Demmzy15:
Qatar's romance with Ikwaan ul Muslimeen is a big and serious issue that can't just be shoved away!

AlBaqir:


Why single out ikhwaanul muslimun? Saudi made mention of their support of "terrorist" Hamas too. Why didn't you mentioned it?

# For the record, Saudi used to finance the two "terrorist" groups. In fact Saudi financed Muslim brotherhood for half a century until the time of President Morsi.

# Try to do your nafs a favor, read what ikhwan wrote about themselves. Read books of their founders, their goal etc. Don't just stop on what their haters and criticizer said about them.

Demmzy15:


You like beating your chest anyhow, don't you know Hamas is Muslim Brotherhood entity? Saudi gives aids to the Palestinian Authority because they're official representative of Palestinians, while Qatar views Hamas as such. You need to know the difference!



Chest beatings as usual!!!



I've read books of their leaders. One of their leaders said the whole Muslim world is in jahilliyah, thereby making Takfir of all Muslims. He was known to curse sahabas like Mu'awiyah, Amr Al As and Uthman this is why Shi'as propagated his works. Modern day takfiris were radicalized by his works. The marriage between Ikwan ul Muslimeen and Shi'a Iran is what gave birth to Al Qaeda, ISIS and their likes!

tbaba1234:
Saudi's issue with Qatar is political. Qatar has a neutral stance with Iran. Saudi and Iran are fighting their proxy wars across the middle east.

Demmzy15:
Qatar's romance with Ikwaan ul Muslimeen is a big and serious issue that can't just be shoved away!

Mofpearl:
What did Yusuf al Qawadri do? * aside the aqeedah issue and the bombing issue*

Modified*

Had a quick read.

vedaxcool:


Do you mean qaradawi? He has revised some of his opinion including on suicide bombing.

Empiree:
Perhaps, tintingz may want to read this.

http://knowislam.com.ng/rebuttal-to-robert-spencers-the-truth-about-muhammad-the-founder-of-worlds-most-intolerant-religion-title/

Empiree:
Perhaps, tintingz may want to read this.

http://knowislam.com.ng/rebuttal-to-robert-spencers-the-truth-about-muhammad-the-founder-of-worlds-most-intolerant-religion-title/

tintingz:
We can't deny the fact that Islam was spread by sword, terror throughout the history and not only Islam, Christianity also. That's why these two religion are more practice everywhere due to colonialism.

Refuting or no refuting, Muslims scholars will find a way to sugar coat Islamic manuscripts, I've defended the barbaric act of some hadiths and Muslims for years while deep down I know Islam was spread by sword, violent, i will never defend that again.

Empiree:
It is not the rebuttal i am concerned about but what the Ustaz said (attachment)

Demmzy15:
Riduane

Riduane:


He wants to eat where he did not sow

See the guy's face! Ole!

Empiree:
Really dont want to get in sectarian arguments back n forth. This is old and should be sealed already. No one is going to solve it.

Empiree:

The Prophet also said:

"Do not curse my Companions. If any of you were to spend the weight of Uhud in gold, it still would not reach the measure (mudd) of one of them nor even one-half of it."

Empiree:

The Prophet also said about the Ansar:

"The Ansar! None loves them except a believer, and none hates them except a hypocrite. Whoever loves them, Allah loves him; and whoever hates them, Allah hates him."

Empiree:

The Prophet also said:

"None of you should come to me with anything (negative) about any of my Companions for I do not want to go out to you except except with a clear heart."

Empiree:


The Prophet also said:

"Allah, Allah! Fear Him with regard to my Companions! Do not make them targets after me! Whoever loves them loves them with his love for me; and whoever hates them hates them with his hatred for me. Whoever bears enmity for them, bears enmity for me; and whoever bears enmity for me, bears enmity for Allah. Whoever bears enmity for Allah is about to perish."


The Prophet also said in the hadith from Jabir:

"Allah chose my Companions over everything else in existence except for the Prophets and the Messengers. He chose four of them for me; Abu Bakr, 'Umar, 'Uthman and 'Ali. He made them my best Companions, and all of my Companions are good."

Empiree:
I don't think you get it. Regardless of what haidith says, it is the same with us muslims today, there are munafi, fasiq, killers amongst muslims. But we have rights towards one another to fulfill.

Say for instance a Muslim dies and he's a known munafiq, he has the to be respected and not speak ill of. He has the right to proper Islamic janaza and his shortcomings are overlooked and left to Allah.

For as long as you recognize those sahaba that you dislike to be muslims, these rights are binding on you. This is really my point. They have the right not to be cursed. Their faults are to be overlooked and left to Allah.

As for those you said tried to assassinate nabi (saw), perhaps you need to tell us if they did what they did before embracing Islam or after?. Just like Abu sufyan, he was hardcore anti-nabi and made several attempts on his life before becoming Muslim. I want to believe this is the type of incident you referring to?

Mofpearl:
Leading Bahraini lawyer Issa Faraj Arhma al-Burashid has filed a case against the government of Bahrain at the High Administrative Court of the Kingdom of Bahrain, seeking the court's intervention to lift the blockade imposed by his country on Qatar.

Local Arabic daily Al Arab reported that the international lawyer pointed out that the whole Bahraini society was taken by surprise on the dawn of June 5 when the Bahraini Cabinet issued a decision to sever all diplomatic relations with Qatar. Besides, instructions were given to all the related Bahraini government ministries, offices and departments to take the necessary measures to implement this decision.
Accordingly, the Ministry of Interior in Bahrain issued another decision based on the first one on June 6 instructing the department concerned to ban Bahraini citizens from travelling, staying or passing through Qatar. It also banned Qataris from travelling to and staying in Bahrain and gave them an ultimatum of 14 days to leave the country.

The Bahraini lawyer argued in his case that such procedures and decisions violate the articles of the Bahraini Constitution which clearly indicates the country works towards maintaining the economic unity among Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) States and the member countries of the Arab League. The lawyer also mentioned all the related articles of the Constitution that prohibit imposing a ban on Qatar.

Besides, he argued that Qatar is a member of various international organisations and to accuse it of sponsoring terrorism should be based on a decision from the UN Security Council, which has never taken place. Further, the ban violates the stipulations of the international law and breaks families and separates close relations of the common families in the two countries, and reflects negatively on their joint interests.
It also involves imposing restrictions on the free movement of Bahraini citizens and harm their various interests. Eventually, the lawyer demanded the revoking of the decision as being unconstitutional.

http://www.gulf-times.com/story/553183/Bahraini-lawyer-moves-court-to-have-Qatar-ban-revo