Christians and muslims believe there is a God that created heaven, earth and man...

But for the atheist, there is no God, and he didn't create man.

Now here is my question to the atheists. How did man came into existence, if there is no God in existence??

Let's hear from you guys...

hopefulLandlord, hahn, Seun, KingEbukasBlog, winner01, felixomor, OLAADEGBU, sonoflucifer, thesixthsense, EyeHateGod, AgentOfAllah, cloudgoddess, CAPSLOCKED, Scholar8200

Following

[size=20pt]I DON'T KNOW[/size]



How are you so sure it is your god that created man?

How did your god came into existence?

Now you know why most atheists uphold the evolution theory. They dont wanna be lost

iamtewwy:
How did your god came into existence?

For something to begin, it needs time. Time started with the beginning of the universe along with space.
Whatever was in existence before the beginning is timeless i.e eternal

Eternal means no beginning, no end.
I know its difficult to wrap this around the human brain, but im pretty sure its not difficult to admit the limits of human knowledge and acknowledge a much more greater power that brought all into existence.

That is the power of God.

winner01:
For something to begin, it needs time. Time started with the beginning of the universe along with space.
Whatever was in existence before the beginning is timeless i.e eternal

Eternal means no beginning, no end..

BULLSH!T

Edenoscar:

BULLSH!T

No vex, na me find your wahala. You are your creator ehn

RabbaRabbi:
Christians and muslims believe there is a God that created heaven, earth and man...

But for the atheist, there is no God, and he didn't create man.

Now here is my question to the atheists. How did man came into existence, if there is no God in existence??

Let's hear from you guys...

hopefulLandlord, hahn, Seun, KingEbukasBlog, winner01, felixomor, OLAADEGBU, sonoflucifer, thesixthsense, EyeHateGod, AgentOfAllah, cloudgoddess, CAPSLOCKED, Scholar8200

Dear RabbaRabbi, the way your question is framed suggests one either ought to know the origins of man; or, otherwise believe that god did it. There couldn't be a more flawed attempt at seeking answers. In seeking answers, you must also be open to the many other possibilities that abound. For example, man may have emerged from the failed experiment of advanced alien species, man may be the descendants of old world apes, man may have been involved in a teleportation experiment from another universe, man may be the highly intelligent project of the devil that god has decided to colonise out of spite and jealousy. Also, the answer could just simply be "I don't know!". So why compel people to pick sides in a false dichotomy?

At any rate, to me, the most compelling theory on the origins of man is as outlined by the theory of evolution. This theory has made use of a panoply of mutually exclusive bodies of facts; including genetics, anatomy and physiology, fossil records, behavioral biology and lab experiments to come up with a coherent and compelling narrative about our origins. In the circumstances, I have no reason to reject the proposition that we come from an old world ape that is a common ancestor to other existing apes too. If a definitive proof against evolution surfaces, I will very promptly discard it, and maybe adopt a more compelling answer, supposing one were to come along. But I don't feel compelled to know the origin of man as you do OP.

AgentOfAllah:


Dear RabbaRabbi, the way your question is framed suggests one either ought to know the origins of man; or, otherwise believe that god did it. There couldn't be a more flawed attempt at seeking answers. In seeking answers, you must also be open to the many other possibilities that abound. For example, man may have emerged from the failed experiment of advanced alien species, man may be the descendants of old world apes, man may have been involved in a teleportation experiment from another universe, man may be the highly intelligent project of the devil that god has decided to colonise out of spite and jealousy. Also, the answer could just simply be "I don't know!". So why compel people to pick sides in a false dichotomy?

At any rate, to me, the most compelling theory on the origins of man is as outlined by the theory of evolution. This theory has made use of a panoply of mutually exclusive bodies of facts; including genetics, anatomy and physiology, fossil records, behavioral biology and lab experiments to come up with a coherent and compelling narrative about our origins. In the circumstances, I have no reason to reject the proposition that we come from an old world ape that is a common ancestor to other existing apes too. If a definitive proof against evolution surfaces, I will very promptly discard it, and maybe adopt a more compelling answer, supposing one were to come along. But I don't feel compelled to know the origin of man as you do OP.

nice writeup

RabbaRabbi:

Now here is my question to the atheists. How did man came into existence, if there is no God in existence??

