CapitalCee:


There is no opinion here to give Mr. Saying that scoring a penalty is a 50-50 chance is like saying Addiss Ababa is the capital of Nigeria. It's easier to score from the penalty spot than any means. You know you are just deluding yourself. Even if all all 5 Chelsea players missed their penalties on Sunday it still doesn't Negate the fact that the probability to miss a penalty is about 1/10.

When you place 10 balls in a bag. 9 balls are white, 1 of the balls is red, if you randomly pick 1 ball from the bag. The probability that you will pick a red ball is 9/10 that of white is 1/10. what it means is that there is a very high chance that a ball picked at random from the bag will be red, with a slim chance of the picked ball being white. But that doesn't mean that it's not possible for you to pick a white ball, or even still pick a white ball again if you repeat the exercise or even for a third time.

When a couple with blood genotype AS and AS marry, this is the possible outcome of the genotype of their next offspring, according to Mendelian law of independent assortment: AS, AS,AA, and SS. The chance to produce a carrier(As) is 50% while those of sicklers and normal genotype is 25% apiece. So giving birrh to a sickler is less likely than producing a carrier and normal offspring, which is 75:25. But haven't you seen where a couple with such genotype in my example produced 3 sickling offsprings of of 4 children? And even in a classical case the 4th may even be an AA which also has a 25% chance to occur, while that which has the highest chance from the trio of outcomes AS may not even happen even if you try procreating 10 times.

I saw where you gave examples with Chelsea players scoring just one of their penalties or Portugal missing all their kicks against Chile. But you forgot that Arsenal and Chile in you scenario had a 100% success rates. Statistics has shown that penalties has far been scored more often than missed. So saying that scoring a penalty is a 50-50 chance is a ridiculous claim, except if you just want to exergerate

afrodoc2:


According Jordet et al in the Journal of Sports Science the success rate of penalties in the World Cup is 71.2 %, Copa America and Euros is above 82 % and even the 5th penalty which has the lowest success rate is above 64 %.
Penalty is not 50-50, more like 80-20 and there is no attacking action easier to implement in football than a penalty kick apart from maybe an empty net tap in.

Segadem:
...and don't u think some faithful fans will label u as a libel?

diggz:


Afrodoc na why u shook Ur mouth inside this thing now?

Anyways my point is that there is no way you and I can tell for sure if a penalty will end up as a goal or not, till after it is taken. We are never sure of the outcome are we? At best we can take an educative guess right? That was the point I was trying to make when I stated pens are 50 - 50.

Now based on the stats you posted above, how did you arrive at 80 - 20?

Will you be open to placing a bet each time a pen is about to be taken? If you are, kindly let me know. Tx

Segadem:
haba see long epistle!
Maybe what he meant was penalty shoot-out is 50-50 to either team
Pelle of Brazil said "it is only a bad penalty that will be missed"

Bimffo:


I am in.

When will payment start?

But damn it, you are a clown.

Delivery format sef dey. Where will be my Location/Thread sir.

CapitalCee:


There is no opinion here to give Mr. Saying that scoring a penalty is a 50-50 chance is like saying Addiss Ababa is the capital of Nigeria. It's easier to score from the penalty spot than any means. You know you are just deluding yourself. Even if all all 5 Chelsea players missed their penalties on Sunday it still doesn't Negate the fact that the probability to miss a penalty is about 1/10.

When you place 10 balls in a bag. 9 balls are white, 1 of the balls is red, if you randomly pick 1 ball from the bag. The probability that you will pick a red ball is 9/10 that of white is 1/10. what it means is that there is a very high chance that a ball picked at random from the bag will be red, with a slim chance of the picked ball being white. But that doesn't mean that it's not possible for you to pick a white ball, or even still pick a white ball again if you repeat the exercise or even for a third time.

When a couple with blood genotype AS and AS marry, this is the possible outcome of the genotype of their next offspring, according to Mendelian law of independent assortment: AS, AS,AA, and SS. The chance to produce a carrier(As) is 50% while those of sicklers and normal genotype is 25% apiece. So giving birrh to a sickler is less likely than producing a carrier and normal offspring, which is 75:25. But haven't you seen where a couple with such genotype in my example produced 3 sickling offsprings of of 4 children? And even in a classical case the 4th may even be an AA which also has a 25% chance to occur, while that which has the highest chance from the trio of outcomes AS may not even happen even if you try procreating 10 times.

I saw where you gave examples with Chelsea players scoring just one of their penalties or Portugal missing all their kicks against Chile. But you forgot that Arsenal and Chile in you scenario had a 100% success rates. Statistics has shown that penalties has far been scored more often than missed. So saying that scoring a penalty is a 50-50 chance is a ridiculous claim, except if you just want to exergerate

CapitalCee:


There is no opinion here to give Mr. Saying that scoring a penalty is a 50-50 chance is like saying Addiss Ababa is the capital of Nigeria. It's easier to score from the penalty spot than any means. You know you are just deluding yourself. Even if all all 5 Chelsea players missed their penalties on Sunday it still doesn't Negate the fact that the probability to miss a penalty is about 1/10.

