Modsbuty:
Lol

armyofone:
in dreams

mojeer678:


A mega-popular President will surely succeed.



Look at the church like building - it is PACKED in front of it, yet in the fake media photo there is no one there!. Overall, Trump had the area in front of the white building packed tighter than Obama did. Trump probably, in fact, drew a larger crowd but we can't get that answer without a REAL photo of what was going on behind the white building. What's worse? CNN had this photo, which proves Trump's crowd was ENORMOUS. Pure fraud is all CNN is.

ValerianSteel:
Entire Senior Staff at the State Department resigned. Sources say they believe the Department is being headed by the leader of the Swamp, diplomacy will be overridden by Corporate interest.

This should scare anyone. Career diplomats and bureau officials are being replaced by corporatist and special interest.

Also in the news, Mexican President has rejected White House visit with BLOTUS(Biggest Liar of the United States) reaffirming his previous stance that Mexico will never foot the bill for the ridiculous and stupid wall.

Missy89:


Not true. Most of them were fired

Missy89:


Not true. Most of them were fired

mojeer678:


Continue your delusion

DAY FOUR MAGA!!!

The entire senior management of the State Department just resigned!

The Washington Post thinks it is a bad thing, because "too much experience walked out the door".

I think it is great, because the "experience" that walked out the door was part of a system so corrupt it almost destroyed the country.

So what if there are a few glitches and bumps as things get going again, when once back on the road the State Department will at least be going in a better direction.

uniklinkum:
Laughing out loud at the gop senators morrafuckers. They are all now concerned with the maniac fantasy on the wall bullshiit and investigating the election. Can't wait on drumpf to draw up his signature health care reform.

Afam4eva:
Do you guys think that America can pull off building the US-Mexico wall without financial support from Mexico because it seems to me that mexico will not be interested in paying such a huge amount of money for something that will not be beneficial to them. From what i gathered, the wall will not cost anything less than $50 billion. Can America afford it?

armyofone:
There is really no need to build a wall. If we have 50 billion, it should be spent on improving schools, roads, support small business, shelters for the homeless etc
Mexico immigrants and those coming in aren't the problem we are facing here. I agree, Mexico should not pay for it in whatever form.

mojeer678:


Don't let them deceive you, it's only about $5B.

There have been quotes as high as $10 trillion to build the wall thrown around online.

MY ESTIMATE: $5 billion and no more, IF THAT. When property costs do not get in the way, according to the New Jersey DOT, roads cost only $183,000 per lane mile to build. The lowest cost state, (South Carolina) has had road construction costs as low as $39,403 per lane mile. Even if the wall cost $2 million a mile to build, we'd get 2,500 miles of wall for $5 billion. Much of the wall is already built, and it is far easier to build a wall than it is to put in a two lane road complete with bridges and drainage. A two lane road that spanned the same distance would cost a lot less than $5 billion, especially if it only had to consider what the wall will need to consider, which is nearly nothing when compared to what a road needs.

So don't be trolled about the high cost of the wall, the real estate is cheap along the wall route and there is no way it can possibly cost a whole lot. This does not mean I am for the wall, because if it can keep Mexicans out, it can also trap Americans in.

And Mexico will eventually pay for the wall.

Lucasbalo:
I tell you that your brain needs a resetting. You are not worried about Naira turning into tissue paper. Have you ever seen a Peso in your life. Naira is about 500 to a $ and you are foaming in the mouth about Mexican Pesos. What you should worry about is the hyper inflation that is messing up your life with your meagre resources.

happney65:


"Have you ever seen a peso in your life"Chai bros,that was below the belt..Dammmm..That guy suppose go kill himself..

Brightwood:
Trump wants to cancel the F-35 fighter jet development, as an Aerospace Engineer, I'm not sure how I feel about this.

Brightwood:
Trump wants to cancel the F-35 fighter jet development, as an Aerospace Engineer, I'm not sure how I feel about this.

CFCman:

I'm all for it.

Congress wasted 100s of billions of $$ on useless weapons programs that this country doesn't need. You don't need too much sophistication to defeat the likes of ISIS and other terrorist groups. It's like the $1bn a-piece B-52 bomber that has only been used a grand total of FIVE times in combat. The US has 20 B-52 stealth bombers currently. These weapons were designed to battle the old Soviet Union, and are mostly unnecessary in the fight against radical jihadi terrorists.

It's no wonder the average starting salary for engineers working in the Military Industrial Complex is around $84,000/year. A sizeable chunk of those billions go into their pockets. Full disclosure, my bro works in one of those companies.

ValerianSteel:
If we want to go back to being fiscally conservative, let's start with the Military, too much wasteful spending there. With regards to the F-35 it's too late in stage go outrightly cancel it. Other countries will be pissed especially Israel, Bibi has been waiting on those birds to flex muscles with Russia in Syria.

It won't be an easy task, he could however reduce the number of orders. I don't get why we have three variants for each of the air fighting forces. That's where the real cost is.

CFCman:

Agree with the bolded portion. And I also don't understand why, for instance, the Navy will have 5 different kinds of fighter jets. All these add to government waste.
Left to me, I'd only allow 2 types of fighter jets for all the branches bar the Marines.

CFCman:

I'm all for it.

Congress wasted 100s of billions of $$ on useless weapons programs that this country doesn't need. You don't need too much sophistication to defeat the likes of ISIS and other terrorist groups. It's like the $1bn a-piece B-52 bomber that has only been used a grand total of FIVE times in combat. The US has 20 B-52 stealth bombers currently. These weapons were designed to battle the old Soviet Union, and are mostly unnecessary in the fight against radical jihadi terrorists.

It's no wonder the average starting salary for engineers working in the Military Industrial Complex is around $84,000/year. A sizeable chunk of those billions go into their pockets. Full disclosure, my bro works in one of those companies.

ValerianSteel:
The production is freaking expensive though a joint one with other countries, but we should be reminded that it's not like our conventional stealth fighters, it's a multi role fighter, it would be a mistake for him to gut this. Lockheed has agreed to review the cost and eventually lower the price. Thousands of jobs are on the line if the program ends.