Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,173,640 members, 7,889,063 topics. Date: Saturday, 13 July 2024 at 09:38 PM

What Would World War III Look Like? - Foreign Affairs - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / What Would World War III Look Like? (2272 Views)

Swaziland's King, Mswati III Marries A 19-year-old As His 14th Wife (photo) / 10 Signs We Are Heading Towards World War III / Donald Trump: There Will Be World War III If You Elect Hillary Clinton (2) (3) (4)

(1) (Reply) (Go Down)

What Would World War III Look Like? by BizLifeE: 8:43am On Oct 10, 2016
How will we know if a multinational conflict is, in fact, as big a deal as WWI or II?

There’s a saying about this.

“War isn’t about who’s right. Just who’s left”

So we have 2 sides. Side a (America and it’s allies) versus side b(Russia and her Allies)

Imagine all the nukes in the world.

So if we do the math. Let’s see 250+8,494+10= 8744 verus 7,506+225+300+90+80+100= 8,301. So by that math, side b wins. however just imagine 17045 of these hitting your city.

Yup. planetary destruction. Boom over 5 Billion people vanish off the face of the Earth. Cities that used to bustling cities home to people, instantly gone forever. Who wins? You decide. Imagine. A country “wins” the nuclear war. However 90% of the population is dead. The land is irradiated for centuries to come. Birth defects and cancer plague your country for generations. Did you really win? I’d like you to think about that.

See this? This is a shadow. Not any ordinary shadow. But a person. The blast at Hiroshima vaporized this poor soul. Now imagine 2 billion or so of these souls lost. That is nuclear war.

Source: https://www.quora.com/What-would-World-War-III-look-like

Neteller here: www..com.ng
Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by Appleyard(m): 9:05am On Oct 10, 2016
Yeah. Much of the world would be lost. But as unpalatable unthinkable as it may sound, it's going to happen, and there is very little we can do to prevent it.

1 Like 1 Share

Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by CSTR2: 5:02pm On Oct 10, 2016
Appleyard:
Yeah. Much of the world would be lost. But as unpalatable unthinkable as it may sound, it's going to happen, and there is very little we can do to prevent it.
That is why the US is being proactive by upgrading their numerous bases to missile defence shields.
A significant percentage of incoming payload would have been shot down before it enters the continent, and the rest shot down as it enters.
Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by Nobody: 7:32pm On Oct 10, 2016
CSTR2:
That is why the US is being proactive by upgrading their numerous bases to missile defence shields.
A significant percentage of incoming payload would have been shot down before it enters the continent, and the rest shot down as it enters.

Amerikan Missile Defense Shields that are as useless as the tail of a dog which neither covers its rear end, nor protects it from the bites of insects. grin cheesy grin


How Russia's S-400 makes the F-35 obsolete


It’s not often that a relatively inexpensive air defence weapon is able to make a trillion dollar fighter programme obsolete. But the $500 million S-400 missile system has done precisely that to America’s brand new F-35 stealth
fighter.

In November 2014 Moscow and Beijing inked a $3 billion agreement for the supply of six battalions of S-400 anti-aircraft/anti-missile systems that will significantly boost China’s air defence capability against the US and its allies in the Western Pacific.

With a tracking range of 600 km and the ability to hit targets 400 km away at a blistering speed of 17,000 km an hour – faster than any existing aircraft–the S-400 is a truly scary weapon if you are facing its business end.First deployed by Russia in 2010, each S-400 battalion has eight launchers, a control centre, radar and 16 missiles available as reloads.

Unlike the overhyped US Patriot missile that turned out to be a dud in battle, the S-400 was designed to create the daddy of Iron Domes.

“Given its extremely long range and effective electronic warfare capabilities, the S-400 is a game-changing system that challenges current military capabilities at the operational level of war,” Paul Giarra, president, Global Strategies and Transformation, told Defense News.

The S-400 will have the “effect of turning a defensive system
into an offensive system, and extend China’s A2/AD (anti-access/area-denial) umbrella over the territory of American allies and the high seas.”

An S-300 missile fired from, say, Damascus will blow away an aircraft over central Tel Aviv in about 107 seconds, giving the Israelis just enough time to say their prayers. It is precisely because the S-series missile systems can so dramatically upset the military balance that Israel has pressured Russia against introducing it into the Middle East
tinderbox. Israel has also warned it would go after Syrian S-300 batteries with everything it’s got.


