MetaHuman:
Chelsea manager Antonio Conte
immortalised as emoji






Chelsea manager Antonio Conte has been
given his own emoji on Twitter.
It comes ahead of the Premier League
champions' final match against Sunderland on
Sunday.
Should they win that game, Chelsea will beat
their own record of 29 wins in the 2004-05
season - with 30 wins in the Premier League
this year.
The team could also still do the Double if they
beat Arsenal in the FA Cup final next weekend.

007author:



I just weak

What is our business with masimiliano Allegri

Chelseafan1:


I am still trying to understand why they keep trying to tell us Allegri is better, should we go sign Allegri or what exactly?

Raumdeuter is just always very stupiid for his age. **spits**

Chelseafan1:


You are probably the only Chelsea fan that complains about Hazard all the time. Would you rather we sell him off and stick to them Pedro and Willian?

There is a good reason all the Coaches that have come to Chelsea since Hazard joined regard him as our best player and cannot bench him for anyone, not De bryune, not Pedro, not Willian, not Fabregas, not Salah, who else.?

None of them has dropped him cos of his low stats, None!!! What does that tell you about stats when it comes to players like Hazard, Ribery, Zidane and Iniesta.?

Stop giving all these trolls reasons to yarn dust abeg.

PattyCake:



Pogba got it first and he's not even a manager...Find something better.

Ibime:


I don't complain about Hazard. I complain about y'all turning Hazard to what he is not.

So because y'all run wild with your puerile childish fantasies that Hazard is one of the best in the world you think there are not many Chelsea fans like myself, FBS, Lalaboi that put Hazard just where he is in football heirarchy.

Hazard is no more than a Ribery in football, and that's fact. I rate him how I rated Ribery, nothing more, nothing less. He just made my Chelsea all time 11 for the first time this season.

It is y'all fanboys running around comparing him past his level. We are Chelsea fans. We have players who took us to UCL semis every year, players who scored 20 goals, 15 assists every year, players who actually came 2nd in Ballon D,'or and we did not hype them to this level. Hazard meanwhile is still owing us a half-decent UCL season, after getting us knocked out against Atleti in 2014 . You better check yourself boi. You must have slipped and knocked your head coming at me with this bullshit. Step off.

hensben:
so you're saying hazard is not one of the best player in the world currently? What an arrant nonsense coming from you.

Ibime:


Quality of pass, weight of pass etc.

Whereas Fabregas drop ball for you so all you have to do is shoot one-on-one with goalie, Hazard might flash ball across box where striker has to execute a difficult manoeuvre to score.

It takes no gainsaying to know that if you heard that Wilfred Zaha for example made more chances than say Christian Eriksson, you sef will know the kind of chances Zaha creates are not quality chances, they are probably chances where he dribbles to the byline and flash the ball at top speed toward the striker making it difficult to score, whereas Erikssons chances will be easier to convert.

Greatihex:
you have a point in what you said. But, the question question is, is that totally the case with hazard? For me, I will no. I watch Chelsea matches and see the chances created by hazard and it doesn't totally correlate with what you said.
Take for instance, pedro and maybe willian have more assist than hazard this season, does it mean that both play better quality of passes than hazard? The answer is no. So, you see why it is not really the quality of pass and weight of pass. For me, I think that it is in the nature of the pass the striker likes to score from and luck.

bigkesh:


The day I saw 8 players in City's half at the Etihad was the day I knew we had a proper manager

If Jose played 3-4-3

.............Courtois..........


Zouma......Terry....Cahill


Iva........Mikel.......Matic......Azpi


......Ramires.....Costa........Hazard

Ibime:


I don't complain about Hazard. I complain about y'all turning Hazard to what he is not.

So because y'all run wild with your puerile childish fantasies that Hazard is one of the best in the world you think there are not many Chelsea fans like myself, FBS, Lalaboi that put Hazard just where he is in football heirarchy.

Hazard is no more than a Ribery in football, and that's fact. I rate him how I rated Ribery, nothing more, nothing less. He just made my Chelsea all time 11 for the first time this season.

