Stats: 3,183,716 members, 7,921,561 topics. Date: Thursday, 15 August 2024 at 08:38 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) (59256 Views)
Olumba Olumba Disagrees With Christians On Death, Resurrection Of Jesus Christ / Shiite Muslims In Jos Celebrate Christmas In A Church With Christians Photos / Shiite Members Storm Church In Jos, Celebrate Pastor's 50th Birthday With Him (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by ShiaMuslim: 10:23am On Dec 30, 2016 |
Demmzy15: logical fallacy! you are stupid. disprove it. so you throw claims and others should disprove it. the burden of proof lies upon the one who makes the claim. have you ever heard of that? Japanese Attacks on (Superior) Enemy Military Targets: Kamikaze (神風 ?, [kamikaꜜze] ( listen); "divine wind" or "spirit wind" ), officially Tokubetsu Kōgekitai (特別攻撃隊 "Special Attack Unit" ?), abbreviated as Tokkō Tai (特攻隊 ?), and used as a verb as Tokkō (特攻 "special attack" ?), were suicide attacks by military aviators from the Empire of Japan against Allied naval vessels ...These attacks, which began in October 1944, followed several critical military defeats for the Japanese. They had long since lost aerial dominance due to outdated aircraft and the loss of experienced pilots. Kamikaze - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamikaze
carry arms, and flood syria from all over the world to fight your so called "jihad" and see if bashar al-assad will not turn you into pests he will crush. go fight a proxy sectarian war in Syria and you reap what you sow. it is the choice your people made to fight. when they carry arms against the government of a sovereign nation that is secular and never for once persecuted ANYONE based on religion or sect, do not complain and feign "civilians" when they get dealt with.
do you condemn the suicide bombings by Wahhabi ISIS that targets Shia civilians in Iraq and Christians in Syria, Egypt, Nigeria and elsewhere? it is a direct yes or no. your (scholars) condemn "suicide bombings" on tv for the cameras while your people do it all over the world, and you do not condemn them targeting civilians of other faiths. hypocrisy! so it is a simple yes or no. then we shall see if Wahhabi clerics truly oppose the targeting of Shia civilians and Christians and people of other faiths. remember: the burden of proof lies upon the one who makes the claim. for example, i claimed that Egypt banned the literature and hate writings of Ibn Taymiyyah. here is the proof. a credible news report. "Egypt bans Salafi books from mosques" https://muslimvillage.com/2015/06/28/83307/egypt-bans-salafi-books-from-mosques/ Jordan under pressure to ban Ibn Taymiyyah's books https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/news/2015/6/10/jordan-under-pressure-to-ban-ibn-taymiyyahs-books another example, Ibn Taymiyyah inspires Wahhabi AKA Salafist ISIS. here is a Reuters article to that direction: The three powerful scholars fueling Islamic State’s hate so keep claiming it is Shia Iran that is behind Wahhabi alqaeda and its bas.tard offspring because someone claims so. the burden of proof is upon you and the one, anyone, who makes the claim. the founder of alqaeda (bin laden) is from wahhabi saudi. his deputy from Sunni Egypt and he is Salafist inspired by the likes of Sayyid Kutb,Hassan al-Banna, founder of the (Salafist) Egyptian Muslim brotherhood that was deposed by Sisi. |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by ShiaMuslim: 10:36am On Dec 30, 2016 |
Egypt to remove books of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Baz and Ibn Uthaymeen from all mosques The Egyptian Ministry of Religious Endowments have launched a campaign to remove the books of scholars that belong to the Salafi movement from all mosques in Egypt. Names of scholars whose books are to be removed or confiscated:- – Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab – Imam Ibn Taymiyyah – Sheikh Ibn Baz – Sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen – Sheikh Abu Ishaq al-Huweini – Sheikh Mohamed Hussein Yacoub – Sheikh Mohammed Hassan They have already confiscated 7000 books and CDs from mosque libraries in Cairo, Alexandria and Giza. The authors of these materials include: – Sheikh Wagdi al-Ghoneim – Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi – Sheikh Muhammad al-Maqsood – Yasser al-Burhami – Sheikh Abu Ishaq al-Huweini – Sheikh Mohamed Hussein Yacoub – Sheikh Mohammed Hassan The ministry’s department is currently launching an inspection campaign on mosques and libraries in all provinces, to make sure they are free of any books and media calling for “militancy and extremism”. Source: http://www.doamuslims.org/?p=3861 |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Renaissance2017: 11:07am On Dec 30, 2016 |
Demmzy15:Argh!! No vex bros. Bombing and terrorism bad gaaan..... 1 Like |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by crosbreaka: 11:10am On Dec 30, 2016 |
Renaissance2017: don't mind him jare wahhabism/salafism and terrorism are 5 and 6. no be today. |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by crosbreaka: 11:25am On Dec 30, 2016 |