My terrorist friend, you had better concentrate on upgrading your moniker from CSTR2 to CSTR200 and leave Amerika to sink into oblivion as her fate is already sealed by the Cosmic Order. grin


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxUnnbZDqAc

5 Likes 2 Shares

Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by CSTR2: 8:08pm On Oct 10, 2016
Zoharariel:


Amerikan Missile Defense Shields that are as useless as the tail of a dog which neither covers its rear end, nor protects it from the bites of insects. grin cheesy grin


How Russia's S-400 makes the F-35 obsolete


It’s not often that a relatively inexpensive air defence weapon is able to make a trillion dollar fighter programme obsolete. But the $500 million S-400 missile system has done precisely that to America’s brand new F-35 stealth
fighter.

In November 2014 Moscow and Beijing inked a $3 billion agreement for the supply of six battalions of S-400 anti-aircraft/anti-missile systems that will significantly boost China’s air defence capability against the US and its allies in the Western Pacific.

With a tracking range of 600 km and the ability to hit targets 400 km away at a blistering speed of 17,000 km an hour – faster than any existing aircraft–the S-400 is a truly scary weapon if you are facing its business end.First deployed by Russia in 2010, each S-400 battalion has eight launchers, a control centre, radar and 16 missiles available as reloads.

Unlike the overhyped US Patriot missile that turned out to be a dud in battle, the S-400 was designed to create the daddy of Iron Domes.

“Given its extremely long range and effective electronic warfare capabilities, the S-400 is a game-changing system that challenges current military capabilities at the operational level of war,” Paul Giarra, president, Global Strategies and Transformation, told Defense News.

The S-400 will have the “effect of turning a defensive system
into an offensive system, and extend China’s A2/AD (anti-access/area-denial) umbrella over the territory of American allies and the high seas.”

An S-300 missile fired from, say, Damascus will blow away an aircraft over central Tel Aviv in about 107 seconds, giving the Israelis just enough time to say their prayers. It is precisely because the S-series missile systems can so dramatically upset the military balance that Israel has pressured Russia against introducing it into the Middle East
tinderbox. Israel has also warned it would go after Syrian S-300 batteries with everything it’s got.


My terrorist friend, you had better concentrate on upgrading your moniker from CSTR2 to CSTR200 and leave Amerika to sink into oblivion as her fate is already sealed by the Cosmic Order. grin


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxUnnbZDqAc
US missile shields are useless? You are a very deluded human being. Even Russians are not that deluded.
The patriots Missiles and the THAAD have not failed in history. It will destroy any possible threat available today which is why America does not need to create s-1000000000000 SAMs like a candy man.
When Russia produces a Jet that can escape American defences, then the pentagon would invest billions in SAMs to recreate that edge. For now, the US SAMs is the most trusted, the most sought after SAMs systems, fortunately reserved for some elite nations and not the junk Russia sells to every nation with a few change.
Turkey has American SAMs and so are too hot for Russia to handle regardless of provocation. cheesy
Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by Nobody: 9:34pm On Oct 10, 2016
CSTR2:
For now, the US SAMs is the most trusted, the most sought after SAMs systems, fortunately reserved for some elite nations and not the junk Russia sells to every nation with a few change.

Pls desist from misleading & endangering the lives of innocent Nigerians living abroad by giving them false hope.

Remember the gulf war when 27 out-dated scud missiles were fired from Iraq to Israel only 3 were intercepted by the Amerikan useless Patriot interceptor batteries grin cheesy grin

Now, read this:

TV documentary: US lied about Gulf War missile “hits”

On Wednesday evening, the same day that US Secretary of State Colin Powell addressed the UN Security Council, a Canadian television program provided a timely reminder of the lengths to which the US government, assisted by a servile media, went to deceive American and world public opinion during the 1991 Gulf War.

In a report entitled “The Best Defence,” the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s documentary program, The Fifth Estate traced one set of lies told by the previous Bush administration and the Pentagon during the 1991 conflict. It replayed footage of both President George Bush the elder and Desert Storm commander General H. Norman Schwarzkopf declaring that the US military’s Patriot missiles had achieved a 100 percent success rate in destroying Iraqi Scud missiles headed for Saudi Arabia and Israel.

It is now clear from The Fifth Estate program that when he made that boast, Bush knew it to be a lie. Just before his appearance at the Raytheon factory (the company that manufactured the Patriot Missiles), he received an urgent visit from Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Arens, who warned him that Israel was about to enter the war against Iraq because the Patriot missiles had proven completely ineffective. grin cheesy grin

Arens said he told Bush that, at best, the Patriots had intercepted 20 percent of the Scuds, a figure that soon turned out to be generous.
grin cheesy grin

But by the time the 40-day war ended, 39 Iraqi Scuds had struck Israeli territory, killing two people and wounding hundreds, despite constant fire from US-operated Patriot batteries near Tel Aviv. American soldiers also became victims of the Patriot cover-up. In the most serious incident, 28 were killed when a Scud missile hit a barracks in Saudi Arabia.

