Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,208,536 members, 8,002,927 topics. Date: Thursday, 14 November 2024 at 09:14 PM

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (65) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1037397 Views)

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (62) (63) (64) (65) (66) (67) (68) ... (668) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 10:56am On Oct 23, 2016
Posidonius:

Henry240, wondering why we can't shift our focus to the Indian HTT 40, and maybe with a JV we can get a super Tucano replacement. Armed to the teeth with Chinese or Russian weapons.

I think HTT40 's problem is what time it can be delivered with competive price ,quality and reliablity
similar trainer as Dart-450/Yak-152

pic 1, 2 diamond dart-450
pic 3,4 Yak-152

some rumors say dart450 will be sold at USD 3mllion,the first full carbon fiber trainer,Service ceiling: 7000 m, 8 hours air endurance ,operating cost: $500/hour
very competitive isn't it ?

General characteristics of DART450

Crew: Two
Length: 10.75 m (35 ft 3 in)
Wingspan: 11.74 m (38 ft 6 in)
Height: 3.38 m (11 ft 1 in)
Empty weight: 1,330 kg (2,932 lb)
Max takeoff weight: 2,300 kg (5,071 lb)
Fuel capacity: 850 l (190 imp gal; 220 US gal) usable
Powerplant: 1 × Ivchenko-Progress Motor Sich AI-450S turboprop, 369 kW (495[4] hp)
Propellers: 5-bladed MT Propeller[4]
Performance

Maximum speed: 463 km/h; 288 mph (250[1] kn)
Cruise speed: 426 km/h; 265 mph (230 kn)
Stall speed: 111 km/h; 69 mph (60[1] kn)
Endurance: 8 hr 10 min
Service ceiling: 7,010 m (22,999 ft) absolute
g limits: +7/-4G[4]
Rate of climb: 15.2 m/s (2,990 ft/min)
Take-off run: 600 metres (2,000 ft)
Landing run: 400 metres (1,300 ft)
fuel burn: 90 litres/hour[5]
operating cost: $500/hour[5]

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 11:13am On Oct 23, 2016
Henry240:


Thanks, i've shared this one previously.
you are welcome , you may have already subsribe the weixin or weibo of the manufacturer but they probably won't leak many.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:43pm On Oct 23, 2016
Henry240:


There has to be first an existing military partnership before any JV can be carried out. We currently don't have that with India.

.....................and i thought u were quite informed about Nigerian military .

military relationship/partnership exists .
what does not exist is military-industrial cooperation.

army aviation ?
NDA ?
navy ?

as to ur BVR question i will answer that later , fuuking windows update is chewing me up. grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:31pm On Oct 23, 2016
nemesis2u:


.....................and i thought u were quite informed about Nigerian military .

military relationship/partnership exists .
what does not exist is military-industrial cooperation.

army aviation ?
NDA ?
navy ?

as to ur BVR question i will answer that later , fuuking windows update is chewing me up. grin

You should know i was referring to military-industrial relationship, which by the way, actually exists. That's where i made an error.


The Nigerian navy and Indian navy signed an MoU earlier this year(2016) on a joint partnership to locally build 2 ships for the Nigerian navy. A Landing Ship Tank and a Hydographic ship.


The current Nigerian President attending courses at Indian military school, there's also an agreement for joint training between the Nigerian navy SBS and the Indian navy special forces unit.


Cooperation exists across the board.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:06pm On Oct 23, 2016
Henry240:


You should know i was referring to military-industrial relationship, which by the way, actually exists. That's where i made an error.


The Nigerian navy and Indian navy signed an MoU earlier this year(2016) on a joint partnership to locally build 2 ships for the Nigerian navy. A Landing Ship Tank and a Hydographic ship.


The current Nigerian President attending courses at Indian military school, there's also an agreement for joint training between the Nigerian navy SBS and the Indian navy special forces unit.


Cooperation exists across the board.

yes

many of the instructors in NDA were from IA before, they have been gradually replaced by NA instructors.

