Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,208,945 members, 8,004,431 topics. Date: Saturday, 16 November 2024 at 04:07 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? (4237 Views)
Intelligent Design - A Rational Conclusion / Arguments Against Intelligent Design / Intelligent Design Or No Intelligent Design? Can We Analyze This? (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply) (Go Down)
Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Blogthug(m): 4:41pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
p 1. All codes of known origin is a product of intelligence (empirical observation) p 2. The DNA is a code p3 .therefore the DNA is a product of intelligence Deductive logical inference for those that would think all codes of known origin are produced by only humans : http://www.livescience.com/3812-dancing-bees-speak-code.html please avoid Strawmaning my Argument as u attempt to refute p1 and 2 , if u can't u should concede to the argument and prolly become and Atheist that believes in ID if that's even possible lol, good luck Atheist 2 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by ExAngel007(f): 4:48pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
baseless... many new viruses pop up frm everywhere around the world, that doesnt mean it was created 2 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Nobody: 4:55pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
I agree DNA has a creator-evolution 1 Like |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by felixomor: 4:56pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
ExAngel007: Is virus a code? Please mention one example of a place u "popped out" a virus from? Besides, there is much ample evidence to the genetical engineering of viruses in research labs. 1 Like |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by jonbellion(m): 5:07pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
LightandDarkness:actually I'd prefer to use the word nature 1 Like |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Nobody: 5:09pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
felixomor: Viruses contain RNA/DNA which they use to infect host cells. |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by jonbellion(m): 5:09pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
Blogthug:Mr man first off Do you believe all things were created according to thier "kind" Lol 1 Like |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by forray(m): 5:13pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
Why cant we just respect the believe of one another and try to live right? Una no dey tire for this arguments? Live the best possible moral justified life in what ever ur belief is and let the end judge Abeg. 1 Like |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by felixomor: 6:07pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
LightandDarkness: Of course I know. If i didnt know, i wouldnt make the claim that viruses were genetically engineered in research labs. But the virus itself, is it a code? No. |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Blogthug(m): 6:10pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
jonbellion:Red herring fallacy, try again 5 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Blogthug(m): 6:11pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
ExAngel007: non sequitor fallacy, try again 4 Likes |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by jonbellion(m): 6:58pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
Blogthug:I just asked na |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Nobody: 7:04pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
felixomor: I believe his point is about the DNA/RN in viruses themselves... |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by felixomor: 7:14pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
LightandDarkness: Read my reply to him. U should have also excercised ur "belief" while reading my reply to him. Rather than take the first line literally. |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Ranchhoddas: 7:29pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
Blogthug:All living entities have progenitors. God is a living entity. Ergo, God has a progenitor Do you agree? Why? 1 Like |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Blogthug(m): 9:54pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
Ranchhoddas: non sequitor but God should not be classified as a living entity, that's why the question is always Does God exists? not is god living? 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Nobody: 10:39pm On Feb 23, 2017 |
ExAngel007: THE END 1 Like |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by MrMontella(m): 12:31am On Feb 24, 2017 |
Blogthug:the atomic line spectra is a kind of a Morse code, even the sun's absorption hydrogen spectrum too. 1 Like |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by lepasharon(f): 2:55am On Feb 24, 2017 |
DNA is a code, but it's not perfect |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Nobody: 5:05am On Feb 24, 2017 |
Rejoinder: Yes, nature built my house for me, also painted it, put a plasma and set everything else in place. Ain't nature just wonderful? jonbellion: |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Nobody: 5:10am On Feb 24, 2017 |
lepasharon: |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:17am On Feb 24, 2017 |
lepasharon: So what? Try and show the argument is invalid. |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:20am On Feb 24, 2017 |
Ranchhoddas: Material living entities have progenitors. God is immaterial. Try again. Actually, the argument Blogthug made has some flaws but I won't reveal it. A smart atheist should be able to figure it out. Once the argument is better structured it becomes unassailable. 2 Likes |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:22am On Feb 24, 2017 |
MrMontella: Wrong. In Morse code, taps or electric signals represent a letter. In the genetic code codons represent an amino acid. The atomic line spectra reps nothing. 2 Likes |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:24am On Feb 24, 2017 |
felixomor: The virus is not a code but the RNA or DNA material in it has a code. |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:28am On Feb 24, 2017 |
jonbellion: Nature cannot effect DNA. There is no evidence for such. In fact many artificial chemicals like nylon do not and cannot be naturally synthesized and so can never be found naturally occuring anywhere on Earth or the universe. The conditions for their synthesis are very specific and is outside the abilities of nature to effect. 3 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:30am On Feb 24, 2017 |
LightandDarkness: No. Evolution starts when there is a living thing with DNA. Abiogenesis is the thesis that seeks to explain how life and its DNA originated. The thesis is a failed one only upheld because of the materialistic paradigm ruling science. 3 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:33am On Feb 24, 2017 |
ExAngel007: You are suggesting a false spontaneous generation of viruses. That theory has been thoroughly discredited and no scientist will talk such nonsense as you have. New viruses don't pop up. They have always existed in some inert state in nature or in other species before humans get in contact with them and become aware of them. 3 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by jonbellion(m): 6:24am On Feb 24, 2017 |
Omudia:yes yes Misinterpret away BTW you do realise DNA in no way proves the Abrahamic God 1 Like |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by DeSepiero(m): 6:46am On Feb 24, 2017 |
Blogthug: Kindly highlight what your p1 describes as 'codes of known origin'. |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Ranchhoddas: 7:21am On Feb 24, 2017 |
UyiIredia:Special Pleading. Or can you give me another example of an immaterial living entity? 1 Like |
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by MrMontella(m): 8:38am On Feb 24, 2017 |
UyiIredia:what nonsense are you spitting bro?
|
How Often Do You Evangelise? / The Summary Of The Mystery Of The World / Benefits Of Being A Muslim Woman:
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 39 |