TheGoodJoe:


If that is what you want. Fine. A striker who will not score almost a year for the Super Eagles. No wonder you prefer Etebo.

Me, I will always want a clinical goal scorer leading the line.

Also, cancel Algeria because even their coach pointed Iheanacho as the reason they lost. Whether you like it or not, you can not bend the truth. In South Africa, our final balls let the team down. Not Iheanacho.

Mickael2:


Goldfish here you go, seems like theGoodJoe is trying to implement the 'changing the goal posts' skills he learnt from Pep's training sessions, this is a comment you made after the match against Leicester, feel free to click on it and read all you said then

Mickael2:


Goldfish here you go, seems like theGoodJoe is trying to implement the 'changing the goal posts' skills he learnt from Pep's training sessions, this is a comment you made after the match against Leicester, feel free to click on it and read all you said then

goldfish80:

Hahahahaha

This is the thing with lies. You won't know when you contradict yourself. The Internet never forgets.

TheGoodJoe please come and dig yourself out of this.

This night is shapping up nicely.

TheGoodJoe:


You do not need to lie to make a point. When Iheanacho played well and people like you want o paint him bad, supporting your misconception and misunderstanding is deceiving myself.

I have criticised Nacho in games. I think one was against Leicester City last season when I said Nacho should have not stayed with the marker but drop deep to evade them.

I have repeatedly called on Nacho to study Firmino. So I wonder where you got that do no wrong idea.

Also, Asensio is not a Real Madrid regularly but when he comes on, you see quality. What he pulled off yesterday was breathtaking and a new dimension of the Asensio I know. Watching it was a pure reflection of hardwork, confidence and determination. He achieved this without being a Real Madrid regular.

My point is too simple.

TheGoodJoe:


Please pull the quotes. Let me see how I praised Iheanacho. I am waiting.

[color=#000099]TheGoodJoe:


Iheanacho had a good game. There I no way you can say he had a poor game when he did not have good service. He made the most of the situation. Created a clear scoring opportunity for Gundogan, won a clear penalty that was denied.

The question is, how did you not see any of these and asked for one thing.

What of the clear build-up plays by Nacho when he dropped deep?

So, which if these did you see?

Yara Yara, bring my Bullet proof vest. Someone is shooting point blank. [/color ]

goldfish80:

TheGoodJoe:


I guess you do not understand what praising a player is. Saying a player was not poor is not praising. Praising a player is when you say the player did well.

tbaba1234:


I have said it severally, the best local players are not in the league. League players have the mindset that makes it impossible to win away.

If we had Manu Garba assembles an under 20 side from academies or amatuer teams, they will stand a better chance of winning away.

We have seen our league players take healthy leads to Sudan and capitulate.

TheGoodJoe:


There is no way you can say he had a poor game when he did not have good service. He made the most of the situation.

Grammar. That is not praising. From the situation he had, you can nit say he had a poor game.

When you guys are working hard to rubbish Iheanacho's effort and I am pointing out the things he did well, that is not praising.

TheGoodJoe:


Iheanacho had a good game. There I no way you can say he had a poor game when he did not have good service. He made the most of the situation. Created a clear scoring opportunity for Gundogan, won a clear penalty that was denied.

The question is, how did you not see any of these and asked for one thing.

What of the clear build-up plays by Nacho when he dropped deep?

So, which if these did you see?

Yara Yara, bring my Bullet proof vest. Someone is shooting point blank.

goldfish80:


Classic! Absolutely classic! As a spin doctor, you're above average. With a few crash course here and there you can land yourself a job with the Apc propaganda machinery.
To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if you raised a Kelechi Iheanacho alter in your living room.

goldfish80:


TheGoodJoe:


Iheanacho had a good game. There I no way you can say he had a poor game when he did not have good service. He made the most of the situation. Created a clear scoring opportunity for Gundogan, won a clear penalty that was denied.

The question is, how did you not see any of these and asked for one thing.

What of the clear build-up plays by Nacho when he dropped deep?

So, which if these did you see?

Yara Yara, bring my Bullet proof vest. Someone is shooting point blank.

The bolded is not praising Kelechi abi? Are we still talking about a guy who touched the ball 12 times before subbed off?

TheGoodJoe:


There is no way you can say he had a poor game when he did not have good service. He made the most of the situation.

IT is very clear. No spin. I did not praise Nacho. I was explaining he did not have a poor game. You can not bend the truth.

TheGoodJoe:


You do not need to lie to make a point. When Iheanacho played well and people like you want o paint him bad, supporting your misconception and misunderstanding is deceiving myself.

I have criticised Nacho in games. I think one was against Leicester City last season when I said Nacho should have not stayed with the marker but drop deep to evade them.

I have repeatedly called on Nacho to study Firmino. So I wonder where you got that do no wrong idea.