You Can’t Understand ISIS If You Don’t Know the History of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia 08/27/2014 11:56 am ET | Updated Jun 03, 2016 Alastair Crooke Fmr. MI-6 agent; Author, ‘Resistance: The Essence of Islamic Revolution’ BEIRUT — The dramatic arrival of Da’ish (ISIS) on the stage of Iraq has shocked many in the West. Many have been perplexed — and horrified — by its violence and its evident magnetism for Sunni youth. But more than this, they find Saudi Arabia’s ambivalence in the face of this manifestation both troubling and inexplicable, wondering, “Don’t the Saudis understand that ISIS threatens them, too?” It appears — even now — that Saudi Arabia’s ruling elite is divided. Some applaud that ISIS is fighting Iranian Shiite “fire” with Sunni “fire”; that a new Sunni state is taking shape at the very heart of what they regard as a historical Sunni patrimony; and they are drawn by Da’ish’s strict Salafist ideology. Other Saudis are more fearful, and recall the history of the revolt against Abd-al Aziz by the Wahhabist Ikhwan (Disclaimer: this Ikhwan has nothing to do with the Muslim Brotherhood Ikhwan — please note, all further references hereafter are to the Wahhabist Ikhwan, and not to the Muslim Brotherhood Ikhwan), but which nearly imploded Wahhabism and the al-Saud in the late 1920s. Many Saudis are deeply disturbed by the radical doctrines of Da’ish (ISIS) — and are beginning to question some aspects of Saudi Arabia’s direction and discourse. THE SAUDI DUALITY Saudi Arabia’s internal discord and tensions over ISIS can only be understood by grasping the inherent (and persisting) duality that lies at the core of the Kingdom’s doctrinal makeup and its historical origins. One dominant strand to the Saudi identity pertains directly to Muhammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab (the founder of Wahhabism), and the use to which his radical, exclusionist puritanism was put by Ibn Saud. (The latter was then no more than a minor leader — amongst many — of continually sparring and raiding Bedouin tribes in the baking and desperately poor deserts of the Nejd.) The second strand to this perplexing duality, relates precisely to King Abd-al Aziz’s subsequent shift towards statehood in the 1920s: his curbing of Ikhwani violence (in order to have diplomatic standing as a nation-state with Britain and America); his institutionalization of the original Wahhabist impulse — and the subsequent seizing of the opportunely surging petrodollar spigot in the 1970s, to channel the volatile Ikhwani current away from home towards export — by diffusing a cultural revolution, rather than violent revolution throughout the Muslim world. But this “cultural revolution” was no docile reformism. It was a revolution based on Abd al-Wahhab’s Jacobin-like hatred for the putrescence and deviationism that he perceived all about him — hence his call to purge Islam of all its heresies and idolatries. MUSLIM IMPOSTORS The American author and journalist, Steven Coll, has written how this austere and censorious disciple of the 14th century scholar Ibn Taymiyyah, Abd al-Wahhab, despised “the decorous, arty, tobacco smoking, hashish imbibing, drum pounding Egyptian and Ottoman nobility who travelled across Arabia to pray at Mecca.” In Abd al-Wahhab’s view, these were not Muslims; they were imposters masquerading as Muslims. Nor, indeed, did he find the behavior of local Bedouin Arabs much better. They aggravated Abd al-Wahhab by their honoring of saints, by their erecting of tombstones, and their “superstition” (e.g. revering graves or places that were deemed particularly imbued with the divine). All this behavior, Abd al-Wahhab denounced as bida — forbidden by God. Like Taymiyyah before him, Abd al-Wahhab believed that the period of the Prophet Muhammad’s stay in Medina was the ideal of Muslim society (the “best of times”), to which all Muslims should aspire to emulate (this, essentially, is Salafism). Taymiyyah had declared war on Shi’ism, Sufism and Greek philosophy. He spoke out, too against visiting the grave of the prophet and the celebration of his birthday, declaring that all such behavior represented mere imitation of the Christian worship of Jesus as God (i.e. idolatry). Abd al-Wahhab assimilated all this earlier teaching, stating that “any doubt or hesitation” on the part of a believer in respect to his or her acknowledging this particular interpretation of Islam should “deprive a man of immunity of his property and his life.” One of the main tenets of Abd al-Wahhab’s doctrine has become the key idea of takfir. Under the takfiri doctrine, Abd al-Wahhab and his followers could deem fellow Muslims infidels should they engage in activities that in any way could be said to encroach on the sovereignty of the absolute Authority (that is, the King). Abd al-Wahhab denounced all Muslims who honored the dead, saints, or angels. He held that such sentiments detracted from the complete subservience one must feel towards God, and only God. Wahhabi Islam thus bans any prayer to saints and dead loved ones, pilgrimages to tombs and special mosques, religious festivals celebrating saints, the honoring of the Muslim Prophet Muhammad’s birthday, and even prohibits the use of gravestones when burying the dead. Those who would not conform to this