Now bbn is over oya magu case ti take over




Una don start again

[color=#990000][/color]i beg sey na only magu dey ni? y can't FG present another person?

Our House of Summons Senate will soon Summon the VP for telling them the obvious.

Bunch of Jokers.

Ride on Magu. You have full support of anti -corruption patriots like me.

I didn't ask for much, I onli pleaded for dis administration to keep the goats far from the yam.MAGU is d man for the job but d goats are fighting him seriously.

deantimes:


http://www.socialtimesng.net/2017/04/we-can-re-present-magu-for-confirmation-osinbajo/

Soon we shall all be reading the same Bible. The Nigerian Bible. Carry go VP. Salute

dolphinife:
The EFCC act says the chairman should be presented to the Senate

The constitution says he shouldn't be presented

And whenever the act and the constitution clashes, the constitution gains preeminence....

When they know this, why do they keep sending his name to the Senate for confirmation??

The Magu brouhaha thing may actually be a false flag operation used by the executive to understudy the Senate to know those who will stand with the presidency when push comes to shove.

Since at inception when the president refused to interfere as to whom emerged leader of the senate...in order to project a front of being a repentant tyrant but now a democrat...which has come to bite him in the as.s, have learnt his lessons hence using Magu confirmation to instigate unrest...and pull some certain strings...

.....students of political science....over to you to analyse this conspiracy theory

Good to know. U better stick to ur guns, else NASS will end up antagonizing d anti corruption fight. Keep it up..PYO.

Dhugal:
The EFCC Act is a subsidiary legislation to the Constitution,it does not in any way conflict with Constitutional provisions.Nowhere in the Constitution is there mention of EFCC,how it's to be structured and its leadership appointed.That part came under lawmaking powers of the NASS.
Simple Govt 101 and our VP failed it.
I wonder which law school the VP and Falana attended and what grades they came out with.

God bless you my friend.

dolphinife:
The EFCC act says the chairman should be presented to the Senate

The constitution says he shouldn't be presented

And whenever the act and the constitution clashes, the constitution gains preeminence....

When they know this, why do they keep sending his name to the Senate for confirmation??

Because they don't want to disgrace and make them irrelevant.

Dhugal:
The EFCC Act is a subsidiary legislation to the Constitution,it does not in any way conflict with Constitutional provisions.Nowhere in the Constitution is there mention of EFCC,how it's to be structured and its leadership appointed.That part came under lawmaking powers of the NASS.
Simple Govt 101 and our VP failed it.
I wonder which law school the VP and Falana attended and what grades they came out with.

this ur assertion (bolded) is really a stewpeed one... who are you and wah have you ever achieve as a lawyer...
If you sabi pass them why not present ur case in court... empty skull

princechurchill:
What ever Spirit that compelled me to vote for this idiots, two years and nothing to show,I say die by fire ahhhhhh

Who is the idiot? EFCC is recovering looted money. EFCC is gaining convictions; including recently, a former governor and subsidy thieves. The judiciary is slow, due partly to the amount of money and power available to the corrupt politicians. They have enough money to even buy the way people reason, educated people, including you. It is good that we have a President with string character. Nigerians are now fully informed

Chuksonyeike:
retaining Magu as EFCC bos will actually weaken the EFCC as an illegal shiaman cannot legally prosecute anyone in court.

What makes him illegal?... A bunch of national revenue gulping rogues in the NASS dont want him, is that what makes him illegal?

Like has been pointed out a few times, he can keep being the chairman of efcc in acting capacity FOREVER cos the constitution of your country doesnt specify a maximum timeline to which a person can be acting. Secondly, there was no need sending his name to the NASS for confirmation in the first place. The efcc act says he should be sent to NASS for confirmation, but the constitution states otherwise; and when there's a clash between constitution and any other laws, the constitution takes precedent.

So I ask again, what makes him illegal?... is it cos some fat bellied shameless rogues who swallow 25% of the nation's recurrent budget dont like him?

dolphinife:
The EFCC act says the chairman should be presented to the Senate

The constitution says he shouldn't be presented

And whenever the act and the constitution clashes, the constitution gains preeminence....

When they know this, why do they keep sending his name to the Senate for confirmation??

According to the VP, i think it was Falana that opened their eyes to it. I know anytime Falana talks, the Government either gains from his speeches or receives good information from his so called outbursts.

I just don't know why Buhari didn't pick him as Attorney General of the Federation.

Nigeria is a Game of throne again

The Federal Government should head to the Supreme court for interpretation instead of making Magu look like the only qualified person out of 170million Nigerians that can manage EFCC. As for Falana anything he says or write i take with a pinch of salt. He has, so far shown that he is more conservative than progressive as far the law is concern, his era is ending.

Nairadays:


According to the VP, i think it was Falana that opened their eyes to it. I know anytime Falana talks, the Government either gains from his speeches or receives good information from his so called outbursts.

I just don't know why Buhari didn't pick him as Attorney General of the Federation.

because he is not a politician and has no god fathers?...you don't get political position just because you are good,you have to bring something to the table.. Unfortunately falana didn't support the APC govt into power

President magu to be re presented again,how much time do this people think they have,if this apshit govt can spend much of their time on restructuring Nigeria the better for everyone.
If they like let them confirm president magu as long as we still have criminals in the apshit govt it is a waste of time.