Also, Asensio is not a Real Madrid regularly but when he comes on, you see quality. What he pulled off yesterday was breathtaking and a new dimension of the Asensio I know. Watching it was a pure reflection of hardwork, confidence and determination. He achieved this without being a Real Madrid regular.

My point is too simple.

goldfish80:

Our for curiosity, how did you manage to criticize and still want to explain he didn't have a poor game?
What kind of paradox is that? I can't reconcile the two sentences.

TheGoodJoe:


I am not ready to start digging out my position of Iheanacho increasing his movement, following the ball and being part of the overall play of the game. A lot of you are just wrapped in bias logic just as the above. Then make up stories.

I have repeatedly highlighted Iheanacho should study Firmino. Use the wings. That is for him to become better and imposing. To become brilliant. Criticizing someone is not always about being creative.


There is a term called constructive criticism.

tbaba1234:
Sadiq Umar has been signed by Torino on loan with an option to buy for 6 Million Euros.

goldfish80:



Constructive criticism indeed. Please point out those constructive criticisms from your posts after the Leicester City game.
You basically went on and on how the referee cheated you, complained about Leicester City players bullying Kelechi, how Kelechi won headers, how he ran past Albrighton (this was only shown on your TV). Suddenly, today you somersaulted and claimed you critised Kelechi's poor game.

TheGoodJoe:


That is me explaining that Iheanacho did not have a poor game. With the venomous attacks coming in and me seeing the young man's efforts, I explained to people like you the things he did right.

As I said, I am not ready to start digging post of me telling Iheanacho to drop deep and be part of the game. Or when I repeatedly called for Iheanacho to study Firmino.

At least you can see I did not praise Iheanacho.

TheGoodJoe:


That is me explaining that Iheanacho did not have a poor game. With the venomous attacks coming in and me seeing the young man's efforts, I explained to people like you the things he did right.

As I said, I am not ready to start digging post of me telling Iheanacho to drop deep and be part of the game. Or when I repeatedly called for Iheanacho to study Firmino.

At least you can see I did not praise Iheanacho.

goldfish80:


Nobody was attacking Kelechi. You first came up with the sentence that he had a good game.
People started reacting to that sentence. Please don't twist facts.

goldfish80:


Nobody was attacking Kelechi. You first came up with the sentence that he had a good game.
People started reacting to that sentence. Please don't twist facts.

TheGoodJoe:


Oh, Blood Of Jackie Chan.

Please read the follow up of the good game I beg you before posting this kind of thing of me being first.


There is no way you can say he had a poor game when he did not have good service. He made the most of the situation.

Did you read you can not say he had a poor game? Ha.

TheGoodJoe:


I did not say stay at Manchester City all his career. A year or two and absolve the technical understanding and Discipline of the game. After that seek for game time. You can not unlock knowledge. This is about gaining deep understanding and applying it. Improving his attributes.

For instance, if he learns to play as fluid as Gabriel Jesus or Firmino, a coach can not unlock that.

Mickael2:



but you just said you criticised him after the game, I searched through 5 pages before that your comment and five other pages after just to be sure you still had a little credibility when it comes to Iheanacho but ofcourse.

Here is a hint, click on 'search', type 'Iheanacho should learn from coutinho, theGoodjoe', and tell us what you saw(as my friend I am advicing you not to). You only started pointing out that Nacho should learn from Firminho when Pep stopped playing him entirely, ofcourse that was just a move to justify Pep because I don't really know if you share the same bed with him so you were only open to criticising Nacho if it means praising Pep

Mickael2:


this is the ONLY time you mentioned that he should learn from Firmino and check that date, that was on the 8th of April and that was in a bid to support Pep's decision to always leave him on the bench, feel free to read Sir

Mickael2:


First you said you criticised him, you never did.

Second, you said you pointed out that he should learn from Firmino, you didn't do that either, you only said he did his part that it was the defenders' faults that Iheanacho did not score(can't stop myself from laughing)

TheGoodJoe:


As I said before Etebo is not a good choice to spearhead our attack when we have Iheanacho in the side. When it comes to selection, it is best to have the most clinical finisher ahead to make the most of the chances.

Joebie:
The most clinical forward does not always play as a Center Forward. Have you noticed that Messi hardly plays 9, Even Ronaldo also. We need a three-prong, or two-prong fire power. I don't care where Iheanacho plays. Etebo didn't play 9 when he scored four times in our Olympics opener. Let's have 2 to 3 strikers that can fire from any angle, complementing each other as well. Football don't have to be rigid.

TheGoodJoe:


Even if you have three striking combination, one must spearhead the attack. In Barcelona today, it is Suarez and he is today more clinical than Messi to the best of my knowledge. I will prefer Suarez leading the attack than Messi. I wonder who you feel is better leading.