view should be killed, their wives and daughters violated, and their possessions confiscated, he wrote. Abd al-Wahhab demanded conformity — a conformity that was to be demonstrated in physical and tangible ways. He argued that all Muslims must individually pledge their allegiance to a single Muslim leader (a Caliph, if there were one). Those who would not conform to this view should be killed, their wives and daughters violated, and their possessions confiscated, he wrote. The list of apostates meriting death included the Shiite, Sufis and other Muslim denominations, whom Abd al-Wahhab did not consider to be Muslim at all. There is nothing here that separates Wahhabism from ISIS. The rift would emerge only later: from the subsequent institutionalization of Muhammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab’s doctrine of “One Ruler, One Authority, One Mosque” — these three pillars being taken respectively to refer to the Saudi king, the absolute authority of official Wahhabism, and its control of “the word” (i.e. the mosque). It is this rift — the ISIS denial of these three pillars on which the whole of Sunni authority presently rests — makes ISIS, which in all other respects conforms to Wahhabism, a deep threat to Saudi Arabia. BRIEF HISTORY 1741- 1818 Abd al-Wahhab’s advocacy of these ultra radical views inevitably led to his expulsion from his own town — and in 1741, after some wanderings, he found refuge under the protection of Ibn Saud and his tribe. What Ibn Saud perceived in Abd al-Wahhab’s novel teaching was the means to overturn Arab tradition and convention. It was a path to seizing power. Their strategy — like that of ISIS today — was to bring the peoples whom they conquered into submission. They aimed to instill fear. Ibn Saud’s clan, seizing on Abd al-Wahhab’s doctrine, now could do what they always did, which was raiding neighboring villages and robbing them of their possessions. Only now they were doing it not within the ambit of Arab tradition, but rather under the banner of jihad. Ibn Saud and Abd al-Wahhab also reintroduced the idea of martyrdom in the name of jihad, as it granted those martyred immediate entry into paradise. In the beginning, they conquered a few local communities and imposed their rule over them. (The conquered inhabitants were given a limited choice: conversion to Wahhabism or death.) By 1790, the Alliance controlled most of the Arabian Peninsula and repeatedly raided Medina, Syria and Iraq. Their strategy — like that of ISIS today — was to bring the peoples whom they conquered into submission. They aimed to instill fear. In 1801, the Allies attacked the Holy City of Karbala in Iraq. They massacred thousands of Shiites, including women and children. Many Shiite shrines were destroyed, including the shrine of Imam Hussein, the murdered grandson of Prophet Muhammad. A British official, Lieutenant Francis Warden, observing the situation at the time, wrote: “They pillaged the whole of it [Karbala], and plundered the Tomb of Hussein... slaying in the course of the day, with circumstances of peculiar cruelty, above five thousand of the inhabitants ...” Osman Ibn Bishr Najdi, the historian of the first Saudi state, wrote that Ibn Saud committed a massacre in Karbala in 1801. He proudly documented that massacre saying, “we took Karbala and slaughtered and took its people (as slaves), then praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds, and we do not apologize for that and say: ‘And to the unbelievers: the same treatment.’” In 1803, Abdul Aziz then entered the Holy City of Mecca, which surrendered under the impact of terror and panic (the same fate was to befall Medina, too). Abd al-Wahhab’s followers demolished historical monuments and all the tombs and shrines in their midst. By the end, they had destroyed centuries of Islamic architecture near the Grand Mosque. But in November of 1803, a Shiite assassin killed King Abdul Aziz (taking revenge for the massacre at Karbala). His son, Saud bin Abd al Aziz, succeeded him and continued the conquest of Arabia. Ottoman rulers, however, could no longer just sit back and watch as their empire was devoured piece by piece. In 1812, the Ottoman army, composed of Egyptians, pushed the Alliance out from Medina, Jeddah and Mecca. In 1814, Saud bin Abd al Aziz died of fever. His unfortunate son Abdullah bin Saud, however, was taken by the Ottomans to Istanbul, where he was gruesomely executed (a visitor to Istanbul reported seeing him having been humiliated in the streets of Istanbul for three days, then hanged and beheaded, his severed head fired from a canon, and his heart cut out and impaled on his body). In 1815, Wahhabi forces were crushed by the Egyptians (acting on the Ottoman’s behalf) in a decisive battle. In 1818, the Ottomans captured and destroyed the Wahhabi capital of Dariyah. The first Saudi state was no more. The few remaining Wahhabis withdrew into the desert to regroup, and there they remained, quiescent for most of the 19th century. HISTORY RETURNS WITH ISIS It is not hard to understand how the founding of the Islamic State by ISIS in contemporary Iraq might resonate amongst those who recall this history. Indeed, the ethos of 18th century Wahhabism did