We had a very hot argument with Chelsea fan today consigning Salah of Liverpool and Hazard of Chelsea. Please guy what do you think about the two, who do you think is the best currently?

Harzar has more experience

Salah is still a raw talent that is getting matured.

No comparisons, Hazard is better.

I am a Monaco Fan BTW.

Why the fucck would anybody compare hazard with salah?

That is an insult to hazard.

They have compared hazard with virtually every flavour of the month ranging from martial, depay, sanchez, KDB, e.et.c

salah is the man of the moment,harzard is the man of the people....shikena,,,,,,,,,,,never walk alone

Apart from dribbling Harzard is not better than Mo'Salah

BeeBeeOoh:
Apart from dribbling Harzard is not better than Mo'Salah

You are right.hazard doesnt dribble,he dances.i rate sanchez higher than hazard,he scores more,assists more and dribbles more.he has even won international trophies.

BiafranBushBoy:
Harzar has more experience

Salah is still a raw talent that is getting matured.

No comparisons, Hazard is better.

I am a Monaco Fan BTW.

currently now bro Salah is better than Hazard no sentiment

cstr1000:
Why the fucck would anybody compare hazard with salah?

That is an insult to hazard.

They have compared hazard with virtually every flavour of the month ranging from martial, depay, sanchez, KDB, e.et.c

you get it wrong Salah is better than Hazard in there current form

Salah all the way.

Lataability:
you get it wrong Salah is better than Hazard in there current form

Current form ko, current form ni.

Salah is better than Ronaldo on current form. That is how ridiculous you sound.

BeeBeeOoh:
Apart from dribbling Harzard is not better than Mo'Salah

Are you talking about the same salah that couldn't cut it with Chelsea?

If he is that Good, the best clubs will be looking for him like countinho.

Anyway, we have heard stuffs like this before. That was how manure fans at some point in time said Depay is better than hazard because of few weeks of highlights.

na here we go dey na.

Lataability:
currently now bro Salah is better than Hazard no sentiment

There is a difference between current form and being better.

Take note.

Sallah is leading hazard with goals and all a sudden he's better than hazard lol I understand Liverpool fans wanna hype there own but pls don't try to be smart by saying current form, even hazard has more work rate than salah currently. We talking bout a player that had injury at the beginning of season yet he manage to get along real fast,I'll wait till salah win pfa then we will talk .

Which fool made this comparison?

Oluwasaeon:
Which fool made this comparison?

this is open debate, make a point and don't insult ursef

Chai!...This is so disrespectful comparing Salah to Hazard. Before it was martial,coutinho,depay,sanchez,KDB,someone even said sterling. Chai i wish he was in a more attacking team than chelsea then this nonesense no go happen.

There is no basis for comparison. They play for different clubs whose style of play differs. What the coaches of the clubs require/will require from both will also be different. It depends on what the coach wants.
If you want someone with sharp and fast counter attacking football, and one that can run behind the defence, you'll probably go for Salah. If you want someone that can face, torment and take the ball to the opposition defenders, you'll go for Hazard.
The closest person you can compare with Hazard in Liverpool is Coutinho, because they play almost the same way. Both have their strength and weaknesses also.

BiafranBushBoy:
Harzar has more experience

Salah is still a raw talent that is getting matured.

No comparisons, Hazard is better.

I am a Monaco Fan BTW.

Nigerians most times watch English Premier league and we just believe dat those players playing in premier league are better off than other players in other leagues. how many of us watch Seria A (AS Roma) or Switzerland League (Basel)
Salah has more experience than Hazard, Salah has proven to be not only an experience player but a very important player in every team he has played for.
If only Morinho had been patient with d likes of Salah and Debruyne Chelsea wud have been like d present day Man City. Salah is a superb player, he has great pace, quality passes, dribbles so well, great strength (d guy no dey tire) and above all can score any day any time.
From Zamalek to Basel to Chelsea to Roma and Currently Liverpool, he has been delivering and u say he is upcoming Na wa for u ooo

agbangam:



Nigerians most times watch English Premier league and we just believe dat those players playing in premier league are better off than other players in other leagues. how many of us watch Seria A (AS Roma) or Switzerland League (Basel)
Salah has more experience than Hazard, Salah has proven to be not only an experience player but a very important player in every team he has played for.
If only Morinho had been patient with d likes of Salah and Debruyne Chelsea wud have been like d present day Man City. Salah is a superb player, he has great pace, quality passes, dribbles so well, great strength (d guy no dey tire) and above all can score any day any time.
From Zamalek to Basel to Chelsea to Roma and Currently Liverpool, he has been delivering and u say he is upcoming Na wa for u ooo

nice one, this is ehat am expecting to hear

korlahwarleh:
There is no basis for comparison. They play for different clubs whose style of play differs. What the coaches of the clubs require/will require from both will also be different. It depends on what the coach wants.
If you want someone with sharp and fast counter attacking football, and one that can run behind the defence, you'll probably go for Salah. If you want someone that can face, torment and take the ball to the opposition defenders, you'll go for Hazard.
The closest person you can compare with Hazard in Liverpool is Coutinho, because they play almost the same way. Both have their strength and weaknesses also.

