diggz:


My niqqa! welcome back

Griffon:


Oh man. Never seen a World No1 who lacks so much conviction in his abilities.

Do you fancy Stan grabbing this?

raumdeuter:


What brought about the hype of balotelli

knightsTempler:
CHELSEA'S POTENTIAL 2017/18 XI

Roland17:


I have always regarded Stan especially on non grass courts, that being said, Nadal has looked convincing especially his semi against D. Thiem. He seems to have rediscovered the hunger Djokovic is lacking, and with the coast clear, i see him moving Stan around the clay more than any of Stan's opponent for the victory.

Don't forget Nadal is king of the clay in the modern era, he understands movement around the clay better than Stan. if he wins this one, it would be his 10th French open title.

Thecassanova:

I see your handwork for that other side.

BTW, I don't think Conte like luiz In midfield. He rather field Matic.

Nihilist:
Just ran into this guy on the train from Leeds to London.

I'm still on it sef.

airmark:


Arsenalfan tv guy? Did he sing for you before talking?

timbros:


FA cup? Last season that the whole of Chelsea squad (not just the defenders) are woeful? Is it by last season FA cup that Chelsea defenders will 'testify?

How many matches have Lukaku played against Chelsea that, after just one FA cup goal, our defenders go testify?

Roland17:


I have always regarded Stan especially on non grass courts, that being said, Nadal has looked convincing especially his semi against D. Thiem. He seems to have rediscovered the hunger Djokovic is lacking, and with the coast clear, i see him moving Stan around the clay more than any of Stan's opponent for the victory.

Don't forget Nadal is king of the clay in the modern era, he understands movement around the clay better than Stan. if he wins this one, it would be his 10th French open title.

airmark:
Belgium is very useless upfront without hazard.

knightsTempler:
CHELSEA'S POTENTIAL 2017/18 XI

Chelseafan1:


But Raumdeuter always told us that De bryune is the man and while Hazard is the one dragging them back, what is happening now dt Hazard isn't playing.

Ayam not understanding again.

knightsTempler:
CHELSEA'S POTENTIAL 2017/18 XI

Thecassanova:

No Cahill? Lol, I think Cahill is surely in Conte's plan next season. No way he's not starting.

No backup for Moses?

Chelseafan1:

But Rumdeuter always told us that De bryune is the man and while Hazard is the one dragging them back, what is happening now dt Hazard isn't playing.

Ayam not understanding again.

airmark:


Debruyne what? Dayo watches players on whoscored. Without hazard in this belgium team, they will struggle against super eagles. Debruyne that looked jaded throughout the match despite playing estonia. Martinez needs to work on that team. They are easily predictable, expected more from mertens and carrasco too. Those estonians sat back, especially after collecting red card and the belgians became clueless. Nobody to stamp his authority and unlock the defence with mazy runs and creativity. There are more to soccer than adding goals and assists. I hope lukaku gets used to playing and scoring against community defenders (in apari's voice). He wasnt impressive today.

Ibime:
DeBruyne assisted both goals in Belgium's 2-0 win yesterday. . . . just incase you thought different.

raumdeuter:

So who's lying

A40:

Surely you don't expect Lukaku who plays for a relatively mid-table team like Everton to bang in goals vs Chelsea every match. Even players who play for bigger clubs don't do this

Ibime:
DeBruyne assisted both goals in Belgium's 2-0 win yesterday. . . . just incase you thought different.

Greatihex:
that is the problem.


There was a time last year when hazard was not playing well, but he scored the winning goal that got Belgium three points, yet the coach said he was their worst player. What did you say then?

In the world Cup, hazard assisted two winning goals that helped qualify Belgium from the group stage, what did you comment on his performance at the world Cup?

timbros:


Then what do Chelsea defenders have to 'testify' about Lukaku? That he is a pain their backside?

N.B: Benteke plays for a more inferior team (right from his Aston Villa years) but he still manages to score again us regularly. So that your mid-table-team-like-Everton excuse is null and void.

Ibime:


I don't really follow.

All I know is DeBruyne played well yesterday and was the game winner. Several chances were created, but the keeper was in inspired form. I don't know what match Airmark was watching. He may have been talking about Carrasco, Fellaini and others, but as for DeBruyne, he was MOTM.

Greatihex:
i didn't watch the match, but I was trying to point out how relying on goals and assists alone to rate a player can be very flawed.
One of the worst performances i have ever seen from neymar in a match was in last seasons champions league match between Barcelona and mochengladbach. Neymar could not complete a dribble, neither could he complete a pass, but he got an assist from his only completed pass. The goal was an equalizer, and Barcelona went on to win the game. If we are to judge with goals and assist, won't we say that neymar played well? This is the problem!.