not just wither in Nejd, but it roared back into life when the Ottoman Empire collapsed amongst the chaos of World War I. The Al Saud — in this 20th century renaissance — were led by the laconic and politically astute Abd-al Aziz, who, on uniting the fractious Bedouin tribes, launched the Saudi “Ikhwan” in the spirit of Abd-al Wahhab’s and Ibn Saud’s earlier fighting proselytisers. The Ikhwan was a reincarnation of the early, fierce, semi-independent vanguard movement of committed armed Wahhabist “moralists” who almost had succeeded in seizing Arabia by the early 1800s. In the same manner as earlier, the Ikhwan again succeeded in capturing Mecca, Medina and Jeddah between 1914 and 1926. Abd-al Aziz, however, began to feel his wider interests to be threatened by the revolutionary “Jacobinism” exhibited by the Ikhwan. The Ikhwan revolted — leading to a civil war that lasted until the 1930s, when the King had them put down: he machine-gunned them. For this king, (Abd-al Aziz), the simple verities of previous decades were eroding. Oil was being discovered in the peninsular. Britain and America were courting Abd-al Aziz, but still were inclined to support Sharif Husain as the only legitimate ruler of Arabia. The Saudis needed to develop a more sophisticated diplomatic posture. So Wahhabism was forcefully changed from a movement of revolutionary jihad and theological takfiri purification, to a movement of conservative social, political, theological, and religious da’wa (Islamic call) and to justifying the institution that upholds loyalty to the royal Saudi family and the King’s absolute power. OIL WEALTH SPREAD WAHHABISM With the advent of the oil bonanza — as the French scholar, Giles Kepel writes, Saudi goals were to “reach out and spread Wahhabism across the Muslim world ... to “Wahhabise” Islam, thereby reducing the “multitude of voices within the religion” to a “single creed” — a movement which would transcend national divisions. Billions of dollars were — and continue to be — invested in this manifestation of soft power. It was this heady mix of billion dollar soft power projection — and the Saudi willingness to manage Sunni Islam both to further America’s interests, as it concomitantly embedded Wahhabism educationally, socially and culturally throughout the lands of Islam — that brought into being a western policy dependency on Saudi Arabia, a dependency that has endured since Abd-al Aziz’s meeting with Roosevelt on a U.S. warship (returning the president from the Yalta Conference) until today. Westerners looked at the Kingdom and their gaze was taken by the wealth; by the apparent modernization; by the professed leadership of the Islamic world. They chose to presume that the Kingdom was bending to the imperatives of modern life — and that the management of Sunni Islam would bend the Kingdom, too, to modern life. On the one hand, ISIS is deeply Wahhabist. On the other hand, it is ultra radical in a different way. It could be seen essentially as a corrective movement to contemporary Wahhabism. But the Saudi Ikhwan approach to Islam did not die in the 1930s. It retreated, but it maintained its hold over parts of the system — hence the duality that we observe today in the Saudi attitude towards ISIS. On the one hand, ISIS is deeply Wahhabist. On the other hand, it is ultra radical in a different way. It could be seen essentially as a corrective movement to contemporary Wahhabism. ISIS is a “post-Medina” movement: it looks to the actions of the first two Caliphs, rather than the Prophet Muhammad himself, as a source of emulation, and it forcefully denies the Saudis’ claim of authority to rule. As the Saudi monarchy blossomed in the oil age into an ever more inflated institution, the appeal of the Ikhwan message gained ground (despite King Faisal’s modernization campaign). The “Ikhwan approach” enjoyed — and still enjoys — the support of many prominent men and women and sheikhs. In a sense, Osama bin Laden was precisely the representative of a late flowering of this Ikhwani approach. Today, ISIS’ undermining of the legitimacy of the King’s legitimacy is not seen to be problematic, but rather a return to the true origins of the Saudi-Wahhab project. In the collaborative management of the region by the Saudis and the West in pursuit of the many western projects (countering socialism, Ba’athism, Nasserism, Soviet and Iranian influence), western politicians have highlighted their chosen reading of Saudi Arabia (wealth, modernization and influence), but they chose to ignore the Wahhabist impulse. After all, the more radical Islamist movements were perceived by Western intelligence services as being more effective in toppling the USSR in Afghanistan — and in combatting out-of-favor Middle Eastern leaders and states. Why should we be surprised then, that from Prince Bandar’s Saudi-Western mandate to manage the insurgency in Syria against President Assad should have emerged a neo-Ikhwan type of violent, fear-inducing vanguard movement: ISIS? And why should we be surprised — knowing a little about Wahhabism — that “moderate” insurgents in Syria would become rarer than a mythical unicorn? Why should we have imagined that radical Wahhabism would create moderates? Or why could we imagine that a doctrine of “One leader, One authority, One mosque: submit to it, or be killed” could ever ultimately lead to moderation or tolerance? Or, perhaps, we never imagined. This article is Part I of Alastair Crooke’s historical analysis of the roots of ISIS and its impact on the future of the Middle East. Read Part II here. Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alastair-crooke/isis-aim-saudi-arabia_b_5748744.html |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Demmzy15(m): 11:41am On Dec 30, 2016 |