The problem in Nigeria, is that the so called educated people are not capable of objective reasoning without sentiments.

Thank God for democracy . The law is there to guide all through. Senate wanted to rubbish the judgement of a disciplined president but the law has come to his aid. God bless the erudite Vice President for coming out to show us vividly what the law says on this very important subject matter. No wonder Papa Sageh was very furious with the senators decision . Knowledge is light indeed. I have always known that Osinbajo won't sit down & watch the president making an avertable error. Magu is really fighting hard to eliminate or refuse corruption in our society . We are watching and praying hard for you all. The saboteurs are angry but they will never succeed over you in Jesus name. It is evil that bows before the good,the wicked must bow at the gate of the righteous .

obailala:
What makes him illegal?... A bunch of national revenue gulping rogues in the NASS dont want him, is that what makes him illegal?

Like has been pointed out a few times, he can keep being the chairman of efcc in acting capacity FOREVER cos the constitution of your country doesnt specify a maximum timeline to which a person can be acting. Secondly, there was no need sending his name to the NASS for confirmation in the first place. The efcc act says he should be sent to NASS for confirmation, but the constitution states otherwise; and when there's a clash between constitution and any other laws, the constitution takes precedent.

So I ask again, what makes him illegal?... is it cos some fat bellied shameless rogues who swallow 25% of the nation's recurrent budget dont like him?

Please for educational purposes can you state this part of constitution that efcc chairman should not go to nass
Thank you

Na by force?!
Jheeze... Find someone else and lets move on FFS!

`

de looters in senate are afraid of KARMA catching up with them

Nbote:
Jus listen to dis ppl.. By d tym dis govt is done with us, we probably won't tell d difference between change and chains.. Since there was no need to present him to the Senate in the first place, den jus go ahead and confirm him urselves instead of wasting d tym of Nigerians, d Senate and dat of urselves..

English is difficult! He said there was no need for Magu to have appeared before the Senate, since constitutionally it is only Ambassadorial and Ministerial nominees are compelled to do so. This means Magu's name only needs to be set to the Senate, he need not appear before the Senate. Kai!!!

If the EFCC Act is in conflict with the Constitution, why not abrogate that part of the Act? In any case, you want to continue presenting him again and again and again and again while the DSS and the Senate continue to say NO. And, meanwhile, he continues performing as the Chairman and nobody sees nothing wrong with that. SMH. Most of our so called "lawyers" are not reasonably logical?

[quote author=Chuksonyeike post=55496614]retaining Magu as EFCC bos will actually weaken the EFCC as an illegal shiaman cannot legally prosecute anyone in court.[/quot
e]


Try to borrow some sense, please.

dolphinife:
The EFCC act says the chairman should be presented to the Senate

The constitution says he shouldn't be presented

And whenever the act and the constitution clashes, the constitution gains preeminence....

When they know this, why do they keep sending his name to the Senate for confirmation??

Can you show me where the constitution said HE SHOULDN'T BE PRESENTED TO THE SENATE.

Osinbajo is twisting the law to push Magu forward.

joelreg:



Please for educational purposes can you state this part of constitution that efcc chairman should not go to nass
Thank you

Head of agencies which efcc is one does not have to go to nass..

Nbote:
Jus listen to dis ppl.. By d tym dis govt is done with us, we probably won't tell d difference between change and chains.. Since there was no need to present him to the Senate in the first place, den jus go ahead and confirm him urselves instead of wasting d tym of Nigerians, d Senate and dat of urselves..

Speak for yourself only. This government is the most honest and transparent government ever. Only those who are of the truth can see it...

Montaque:
Wow
I have every reason to believe that the VP is the force behind all the judicial impunity of PMB's administration.

The constitution is the number font erigo, point taken. It also sets up the organs of government with powers to function, such function must to be in line, and NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE CONSTITUTION. This is the basis for judging all that the VP is saying here.

The question now is; "is the EFCC Act made under and in compliance of the constitution?" The answer is in the affirmative.

The constitution needs not be exhaustive as to how to appoint all the heads of government parastatals. That's why the NA made laws for all agencies of the FG, and the VP just picked out one to castigate because he and his boss couldn't have their way with Magu.

Osinbajo should not be the executive and the judiciary at the same time. I wonder how he wants to keep interpreting our constitution like he wants.

As for Falana, I don't know what to say. He plays his pipe for the highest bidder.

Pdp stalwart !
We all know Femi Falana And Professor Yemi Osinbajo as authorities in law.
But who are you ?

Dhugal:
The EFCC Act is a subsidiary legislation to the Constitution,it does not in any way conflict with Constitutional provisions.Nowhere in the Constitution is there mention of EFCC,how it's to be structured and its leadership appointed.That part came under lawmaking powers of the NASS.
Simple Govt 101 and our VP failed it.
I wonder which law school the VP and Falana attended and what grades they came out with.

We all know Femi Falana And Professor Yemi Osinbajo as authorities in law.
But, who the fu*k are you?