NA aviation is getting lots of inputs from IA aviation wing

vice versa IA looking to learn from NA COIN experience

in many other military & co areas cooperation exists which i cannot disclose since it has bearing on national security, nothing related to hardware.

blame is on Indian side to due to previous govts apathy in promoting Indian defense capability , present govt is seriously pushing Indian participation in joint MI cooperation along many countries.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:14pm On Oct 23, 2016
i finally got the windows update finished angry
16 hrs fuuk , errors at 50% error at 99% and then when finished database corruption r u kidding me angry
did it manually again , gods help me udates gets automatically rolled back , resistry problems angry
tased my bandwidth 5 gb downloads angry
saturday and sunday ruined as hell

microsoft is shiit angry
i wish we had a user friendly and widely accepted alternative to this shit
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:46pm On Oct 23, 2016
Indian Navy all set to reveal a Radar ship in December, specially designed to track long range ballistic missiles and air borne targets. The Ship is officially called as Missile Range Instrumentation Ship.

The Project almost finished now and set to be floated into the sea by this fall. Indian Navy crews will run the ship while DRDO and some other scientists will operate the ship. Countries like US, Russia China already have such ships in their inventory which is a major part of the Ballistic missile interception program.

The ship was built by the Hindustan Shipyard limited in Visakhapatnam, The ships keel was laid on June 2014 as a project completion date set by December this year. Same like INS arihant the Radar ship also monitored and funded by the Prime ministers office. theoretically The Ship will further boost India's anti ballistic missile shield, by providing exact information about the enemy missiles even at the longer range and higher altitude for mid course Interception.

The Ship houses two AESA radars, another set of telemetry scanners and associated systems. The Ship houses a large X Band AESA for long range target tracking and surveillance, Usually most of the X band AESA having range of more than 2000 kilometers for steady tracking. The reason behind adding the AESA in the ship is, it can be moved easily, due to earth's curvature, fixed land based Radar's lacks range and reliability. Since Ballistic missiles fly with the Earth's rotation to meet the target in short time.

The new X band AESA comes with state of art gallium nitrite technology, The GaN based T/R Modules requires less power to operate and highly reliable, optimized smaller in size and longer operational life. The 360 degree rotating heavy AESA is the Ships can provide clear information about incoming enemy threats even at longer range. The X band transmit and receive the data at the frequency level of 8.0 GHz to 12 GHz band.

Another is a S Band Radar, Which also provide search and tracking in another frequency range, Most nations uses the S Band to track very fast moving cruise missiles, and low flying sea skimmers. Most of the Missiles navigates very smart to escape from enemy Radar's. The S band AESA can track even those highly maneuvering missiles. Some of the Chinese cruise missiles has range of more than 1000 kilometers even they were nuke capable missiles.

Both S and X band can track all kind of airborne targets even flying at the range of some 2000 Kilometers. The ship also can provide target information's to the nearby ships about the incoming threats. The Ship can guide the land based PAD/AAD missiles to hit the ballistic missile targets at the mid course mostly if failed then terminal phase, Terminal passe can increase the interception probability of the missile if the mid course interception was failed.

The Ship can possibly add one more Radar to find Low observable targets. It's reported that UHF radar's can able to track low observable targets like semi stealth fighter jets and stealth UAV's. However the UHF's Tracking range is some 500 kilometer or less. The DRDO's Radar ship can add the UHF for additional supports. However it's still not confirmed

Other systems like Telemetry scanners used for target acquisition and classification. which transmit and receive target information's from Tracking radar and classifies it into the mission computers. Like Fighter jets or Cruise missiles, Mostly telemetry used for spying purpose to receive information's from enemy activities. which gives communication supports to covert military agents for secure transmissions.

The ship length is some 175 meters and displacement of more than 10,000 tons as described by the ship designer Vik Sandvik. The ship also carry a Helicopter for support missions. However the ship will not carry any weapon systems onboard. Usually one or two EO based CIWS used for self defense..
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:49pm On Oct 23, 2016
Multi-Object Kill Vehicle (MOKV) Begins to Take Shape

PAST its prime:


CURRENT sensation:


FUTURE hope:
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:57pm On Oct 23, 2016
Ka-226K (naval version)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:08pm On Oct 23, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:16pm On Oct 23, 2016
The 105mm ultra-light gun-GARUDA by Bharat Forge in collaboration with mandus

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:20pm On Oct 23, 2016
Indian CT ops, the terrorists r armed heavily with made in china weapons/............

