I see someone is really craving attention so bad here, Just ignore him

CaeserVelli:


Only ediots are impressed by ediots.

Coming from a loser who nobody in your family tree will amount to anything in this world and the hereafter. The obama are greater than anything that your lineage will ever produce.

Coward!!! Using the back door formula. We cremated your lost soul in the rap section. And if you want some more, i am willing to drag the whole of your lineage on the floor here.

sleekdot:


Watch how he spins this then you will understand the Liberals and their lies perfectly. He will probably say he made a typographical error in 2013, or it was someone else using his account then or you and I went to edit his post or whitewashed it

Of course, he'll always have a spin like CNN has taught him. To be honest, I think he's beyond help at this point. His biggest failing is that he cannot reason. What kind of conversation will you have with a person like that? Tufiakwa. I wonder how his wife copes with his dumb ass.

Kophschmerzen:


Coming from a loser who nobody in your family tree will amount to anything in this world and the hereafter. The obama are greater than anything that your lineage will ever produce.

The same can be said of Adolf Hitler and your lineage. Is there anyone in your lineage who can achieve what Hitler achieved? Like I said, ediots will only be impressed by their ilk. By the way, are you Lucas or his "representative"? Let me know how I will sculpt my barbs.

CaeserVelli:


The same can be said of Adolf Hitler and your lineage. Is there anyone in your lineage who can achieve what Hitler achieved? Like I said, ediots will only be impressed by their ilk. By the way, are you Lucas or his "representative"? Let me know how I will sculpt my barbs.

Are you not that son of perdition that was fathered by the midgets in the lunatic ward. The whole generation of losers you originate from will amount to nothing until the end of time. I am here to put sense in to all the faux news zombie losers.

Kophschmerzen:



Are you not that son of perdition that was fathered by the midgets in the lunatic ward. The whole generation of losers you originate from will amount to nothing until the end of time. I am here to put sense in to all the faux news zombie losers.

Lol. Ok. Carry on.

sleekdot:


He is not an illegal at the moment, He got married to an African American lady and he got his papers a long time ago

hmmmm..

The way the media is reacting you would think Don JR had a foundation that illegally took millions of dollars in exchange for favors

CaeserVelli:
Lol. Ok. Carry on.

Good thing you ignored the schizophrenic iddiot. He is hearing voices in his head like liberals usually do

Talking about rap section, I dont think I have ever been a regular contributor there or have you?

Poll: Majority of French Approve of Trump Visit

Your m0ronic looking father and mother are the schizophrenic idiotic losers, don't let me go dig your family pictures pasted on this forum sometimes back you grass eating son of losers. You are on the rap section to malign coogar during the babe3 ish cos you so jealous of the brother for dragging you like the loser you are born to be. I know you are scared of engaging, little wonder the scum of earth is forming all the ignoring excuse. If the never do wells in ogbomoso ain't bastard man up, you scumbag.

CaeserVelli:


Lol. Ok. Carry on.

Fuckboy taking the back door like the loser he's born to be

sleekdot:


Good thing you ignored the schizophrenic iddiot. He is hearing voices in his head like liberals usually do

Talking about rap section, I dont think I have ever been a regular contributor there or have you?

I doubt if I have ever made a post there. I haven't even visited there this year.

New Time Cover has a picture of Trump Junior on it with the Headline "RED-HANDED"..

I can see you're a Kekistan and a frequent lurker at r/The_Donald.

CaeserVelli:


Arabs aren't people, you bloody cave-dwelling, third world living, yelloweyed Trumpist . Only Americans are people.

obixcel:
Hahaha....open up the damn can of worms. I've always said they are hypocritical hypocrites.

Still waiting for those facts proving your fake news.

CaeserVelli:


This is a re herring. Obama never needed lawyers yet he armed rebels to oust a legitimate government in Syria. Why would he need lawyers when he was towing the puppeteers line? Trump is under attack because he has deviated from the globalists' plan. How come Hillary spent IMF funds meant for Ukraine on her campaign breaking US campaign laws and isn't under prosecution?

Hope you know steam is gathering on how Loretta Lynch smuggled in the Russian lawyer in question into the US. Same Loretta Lynch who met with Bill Clinton when Bill's wife was under investigation. Same Loretta Lynch who is the first US Attorney General to plead the fifth? And you're saying Obama something something said they never needed lawyers. Was Laurent Gbagbo not taken to ICC? Why wasn't Bush taken there for invading Iraq or Obama for killing multiple civilians with his "surgical" drone strikes?

How come rapist Bill Clinton is not in jail for molesting women? How cone he hasn't been taken to court?

We no need lawyer ko, we no wear diapers ni.

Amazing how this went from Obama to Hillary and the Clintons. LoL

CaeserVelli:


Only ediots are impressed by ediots.