ShiaMuslim: ShiaMuslim you're still pouring spit, I'm challenging you to disprove my above points not with emotions but facts. I'm waiting patiently for that! Japanese Attacks on (Superior) Enemy Military Targets: Lmao!!! ![]() 1. Self-flaggelation aka Matam was done by Christians now integrated into Shiism. 2. Running on hot coals was done by Hindus now integrated into Shiism. 3. Incessant wailing and empty chest beatings is done by Jews and currently by our Igbo Brothers ![]() 4. Suicide Bombings was done by Shinto Idol worshipping Japanese, then passed on to Shias who then passed it on to communist PKK who passed it onto Al Qaeda. So you've exposed yourself once more, I hope those who follow you here can see how shallow minded you're. carry arms, and flood syria from all over the world to fight your so called "jihad" and see if bashar al-assad will not turn you into pests he will crush. go fight a proxy sectarian war in Syria and you reap what you sow. it is the choice your people made to fight. I can't go into Syria to fight because it's not my war but the Syrians. All I can do is to pray that Allaah ease their suffering, that's the position of Ahl Sunnah Wa Ja'amah aka Wahabis. But can we say the same for Shi'as? Absolutely no, they've all invaded Syria in their thousands fighting a war which doesn't concern them in any way. In Syria today, the Syrian Amy is largely composed of foreign Shia gangs from Afghanistan(hazara), Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon. These mad men are killing and butchering the Syrians, even ISIS with its known brutality can't be compared with them. As your predecessors, you and the Khawarij are brothers. You've always loved to spill the blood of Muslims, you betray Muslims and kill them and you open your gutter cursed mouth to blame Wahhabism. when they carry arms against the government of a sovereign nation that is secular and never for once persecuted ANYONE based on religion or sect, do not complain and feign "civilians" when they get dealt with. So you're justifying the over 300,000 deaths your brethrens have caused? Hope you know you're invaders! do you condemn the suicide bombings by Wahhabi ISIS that targets Shia civilians in Iraq and Christians in Syria, Egypt, Nigeria and elsewhere? I don't need to condemn anything because I don't support suicide bombings in the first place, click my profile and see if I've ever supported them in the first place. Now do you condemn what Assad and his Shia allies are doing in Syria currently killing thousands? it is a direct yes or no. your (scholars) condemn "suicide bombings" on tv for the cameras while your people do it all over the world, and you do not condemn them targeting civilians of other faiths. hypocrisy! so it is a simple yes or no. then we shall see if Wahhabi clerics truly oppose the targeting of Shia civilians and Christians and people of other faiths. I can see that you're confused, Wahabis have been speaking against terrorism even before they born your father. So you're not the one who's going to put words in my mouth! www.islamagainstextremism.com is a Wahabi website, it's open, visit it yourself! remember: the burden of proof lies upon the one who makes the claim. Proof to me that Iran doesn't support terrorism! for example, i claimed that Egypt banned the literature and hate writings of Ibn Taymiyyah. here is the proof. a credible news report. I said it's not possible Ogbeni, even Iran can't ban ibn Abdul-Wahhab and ibn Taymeeyahs books. We have thousands of Salafees in Egypt and millions in Jordan, in fact Sheikh Al Albani has a Centre he built during his lifetime in Jordan and you're here barking like a dog! another example, Ibn Taymiyyah inspires Wahhabi AKA Salafist ISIS. here is a Reuters article to that direction: http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/10096820 This article exonerates and explains how his fatwaas were taken out of context just as extremists and non-Muslims quote the Qur'an not minding its historical and textual context. so keep claiming it is Shia Iran that is behind Wahhabi alqaeda and its bas.tard offspring because someone claims so. the burden of proof is upon you and the one, anyone, who makes the claim. I'm challenging you to disprove what I stated of Iran supporting terrorism as confirmed by your Shia brethren Yasser Al Habib. the founder of alqaeda (bin laden) is from wahhabi saudi. He's from Yemen but grew up In Sa'udi Arabia, some scholars who went to school with him said he didn't excel well in his studies. Sheikh Khaled Al Ankary said he didn't even pass his religious classes well! his deputy from Sunni Egypt and he is Salafist inspired by the likes of Sayyid Kutb,Hassan al-Banna, founder of the (Salafist) Egyptian Muslim brotherhood that was deposed by Sisi. Ayman Zawahiri is a surgeon who belongs to the Soofee Ikwaanul Muslimeen, he doesn't even have a religious qualifications whatsoever. This is a group which seeks to to bridge the gap between Sunnis and Shi'as by uniting them. This was what created Al Qaeda with the help of Iran to oppose western intervention in the middle-east. So you can see how you're exposing yourself abi? 2 Likes |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Demmzy15(m): 11:44am On Dec 30, 2016 |