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 2:49am On Oct 24, 2016
nemesis2u:
Indian CT ops, the terrorists r armed heavily with made in china weapons/............
they r poorly equipped,why not have bullet proof vest or NVG ?
China made weapons are everywhere just like Russia made weapons in Syria ,Iraq,Afghan,Pakistan,South America,Africa...almost every battlefields,sometimes both sides.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:13am On Oct 24, 2016
chinese8107:

they r poorly equipped,why not have bullet proof vest or NVG ?
China made weapons are everywhere just like Russia made weapons in Syria ,Iraq,Afghan,Pakistan,South America,Africa...almost every battlefields,sometimes both sides.


u urself answered it with ur question
poor country will be equipped with poor weapons. wink

as for chinese weapons in the hands of terrorist in india this is something i dont expect u to understand or the shenanigans behind it.


as for wearing armor u got to ask the troops , they r issued with these but , whether they don it or not its their personal decision.

as for NVG yeah in broad daylight out in the open u got to be nuts grin

as for weapons i see MP4 for CQB , as per the SOP they used , i am sure they deemed it suited for the task.

these forces r troops who r trained in desert , high altitudes , jungles , cold freezing regions , marshes etc and then on basis of their performance in duty in active combat, they r inducted to CT units and trained again.

very few countries can rival these troops in CT COIN OPS

most of the times,
deadly weapons dont make a soldier, its the soldier who make the weapons deadly grin but i guess u never knew that

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:52am On Oct 24, 2016
GARUDS pic 1

SPG pic 2

BLACK CATS pic 3

MARCOS pic 4

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 3:54am On Oct 24, 2016
China new MRAP

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:02am On Oct 24, 2016
nemesis2u:




most of the times,
deadly weapons dont make a soldier, its the soldier who make the weapons deadly grin but i guess u never knew that

right . then why not India use INSAS rifle for CTO but purchase from other countrys. recent India is invite bids 180000 units of 7.62 x 51 NATO rifles in international market.

HK417 is a good option, the problem is price

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:17am On Oct 24, 2016
chinese8107:


right . then why not India use INSAS rifle for CTO but purchase from other countrys. recent India is aquiring 7.62 x 51 NATO rifles in international market.

HK417 is a good option, the problem is price

lol u and indian media are like........birds of the same flock


India is acquiring 7.62 x 51 NATO rifles for its RR troops who r tasked with CT ops.

army uses 5.56mm during conventional wars so that the bullets injure and not kill so that the enemy is burdened with managing the injured troops.

in CT ops 5.56mm is not effective , when every shot must kill the terrorists.

INSAS and its variants will always be there for the conventional army.

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:30am On Oct 24, 2016
nemesis2u:


lol u and indian media are like........birds of the same flock


India is acquiring 7.62 x 51 NATO rifles for its RR troops who r tasked with CT ops.

army uses 5.56mm during conventional wars so that the bullets injure and not kill so that the enemy is burdened with managing the injured troops.

in CT ops 5.56mm is not effective , when every shot must kill the terrorists.

INSAS and its variants will always be there for the conventional army.




the reason is INSAS not satisfied on it's accuracy and reliablity especially in wildly open arera like plateaus.

but if not for special force or frontline troops It's OK.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 5:46am On Oct 24, 2016
USS Ronald Reagan says hi. Meanwhile I heard Russian carrier is so stealthy that Her majesty ships can't even acquire her visually. grin grin I'll post a pics soon.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 5:51am On Oct 24, 2016
The great Admiral cheesy

3 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:36am On Oct 24, 2016
chinese8107:


the reason is INSAS not satisfied on it's accuracy and reliablity especially in wildly open arera like plateaus.

but if not for special force or frontline troops It's OK.

do u ever bother to think/research before u type.

INSAS Rifle was designed and developed by DRDO based on Qualitative Requirements (QRs) set in 1982 and met all QR parameters and inducted into Service in 1996. The Rifle has been fully exploited since then including OP Vijay in 1999. Subsequent to OP Vijay (kargil war) in sub zero temperatures , the following problems were observed:

(a) Loosening of flash eliminator

(b) Loosening of Piece guide

(c) Upper Hand Guard requirement

(d) Additional safety in firing mechanism

(e) Grenade sight requirement

(f) Improved Lever Locking Gas Cylinder

DRDO & Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) jointly took up product improvement program based on the above feedback received from User. Necessary improvements were carried out and introduced in the Improved Rifle as Rifle Mark 1B1 in 2001.