Hmmm you may need to examine that pointing hand, 3 fingers are pointing backward.

LordReed:


Amazing how this went from Obama to Hillary and the Clintons. LoL

Aren't they colleagues, team mates et al? Didn't Obama campaign for Cankles on the American taxpayers dime? Didn't he, along with the DNC and Hillary's camp, push the silly nothing burger Russian story? They are now inextricably linked, brother.

Wasn't it under Obama's watch that Hillary staged the coup in Ukraine? The Benghazi failure, the ousting of Gaddafi? You saying Obamsky wasn't aware of all these shenanigans? Get real.

LordReed:


Hmmm you may need to examine that pointing hand, 3 fingers are pointing backward.

Indeed. You may need to examine your call for me to examine my pointing hand.

CaeserVelli:


Aren't they colleagues, team mates et al? Didn't Obama campaign for Cankles on the American taxpayers dime? Didn't he, along with the DNC and Hillary's camp, push the silly nothing burger Russian story? They are now inextricably linked, brother.

Wasn't it under Obama's watch that Hillary staged the coup in Ukraine? The Benghazi failure, the ousting of Gaddafi? You saying Obamsky wasn't aware of all these shenanigans? Get real.

You get real. Your narrative will never be free of blaming Obama and Hillary because your idol can't take responsibility and do his job. Also you keep making out like if the century+ history of American interventionist policies only started in Obama's time. You need to really get real.

CaeserVelli:


Indeed. You may need to examine your call for me to examine my pointing hand.

LoL.

LordReed:


You get real. Your narrative will never be free of blaming Obama and Hillary because your idol can't take responsibility and do his job. Also you keep making out like if the century+ history of American interventionist policies only started in Obama's time. You need to really get real.

Let's not get carried away shall we. I made that comment on response to an Obama staffer who smugly claimed they never needed lawyers which I said is a red herring. The Obama administration has indulged in activity that [b]would[/] generally have led to Obama hiring lawyers hence my examples above.

Whether or not the US was responsible was responsible for the French revolution is irrelevant. The point is that person who made that statement should shut up and produce more productive comments. If that doesn't make you get real, I don't know what will. But I will keep on trying.

By the way, I don't see how bringing in bringing in related examples to prove a hypocrite is talking out of his arsé should be a problem when we know why the present administration has to employ lawyers when the exact one that preceded them doesn't/didn't have to.

CaeserVelli:


Let's not get carried away shall we. I made that comment on response to an Obama staffer who smugly claimed they never needed lawyers which I said is a red herring. The Obama administration has indulged in activity that [b]would[/] generally have led to Obama hiring lawyers hence my examples above.

Whether or not the US was responsible was responsible for the French revolution is irrelevant. The point is that person who made that statement should shut up and produce more productive comments. If that doesn't make you get real, I don't know what will. But I will keep on trying.

By the way, I don't see how bringing in bringing in related examples to prove a hypocrite is talking out of his arsé should be a problem when we know why the present administration has to employ lawyers when the exact one that preceded them doesn't/didn't have to.

I am sure you one of these conspiracy theorists who believe Obama and the Clintons belong to some World dominating order that's why they can't be persecuted. For the record I think that position is totally bogus, an attempt to transfer the burden of proving true wrong to some shadowy figures, a more sophisticated version of "it's the devil's hand work!". If Obama did something that was worth persecuting a Republican majority Congress would have leapt to action without an iota hesitation same way Clinton was impeached. So I think that argument should be laid to rest, it has no merit whatsoever.

The relevance of bringing up US foreign policy under Obama is also another bogus position because then you'll have to take all of US history into cognisance. So while you want to hang Obama for those policies I think you should also hang every other President before and after him because as far as I can see nothing has changed. Drones have increased, an ineffective missile strike was authorized, etc. This US policy, it almost has nothing to do with the President but everything to do with US interests and maintaining their hegemony. Don't kid yourself into thinking this presidency is any different.

LordReed:


I am sure you one of these conspiracy theorists who believe Obama and the Clintons belong to some World dominating order that's why they can't be persecuted. For the record I think that position is totally bogus, an attempt to transfer the burden of proving true wrong to some shadowy figures, a more sophisticated version of "it's the devil's hand work!". If Obama did something that was worth persecuting a Republican majority Congress would have leapt to action without an iota hesitation same way Clinton was impeached. So I think that argument should be laid to rest, it has no merit whatsoever.

The relevance of bringing up US foreign policy under Obama is also another bogus position because then you'll have to take all of US history into cognisance. So while you want to hang Obama for those policies I think you should also hang every other President before and after him because as far as I can see nothing has changed. Drones have increased, an ineffective missile strike was authorized, etc. This US policy, it almost has nothing to do with the President but everything to do with US interests and maintaining their hegemony. Don't kid yourself into thinking this presidency is any different.