Your question has been answered by scientists. You can read the answer here:
http://humanorigins.si.edu/education/introduction-human-evolution

AgentOfAllah:


Dear RabbaRabbi, the way your question is framed suggests one either ought to know the origins of man; or, otherwise believe that god did it. There couldn't be a more flawed attempt at seeking answers. In seeking answers, you must also be open to the many other possibilities that abound. For example, man may have emerged from the failed experiment of advanced alien species, man may be the descendants of old world apes, man may have been involved in a teleportation experiment from another universe, man may be the highly intelligent project of the devil that god has decided to colonise out of spite and jealousy. Also, the answer could just simply be "I don't know!". So why compel people to pick sides in a false dichotomy?

At any rate, to me, the most compelling theory on the origins of man is as outlined by the theory of evolution. This theory has made use of a panoply of mutually exclusive bodies of facts; including genetics, anatomy and physiology, fossil records, behavioral biology and lab experiments to come up with a coherent and compelling narrative about our origins. In the circumstances, I have no reason to reject the proposition that we come from an old world ape that is a common ancestor to other existing apes too. If a definitive proof against evolution surfaces, I will very promptly discard it, and maybe adopt a more compelling answer, supposing one were to come along. But I don't feel compelled to know the origin of man as you do OP.

Too much sense here

What part of the o.p is suggestive of compulsion?!. The way some people reason is mind boggling.

AgentOfAllah:


Dear RabbaRabbi, the way your question is framed suggests one either ought to know the origins of man; or, otherwise believe that god did it. There couldn't be a more flawed attempt at seeking answers. In seeking answers, you must also be open to the many other possibilities that abound. For example, man may have emerged from the failed experiment of advanced alien species, man may be the descendants of old world apes, man may have been involved in a teleportation experiment from another universe, man may be the highly intelligent project of the devil that god has decided to colonise out of spite and jealousy. Also, the answer could just simply be "I don't know!". So why compel people to pick sides in a false dichotomy?

At any rate, to me, the most compelling theory on the origins of man is as outlined by the theory of evolution. This theory has made use of a panoply of mutually exclusive bodies of facts; including genetics, anatomy and physiology, fossil records, behavioral biology and lab experiments to come up with a coherent and compelling narrative about our origins. In the circumstances, I have no reason to reject the proposition that we come from an old world ape that is a common ancestor to other existing apes too. If a definitive proof against evolution surfaces, I will very promptly discard it, and maybe adopt a more compelling answer, supposing one were to come along. But I don't feel compelled to know the origin of man as you do OP.

winner01:
No vex, na me find your wahala. You are your creator ehn

Science: "We don't know, but we have a couple ideas for how this universe started

Religion: "We don't know, but we're sure God did it. That's our god, by the way, not yours."

Religion offers nothing and explains nothing. It can't do anything else. Science at least is a good start and will continue to investigate as a self-correcting process.

AgentOfAllah:


Dear RabbaRabbi, the way your question is framed suggests one either ought to know the origins of man; or, otherwise believe that god did it. There couldn't be a more flawed attempt at seeking answers. In seeking answers, you must also be open to the many other possibilities that abound. For example, man may have emerged from the failed experiment of advanced alien species, man may be the descendants of old world apes, man may have been involved in a teleportation experiment from another universe, man may be the highly intelligent project of the devil that god has decided to colonise out of spite and jealousy. Also, the answer could just simply be "I don't know!". So why compel people to pick sides in a false dichotomy?

At any rate, to me, the most compelling theory on the origins of man is as outlined by the theory of evolution. This theory has made use of a panoply of mutually exclusive bodies of facts; including genetics, anatomy and physiology, fossil records, behavioral biology and lab experiments to come up with a coherent and compelling narrative about our origins. In the circumstances, I have no reason to reject the proposition that we come from an old world ape that is a common ancestor to other existing apes too. If a definitive proof against evolution surfaces, I will very promptly discard it, and maybe adopt a more compelling answer, supposing one were to come along. But I don't feel compelled to know the origin of man as you do OP.

thread closed!

AgentOfAllah:


Dear RabbaRabbi, the way your question is framed suggests one either ought to know the origins of man; or, otherwise believe that god did it. There couldn't be a more flawed attempt at seeking answers. In seeking answers, you must also be open to the many other possibilities that abound. For example, man may have emerged from the failed experiment of advanced alien species, man may be the descendants of old world apes, man may have been involved in a teleportation experiment from another universe, man may be the highly intelligent project of the devil that god has decided to colonise out of spite and jealousy. Also, the answer could just simply be "I don't know!". So why compel people to pick sides in a false dichotomy?

