Sunmolar:

dem born em with hijab ni?

Were u born wearing cloth? Use ur sense

Look at the way u Africans r fighting over cultures that r not urs but imposed on ur ancestors by religious imperialists.

Hijab,bible,quoran,churches etc ve never n will never advance d course of d African in this ever changing world.

Africa is lagging behind in all spheres of life but religion.

jamesibor:


The pillar of Islam has nothing to do with adhering to simple rules.

I tire oh! As if the bar na mosque

mapet:


I was wondering what your name is, thanks for telling me.

With the stupid school rules that you posted above, we are still waiting for you to tell us how that is superior to the fundamental human rights in the constitution
Empty fu cking jerry can!

Sometimes i wonder if the christiens abide by there bible doctrine or not, if u r a true christien lady, u r suppose to cover ur head as directed in the bible, but the christiens are those strongly against it when ever they saw someone wearing it, i see christienity more of a religeon of racing for riches n also fashion.... Not of faith.

Elthugnificent:
I believe you are a Muslim right? Can you show me where it is clearly Witten in the quoran that woman are to wear hijab?

Quran24:31And tell the believing women to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their sons, their husbands' sons, their brothers, their brothers' sons, their sisters' sons, their women, that which their right hands possess or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.

cooljoe:
the law school rules which she knows explicitly states dat she can't have her hair covered for c2b. ignorance of d law is never an excuse, but equity can step in and grant u relief in ignorance of facts- an option still not available to her, cos she knew from d onset. bro's, d constitution is d ground norm, but d rules of d b council off legal education has not contravened it. so should I now say. because d constitution gives me a right. to freedom of speech- I have a right os slander someone? ur rights are subject to a lot of things. that's y dat same constitution always says say subject to so nd so or in pursuant to so nd so, or d provisions o so nd so notwithstanding. that is to tell u dat notn is absolute

I'll post a judgement of the law court for you and @Mapet to peruse.

Hope you guys will understand and tell the world the contradiction in their rule dress code to the constitution. If any in law is in disagreement with the constitution, it's void.

Yes, nothing is absolute. Even section 45 of the constitution states unequivocally when and why such right can be taken off an individual . The law school is acting outside that provisions and as people in law profession, they must be seen to be acting within the ambit of the law.

Courts have consistently held that, having regards to chapter 24:30-31 of the Holy Quran, a Muslim female has the unfettered right to wear her hijab anywhere.

The Court of Appeal Ilorin Division in the Unreported case of *THE PROVOST, KWARA STATE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ILORIN & 2 ORS VS BASHIRAT SALIU & 2 ORS Appeal No CA/IL/49/2006,
delivered on the 18th day of June, 2009, per Hussein Mukhtar, JCA,held at page 15 – 16 of the lead judgement thus:

“The foregoing verses of the Glorious Qur’an and Hadiths have left no room for doubt on the Islamic Injunction on women’s mode of dress, which is clearly in conformity with not only the Respondent’s veiled dress but also the controversial article J of the 3rd Applicants’ dress code. The use of veil by the respondents, therefore qualifies as a fundamental right under Section 38 (1) of the Constitution”.

The Court of Appeal further held per Massoud AbdulRahman Oredola, JCA at page 2 of the concurrent judgement;

“The right of the Respondents to wear their Hijab, veil within the School campus and INDEED ANYWHERE else is adequately protected under our laws. Human rights recognizes and protects religious rights. Section 38 of the
1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria guaranteed freedom of religion to all and sundry. Thus things that lawfully constitute OPEN MANIFESTATION, PROPAGATION, WORSHIP, TEACHING, PRACTICE AND OBSERVANCE of
the said religion are equally and by extension similarly guaranteed and protected by the Constitution. Indeed the Hijab, Niqab or Burqa, being part and parcel of Islamic code of dressing and by whatever standard a dignified
or vividly decent one cannot be taken away by any other law other than the Constitution”

Just last year, 2016, Justice Falola of the Osun State High Court restated the law as pronounced in the Court of Appeal decision above while delivering judgement in the case of Sheikh Oyinwola & Ors V The Governor of Osun state & Ors SUIT NO. HOS/M.17/2013 delivered on the 3rd of June, 2016. Bound by the time honoured principle of Judicial Precedent, the court held that the use of Islamically prescribed head cover called Hijab by the Muslim Female Students in all Primary and Secondary
Schools in Osun State forms part of their fundamental rights to
freedom of religion, conscience and thought as contained in Section
38 of 1999 Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) and also declared that Article 8.2(v) of the “Guidelines on Administration
and Discipline in Osun State Public Schools“ issued by the Ministry
of Education prohibiting Muslim females from wearing hijab in public schools is not only discriminatory against Muslim female students but also uncalled for, inconsistent with Section 38 of 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and a clear violation of the fundamental rights of Muslim female
students in Public Schools in Osun State to freedom of religion and therefore null, void and of no effect whatsoever.

A month after, A specially constituted panel of the Court of Appeal sitting in Lagos on Thursday, July 21, 2016 unanimously reaffirmed its decision delivered in 2009 at Ilorin, Kwara state Division. It reversed the judgment of a Lagos State High Court in Ikeja which on October 17, 2014 banned the use of hijab in Lagos State public primary and secondary schools.
The appellate declared in a unanimous judgment on Thursday that the ban was discriminatory against Muslim pupils in the state.
It accordingly reinstated the use of hijab in Lagos schools.

so bcoz buharis daughter do not hear hijab then every Muslim girl should stop wearing hijab abi?

nonut:

Actually, they were talking to the israelites.
In your Koran, they were specifically talking to Muslims in general.
If you wanna quote, do it correctly.