It is y'all fanboys running around comparing him past his level. We are Chelsea fans. We have players who took us to UCL semis every year, players who scored 20 goals, 15 assists every year, players who actually came 2nd in Ballon D,'or and we did not hype them to this level. Hazard meanwhile is still owing us a half-decent UCL season, after getting us knocked out against Atleti in 2014 . You better check yourself boi. You must have slipped and knocked your head coming at me with this bullshit. Step off.

obainojazz:
whoscored- Likes to dribble ...thought I've seen it all....His weakness- crossing...guess ibime was right about the quality of cross thing....
but I'll like the fella in man utd.

bigkesh:


The day I saw 8 players in City's half at the Etihad was the day I knew we had a proper manager

If Jose played 3-4-3

.............Courtois..........


Zouma......Terry....Cahill


Iva........Mikel.......Matic......Azpi


......Ramires.....Costa........Hazard

Chelseafan1:


Facts are those I stated staring at you in the face, Hazard is prefered to all those players you rate above him by all the managers that have coached him At Chelsea...I have no words for all the nonsense you posted above.

Quote me when your De bryune, Pedro and Willian gets rated higher than Hazard, till then, keep your foolish, senseless opinions to your bloody self.

That was how you foolishly made us believe Iniesta is shiit when you are actually the two-faced mumu spewing rubbish about players that get rated by professionals in the game.

FOH Ogbeni.

Chelseafan1:


Why would you like a player with a weak stats in Manutd??

itsJude:
that man is legendary at disgracing a club

Chelseafan1:


Facts are those I stated staring at you in the face, Hazard is prefered to all those players you rate above him by all the managers that have coached him At Chelsea...I have no words for all the nonsense you posted above.

Quote me when your De bryune, Pedro and Willian gets rated higher than Hazard, till then, keep your foolish, senseless opinions to your bloody self.

obainojazz:
whoscored- Likes to dribble ...thought I've seen it all....His weakness- crossing...guess ibime was right about the quality of cross thing....
but I'll like the fella in man utd.

Ibime:


You must be very foolish fanboy1.

Can you show me where I rated Pedro and Willian over Hazard are you just pulling statements out your àss?

DeBruyne I will rate higher. You can like it or lump it, until you can show me different.

Don't bring me into your Hazard WPOTY nonsense again fückboy. Hazard is just a good player for my team, one of my top 11 Chelsea players of all time. There are others ahead of him that we never compared to Ronaldinho, Messi etc al who did 10 times what he has done.

Ibime:


I can't call it. All I know is if there's urgency in your game, and you are producing quality final passes, assists will surely follow. I don't believe in luck. I saw Raheem Sterling leading in key passes at some point of the season 2 or 3 years ago without the assists to show for it. And when you look at the type of chances he was creating, they were not clean. There are different quality of chances. When the likes of DeBruyne, Eriksson, Fabregas hit you with a goalscoring chance, the whole world and his mama knows the chance is clean and easier to score.

obainojazz:
Since martial no give me joy

lalaboi:
Hazard fanboys at it again.

Ibime, you wont get anywhere arguing Hazard with these one sided muchachos who wont accept nor say the truth even when their lives depended on it.

Best player no be by mouth when you don't consistently have the stats to back it up. He is currently not one of the top scorers in the league. He is currently not even top 10 assisters in the league. for someone who is supposedly 'Chelsea's' best player whom some pricks want us to believe that he's Ronaldo/Messi and even Neymar level. Ori yin o fe pe!

Mourinho the reason Hazard has not flourished? which kain yeye nonsense be this?

Or maybe theres more to it. These pro-hazard dudes have won money on this board before because of hazard, hence the loyalty being displayed alongside the level of absurdity of their claim.

He may arguably be Chelsea's best 'attacking' player but that doesn't mean we cant speak up when he isnt doing enough...

lalaboi:
Hazard fanboys at it again.

Ibime, you wont get anywhere arguing Hazard with these one sided muchachos who wont accept nor say the truth even when their lives depended on it.

Best player no be by mouth when you don't consistently have the stats to back it up. He is currently not one of the top scorers in the league. He is currently not even top 10 assisters in the league. Does it make him not to be the best player in the team? for someone who is supposedly 'Chelsea's' best player whom some pricks want us to believe that he's Ronaldo/Messi and even Neymar level. Ori yin o fe pe!

Mourinho the reason Hazard has not flourished? which kain yeye nonsense be this?

Or maybe theres more to it. These pro-hazard dudes have won money on this board before because of hazard, hence the loyalty being displayed alongside the level of absurdity of their claim.

He may arguably be Chelsea's best 'attacking' player but that doesn't mean we cant speak up when he isnt doing enough...