crosbreaka:Cc FriendChoice, lexiconkabir this olori pangolo don switch o! I guess he's a Christian with this new moniker! ![]() 1 Like |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Nobody: 11:46am On Dec 30, 2016 |
Demmzy15: lol, shiamuslim doing what he knows how to do best. At-taquiyya! 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Demmzy15(m): 11:51am On Dec 30, 2016 |
Renaissance2017:Yes I know, that's my message and that's what I'm trying to tell that slowpoke. What I meant by Muslims have been using explosives is that during warfares, they've been using it. Like when the Ottoman Empire was at war with the Europeans, they used explosives! 1 Like |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Nobody: 11:58am On Dec 30, 2016 |
Demmzy15: What do you expect from the devils who prefer Ummu Hawiya (Hell) than ummu believers (Aisha r.d ) 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Renaissance2017: 1:31pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
Demmzy15:I got you bro. But those f*cking mofos are f*cking brainwashed and blind folded to differentiate between good and evil, darkness and light, God and satan etc. I rest my case b4 they come for my head. |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Demmzy15(m): 1:41pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
Renaissance2017:Exactly, if you went through my posts and his,you'll see the excuses he uses to justify bombings. He even went as far as to use the Japanese as an excuse, upon all this, he still blames me for violence! 3 Likes |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by crosbreaka: 2:14pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
Demmzy15: inviting your Wahhabi hordes of online fanatics and cracking jokes is no response to an article written by a security expert with historical facts. do not judge the messenger. examine the message. you cannot evidently refute the points in that article, written by a professional security expert and former Mi6 agent. based on the article, you should treat these questions. apparently, there is a rift between Wahhabi militants and the Wahhabi Saudi leadership, both the monarchy and the clerics who descended from ibn abdul wahab and hold the position of saudi grand mufti. the Wahhabi militants are opposed to the monarchy of the Saud family. the clerics belonging to the Saudi institution oppose suicide bombings and support the royal family as a tradition and agreement between the al-saud founding father and the wahhabi founder. why do the two differ on these two points? is it because the clerics loyal to the saud ruling family, who are descended from the founder of wahhabism himself, are more humane thank wahhabi militants opposed to the ruling family? or is it because the clerics fear that the Wahhabi militants could use such cheap warfare as suicide bombing inside the kingdom itself and such tactics could prove deadly to the monarchy since Wahhabis are extremists willing to die/blow up themselves at the slightest go? when Wahhabi militants blow themselves up in Iraq and Syria targeting Shiites and Christians and other non-Muslims like the Yazidis, the Saudi response is either silence at best or ambivalent. when these militants operate in the kingdom, they are labeled outright "misguided terrorists". but when they perform in Syria and Iraq targeting other faiths, they are called "Syrian rebels" for instance. why the ambivalence? the monarchy and Wahhabi militants or Wahhabi terrorists like ISIS however agree on takfirism and takfiri attacks and killings; i.e. faith based killings (of adherents of other faiths). as per the above article, the founders of Saudi Arabia and Wahhabism ransacked Iraqi cities and looted, plundered, r a p e d and took prisoners just as ISIS does today in faith based (takfiri) attacks/killings. and another binding point is BEHEADING. both ISIS and Saudi Arabia behead people (which may include members of minority religious groups, dissidents, atheists, terrorists, drug smugglers etc.). while you are trying to appear so sweet and loving to oppose "suicide bombing" in its entirety (to appeal to us Christians) whether used against superior military targets by weak Muslims (as Sunnis do in Palestine against the occupation of their land by a superior force, instead of submission) or when it is used by Wahhabi militants for takfiri killings. that is all sweet sounding. NOW KINDLY EXPLAIN TO US WHY IS SUICIDE BOMBING IN ITS ENTIRETY (defensive or offensive/takfiri attacks) AN UGLY AND FORBIDDEN ACT, BUT BEHEADING IS A NICE PUNISHMENT AND HUMANE WORTHY OF BEING CARRIED OUT BY WAHHABI SAUDI ARABIA? Saudi Arabia carried out more executions (twice as much) by beheading in 2015 than ISIS did. Saudi Arabia is the only country on earth to execute people through beheading!!! you seem to be leaning more towards the views of the Wahhabi institutions in Saudi than the nonconforming Wahhabi militants opposed to the royalty. http://www.mintpressnews.com/saudi-arabia-beheads-nearly-twice-as-many-people-as-isis-so-far-this-year/208894/ http://www.cbsnews.com/news/saudi-arabia-beheadings-decades-executions/ ![]() |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Nobody: 2:16pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