It points to the hypocrisy of the Democrats. Read this thread and point out those yammering about Bush policy against Afghanistan and Iraq. You will see that they were democrats when we now bring Syria, Libya Egypt what did we hear crickets and excuses like the one you are giving now that its over 100yrs of American policy.

Quick question: Why didnt you proffer this excuse of 100yrs when it was George W Bush? But suddenly remembered that 100yrs excuse when it came to Obama?

Bush had the excuse that America was attacked that was why he attacked Afghanistan and Iraq. Please tell us what was Obamas excuse for the war in Libya, Syria etc?

All the liberal warriors like oyb and midfulness that were so offended by the Arab lives lost during Bush era, suddenly lost their voice when we reminded them of the Syria and Libya.

Is it because Syrian and Libyan lives hold less value than Afghan and Iraqi lives?

sleekdot:


It points to the hypocrisy of the Democrats. Read this thread and point out those yammering about Bush policy against Afghanistan and Iraq. You will see that they were democrats when we now bring Syria, Libya Egypt what did we hear crickets and excuses like the one you are giving now that its over 100yrs of American policy.

Quick question: Why didnt you proffer this excuse of 100yrs when it was George W Bush? But suddenly remembered that 100yrs excuse when it came to Obama?

Bush had the excuse that America was attacked that was why he attacked Afghanistan and Iraq. Please tell us what was Obamas excuse for the war in Libya, Syria etc?

All the liberal warriors like oyb and midfulness that were so offended by the Arab lives lost during Bush era, suddenly lost their voice when we reminded them of the Syria and Libya

maybe because obama did not go running in like a go it alone cowboy.

and please spare us the batshit crazy republican idiocy.

obama avoided syria like the plague [after the libya fallout], and of course you republicans gave him hell for it

what russia investigation
is it a witch hunt if you are a witch?

oyb:


maybe because obama did not go running in like a go it alone cowboy.

and please spare us the batshit crazy republican idiocy.

obama avoided syria like the plague [after the libya fallout], and of course you republicans gave him hell for it

Hi. I want to ask you something...

sleekdot:


It points to the hypocrisy of the Democrats. Read this thread and point out those yammering about Bush policy against Afghanistan and Iraq. You will see that they were democrats when we now bring Syria, Libya Egypt what did we hear crickets and excuses like the one you are giving now that its over 100yrs of American policy.

Quick question: Why didnt you proffer this excuse of 100yrs when it was George W Bush? But suddenly remembered that 100yrs excuse when it came to Obama?

Bush had the excuse that America was attacked that was why he attacked Afghanistan and Iraq. Please tell us what was Obamas excuse for the war in Libya, Syria etc?

All the liberal warriors like oyb and midfulness that were so offended by the Arab lives lost during Bush era, suddenly lost their voice when we reminded them of the Syria and Libya.

Is it because Syrian and Libyan lives hold less value than Afghan and Iraqi lives?

If you can point one post where I personally griefed about George W. Bush's foreign policy, I'll be glad to apologize. But you won't because I am not unaware of American history, you can't find me making such statements. I hold myself responsible for my opinions and statements but I will not take responsibility for those of others. When discussing with me please focus on my statements and not on what others have said.

Ishilove:

Hi. I want to ask you something...

anthonybombata@gmail.com

oyb:
maybe because obama did not go running in like a go it alone cowboy.
and please spare us the batshit crazy republican idiocy.
obama avoided syria like the plague [after the libya fallout], and of course you republicans gave him hell for it

This is hilarious. Obama armed the rebels in Syria, He did the same in Libya. How come you are not counting the number of dead people as a result

WHat has happened to the economy and lives of people in Syria and Libya now?

Mr Obama is arguing that he reluctantly went along with those who said it was the way to combat the Islamic State, but that he never wanted to do it and has now has been vindicated in his original judgment.”

This bizarre “I was peer pressured into sending more weapons into the Middle East” argument by the president is possibly the most blatant example of blame shifting in recent memory, since he had every opportunity to speak out against it, or veto the bill. Instead, this is what Obama said at the time: “I am pleased that Congress...have now voted to support a key element of our strategy: our plan to train and equip the opposition in Syria.”

But besides the fact that he clearly did support the policy at the time, it’s ridiculous for another reason: years before Congress approved the $500m program to arm the Syrian rebels, the CIA had been running its own separate Syrian rebel-arming program since at least 2012. It was reported prominently by the New York Times at the time and approved by the president.

Mr Obama: I was peer pressured into doing it, LMAO. Liberals and blame shifting


America was attacked under Bush, that was his excuse for going to Iraq and Afghanista, What was Obamas excuse to intervene in Libya, Egypt and Syria?? Oh I get the excuse was Republicans made me do it. LMAO