adepeter26:

Just forget that guy my gee...

KingEbukasBlog:


You are the one who should provide proof that Mark had professed atheism on his facebook page not me .

Since you became an atheist , you stopped being logical .

Well I mean its expected .

Ranchhoddas:
Na the main thing be that I dey tell you? He's probably the only person on the planet making this argument. Na to ignore am sure pass.

Ranchhoddas:
Na the main thing be that I dey tell you? He's probably the only person on the planet making this argument. Na to ignore am sure pass.

KingEbukasBlog:
Dear friends and lovers of God , this is only proof that atheists will accept anything that appeals to them without questioning it .

They are gullible , uncritical and only purport themselves as rational people .

Its all fake .

And this thread proves it .

KingEbukasBlog:


You are the one who should provide proof that Mark had professed atheism on his facebook page not me .

Since you became an atheist , you stopped being logical .

Well I mean its expected .

adepeter26:

This is what i ve come to observe about KingEbukasBlog.

Everybody: James is Dead.
KingEbuks: No.
Everybody: but here is an obituary, confirming he's dead na.
Knigebuks: Until James himself says/proofs he's dead

KingEbukasBlog:


I'm logical and I'm not credulous unlike you people .

Atheists say question everything but they won't question wall's street claim that Mark considers himself an atheist with no proof . They readily gorged on it with no proof whatsoever because they badly want Mark Zuckerberg to be an atheist .

BULLSHIIT

I'm still waiting for evidence

KingEbukasBlog:


I'm logical and I'm not credulous unlike you people .

Atheists say question everything but they won't question wall's street claim that Mark considers himself an atheist with no proof . They readily gorged on it with no proof whatsoever because they badly want Mark Zuckerberg to be an atheist .

BULLSHIIT

I'm still waiting for evidence

felixomor:


Of course.

KingEbukasBlog:


I'm not surprised. Very bright guy who has now reduced himself to someone who makes illogical statements , arguments suffused with fallacies .

That's what atheism can do to someone

Ranchhoddas:
Why did you not question it before Christmas? And how exactly do you expect anyone to bring proof of what was on his profile formerly?

felixomor:


As in eh.
I used to have hope in him.
Not until he told me Israel was an arbitrary location.

Then, i increased the prayer for him.

KingEbukasBlog:


I'm logical and I'm not credulous unlike you people .

Atheists say question everything but they won't question wall's street claim that Mark considers himself an atheist with no proof . They readily gorged on it with no proof whatsoever because they badly want Mark Zuckerberg to be an atheist .

BULLSHIIT

I'm still waiting for evidence

noillebnoj:
lemme tell you a secret....
Come closer ....
"NOBODY GIVES A CRAP!"

KingEbukasBlog:


I took time to review Mark's statement where he rejected atheism .

And I had an epiphany - Mark was never an atheist

And I ransacked the internet for proof that he was an atheist before that tendentious response and I found no dearth of evidence that the guy is an atheist .

But I'm not obdurate about my stance , I can change it when I see cogent evidence that he was an atheist . Simple .

Ranchhoddas:
#InTywinLannister's voice# Any man who must say 'I am logical' is not truly logical'.

KingEbukasBlog:


Again , I explained to you how you gave a crap about this topical issue .

And if nobody gives a crap , why did Seun react in that manner and why did atheists create threads to reassure themselves that Mark lied and that he is still an atheist while apparently he never was .

noillebnoj:
don't you have anything better to do
You're studying computer science
Trivial things like this shouldn't take much of your time
And you do realise zuckerberg could have edited his wikipedia page if he found the need too
Astrophysicist Neil Degrasse Tyson did it when misinformation was been spread about him being athiest
You don't have a point

felixomor:


That guy is on his 3rd or 4th moniker in one week.
All on top of Zuckenberg issue.

Hahaha, and he says no one gives a crap.

#Jokes

KingEbukasBlog:


Assumptions without proof

Now I you have to provide proof that

Mark Zuckerberg must have edited his Wikipedia page

When will you stop embarrassing yourself , when ? Just when ?

felixomor:


That guy is on his 3rd or 4th moniker in one week.
All on top of Zuckenberg issue.

Hahaha, and he says no one gives a crap.

#Jokes

noillebnoj:
smh

KingEbukasBlog:


Lmaoo !!

Exactly ! He does not care yet he is still on Mark Zuckerberg's matter with the third moniker

Nobody gives a crap indeed .

They are just frustrated that's all .

noillebnoj:
are you smoking ass fart
Read again perhaps more slowly
If mark zuckerberg felt that misinformation was spread about him been athiest he could have edited it himself or cleared the air in which he did none of the above
I gave you an example of agnostic Neil Degrasse Tyson

KingEbukasBlog:


I presented my thoughts , what are your objections please


Let's scrutinize this :

Mark Zuckerberg's initial post was : "Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah from Priscilla, Max, Beast and me!"

Then his response to a Facebook user when asked if he were an atheist : "No. I was raised jewish and then I went through a period where I questioned things, but now I believe religion is very important."

He mentions Judaism as the religion he was raised in , then states clearly that he went through a period where he questions things but now he believes religion is very important .

The most logical conclusion is that Mark Zuckerberg has reverted to Judaism . Hannukkah and Christmas are celebrated on the same day . His wife is a Buddhist and that could have changed his perception of religion .

I would have thought of him as a Buddhist assuming his response when asked if he were an atheist was : "Yes , I was raised jewish and then I went through a period where I questioned things, but now I believe religion is very important" because Buddhism is indifferent towards the belief in God(s) and his wife may have persuaded him to become one .

Mark isn't a pantheist because pantheism is associated with very few religions like in African traditional religions and in Confucianism which he does not adhere to and Modern Pantheism is irreligious in nature and not even popular . He must have questioned pantheism too though less likely "then I went through a period where I questioned things.... " .

Like I said earlier , the most logical conclusion is the Mark Zuckerberg has reverted to Judaism , the religion he was brought up in .

@ JackBizzle

KingEbukasBlog:


There are thousand and one reasons why Mark Zuckerberg couldn't care less whether he is regarded as an atheist or not . Mr Computer Science you didn't think of this ba

Because Neil acted this way , then Mark should have done the same ?

Logic ... oh logic

chai .. chai ...

Its apparent you guys desperately want Mark to be an atheist for the reasons I gave before , on the second page .

KingEbukasBlog:


There are thousand and one reasons why Mark Zuckerberg couldn't care less whether he is regarded as an atheist or not . Mr Computer Science you didn't think of this ba

Because Neil acted this way , then Mark should have done the same ?

Logic ... oh logic

chai .. chai ...

Its apparent you guys desperately want Mark to be an atheist for the reasons I gave before , on the second page .

KingEbukasBlog:


There are thousand and one reasons why Mark Zuckerberg couldn't care less whether he is regarded as an atheist or not . Mr Computer Science you didn't think of this ba

Because Neil acted this way , then Mark should have done the same ?

Logic ... oh logic

chai .. chai ...

Its apparent you guys desperately want Mark to be an atheist for the reasons I gave before , on the second page .

realmindz:

.The powerful ones, the elites see religion as a necessary tool..

KingEbukasBlog:


Communism and its variants that are intolerant of religious practices counter example that prove this wrong .

If religion were a necessary tool to control the masses , then totalitarian governments like North Korea's and Stalin's would have used religion to inveigle the masses to conform to their goals and objectives instead they sought to abolish religion .