DRDO has developed the INSAS weapon system at a cost of Rs. 3.50 Cr. This is less than 1 million dollars shocked

based on the experienced gained the following weapons/varient were developed
1.Multi Caliber Individual Weapon System, (MCIWS)
2.KALANTAK carbine
3.AMOGH/MICRO INSAS
4.JVPC/MSMC PDW
5.EXCALIBUR
6.INSAS LMG
7.ASSAULT RIFLE MK1C
8.TRICHY ASSAULT RIFLE
9.GHATAAK
ETC

close to one million INSAS rifles have been built till date .

in 2011 a tender was floated and of them CZ-805, ARX-160, Galil ACE, and Colt Combat Rifle made it to the trial round.Galil ACE and ARX-160 were left in the final competition.however in 2015, the tender was cancelled.

it should interest u that in September 2015, EXCALIBUR had passed the water and mud tests, which four of the foreign rifles in the above tender competition had failed.
the EXCALIBUR will replace the INSAS RIFLES.

the reason is INSAS not satisfied on it's accuracy and reliablity especially in wildly open arera like plateaus.

from were did u conjure this false info.

INSAS never had any complains on accuracy and reliability was not a issue once the improvements were made.

when a country wants to develop a small arms industry , it will face teething problems , need i remind u of the poorly made unreliable Chinese clones in the past , after spending 30 years on developing small arms it is in a better stage today.
US RUSSIA GERMANY have experience of 100 years , they have PEDIGREE , India is trying to build the same.there are no short cuts.

if Indian private sector is allowed to make small arms then it will be a huge leap for Indian small arms industry. the govt companies monopoly must be broken to increase competition and produce world class better products. now it leaves much to be desired.

edit: EXCALBUR has already been inducted into some para military forces. the person on the extreme right is carrying it, with the field glasses .




also the tender for 7.62 x 51mm rifles will also get cancelled mark my words. grin
the MCIWS is being converted to fire 7.62x51mm rounds (the rifle on the right side)

and the rifle on the left side is INSAS 1B1 in its final iteration and the object of ur scorn grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 8:37am On Oct 24, 2016
Russia made MRAP

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 8:42am On Oct 24, 2016
China to unveil new M20 short-range tactical missile system at Zhuhai Airshow 2016


http://defence-blog.com/news/china-to-unveil-new-m20-short-range-tactical-missile-system-at-zhuhai-airshow-2016.html

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 9:54am On Oct 24, 2016
bidexiii:
China to unveil new M20 short-range tactical missile system at Zhuhai Airshow 2016


http://defence-blog.com/news/china-to-unveil-new-m20-short-range-tactical-missile-system-at-zhuhai-airshow-2016.html
SANDF tactical missile system. grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 11:05am On Oct 24, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:06pm On Oct 24, 2016
tdayof:
The great Admiral cheesy

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 12:18pm On Oct 24, 2016
nemesis2u:


do u ever bother to think/research before u type.

INSAS Rifle was designed and developed by DRDO based on Qualitative Requirements (QRs) set in 1982 and met all QR parameters and inducted into Service in 1996. The Rifle has been fully exploited since then including OP Vijay in 1999. Subsequent to OP Vijay (kargil war) in sub zero temperatures , the following problems were observed:

(a) Loosening of flash eliminator

(b) Loosening of Piece guide

(c) Upper Hand Guard requirement

(d) Additional safety in firing mechanism

(e) Grenade sight requirement

(f) Improved Lever Locking Gas Cylinder

DRDO & Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) jointly took up product improvement program based on the above feedback received from User. Necessary improvements were carried out and introduced in the Improved Rifle as Rifle Mark 1B1 in 2001.

DRDO has developed the INSAS weapon system at a cost of Rs. 3.50 Cr. This is less than 1 million dollars shocked

based on the experienced gained the following weapons/varient were developed
1.Multi Caliber Individual Weapon System, (MCIWS)
2.KALANTAK carbine
3.AMOGH/MICRO INSAS
4.JVPC/MSMC PDW
5.EXCALIBUR
6.INSAS LMG
7.ASSAULT RIFLE MK1C
8.TRICHY ASSAULT RIFLE
9.GHATAAK
ETC

close to one million INSAS rifles have been built till date .

in 2011 a tender was floated and of them CZ-805, ARX-160, Galil ACE, and Colt Combat Rifle made it to the trial round.Galil ACE and ARX-160 were left in the final competition.however in 2015, the tender was cancelled.

it should interest u that in September 2015, EXCALIBUR had passed the water and mud tests, which four of the foreign rifles in the above tender competition had failed.
the EXCALIBUR will replace the INSAS RIFLES.



from were did u conjure this false info.