At any rate, to me, the most compelling theory on the origins of man is as outlined by the theory of evolution. This theory has made use of a panoply of mutually exclusive bodies of facts; including genetics, anatomy and physiology, fossil records, behavioral biology and lab experiments to come up with a coherent and compelling narrative about our origins. In the circumstances, I have no reason to reject the proposition that we come from an old world ape that is a common ancestor to other existing apes too. If a definitive proof against evolution surfaces, I will very promptly discard it, and maybe adopt a more compelling answer, supposing one were to come along. But I don't feel compelled to know the origin of man as you do OP.

I dash you 72 virgins for this write up.

Lexxyburg:
I dash you 72 virgins for this write up.

And 72 bottles of orijin. One for each round

Science aims to satiate man's curiosity with unfettered discovery.

Religion tells man that almost everything about life is wrong - especially curiosity, doubt and discovery.

The only thing that is right is appealing to the fragile egos of the gods.

Even if you been told, you still wouldn't believe if you still have the religion Operating system running in your brain. But let me just make a little summary of it by just dropping points. It started like this.

First , No time no space, nothing whatsoever

Second, Nothingness is nothing but in physics Nothing can accumulate to form Energy and in turn Energy would form matter and again matter can also covert back to raw energy....According to Albert Einstein (E=MC2)
The nothingness in the early universe happened to form energy hence, in a little Atom of like a Golf ball, that was how the early universe looked like.

Third, The intensity of the energy in that ball caused it to expand by billions billions billion rate even faster than the speed of light.

Four, BAM, The bang occurred.

Five, Our universe is born but still with intense heat after about 350 years the universe began to cool off. At the point, Gases in the periodic table started to form and the very first to form was hydrogen...............

Six, Keep in mind, the birth of the Universe was the beginning of time and space. How do we physicist know the bang occur and beginning of time?
Well, just like a movie, when you watching it, you might want to rewind back to catch a glimpse of what you missed, it's same with physics in relation to the Universe.

Seven, still formation of the universe, the solar system formation occurred giving rise to all planets, Sun and other planetary bodies then a dead small planet collided with the Earth and ended up being a moon for Earth.

Eight, Earth, our home happen to be the best planet to support life, why, because it was the planet with the suitable amount of gases and forces required to support life existence, it was either in excess or too little in other planets for instance, If gravitational force was lower on earth no life and it it was higher, no life. This is best we have that has habited our existence.

Nine, Earth started cooling down after its formation 4.5billion years ago.........Atmosphere formed prior to the right amount of gases here, soon after, the cloud gathered then it rained for many years thus making Earth the only planet with water. Water would later aid the existence of life here on earth.

Ten, Earth further took shape, separating the ocean and land so vegetation started, Ocean bodies is about 70% compared to dry land which is about 30%. So we have water, dry land, vegetation but No single life, So how did life appear?

Life began in the water, the aquatic terrestrial was the first habitat to support life because of the presence of water and gathering microbes also with the perfect temperature and chemical reaction. Life formation took effect and micro organisms in the water up to the fishes appeared, Some period of time later some left the water and come on land and develop lungs to survive while some went back into the water e.g Whale, whale is a mammal, It had hinges but had to go back into the water to adapt to aquatic life.

So, life on land began to co-exist and that's when evolution comes in. Well, prior to Evolution, two things occurred that determined existing life on earth and they were Natural selection and survival for the fittest. I would leave you to go study evolution to continue from here.

Just like man create technology, i believe man originates from a failed experiment by higher intellect of aliens, who are exposed to more civilization than us, and we in turn, we are trying to catch up. Believe it or not, you (human) are not alone, because there are other humans (powerful humans) out there, with the capacity to use 90% of their brains, while man still operate on 10% and dolphin operates on 20%. Or maybe, I DONT KNOW....


The above illustrations and theory were written and formulated by myself alone.

1990news:
Just like man create technology, i believe man originates from a failed experiment by higher intellect of aliens, who are exposed to more civilization than us, and we in turn, we are trying to catch up. Believe it or not, you (human) are not alone, because there are other humans (powerful humans) out there, with the capacity to use 90% of their brains, while man still operate on 10% and dolphin operates on 20%. Or maybe, I DONT KNOW....


The above illustrations and theory were written and formulated by myself alone.

True...but it is much more.

