pascal558:
Ok bros,u 2much!

Simongm:
Malta to beat England @105 odds.
Oh boy, see odds!
Please do you know of any bookie' that is offering (2:0) handicap to Malta?

pascal558:
bro abeg u stl get my merrybet password and username?I b want make u hlp me copy my referal link out nd paste am here so i go copy am,i wan us am refer sum niggies 4 d contest!Lol

tips234:
SWEEDEN
[s][Team Thoren vs Umea FC

TIME: 1800GMT

TIPS: 2/2 HT/FT

ODDS: 4.50[/s]

NETHERLANDS
NEC Nijmegen vs FC Eindhoven

TIME:19:00GMT

TIPS: 1/1 HT/FT

ODDS: 2.15


IRELAND
Dundalk FC vs St Patricks Dublin

TIME: 19:45

TIPS 1/1 HT/FT

ODDS: 2.10

okpaniokpani:
SURE TIP FOR 1/09/17
Hungary - NB II
Gyirmot - Soroksar SC
Prediction - AWAY WIN

youdontknowme:


Odds could be much higher and you have just 2 outcomes to choose from, true. But it doesn't make it less risky bro. In recent years I ve staked more tennis matches than football. The odds might be juicy but first of all, all you need is luck just like in football. I ve seen many upsets happen either in set betting or number of games. 1.02, 1.03 upsets,

For those just delving into this, first thing to note. Rankings doesn't always assure a win, naah.

Other things like fatigue, mindset, surface being played, players in their host country, injury even female players on their pe***d amongst others.

Its not as straight forward as it seems most times.

puskin:

If I catch you spamming here........sorry go be ya case.

Camillus92:


You got it wrong, in my first post I said the less risky option is the over or under games. Let me explain that for benefit of others, a normal tennis game has 3 sets, it is expected to have 12games, being that if the first player wins the first set 6-0, he may also win the second game 6-0, now this outcome is very unlikely, based on the competitiveness of the game, so if there is competition the game will go into the 3rd set, and you can have an over 17.5 games. So if bet9ja gives an over 18.5 games for a 3 set game at 1.74, you don't think its more likely to come than an ov2.5 at 1.5 or sometimes 1.6 for a very goal scoring team.

So my brother isn't it less risky, imagine if a Nasal and federer is playing on a 4 set game, are you telling me that an over 32.5 game will be unrealistic for a 1.8.

My dear, like I said earlier I be studied it, and the chances of a game finishing above an 18.5 for a 3 set game is very high.

For instance, I played a game today, ov 20.5 at 1.70, for a 3 set game, it finished ov 22.5, tell me, isn't it less risky and more profitable that the football we a play.

And lasty you mentioned you play, who to win, that's not smart, I don't do that, first, the odds are low, then anything can happen, why willi put my money on a Nasal against chukwuma at 1.09 , when I can smartly put it on a ov 30.5 at a odd of an 1.6.

I maintain my word, its less risky, at a 50% its more less risky than a football game at 80%.

King4Roller:


Dash me the money you want to dash to alabi.

King4Roller:

I no 2 sure whether i still get am o. If na whatsapp we use transact.e go still dey. But if na text. U go resend am.

Camillus92:


You got it wrong, in my first post I said the less risky option is the over or under games. Let me explain that for benefit of others, a normal tennis game has 3 sets, it is expected to have 12games, being that if the first player wins the first set 6-0, he may also win the second game 6-0, now this outcome is very unlikely, based on the competitiveness of the game, so if there is competition the game will go into the 3rd set, and you can have an over 17.5 games. So if bet9ja gives an over 18.5 games for a 3 set game at 1.74, you don't think its more likely to come than an ov2.5 at 1.5 or sometimes 1.6 for a very goal scoring team.

So my brother isn't it less risky, imagine if a Nadal and federer is playing on a 4 set game, are you telling me that an over 32.5 game will be unrealistic for a 1.8.

My dear, like I said earlier I be studied it, and the chances of a game finishing above an 18.5 for a 3 set game is very high.

For instance, I played a game today, ov 20.5 at 1.70, for a 3 set game, it finished ov 22.5, tell me, isn't it less risky and more profitable than the football we all play.

And lasty you mentioned you play, (who to win), that's not smart, I don't do that, first, the odds are low, then anything can happen, why willi put my money on a Nadal against chukwuma at 1.09 , when I can smartly put it on a ov 30.5 at a odd of an 1.6.

I maintain my word, its less risky, at a 50% its more less risky than a football game at 80%.

puskin:


If I catch you spamming here........sorry go be ya case.

emmyspark007:

Lol see online bullying...puskin na bad guy o, im fit nack this guy ban

motta:
sounds nice i go try.

I just took the risk too. See You in 18 days.

Simongm:
Malta to beat England @105 odds.
Oh boy, see odds!
Please do you know of any bookie' that is offering (2:0) handicap to Malta?

pascal558:
na txt oh,nd me nr get funds 4 phone to txt nw,make i snd am here
u ought to knw d missing digit na!

pascal558:
bro abeg u stl get my merrybet password and username?I b want make u hlp me copy my referal link out nd paste am here so i go copy am,i wan us am refer sum niggies 4 d contest!Lol

Camillus92:


You got it wrong, in my first post I said the less risky option is the over or under games. Let me explain that for benefit of others, a normal tennis game has 3 sets, it is expected to have 12games, being that if the first player wins the first set 6-0, he may also win the second game 6-0, now this outcome is very unlikely, based on the competitiveness of the game, so if there is competition the game will go into the 3rd set, and you can have an over 17.5 games. So if bet9ja gives an over 18.5 games for a 3 set game at 1.74, you don't think its more likely to come than an ov2.5 at 1.5 or sometimes 1.6 for a very goal scoring team.

So my brother isn't it less risky, imagine if a Nadal and federer is playing on a 4 set game, are you telling me that an over 32.5 game will be unrealistic for a 1.8.

My dear, like I said earlier I be studied it, and the chances of a game finishing above an 18.5 for a 3 set game is very high.

For instance, I played a game today, ov 20.5 at 1.70, for a 3 set game, it finished ov 22.5, tell me, isn't it less risky and more profitable than the football we all play.

And lasty you mentioned you play, (who to win), that's not smart, I don't do that, first, the odds are low, then anything can happen, why willi put my money on a Nadal against chukwuma at 1.09 , when I can smartly put it on a ov 30.5 at a odd of an 1.6.

I maintain my word, its less risky, at a 50% its more less risky than a football game at 80%.

Sniper12:
Na only betting fit make man dey vex as hin country score. Make una no cast me NG o

Phi001:
Romania - Armenia
Handicap (0:1) 1 H @2.18

Lithuania - Scotland
Double Chance 1X @2.10

Malta - England
Handicap (3:0) 1 H @2.47


Total Odds: 11.47