Ubenedictus:
I am suprised at the comment above, are u a new xtian? the bible is filled with people killing in the name of God, once isreal left egypt they began a whole series of war in God's name, God ordered saul to wipe out d amalekites AKA genocide, the laws in d bible proscribe death for blasphemy, idolatry, heresy, adultery... all these killings are there in d bible. only a jjc in xtianity will revolt when he hears that sumtin deserves death.

In the gospel of Jesus Christ, He never commanded any one to kill in Jesus Name. I challenge you to show me..chapter what verse what in the new testament dispensation which we are in now (leave the old testament alone for now).

Ubenedictus:
This is what Jesus say a heretic deserves; Matthew 18:6 International Version "If anyone causes one of these little ones--
those who believe in me--to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.'

This is what God commanded about it; (From Deuteronomy 13 NIV) "If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you... and he says, 'Let us follow other gods'... That prophet or dreamer must be put to death... You must purge the evil from among you....

what heresy deserves is death according to d bible, Jesus said it would be even better 4 d heretic if he was drowned.

You are not the judge of the herertic. Jesus said "it would be better..." He did not say you should become the judge. The old testament said many things that are not in force nowin the new testatment. Why should Roman Catholicism selectively pick what will allow the murder of its critics and not apply the rest of the old testament? Its hypocrisy my dear.

Ubenedictus:
so if u see a bad church leader it is because God allows him to be there.

Why would God set out to defeat His own purpose by installing bad church leaders in His church? Leaders may have their personal idiosyncracies but not to the point of becoming outrightly bad people. Jesus wants His kingdom to stand. He cannot do things to defeat His own purpose. He did not die that death on the cross for nothing my dear.

I know your mindset, if you had your way, you, and I mean you Ubenedictus, would kill me and all others who oppose Roman Catholicism. Its alright. I hope you see it and repent before its too late.

sisterme how market na? I thought clinton would be usa last president

kingcity:
sisterme how market na? I thought clinton would usa last president

lolz

Fear monger number 1 how far with your fake predictions

Of concern to us now is vision 6 and 7. As things are going now, vision 6 will be fulfilled as from January 20th 2017, when Hillary Clinton takes office

Deluded Christians

Lol they don Bleep up again

SisterMe:
....Outgoing President Barack Obama had maintained a policy of Russian appeasement, mainly to avoid clashing with Russia. From the foregoing and since Hillary Clinton has determined to alter the status quo by directly confronting Russia on all fronts, it becomes evident why we believe she will be the last US president: considering also how her inauguration in January 2017 is in line with other prophecies of the end time. As we would always say, we are human and could be wrong in our anticipations of the timing of events that are to be or even some of the events themselves. So we encourage that we go on living as if the world will not end in many years to come, but live as though Christ will return any moment.

;DD
Deluded christians, the only good thing about trump winning is that your prophecies were all wrong.

And if you asked her before she'll say its holy spirit guidance.
hopefullandlord hardmirror decide seun
Have you seen this prophecy

Lennycool:

;DD
Deluded christians, the only good thing about trump winning is that your prophecies were all wrong.

And if you asked her before she'll say its holy spirit guidance.
hopefullandlord hardmirror decide seun
Have you seen this prophecy

funny enough it's all the fundamental christians that voted for trump and would benefit from this presidency more I'm not even surprised.
- they all hate Muslims
-They all hate gays
-mysagony(discriminate against women- Paul even did so in the bible
They al think global warming is a hoax
-mike pence vice president is a fucking homophobe who thinks creationism should be thought in science class
Trump’s policies are not going to help anyone but straight, Christian white men
Remind me how christians are persecuted again

jonbellion:
funny enough it's all the fundamental christians that voted for trump and would benefit from this presidency more I'm not even surprised.
- they all hate Muslims
-They all hate gays
-mysagony(discriminate against women- Paul even did so in the bible
They al think global warming is a hoax
-mike pence vice president is a fucking homophobe who thinks creationism should be thought in science class
Trump’s policies are not going to help anyone but straight, Christian white men
Remind me how christians are persecuted again

Muslims hate gays too in a more arrogant manner, that "global warming is a hoax" stuff has nothing to do with religion, some believe it's so, other don't, it's more about an economic issue. Btw, not every one voted based on religion, and for those that did so, it was because the other candidate seemed threatening to their religion, so why wouldn't they vote to oppose it, Fyi hillary is leading in popular vote, so quit all these christian association stuff, look at the exit polls and other analysis, you'd know why the results came out like that, and please don't try to deny Christians being persecuted.

Lennycool:

;DD
Deluded christians, the only good thing about trump winning is that your prophecies were all wrong.

And if you asked her before she'll say its holy spirit guidance.
hopefullandlord hardmirror decide seun
Have you seen this prophecy

Well well I believed Hillary was the woman that would rule the US, obviously I was wrong about that, but remeber, I stressed all along that a woman is coming to rule the US, if its not Hillary this time, someone else is coming. You can look through my posts to see where I said that. I never prophesied, did I? I just believed it was the time..show me where I prophesied that God told me Hillary would win- I double dare you.

kingcity:
sisterme how market na? I thought clinton would be usa last president

Yes, I believed that she would win ,and if she did, she would be the last. She did not win. So, A WOMAN PRESIDENT is still to come..