AgentOfAllah:


Dear RabbaRabbi, the way your question is framed suggests one either ought to know the origins of man; or, otherwise believe that god did it. There couldn't be a more flawed attempt at seeking answers. In seeking answers, you must also be open to the many other possibilities that abound. For example, man may have emerged from the failed experiment of advanced alien species, man may be the descendants of old world apes, man may have been involved in a teleportation experiment from another universe, man may be the highly intelligent project of the devil that god has decided to colonise out of spite and jealousy. Also, the answer could just simply be "I don't know!". So why compel people to pick sides in a false dichotomy?

At any rate, to me, the most compelling theory on the origins of man is as outlined by the theory of evolution. This theory has made use of a panoply of mutually exclusive bodies of facts; including genetics, anatomy and physiology, fossil records, behavioral biology and lab experiments to come up with a coherent and compelling narrative about our origins. In the circumstances, I have no reason to reject the proposition that we come from an old world ape that is a common ancestor to other existing apes too. If a definitive proof against evolution surfaces, I will very promptly discard it, and maybe adopt a more compelling answer, supposing one were to come along. But I don't feel compelled to know the origin of man as you do OP.

Evolution is a scam. stop decieving yourself their is nothing like Evolution . that is fantasy.

I can see a future coming, whereby man wont depend on guns, bombs and etc to fight war, rather they would depend on magic. Probably before that happens, man in general should be able to use atleast 40-60% of their brain capacity. Religious beliefs by then would be a past issue, and man would solely depend on my mind, inner strenght, knowledge and the self power to control his world. Still my theories and illustrations again. So call me, TheBeast.

ifenes:


True...but it is much more.

Edenoscar:

Science: "We don't know, but we have a couple ideas for how this universe started

Religion: "We don't know, but we're sure God did it. That's our god, by the way, not yours."

Religion offers nothing and explains nothing. It can't do anything else. Science at least is a good start and will continue to investigate as a self-correcting process.

With out Religeon Science can never exist. if there is no laws of nature to study what will your Science study?
The big question is did the laws of Science just comeup and insistute themselves?

Seun:
Your question has been answered by scientists. You can read the answer here:
http://humanorigins.si.edu/education/introduction-human-evolution

Evolution is a Scam. stop fooling yourself.

1990news:
Just like man create technology, i believe man originates from a failed experiment by higher intellect of aliens, who are exposed to more civilization than us, and we in turn, we are trying to catch up. Believe it or not, you (human) are not alone, because there are other humans (powerful humans) out there, with the capacity to use 90% of their brains, while man still operate on 10% and dolphin operates on 20%. Or maybe, I DONT KNOW....


The above illustrations and theory were written and formulated by myself alone.

So who made the Aliens?

1990news:
I can see a future coming, whereby man wont depend on guns, bombs and etc to fight war, rather they would depend on magic. Probably before that happens, man in general should be able to use atleast 40-60% of their brain capacity. Religious beliefs by then would be a past issue, and man would solely depend on my mind, inner strenght, knowledge and the self power to control his world. Still my theories and illustrations again. So call me, TheBeast.

Technology will have to be less th, because we rely too much on them like... ask someone 12 multiplied by 7, they bring out the mobile phones

Yes, but we would gain this magical powers through technology. How?. The whole world would be zombinized in order to attain a unique set of human mind, who soulfully depends on advanced knowledge void of super beings and fallacies. Technology would introduce us into a new world, advancing man into using 20-30% of his brain.....

ifenes:


Technology will have to be less th, because we rely too much on them like... ask someone 12 multiplied by 7, they bring out the mobile phones

Aliens originates from water. Life starts from water. 70% of the world is populated by water, i mean condenced water, and if they should erupt, that automatically means Rapture, THE END OF DAYS.

blueAgent:



So who made the Aliens?

Anything that has a purpose in its design, must have a Designer eg the Human eye is carefully designed and it has a purpose of giving Humans Sight. it is also well connected to the Human brain for interpretation of vision/sight.it also has several parts that enables it to function.
Their is no possiblity of the Eye occuring by chance one and secondly been connected to the Human brain.

What i want to ask the Athiests is if the Evolution is true , where did Evolution get the inspiration for the shape, Image and parts of the Human body.

1990news:
while man still operate on 10%
.

This is a myth. We use all the parts of our brain

1990news:
Aliens originates from water. Life starts from water. 70% of the world is populated by water, i mean condenced water, and if they should erupt, that automatically means Rapture, THE END OF DAYS.

I laugh at you Athiests. you people sound like dictionary that can only define a word by using another word which itself needs its own definition.

I asked you who made the Aliens , you said they are from the water. so who made the Water ? O yeah Dictionary start.