on of my articles on my profile titled "explanation of certain things in d bible"

raphieMontella:

i thought noah saved all the creatures of god?

Some were in their natural element already like fishes and other aquatic animals. Only land animals needed a ship. And those things survived too. That's why their footprints are found on hard surfaces, obviously softer after the flood. But they could not survive.

Muafrika2:

Some were in their natural element already like fishes and other aquatic animals. Only land animals needed a ship. And those things survived too. That's why their footprints are found on hard surfaces, obviously softer after the flood. But they could not survive.

What of the Nephlims? The Giant? How come we havnt found anything? execpt Photoshop?

Muafrika2:

Some were in their natural element already like fishes and other aquatic animals. Only land animals needed a ship. And those things survived too. That's why their footprints are found on hard surfaces, obviously softer after the flood. But they could not survive.

So dinosaurs were on the ship. For a whole year? By then they would have started eating meat, if they were babies when they were put on the ship. It doesn't add up

Muafrika2:

Something like that.

Now it's not hard to see how fish can survive where dinosaurs can't. Fish can eat plankton and other microscopic animals readily in water. But a dinosaur would need to graze or hunt to survive,

I also spoke about harsh cold weather

How did Jellyfish survive? They either shrivel up or explode when the salinity is messed up. All that rain should have killed them.

Also, how did kangaroos and wallabies make it to Australia without leaving any evidence.

Muafrika2:

Something like that.

Now it's not hard to see how fish can survive where dinosaurs can't. Fish can eat plankton and other microscopic animals readily in water. But a dinosaur would need to graze or hunt to survive,

I also spoke about harsh cold weather

See mental gymnastics.

An aquatic dinosaur could eat fish, which would also be 'readily in water'. So that point is moot.

In fact, the entire argument is moot because in the first place the Noah's ark story would have killed nearly all sea life. Why? Because there are salt-water aquatic organisms and fresh-water aquatic organisms. The bodily cells of each organism are suited only to one or the other (to the exclusion of a few rare species which can survive in either). Mixing of salt & fresh water (which would happen in a global flood) means both salt & freshwater organisms would have gone extinct.

Ahmadgani:
they've evolve into beans, rice etc. just like Hans came from ape in the past and now humans are evolving from fish soon we will start evolving from frog, goat or butterfly

Because that's definitely how evolution works. /sarcasm

Don't flaunt your ignorance for the world to see. It's not something to be proud of.

cloudgoddess:

See mental gymnastics.

An aquatic dinosaur could eat fish, which would also be 'readily in water'. So that point is moot.

In fact, the entire argument is moot because in the first place the Noah's ark story would have killed nearly all sea life. Why? Because there are salt-water aquatic organisms and fresh-water aquatic organisms. The bodily cells of each organism are suited only to one or the other (to the exclusion of a few rare species which can survive in either). Mixing of salt & fresh water (which would happen in a global flood) means both salt & freshwater organisms would have gone extinct.

Salty? Are you sure?

Salt takes time to accumulate by evaporation and we are talking of the first ever rain in human history. The oceans made part of the waters that had covered the earth just a few thousand years.