Stats: 3,186,935 members, 7,931,244 topics. Date: Sunday, 25 August 2024 at 07:55 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins (14028 Views)
Atheist Richard Dawkins: Getting Rid Of God Would Make World Less Moral / Crowd Laughs Hysterically As Richard Dawkins Flounder With Meaning Of Nothing / Christians, Why Do You Hate Richard Dawkins this much? (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Deicide: 7:52pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
naijadeyhia:my job is done here and besides am not a fan of Richard dawkin ![]() |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by raphieMontella: 7:54pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
naijadeyhia:clean wetin? Seems richard dawkins scares shvt outta you... Right? |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Edenoscar(m): 7:55pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
You guys are more obsessed with dawkins than atheist are,when was the last time dawkins had a debate on the existence of God. I wont be suprised if by tomorrow they create a thread on the logical fallacies by johnydon and plaetton |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by raphieMontella: 7:56pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
naijadeyhia:william craig that his claims has been thrashed? |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Nobody: 7:57pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
Deicide: Who employed you that made your job done here? Oh so suddenly you are not a fan of Richard Dawkins? Chai see how you lot are quick to throw him under the bus. He it was that brought a lot of you to the limelight. Much of your arguments and defenses were formulated fallaciously by him and you all parade it like its an authority. See as una dey disown the guy. So whose atheistic bus are you going to jump into next let me dissect that one too. |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Nobody: 7:58pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
raphieMontella: You wish! Please focus on the OP and do not derail. I was bored so decided to use him for entertainment hence this thread. |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by KingEbukasBlog(m): 7:59pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
Seun: Please point them out let's scrutinize them . Atheists and this naughty habit of ridiculing theist's arguments without proving that those arguments are indeed absurd - its an appeal to stone fallacy and shows nothing but hebetude . 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Nobody: 8:00pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
raphieMontella: Who thrashed them? You guys can lie for atheism. William Craig spanked Harris like there was no tomorrow. In fact he spanked him like he gave birth to him. Please focus on the OP. All this your distractions are not needed. 4 Likes 3 Shares |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by KingEbukasBlog(m): 8:10pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
Edenoscar: Done that https://www.nairaland.com/3381123/atheism-logical-fallacies-here-10#49814525 Here is seun's https://www.nairaland.com/3381123/atheism-logical-fallacies-here-10#49814533 4 Likes 3 Shares |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Nobody: 8:17pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
KingEbukasBlog: Hahahahaha Ebuka Nwanne you saw into the future when you dropped that thread. 1 Like |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by KingEbukasBlog(m): 8:25pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
CoolUsername: Time is part of our dimension , same with space and matter . God who is eternal "dwells" in a transcendent realm which is timeless . Time is irrelevant or more appropriately non existent to someone who has always existed or has no beginning . The beginning of this universe indicates the beginning of time thus God as an eternal being transcends time . To God , time is a limitation , and contradicts His nature as an infinite and immutable being . 1 Like |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by KingEbukasBlog(m): 8:28pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
naijadeyhia: They don't know ![]() |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Edenoscar(m): 8:29pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
naijadeyhia:Who spanked who? Your lies can move mount everest to my backyard |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Edenoscar(m): 8:32pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
KingEbukasBlog:This rubbish again. Smh |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Nobody: 8:36pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
Edenoscar: You need proof? I would have loved to give it to you but that would mean derailing this thread with my own hands so kindly focus on the thread |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by KingEbukasBlog(m): 8:39pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
1 Like 1 Share |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Edenoscar(m): 9:03pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
naijadeyhia: What thread? You mean this copy and paste that shows how obsessed you are with dawkins,am sure you're part of those that flood him with hate mails |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Edenoscar(m): 9:07pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
KingEbukasBlog: Still rubbish bro, still rubbish |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by jonbellion(m): 9:11pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
Edenoscar:I tire l. In the end it all boils down to special pleading And why are thiests so obsessed with Richard Dawkins anyway ![]() Do you forget kirk Cameron's ultimate strawman and personal incredulity combined?? Two fallacies in one The New athiest debates has died down recently so I don't know what this is all about Aaaanway behold!! Kirk camerons crocuduck And btw Richard Dawkins is not the athiest high priest
|
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Nobody: 9:16pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
Edenoscar: I guess my first response missed you by inches. I have no time for Dawkins neither have i opened any thread to his name. This is my way of entertaining myself with all his crass fallacies. I am sure it entertained you too otherwise you wouldnt be trying to shoot it down. ![]() ![]() 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by KingEbukasBlog(m): 9:18pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
Edenoscar: Appeal to stone fallacy bro , appeal to stone fallacy |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Nobody: 9:23pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
1 Like 2 Shares |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by CoolUsername: 10:00pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
KingEbukasBlog: Doesn't that mean that complexity doesn't need a creator? |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by KingEbukasBlog(m): 10:06pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
CoolUsername: If something has a cause and a beginning then it must have a creator . God -an appellation of the creator- is the reason for the existence of everything . Anytime an atheist ask this question he has snowflakes in mind as if snowflakes are not part of nature ![]() 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Nobody: 10:08pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
KingEbukasBlog: ![]() ![]() 3 Likes 1 Share |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by KingEbukasBlog(m): 10:11pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by modusOperandi2: 10:12pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
Seun:Interesting seeing the champion of nairaland atheists on the back foot. Nietzsche, you are better than this. |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by jonbellion(m): 10:14pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
KingEbukasBlog:this is just special pleading Not to mention if it wasn't it would be an infinite regress In the end nobody wins really |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by KingEbukasBlog(m): 10:18pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
jonbellion: God is eternal - this precludes infinite regress . I understand that God is eternal and incorporeal . Please show me how I committed special pleading ![]() |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by jonbellion(m): 10:59pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
KingEbukasBlog:everything requires a cause expect God. Cuz he's eternal. Well that's fine and dandy but why must it be God .. The universe has a beginning true but what if nature existed eternally in one form or another. This is basically special pleading for nature too. Not to mention you're basically arguing for the God you have in mind which is off point a non sequitor if I may add Why must it be Yahweh? Why can't it be the diestic version of God Why not Allah? Or Zeus or Ra or a cosmic force That Yahweh dude doesn't even know jack about his supposed creation |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by KingEbukasBlog(m): 11:16pm On Nov 16, 2016 |
jonbellion: It becomes special pleading if it has been proven that everything that exists in whatever reality or realm requires a cause and I gave God as an exception because of my belief in Him . And my statement was "if something has a cause and a beginning it must have a creator" . God has no cause or a beginning so there was no special pleading anywhere . The universe cannot be eternal - every observational data points to it having a beginning and a cause . Gods in various religions are simply variants of The Supreme Being each creating different concepts of the Nature of This Being . So its One God , myriads of concepts in different religions. So which religion or theological/philosophical proposition portrays the true Nature of the Supreme Being - that's an entirely different argument . The Deistic God ? You mean an Impersonal God ? An Impersonal God is another variant of the Supreme Being whereby an attribute of It called immanence is rejected by people who subscribe to it . Plus it has to be a Supreme Being because It is a separate conscious entity . A separate conscious entity , the Supreme Being , can possess the mind , intelligence , power , knowledge which are required to create and design with a purpose . |
Re: The Logical Fallacies Of Richard Dawkins by Nobody: 6:43am On Nov 17, 2016 |
The dawkins delusion |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (Reply)
Lord Of The Sabbath-what Did Jesus Mean Here? / Difference Between Working For God And Working For Church / Who Is Esther ?
Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 42 |