INSAS never had any complains on accuracy and reliability was not a issue once the improvements were made.

when a country wants to develop a small arms industry , it will face teething problems , need i remind u of the poorly made unreliable Chinese clones in the past , after spending 30 years on developing small arms it is in a better stage today.
US RUSSIA GERMANY have experience of 100 years , they have PEDIGREE , India is trying to build the same.there are no short cuts.

if Indian private sector is allowed to make small arms then it will be a huge leap for Indian small arms industry. the govt companies monopoly must be broken to increase competition and produce world class better products. now it leaves much to be desired.

edit: EXCALBUR has already been inducted into some para military forces. the person on the extreme right is carrying it, with the field glasses .




also the tender for 7.62 x 51mm rifles will also get cancelled mark my words. grin
the MCIWS is being converted to fire 7.62x51mm rounds (the rifle on the right side)

and the rifle on the left side is INSAS 1B1 in its final iteration and the object of ur scorn grin

india has been sponsoring neighbering countries seperatists for many years,it should not supprise to see it's own insurgents.

how good is EXCALBUR I can't say,but sure there is no short cut for a country to develop it's own small arms to catch up with TOP players.The materials used,the processing methords & devices and workmanships ect all countribute to the accuary and reliablity of weapons.It's about the whole industry not just one or two companies.The reason China can clone some western or russian weapon is because it has similar or at least not too backward and Full Spectrum indutry that many coutries lack.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 2:09pm On Oct 24, 2016
[quote author=africaken254 post=50466645][/quote]

grin grin

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:04pm On Oct 24, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 5:05pm On Oct 24, 2016
nemesis2u:


do u ever bother to think/research before u type.

INSAS Rifle was designed and developed by DRDO based on Qualitative Requirements (QRs) set in 1982 and met all QR parameters and inducted into Service in 1996. The Rifle has been fully exploited since then including OP Vijay in 1999. Subsequent to OP Vijay (kargil war) in sub zero temperatures , the following problems were observed:

(a) Loosening of flash eliminator

(b) Loosening of Piece guide

(c) Upper Hand Guard requirement

(d) Additional safety in firing mechanism

(e) Grenade sight requirement

(f) Improved Lever Locking Gas Cylinder

DRDO & Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) jointly took up product improvement program based on the above feedback received from User. Necessary improvements were carried out and introduced in the Improved Rifle as Rifle Mark 1B1 in 2001.

DRDO has developed the INSAS weapon system at a cost of Rs. 3.50 Cr. This is less than 1 million dollars shocked

based on the experienced gained the following weapons/varient were developed
1.Multi Caliber Individual Weapon System, (MCIWS)
2.KALANTAK carbine
3.AMOGH/MICRO INSAS
4.JVPC/MSMC PDW
5.EXCALIBUR
6.INSAS LMG
7.ASSAULT RIFLE MK1C
8.TRICHY ASSAULT RIFLE
9.GHATAAK
ETC

close to one million INSAS rifles have been built till date .

in 2011 a tender was floated and of them CZ-805, ARX-160, Galil ACE, and Colt Combat Rifle made it to the trial round.Galil ACE and ARX-160 were left in the final competition.however in 2015, the tender was cancelled.

it should interest u that in September 2015, EXCALIBUR had passed the water and mud tests, which four of the foreign rifles in the above tender competition had failed.
the EXCALIBUR will replace the INSAS RIFLES.



from were did u conjure this false info.

INSAS never had any complains on accuracy and reliability was not a issue once the improvements were made.

when a country wants to develop a small arms industry , it will face teething problems , need i remind u of the poorly made unreliable Chinese clones in the past , after spending 30 years on developing small arms it is in a better stage today.
US RUSSIA GERMANY have experience of 100 years , they have PEDIGREE , India is trying to build the same.there are no short cuts.

if Indian private sector is allowed to make small arms then it will be a huge leap for Indian small arms industry. the govt companies monopoly must be broken to increase competition and produce world class better products. now it leaves much to be desired.

edit: EXCALBUR has already been inducted into some para military forces. the person on the extreme right is carrying it, with the field glasses .




also the tender for 7.62 x 51mm rifles will also get cancelled mark my words. grin
the MCIWS is being converted to fire 7.62x51mm rounds (the rifle on the right side)

and the rifle on the left side is INSAS 1B1 in its final iteration and the object of ur scorn grin
any specs of Excalibur rifle

(1) (2) (3) ... (62) (63) (64) (65) (66) (67) (68) ... (668) (Reply)

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live / American Politics Thread: Trump Is President-Elect! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 87
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.