If we have twenty ancestors as Homo Sapiens or human beings, we might say that two to four of them were not human beings at all!. By genetic make up. Just thesame way pussy cats are not lions, tigers are not leopards, lions are not tigers and etc. They are different species. However the remaining 16 to 18 were Homo Sapiens originating from East Africa. That is the area we find human beings who are most similar to the most ancient human beings. Hence the 'Out of Africa' theory which is inadequate because the small seemingly insignificant non human DNA from our non human ancestors might be the rate determinant or catalyst. For example a group of aliens might land on Earth, 100 in number, mainly men, who then teach us how to increase our lifespan to twenty thousand years, intermarry with us, die off and leave descendants. Those are rate determiners, yet insignificant by genetic footprint.

Some of our non human ancestors have been identified and named, some like the European Neanderthal and the Asian Denisovan have had their genome mapped and can actually be brought back alive amongst us. There are others yet unidentified and genome mapped but are represented in the genetic makeup of subsaharan Africans. They are not Homo Sapiens but we have no names for them yet. Probably because the remains of any of them have never been found. They appeared, mixed with humans and left their genetic footprint in our DNA mix as clearly distinguishable non human genes in thesame way you check a Liger's gene and can determine for sure it is an hybrid of two different species of felines. Such is the foundation of our specie. I am Yoruba and I carry the genes of those unidentified non humans. I carry Neanderthal genes from Europe and possibly Denisovan as well and a preponderance of Homo Sapiens that originated from East Africa. That is true for all humans.

As Yorubas who speak a language spoken 5 thousand years ago in Kemitic Egypt, you should accept it as a matter of fact that some of your ancestors were white people. The society of those who owned that language was made up of Caucasians and Negroes as shown in their artworks that exist to this day. Europe itself was covered by ice maybe over 20 thousand years ago but prior to that, people lived there and those people would have been invariably lighter skinned than people to the South because of climate. The Kemitic Egyptian civilization was made up of such people in combination with darker skinned people who ostensibly came from Wadai known to the Yoruba as Ife Oodaye. Together they built Kemitic Egypt which is seen as grandparent of our modern civilization by historians. However the Indus valley civilization in India was larger than the combination of Egypt and Sumer. They all traded with each other. That covers East of the Atlantic but not China or the West Indies!.

However no doubt that thousands of years before Stonehenge, Egypt, Sumer, Indus valley etc, there probably was a global society that built pyramids and used them for a purpose we are yet to fully decipher and it maybe scientific.

Kemitic Egypt prospered for a while and then collapsed and the people moved South enmasse to mix with people in Yoruba West Africa who adopted the language.
You have white ancestors as there were Caucasians among them.

so you are saying,

we're essentially half cast descendants?

Teempakguy:
so you are saying,


we're essentially half cast descendants?

DNA TEST WILL SHOW ALL EARTHLINGS TO BE MIXED RACE BUT YOUR HUE OR SKIN COLOR IS DETERMINED BY THE NUMBER OF FILIAL GENERATIONS YOU HAVE SPENT EVEN WITHOUT INTERMARRIAGE.

My theory states that human beings are of an alien origin. That is, our earliest ancestors lived on another planet, probably in another solar system. A cataclysmic occurrence forced them to seek refuge among the stars. One of the stars chosen was our sun and eventually earth was settled upon as the most habitable planet in this particular solar system.

Now, well notice that human beings srrm to struggle with the environment even as the the entire earth system reduces our life span by each generation.

We struggle with diseases even when it's so obvious that our bodies are packed full of antigens, but apparently not enough to battle the more vicious ones on this planet. Even the sun does not seem to agree with us and the gravity weighs us down, even though we don't notice it cos we are used to it now.

Microscopic components which make up our bodies show that our flesh and blood are made up of the same particles as found in distant stars. We were created, but not on this planet. So those looking for the garden of Eden will have to travel thousands and millions of light years into the space to locate it.

Well I'd better stop rambling now.

Ioannes:
My theory states that human beings are of an alien origin. That is, our earliest ancestors lived on another planet, probably in another solar system. A cataclysmic occurrence forced them to seek refuge among the stars. One of the stars chosen was our sun and eventually earth was settled upon as the most habitable planet in this particular solar system.

Now, well notice that human beings srrm to struggle with the environment even as the the entire earth system reduces our life span by each generation.

We struggle with diseases even when it's so obvious that our bodies are packed full of antigens, but apparently not enough to battle the more vicious ones on this planet. Even the sun does not seem to agree with us and the gravity weighs us down, even though we don't notice it cos we are used to it now.

Microscopic components which make up our bodies show that our flesh and blood are made up of the same particles as found in distant stars. We were created, but not on this planet. So those looking for the garden of Eden will have to travel thousands and millions of light years into the space to locate it.

Well I'd better stop rambling now.

Your theory is faulty due to the fact that we share a set of "universal genes" that date back to the early formations of the earth itself.

davien:
Your theory is faulty due to the fact that we share a set of "universal genes" that date back to the early formations of the earth itself.

Actually one of the theories of the formation of the earth and its moon, (and there are quite a lot) states that the earth was formed as a result of the destruction of a larger planetary body which explains the existence of the asteroid belt, an orbit initially occupied by the planetary body.

The irons found in our blood has been dated to be quite older than the earth. Now don't ask me how they know this.

Ioannes:


Actually one of the theories of the formation of the earth and its moon, (and there are quite a lot) states that the earth was formed as a result of the destruction of a larger planetary body which explains the existence of the asteroid belt, an orbit initially occupied by the planetary body.

The irons found in our blood has been dated to be quite older than the earth. Now don't ask me how they know this.

You may be misinformed,the earth-moon system was indeed formed by a Mars like protoplanet colliding with the early earth.
The asteroid field however is the remains of unused debris in the formation of the solar system from the sun.
While the iron in our blood can't be dated in of itself because it's not in anyway no more than the age of the living being it occupies..the type of iron however can be dated and it's as old as the earth/solar system, 4.5 billion years.

This evolution nonsense again