[s] crosbreaka:[/s] And who has time to read this copy paste crap from Satan like you. |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by crosbreaka: 2:22pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
FriendChoice: are you Demmzy15? it was not directed at you. and I am not Muslim. and it is not copy/paste. so why am i satan? |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Nobody: 2:24pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
crosbreaka: The fact am mentioned in the quote I have to reply. Yes you're not Muslim but you're shia. Being Shia is what makes you Satan. |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by crosbreaka: 2:31pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
FriendChoice: If you have nothing sane or intellectual to contribute, clear out. I'm neither Shia. But if Shiites aren't Muslims, I'm not sure what gives you confidence, other than fanatic extremism, that you're Muslim yourself. |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Nobody: 2:37pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
crosbreaka: Al-taqiya. You're shia not Muslim. Don't deny your faith here. Or are you ashamed of your religion? |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by crosbreaka: 2:53pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
FriendChoice: Oga no be curse to be Shia. So I should abandon the topic and the points raise that are relevant to the discussion to prove to you what religion I belong to? Why this silly? |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Nobody: 2:56pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
crosbreaka: Na curse to be shia. Do as you wish. Am not looking for proof. I already know who you're. Lying is a pillar in shia religion. So what's new. Why Hiding your belief? |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by crosbreaka: 4:05pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
FriendChoice: ok. i am shia. please discuss ideas, and not people or personalities. thank you. |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Nobody: 4:12pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
crosbreaka: OK. Why then deciv pple b4? But since you have accepted your belief now. we can discuss on other matters sometimes when the need arises. 1 Like |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by udatso: 6:18pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
Why am I not surprised? 1 Like |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Nobody: 8:20pm On Dec 30, 2016 |
udatso:Y? |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by udatso: 6:58pm On Dec 31, 2016 |
FriendChoice:Cos they are shias. |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Nobody: 7:03pm On Dec 31, 2016 |
udatso:Right |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by ShiaMuslim: 11:51am On Jan 03, 2017 |
Demmzy/BetaThing, can lie!!! You can deceive!!! Look at your terror mentors below. ShiaMuslim: ShiaMuslim: ShiaMuslim: |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by Zhulfiqar1: 1:43pm On Jan 03, 2017 |
Saudi Arabia Beheads Nearly Twice As Many People As ISIS So Far This Year By MintPress News Desk | August 25, 2015 http://www.mintpressnews.com/saudi-arabia-beheads-nearly-twice-as-many-people-as-isis-so-far-this-year/208894/ When It Comes to Beheadings,ISIS Has Nothing Over Saudi Arabia Newsweek For the most part, death comes fast. Usually the cut and amputation are surprisingly clean, if the head is kept straight when the fatal blow comes down. But sometimes it takes more than one try. The head, upon detachment, appears to pop off the body, as with a doll that has been squeezed too hard. It rolls to the front or side of the body, which twitches in spasms as the heart continues to beat for a while. The executioner then steps back. Someone moves forward and scoops up the head. Someone else retrieves the body as a jeep backs up to haul it away. http://europe.newsweek.com/when-it-comes-beheadings-isis-has-nothing-over-saudi-arabia-277385?rm=eu ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by ShiaMuslim: 7:17pm On Jan 03, 2017 |