By the time the committee convened, the Army’s official assessments of the Patriot’s success rate in the Gulf War had fallen from 100 percent to 25 percent. Generals admitted relying on intelligence reports of ground damage that were unverified, contradictory, erroneous and misleading.

Many of the targets turned out to be debris from the poorly designed Scuds as they broke up in flight. It became apparent that at least 45 percent of the 158 Patriots launched in the war were aimed against debris or false targets.
grin cheesy grin

Source: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2003/02/cbc-f07.html

If there's any Nigerian living in Amerika who values his/her life; in the event of an all-out war between NATO & Russia - I beg you, do not wait, do not even think, just get on the next flight or ship “if it ain't too late by then” & flee to Mexico because Amerika is GUARANTEED to be obliterated - wallahi tallahi sumo billahi grin cheesy grin

7 Likes 5 Shares

Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by Nobody: 9:47pm On Oct 10, 2016
Imagine the pile of human waste after the war,body count would be more than that of world war 1 and 2 combined shocked shocked shocked

1 Like 1 Share

Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by fineboynl(m): 10:31pm On Oct 10, 2016
hahahaha. I can't stop laughing. I know for sure the USA weapons are overrated. only a war will tell us the true state.

3 Likes 2 Shares

Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by Nobody: 7:40am On Oct 11, 2016
fineboynl:
hahahaha. I can't stop laughing. I know for sure the USA weapons are overrated. only a war will tell us the true state.
don't upset American military fan boy club with these facts,you know they don't like it,soon they will say you are jealous of America grin grin grin grin

3 Likes 2 Shares

Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by CSTR2: 10:32am On Oct 11, 2016
fineboynl:
hahahaha. I can't stop laughing. I know for sure the USA weapons are overrated. only a war will tell us the true state.
If US weapons are overrated then Russian weapons have not rating.
The US is by far the largest exporter of weapons in the world. Tested and proven in War.
Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by Appleyard(m): 3:57pm On Oct 11, 2016
CSTR2:
That is why the US is being proactive by upgrading their numerous bases to missile defence shields.
A significant percentage of incoming payload would have been shot down before it enters the continent, and the rest shot down as it enters.


It is easier said that done,Mister. Hypersonic gliders like the Satan 2 and many other wicked "secret" weapons will make such a war unwinnable for anyone. At the end, the winners would be the crocroache and the bacteria.

5 Likes 1 Share

Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by mojeer678: 9:38pm On Oct 11, 2016
Appleyard:



It is easier said that done,Mister. Hypersonic gliders like the Satan 2 and many other wicked "secret" weapons will make such a war unwinnable for anyone. At the end, the winners would be the crocroache and the bacteria.

Mutually assured destruction for everyone. Total re-set for all mankind, and that's exactly the reason why I believe it would not be allowed to happen. Not by these suicide-inclined players/actors, but by highers-up.

1 Like

Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by mojeer678: 9:39pm On Oct 11, 2016
CSTR2:
If US weapons are overrated then Russian weapons have not rating.
The US is by far the largest exporter of weapons in the world. Tested and proven in War.

Ever heard of a small ME nation called Israel?
Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by Appleyard(m): 12:12pm On Oct 14, 2016
mojeer678:


Mutually assured destruction for everyone. Total re-set for all mankind, and that's exactly the reason why I believe it would not be allowed to happen. Not by these suicide-inclined players/actors, but by highers-up.

Of course, the cosmic order dictates what happens below, especially on such massive war footing..... But it's unfortunate that they too had on many occasion forewarned on this coming war..

We can only pray that the higher-ups keep shifting the goalpost. Otherwise, the world is headed for relegation to the lowest division of hell....


Man is very pathetic.

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by mojeer678: 9:10pm On Oct 14, 2016
Appleyard:


Of course, the cosmic order dictates what happens below, especially on such massive war footing..... But it's unfortunate that they too had on many occasion forewarned on this coming war..

We can only pray that the higher-ups keep shifting the goalpost. Otherwise, the world is headed for relegation to the lowest division of hell....


Man is very pathetic.

I entirely agree with you.

He who has an ear to hear, let him hear.

The following was posted to a popular forum. I believe it is credible, and was probably a top secret "OOPS":
Anonymous posted:
"I rotate through Diego Garcia every 6 weeks to pull maintenance on uplink equipment as a private contractor.
Something big is going on, the island has more aircraft than anytime in the last 9 years. They have blocked off some access roads and are now parking aircraft on the road. Barriers have been set up around the aircraft areas. Temporary barracks and hangers are popping up everywhere. A tent city full of AF and Navy maintenance personnel has also been set up.