i dont think so. Harzard is a utility prayer just like Messi and Cr7 but he don't score, Salah is better than him in this current form

Hazard is good but salah will go farther than him football of this days is all about goals and that (goals) salah have more than hazard

Op if you can compare Hazard with Salah on current form then compare him with measi, ronaldo and neymar too, nonsense!!

agbangam:



Nigerians most times watch English Premier league and we just believe dat those players playing in premier league are better off than other players in other leagues. how many of us watch Seria A (AS Roma) or Switzerland League (Basel)
Salah has more experience than Hazard, Salah has proven to be not only an experience player but a very important player in every team he has played for.
If only Morinho had been patient with d likes of Salah and Debruyne Chelsea wud have been like d present day Man City. Salah is a superb player, he has great pace, quality passes, dribbles so well, great strength (d guy no dey tire) and above all can score any day any time.
From Zamalek to Basel to Chelsea to Roma and Currently Liverpool, he has been delivering and u say he is upcoming Na wa for u ooo

and who tell you say hazard no dey deliver? He was the best player in French league the season Chelsea bought him, he scored 20 league goals that season, only giroud scored more goals than him with 21 goals. He has also won the best player in English league with over 50 league goals for Chelsea since he joined.

spy24:
Hazard is good but salah will go farther than him football of this days is all about goals and that (goals) salah have more than hazard

Bro the modern football doesn't work that way, the modern football is all about consistency, YES salah MIGHT go farther if only he can be consistent. Do you wonder why messi and Ronaldo have been exceptional among other players? Its because they are more consistent than others.

Because sallah has more goals than hazard now means he is better abi then you can say he's better than Ronaldo also naw

comparing salah to hazard is an insult to hazard, salah should be compared with the likes of sterling, de bruyne, martial, sane, dybala , pogba and dele alli.. hazard is a complete player to salah. the likes of neymar, bale, sanchez and coutinho came close and not salah.. pple can compare blindly oo. and who also says hazard don't score much, he won league with an average team lille, came second scorer and won ligue one best player. he has won the league twice with chelsea, pfa and bags more than14 league goals all season except for the 2015/16 season, and won chelsea player of the year for 3 seasons now. hazard brace against Newcastle makes it 80 for Chelsea in 5 season and half, which makes it an average of 15 goals each season.. hazard is the main man in chelsea but salah has the likes of coutinho and mane who makes tge work easy for him. hazard is a better attacker, a better player to salah.. ever consistent is hazard. salah is good but no where near hazard.. am a united fan, but i know hazard is better

BiafranBushBoy:
Harzar has more experience

Salah is still a raw talent that is getting matured.

No comparisons, Hazard is better.

I am a Monaco Fan BTW.

Haa so Monaco got fan for naija

andrew444:


Haa so Monaco got fan for naija

Lol... Yes oo.. We full ground.

maxwell530:
and who tell you say hazard no dey deliver? He was the best player in French league the season Chelsea bought him, he scored 20 league goals that season, only giroud scored more goals than him with 21 goals. He has also won the best player in English league with over 50 league goals for Chelsea since he joined.

Hazard has never scored 20 premier league goals,hazard highest premier league campaign was last season with is about 15 or so,even when Chelsea won the league during mourinho return he scored just 13

cstr1000:

Are you talking about the same salah that couldn't cut it with Chelsea?

If he is that Good, the best clubs will be looking for him like countinho.

Anyway, we have heard stuffs like this before. That was how manure fans at some point in time said Depay is better than hazard because of few weeks of highlights.

na here we go dey na.

Salah was not given a chance at Chelsea just like de Bruyne dats does not make him a bad player okay,hazard was given the chance

andrew444:


Salah was not given a chance at Chelsea just like de Bruyne dats does not make him a bad player okay,hazard was given the chance

I didn't say he was a bad player. Hazard came, took his chance right from the first game.

Salah came, couldn't really compete with the Chelsea team at the time. Yes he should have been given more time, but Hazard didn't need time to became a Chelsea main-stay. He blew from the very first game.

So it is an insult to compare salah with Hazard . Form is temporary, class is permanent.

lukency:
Salah all the way.

let's be sincere,if your team is playing a match against hazard or salah,which player will you dread most?