lexiconkabir: Demmzy15: keep trying to change the topic and run. you have been presented with a wahhabi cleric who supports suicide bombing contrary to your claim. and now you claim you have not heard of him before, as if you know each and every saudi wahhabi cleric and their views. the difference between me and you is that i do not describe people and call them names based on what i think or how i see things or based on my own beliefs. i base people's identity based on their own words and how they describe themselves. here is Qaradawi and his own words and see for yourself if he has not adopted Salafi tendencies AND BELIEFS: 1.) "A Conversation with Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi" http://www.ikhwanweb.com/article.php?id=27682 2.) "The top-most contemporary Salafist cleric and the ideological icon of the Ikhwan al-Muslimin (The Muslim Brotherhood) whose fatwas are authoritative for the global Salafi-Wahhabi clergy, is the Qatar-based Islamist jurist Shaikh Yusuf Al Qaradawi. He has also justified the suicide bombing as ‘a defensive tactic’ in his fatwa issued in the 1990s. Much like Zakir Naik, Shaikh Qaradawi has also repeatedly said that he is not the only cleric to justify suicide bombings and that his fatwa was tailored specifically for helpless Palestinians in their fight against the Israeli occupation." http://www.firstpost.com/world/suicide-bombing-is-haram-in-islam-only-salafist-ideologues-like-zakir-naik-view-it-as-a-war-tactic-2898840.html 3.) "Although al-Qaradawi wrote a book on Imam al-Ghazzali and often quotes his Ihya' as well as clobbers "Salafis" with the Ash`ari School as a whole ("The entire Umma is Ash`ari even if it displeases our 'Salafi' brothers" ![]() http://ahlussunnahwaljamah..com.ng/2008/02/yusuf-al-qaradawi.html 4.) " He informally serves as the main ideologue of the Muslim Brotherhood, for which he is controversial, especially in Egypt, his country of birth. And, though Muslim Salafis and members of the Brotherhood are frequently at odds, al-Qaradawi has been embraced by some Salafis, thus crossing multiple boundaries in Islamic thought." http://rlp.hds.harvard.edu/faq/yusuf-al-qaradawi-0 so you can add to the list the infamous Nasibi Indian Salafist pseudo-scholar Zakir Naik to the list of Wahhabi AKA Salafi clerics who support suicide bombing. he mentioned in the below video two Saudi Wahhabi "senior" clerics (Safar Awali, Salman Oudah) who support suicide bombing. ![]() ![]() IS ZAKIR NAIK NOT SALAFI? PLEASE ENLIGHTEN US!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfdmNJWk4EI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwjIlToCu8s YOU GUYS ARE SO CONFUSED AND F-ED UP THAT THERE IS NO CLEAR CUT CRITERIA ON WHO IS A SALAFI/WAHHABI AND WHO IS NOT. WHAT MAKES ONE A SALAFI. NO CLEAR CUT DOCTRINES. ALL THAT UNITE YOU PEOPLE IS TAKFIRI AND TAKFIRI KILLINGS. EVEN AMONG YOURSELVES. THAT IS WHY YOU SEE THE CONFUSION IS SO MUCH THAT YOU TURN ON YOURSELVES AND PASS TAKFIRI ON ONE ANOTHER. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN SYRIA WHEN AL-NUSRA AND ISIS SPLITS BECAUSE OF TWO TERRORISTS FIGHTING FOR LEADERSHIP OF TERROR. THEY ENDED UP PASSING TAKFIRI ON EACH OTHER AND KILLING THEMSELVES. YET, THEY BOTH RELATE TO THE TEACHINGS OF THE ANCIENT TERRORISTS LIKE IBN TAYMIYYAH AND IBN ABDUL WAHAB, AND THEY UNITE IN THEIR BELIEF OF HATRED FOR SHIA, CHRISTIANS AND EVERYONE WHO DISAGREE WITH THEM. you guys obviously think Salafism/Wahhabism only belongs to your clerics that are loyal to al-Saud. the division amongst you guys is glaring. and this division is centered on a competition on who is more hateful and divisive towards others. Wallahi, this is satanic. in the Quran shaitan is the one described as someone whose aim is to sow enmity among humanity (not only among Muslims); but you sow enmity among Muslims and among yourselves!!! ![]() ![]() THIS, FOR ALLAH'S SAKE, IS NOT ISLAM. LOOK AT THE MANIFEST MISGUIDANCE! |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by plappville(f): 9:28pm On Jan 03, 2017 |
FriendChoice: Shut up. You worship a moon god. You are not different ! ![]() |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by plappville(f): 9:37pm On Jan 03, 2017 |
Renaissance2017: They are exposing themselves. Its still thesame old news. We already know that islam is evil. No matter how they try hard to twist it. Thier brothers keep bombing, gunshot and beheading innocent people simply because they are unbelievers or because they do not practice the qoran to the letters. Thats what thier prophet order them to do. Isis are proud and true Muslims. They will defend Islam and the quran with thier lives. We see that each passing day. |
Re: Shiite Members Celebrate Christmas With Christians In Kaduna (Photos) by ShiaMuslim: 10:11pm On Jan 03, 2017 |
plappville: stop being bitter. you cannot stand up to extremism and terrorists by doing their bidding. when you dash them a religion with 1.5 billion followers across the world, you are empowering them. Muslims are not going to abandon their religion because of Wahhabis or ISIS or whatever Wahhabi terror group wherever. by accepting the version of the extremists and insulting our Prophet (s), you are empowering the extremists and weakening the Muslims who are modest and moderate. so be mindful of your words and your aims. you cannot make your candle shine brighter by blowing out another man's candle. |
(1) (2) (3) ... (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (Reply)
Seminarian Slumped And Died While Acting Passion Of Christ Drama In Imo (photo) / Jehovah's Witness Dies After Rejecting Blood Transfusion / Why A Christian Girl Converted To Islam (Photo)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 184 |