When you place 10 balls in a bag. 9 balls are white, 1 of the balls is red, if you randomly pick 1 ball from the bag. The probability that you will pick a red ball is 9/10 that of white is 1/10. what it means is that there is a very high chance that a ball picked at random from the bag will be red, with a slim chance of the picked ball being white. But that doesn't mean that it's not possible for you to pick a white ball, or even still pick a white ball again if you repeat the exercise or even for a third time.

When a couple with blood genotype AS and AS marry, this is the possible outcome of the genotype of their next offspring, according to Mendelian law of independent assortment: AS, AS,AA, and SS. The chance to produce a carrier(As) is 50% while those of sicklers and normal genotype is 25% apiece. So giving birrh to a sickler is less likely than producing a carrier and normal offspring, which is 75:25. But haven't you seen where a couple with such genotype in my example produced 3 sickling offsprings of of 4 children? And even in a classical case the 4th may even be an AA which also has a 25% chance to occur, while that which has the highest chance from the trio of outcomes AS may not even happen even if you try procreating 10 times.

I saw where you gave examples with Chelsea players scoring just one of their penalties or Portugal missing all their kicks against Chile. But you forgot that Arsenal and Chile in you scenario had a 100% success rates. Statistics has shown that penalties has far been scored more often than missed. So saying that scoring a penalty is a 50-50 chance is a ridiculous claim, except if you just want to exergerate

afrodoc2:


I do not bet, not even on surer things. You do know there are researchers who study practically all the penalties played in top flight football?


The penalty success rate in La Liga over the last 6 seasons is 81 %, Bundesliga 81.56 %, Serie A 79.15 %.
It is basically 80-20 although when you get to the highest level of competition like UCL and the World Cup it is lower, more like 70-30.
These are statistical facts not prognostications from NL analysts

diggz:




Oga there is a reason why football is basically not science or simple mathematics that you can pick a pen to solve however when you reduce it to such, it shows you are not just being arrogant with what you consider to be true but deluded.

People who place their money on penalties will under what I am saying more, not a show off like you trying to reduce or rationalize why you can't tell if a player will miss or score a pen by using Mendelian law of assortment to prove shit.

For your information unlike the blood genotype thingy which science have made a lot of advancement in, no amount of science can predict the exact outcome of a pen to be taken by a player or which player will score a pen and those that will not except it has been prearranged.

If there is an amount of exaggeration in me saying each pen taken is 50 - 50, Yes! But you coming here to shout 75 - 25 like you can accurately tell when/if a pen will be missed or scored, by what ratio it will happen in a game etc is the biggest joke of the day.

I made an offer earlier as regard pens before they are taken, if you are sure of your Mendelian law when next we are going to have a pen in a game, you will be dropping cash to support Ur theory. I am sure you won't mind betting with your life savings if your are sure of turning it into several thousands or millions,will you?

Ibime:
Stewpidity is selling Ake for £20m, then chasing Drinkwater for £30m.

CapitalCee:


I think we should drop this argument, you are drifting out of scope. Even 99:1 probability can go the way of 1/100 at a given time, so I don't know what you mean by I should go and bet on penalties which is very unpredictable. The fact is that it's easier for a player to score from the spot than to miss. No player is praised for scoring a penalty but goal keeper can win motm by saving a single spot kick. You know I am telling you the truth.

Ibime:
Stewpidity is selling Ake for £20m, then chasing Drinkwater for £30m.

diggz:



Burr burrr Ake wasn't good enough and ready to play for the senior team.

bigkesh:

Drinkwater understands PL football and he has experience of European footie
Here at Chelsea, we are not a development center, we don't have time to blood anybody
We want to win trophies and not be like Spurs,that why we sign superstars like Drinkwater and Barkley

Ibime:
Stewpidity is selling Ake for £20m, then chasing Drinkwater for £30m.

hensben:
its not stupidity. We need English players in our squad.

diggz:
Kesh why will you send a name and not include the name of the receiver?


Emmmm......lemme see if I can get who can help out. Griffon who should we address this mail to now.....?

diggz:


We need English players to do what exactly bro?

hensben:
Quota system things

Griffon:


Nihilist isn't a proponent of youth megedefegede, he doesn't believe in that crap. He believes elite competitions should be handled by elite players.

Remember our delivery format?

That is Mr Nihilist's package. Address, 37 City Road London, England.

Griffon:


Nihilist isn't a proponent of youth megedefegede, he doesn't believe in that crap. He believes elite competitions should be handled by elite players.

Remember our delivery format?

That is Mr Nihilist's package. Address, 37 City Road London, England.

hensben:
Quota system things

Griffon:


Ake is definitely homegrown. He has been registered with us for a period of three seasons prior to his 21st birthday.

So he over-qualifies for your quota megedefegede.

bigkesh:
Ladies and gentlemen, we can now confirm that Okazaki is better than Marcus RashFord and Ihenacho