We see alot of New online Atheist demand for proof of God's existence, but can they even prove their mums existence is not a figment of their imagination? let's put it to the test , note if u can't it means u only believe your mum exists and not Know she does

Lawd.....*facepalm

Blogthug:
We see alot of New online Atheist demand for proof of God's existence, but can they even prove their mums existence is not a figment of their imagination? let's put it to the test , note if u can't it means u only believe your mum exists and not Know she does

aren't you a diest
This is quite funny
You do realise the deistic god is impossible to prove so I don't see the point
And what are you even saying

Blogthug:
We see alot of New online Atheist demand for proof of God's existence, but can they even prove their mums existence is not a figment of their imagination? let's put it to the test , note if u can't it means u only believe your mum exists and not Know she does

What does the phrase 'reasonable doubt' mean to you?

Interesting!

jonbellion:
aren't you a diest
This is quite funny
You do realise the deistic god is impossible to prove so I don't see the point
And what are you even saying

when u say impossible to prove what do u mean, are u working with a bearded man imagine here? there is actually no difference between deistic God, Yahweh, Allah and Brahman, only that they are described differently, just like how scientists would describe Nature differently but would never ask themselves which nature?

Ranchhoddas:
What does the phrase 'reasonable doubt' mean to you?

a red herring? answer my question

Blogthug:


a red herring? answer my question

Ah. This one na Olodo. No need to dissipate mental energy.

Ranchhoddas:
Ah. This one na Olodo. No need to dissipate mental energy.

Adhominem fallacy? how atheist of you

Even though my senses are flawed and limited, they remain the best source of evidence I have that something exists. Logic is the second best source of evidence.

I have seen, heard, and touched my mother, and logic tells me she must exist because I have only seen humans originate in mothers' wombs.

None of these apply to any deity.

nice one onetrack

His question stems from solipsism(i wonder why he is addressing it to atheists only)
So as a solipsist, the experience of child birth could be taken as projections from the subconscious.

The solipsism philosophy by Descartes is irrelevant to me, if i can't get to the "supposed full consciousness".

4kings:
nice one onetrack

His question stems from solipsism(i wonder why he is addressing it to atheists only)
So as a solipsist, the experience of child birth could be taken as projections from the subconscious.

The solipsism philosophy by Descartes is irrelevant to me, if i can't get to the "supposed full consciousness".

Exactly. It is useless debating with anyone who appeals to solipsism because I could then use it to doubt the existence of the very person who is appealing to this, along with whatever he or she claims actually does exist (like some god).

Ranchhoddas:
Ah. This one na Olodo. No need to dissipate mental energy.

Smart decision. Take Orijin on my behalf!

So far.

Nobody has been able to refute the OP one bit.
Only insults here and there.

Baby atheists, everywhere.......

onetrack:
Even though my senses are flawed and limited, they remain the best source of evidence I have that something exists. Logic is the second best source of evidence.

I have seen, heard, and touched my mother, and logic tells me she must exist because I have only seen humans originate in mothers' wombs.

None of these apply to any deity.

your seeing an touching your mother has not been proven to not be a figment of your imagination either lol

4kings:
nice one onetrack

His question stems from solipsism(i wonder why he is addressing it to atheists only)
So as a solipsist, the experience of child birth could be taken as projections from the subconscious.

The solipsism philosophy by Descartes is irrelevant to me, if i can't get to the "supposed full consciousness".

this isn't solipsism sorry

onetrack:


Exactly. It is useless debating with anyone who appeals to solipsism because I could then use it to doubt the existence of the very person who is appealing to this, along with whatever he or she claims actually does exist (like some god).

again this isn't solipsism, can u or can u not prove your mums existence isn't a figment of your imagination

felixomor:
So far.

Nobody has been able to refute the OP one bit.
Only insults here and there.

Baby atheists, everywhere.......

it's only to demand for evidence for God that they know, they can't even prove their mums existence after she suffered and carried them for 9 months, they can't claim to know their mums exists but only believe she does since it doesn't require evidence , bunch of baby atheists smh

Blogthug:
... can they even prove their mums existence is not a figment of their imagination?....

Can you prove 'anything' is not a figment of your imagination?

Blogthug:


this isn't solipsism sorry

Ranchhoddas had the proper word for you.
Bye!

Blogthug:


again this isn't solipsism, can u or can u not prove your mums existence isn't a figment of your imagination

No, it's not truly solipsism but your argument is going to end up there.

onetrack:


No, it's not truly solipsism but your argument is going to end up there.

only way u can prove your mums existence isn't a figment of your imagination is if u can log into her consciousness , until then, u can only believe your mum exists and can't claim to know she does

4kings:

Ranchhoddas had the proper word for you.
Bye!

he is baby atheist just like u, sure both of you became atheist via fallacious memes

Blogthug:


he is baby atheist just like u, sure both of you became atheist via fallacious memes

Shatap!

Blogthug:


he is baby atheist just like u, sure both of you became atheist via fallacious memes

Sorry, i'm not an Atheist.

only way u can prove your mums existence isn't a figment of your imagination is if u can log into her consciousness , until then, u can only believe your mum exists and can't claim to know she does

The only way to also disprove solipsism is to log in to another's consciousness, like onetrack told you(since you don't know about solipsism), your argument eventually leads to that point.
Why this unnecessary waste of time?

Blogthug:


only way u can prove your mums existence isn't a figment of your imagination is if u can log into her consciousness , until then, u can only believe your mum exists and can't claim to know she does

So how is this different from solipsism? Are you sure you know what solipsism is?

---

Never mind don't respond!

Blogthug:
We see alot of New online Atheist demand for proof of God's existence, but can they even prove their mums existence is not a figment of their imagination? let's put it to the test , note if u can't it means u only believe your mum exists and not Know she does

A defeatist strawman act is peculiar to the most unintelligent religious lily-livered.

You sure don't have any iota of intelligent response, to the simple question of presenting just a proof, of your personal god idea.

The honest few among the religious folks here, have retreated to the terrain that indulges their charades.

Blogthug:
We see alot of New online Atheist demand for proof of God's existence, but can they even prove their mums existence is not a figment of their imagination? let's put it to the test , note if u can't it means u only believe your mum exists and not Know she does

Someone actually shared this garbage.

U just think of anything and ask for prove.

Can u prove that u are not a mad man talking?

If my mum is a figment of my imagination, how does that help the case of ur God's existence?

U actually sound like u have eventually given up on the quest to prove ur Gods existence. Well, if u think u can relegate ur mum just to prove an imaginary God that has done absolutely nothing to humanity exists, then go ahead.

As for me, my mum is so real and ur God is so nonexisting.

felixomor:
Interesting!

I am not surprised that this garbage is interesting to u, isn't it obvious that it falls in line with ur level of intelligence?

Blogthug:


when u say impossible to prove what do u mean, are u working with a bearded man imagine here? there is actually no difference between deistic God, Yahweh, Allah and Brahman, only that they are described differently, just like how scientists would describe Nature differently but would never ask themselves which nature?

I described something differently and u say there is not difference? Do u even think at all?

Which scientists describe nature differently? Must u always drag science to ur delusion?

frank317:


I am not surprised that this garbage is interesting to u, isn't it obvious that it falls in line with ur level of intelligence?

Hehehe,

You dont usually have anything to say that is meaningful.....

#Sad

felixomor:
So far.

Nobody has been able to refute the OP one bit.
Only insults here and there.

Baby atheists, everywhere.......

U would have at least dared to respond to onetrack's post.
As usual... U see only what u want to see