I have never seen B1s and B2s there at the same time. Actually I have never seen more than 1 there at a time.

Security is nuts I had to show my id at least 8 times a day

My coworker is former AF and said they are like that when nukes are around. We counted over a dozen air refueling tankers on the ground. The airfield had a take off or landing every 15 minutes, very busy. When we flew out we waited in line for quite a while. We never had to wait in the past.

The Navy had the docks full of ships and 6 to 8 more were moored just off shore. We watched many pallets of bombs being off loaded from one ship.

There were a bunch of B-52's coming in that were painted flat black. I have not seen that before.

So are we headed to war again?"

My comment: One might think an aircraft as old as the B-52 would be mothballed, but the B-52 never was because it is practically impossible to shoot down. They can take several direct missile strikes and keep flying. If they are at Diego Garcia, WATCH OUT.

It is strongly rumored that Obama has ordered the annihilation of the Syrian armed forces and that the decision as to when will be made tomorrow (Oct 14). Who knows what will happen then, but they don't send B-52's to Diego Garcia for nothing. WE ALL KNEW THEY'D DESTROY THE WORLD BEFORE THEY LET AMERICA SURVIVE BY ELECTING TRUMP, REMEMBER: IT IS THE JEWISH COMMUNITY DOING THIS, NONE ARE INNOCENT, AND THEY CANNOT BE SAFE AFTER HURTING US THAT BADLY. If they are safe, it would be an amazingly huge FAIL.

Now, the RAF has been given the green light to shoot down Russian jets over Syria.

Why this insanity?

UPDATE: I was wrong about the B-52 being used only for nuclear strikes, though they were developed primarily for that purpose. This has been corrected.

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: What Would World War III Look Like? by Nobody: 8:39am On Oct 15, 2016
Syria: Is The US Preparing A False-Flag Bombing?


The first three pics (attached) are of an Amerikan F/A-18 fighter and attack aircraft in Russian coloring. (The wingtips are raised for storage as this is a carrier enabled plane. The windows of the raised cockpit hood are covered with white sun protection sheets.) On the bottom right is a picture of a Russia SU-34 in the usual Russian color scheme as it is also used by the Russian contingent in Syria.

It would be extremely difficult to distinguish these like-colored planes from each other in a shaky fly-by and "bombing" video.

The U.S. regularly uses planes in "enemy" color schemes as "aggressor force" during training and maneuvers. It helps U.S. pilots to get used to "enemy" targets during air-to-air combat training. So this can all be, like Christian Borys assumes, "standard training".

But there is also Kerry's talk with the Syrian opposition and his explicit request for videos of "Russian" jets bombing in Syria.

This may be an innocent coincidence: Secretary Kerry is asking the scam artists of the White Helmets for video of Russian jets "bombing civilians" in Syria and, just by chance, the U.S. military is painting one of its jets to look like a "Russian" Su-34 strike fighter like those deployed in Syria.


But many incidents in Syria, the Ghouta gas attack, the recent aid convoy attack, get attributed to Russia or the Syrian government without any proof (or even despite contrary evidence). The media always eat these falsehoods up based simply on some official's say-so, some unverified pictures or video and without asking any further questions. A "Russian attack" on some large civilian target like a refugee camp, documented on video!, would be a very easy sell.

The propagandized "uproar" over such an attack could be easily used to launch a wider war. The attack on the Gleiwitz Radio tower, the Gulf of Tonkin incident and "Saddam's WMDs" come to mind. Kerry is not shy of such lying. Today he invented a new hospital attack, said it was a war crime and that Russia and Syria should be investigated. No such attack happened.

The Russian parliament ratified an agreement with Syria about the indefinite stationing of Russian forces in Syria. Yesterday the Russian Ministry of Defense warned that Russian soldiers are embedded with Syrian units on the ground and that they would be defended against any attempt of air attacks by the Russian air-defense in Syria. U.S. media called such matter of course statement bellicose talk.

There is plenty of lose talk in U.S. media about attacking Syrian and Russian forces in Syria. The U.S. recently bombed a Syrian unit in a well known position it had held for many month. 82 Syrian soldier died and many more were wounded. The strike furthered the advance of ISIS on the besieged Deir Ezzor. That was no “mistake” as the U.S. claimed.


Source: http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/10/is-the-us-preparing-a-false-flag-bombing-in-syria.html

2 Likes

(1) (Reply)

Genocide Of Black Libyans In Tawergha - Humanrightsinvestigations.org / The Current Onisabe Of Sabe Wishes All Yoruba Well. / Zimbabwe Introduces $500 Billion Note

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 74
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.