SisterMe:


Well well I believed Hillary was the woman that would rule the US, obviously I was wrong about that, but remeber, I stressed all along that a woman is coming to rule the US, if its not Hillary this time, someone else is coming. You can look through my posts to see where I said that. I never prophesied, did I? I just believed it was the time..show me where I prophesied that God told me Hillary would win- I double dare you.

Hahahaha
You clearly stated that Hillary would be the last US president, and now that your prophecy is wrong your now saying it will be a woman.
Was it the holy spirit that gave you and TB Joshua such wrong prophecies?

SisterMe:


Why would God set out to defeat His own purpose by installing bad church leaders in His church? Leaders may have their personal idiosyncracies but not to the point of becoming outrightly bad people. Jesus wants His kingdom to stand. He cannot do things to defeat His own purpose. He did not die that death on the cross for nothing my dear.

I know your mindset, if you had your way, you, and I mean you Ubenedictus, would kill me and all others who oppose Roman Catholicism. Its alright. I hope you see it and repent before its too late.

God's purposes are insearchable, he allowed bad leaders in isreal, allowed false prophet to rise up in d church, he allows many things. u can question him. besides i'm pretty sure there are bad leader in ur church.

SisterMe:


You are not the judge of the herertic. Jesus said "it would be better..." He did not say you should become the judge. The old testament said many things that are not in force nowin the new testatment. Why should Roman Catholicism selectively pick what will allow the murder of its critics and not apply the rest of the old testament? Its hypocrisy my dear.

D church historically didnt execute heretics, that is d work of d state, d church only inquires if d person is a heretic. the execution and judgement belongs to the state. i simply showed u dat passages to show u there is biblical good precedent to condemn an heretic. if u disagree with those laws that is ur cup of tea. maybe u think d law of God is unjust.

SisterMe:


In the gospel of Jesus Christ, He never commanded any one to kill in Jesus Name. I challenge you to show me..chapter what verse what in the new testament dispensation which we are in now (leave the old testament alone for now).

What passage says it is wrong to punish a heretic.

Ubenedictus:
D church historically didnt execute heretics, that is d work of d state, d church only inquires if d person is a heretic. the execution and judgement belongs to the state. i simply showed u dat passages to show u there is biblical good precedent to condemn an heretic. if u disagree with those laws that is ur cup of tea. maybe u think d law of God is unjust.

The church didnt execute but condemned people to die. Does it matter who actually strikes the blow? It is the "authoriser" that is ultimately responsible.

Ubenedictus:
What passage says it is wrong to punish a heretic.

What passage gives the "church" the right to kill heretic? Even God did not kill Cain who was worse than a heretic - the Bible called him "the son of the evil one".

SisterMe:


What passage gives the "church" the right to kill heretic? Even God did not kill Cain who was worse than a heretic - the Bible called him "the son of the evil one".

the same passage that gives isreal d right to kill an heretic, and d word of Jesus that says d deserves worst than drowning.

and as i explain b4 d church historical didnt kill heretic, d state did, and d state has the power to d so.

SisterMe:




The church didnt execute but condemned people to die. Does it matter who actually strikes the blow? It is the "authoriser" that is ultimately responsible.

D church didnt, d laws of d state did. it seems u are ignorant of these things.

SisterMe:


Well well I believed Hillary was the woman that would rule the US, obviously I was wrong about that, but remeber, I stressed all along that a woman is coming to rule the US, if its not Hillary this time, someone else is coming. You can look through my posts to see where I said that. I never prophesied, did I? I just believed it was the time..show me where I prophesied that God told me Hillary would win- I double dare you.

Hahahahahahaha, you really know how to dribble, you must be Perpetual Nkwocha

SisterMe:


Well well I believed Hillary was the woman that would rule the US, obviously I was wrong about that, but remeber, I stressed all along that a woman is coming to rule the US, if its not Hillary this time, someone else is coming. You can look through my posts to see where I said that. I never prophesied, did I? I just believed it was the time..show me where I prophesied that God told me Hillary would win- I double dare you.

From your dribbling I know you RE A CRIMINAL

Ubenedictus:
the same passage that gives isreal d right to kill an heretic, and d word of Jesus that says d deserves worst than drowning.

and as i explain b4 d church historical didnt kill heretic, d state did, and d state has the power to d so.

Oh yes..the State did...and the laws of the state were drawn up under whose influence? the church of course..so there's no passing the buck here..

Pidgin2:


Hahahahahahaha, you really know how to dribble, you must be Perpetual Nkwocha

No dribbling here, I have simply stated the facts as they transpired.. The facts stand to be proven untrue..

PaulIdu:


From your dribbling I know you RE A CRIMINAL

Criminal ke, I talk lie? post the lie make I see..

SisterMe:


Criminal ke, I talk lie? post the lie make I see..

You too get scope for hand and mouth.

PaulIdu:


You too get scope for hand and mouth.

Ha ha, you make me laugh. A suspected criminal is innocent until proven guilty with available evidence. In the absence of credible evidence, then you have made a false accusation..an offence punishable by law.

SisterMe:


Oh yes..the State did...and the laws of the state were drawn up under whose influence? the church of course..so there's no passing the buck here..

The state draws it law from many places, sometimes from d bible other times from d voice of the people, d important issue is that d law isnt unjust and d punishment is deserving. It isnt passing d buck. The state has d power to put sum1 to death.

Sisterme I hail o