The "Biblical God" of Moses isn't different from that of Joshua and even Jesus.

The verse wasn't quoted from Hindu's or some other religious books. It was quoted from ur very own Bible and as "directed" by ur "Biblical God" so, shove down ur explanation and don't even try to bring dis bla bla bla bull sh*t hia.

U must be well fed with ur pill.

We are used to u guyz picking a particular verse with a view of displaying ur sheer ignorance without getting to know how it came to be.

Don't be tired yet!

abdddone:





BaarakaLlaahu feek brother.

I'm sure some sane and objective minds will pick from what you've said so far but I'm afraid you may not be able to help islamophobes

Wa'iyakum, brother.


They're full of hate to learn, I don't bother myself on them anymore.

ukeleh:
Is President Buhari's daughter a standard to measure Islam? The standard of Islam is the Holy Quran. In the holy Quran, women are told to wear Hijab same as in the Bible. For the fact that Christians don't obey all laws in their Bible will not make Muslims to be forcefully disobey the Quran.

It's better you practice your sharia or quoranic law and not the conventional law ok?

Caseless:
I'll post a judgement of the law court for you and @Mapet to peruse.

Hope you guys will understand and tell the world the contradiction in their rule dress code to the constitution. If any in law is in disagreement with the constitution, it's void.

Yes, nothing is absolute. Even section 45 of the constitution states unequivocally when and why such right can be taken off an individual . The law school is acting outside that provisions and as people in law profession, they must be seen to be acting within the ambit of the law.

sound argument and authority albeit d osun state court pronouncement will only draw water in osun state. bt dat of d court off appeal becums judicial precedent, and remains so except it's upturned by d court of appeal or the supreme Court. Very sound

KanuJEWSarePIGS:


Don't try to bring dis bla bla bla bool sh*t hia.

U must be well fed with ur pill.

We are used to u guyz picking a particular verse with a view of displaying ur sheer ignorance without getting to know how it came to be.

Don't be tired yet!

Give them an acidic verse from the Bible, and they'll deflect by telling you it's for a certain group of people or say "that's in old testament" , as if the Bible did not command them to follow everything contained in it irrespective of the testament.

MrAcube:


So the first daughter should now be the constitution upon which we should all behave. Op get ur fact right before u make presentation lest u are considered unlearned

Your statement lacks any logical basis. If the first daughter can adhere to the rules set by the Council of Legal education as per the dress code for the call to bar event, why should Simbiat from from Makoko disobey the rules under the guise of religion.

MrAcube:


Olodo, u are taking things out of context. To ur understanding what do u think d garment mention there is meant to do if not cover them and to whom does the verse make reference if not women. Must you be spoon-fed always? Read with ur objective mind always

LOL.. I'm being objective and not subjective as you've chosen to be, he said outer garment means veil, why not check the meaning of outer garment and veil.

I'm not taking things out of context, I was only following what he said, and explaining it in my understanding.

Oyinda32:




So President Buhari's family is the Yardstick for Islamic Judgment ? OP oya receive sense

You are the one who needs sense here. Who is talking about President Buhari's fakiky and Islam here?
The subject matter here is adherence to laid down rules and clearly spelt dress code by the Council of Legal Education.

What a beautiful lady She knows that the law comes before anything else As for the one who refused to obey instructions that's her cup of tea

Elthugnificent:
I believe you are a Muslim right? Can you show me where it is clearly Witten in the quoran that woman are to wear hijab?

“And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like both eyes for necessity to see the way, or outer palms of hands or one eye or dress like veil, gloves, headcover, apron), and to draw their veils all over Juyoobihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms) and not to reveal their adornment except to their husbands, or their fathers, or their husband’s fathers, or their sons, or their husband’s sons, or their brothers or their brother’s sons, or their sister’s sons, or their (Muslim) women (i.e. their sisters in Islam), or the (female) slaves whom their right hands possess, or old male servants who lack vigour, or small children who have no sense of feminine sex. And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment. And all of you beg Allaah to forgive you all, O believers, that you may be successful”

[al-Noor 24:31]

This is the verse you requested for.

livinbygrace:



It's better you practice your sharia or quoranic law and not the conventional law ok?

quranic or shariah law are in our constitution. You can't ask us not to practice what's in our constitution.

[quote author=Saheed9 post=63324513]what about this [/quot And compare this to that of Buhari's daughter...... the deference is clear

ify2sladex:

Kindly check Quran 33:59
And I suppose you're a Christian, how about you refer to Corinthians 11:6? (It is clearly stated that your women should cover their hair)
Study your Bible first b4 putting your mouth in what you know nothing about!

Mr man, read verse 5 of the book of Corinthians you recommended, you will see that bible mentioned the condition in which women are mandated to cover their heads, it says when praying. Now ask yourself is that place a place of prayers?. Don't quote bible to suite your hypothetical stance.

HarmonyDee:
What a beautiful lady
She knows that the law comes before anything else
As for the one who refused to obey instructions that's her cup of tea

what law?

Saheed9:
what about this

. compare this to that of Buhari's daughter.... the deference is clear

HarmonyDee:
What a beautiful lady
She knows that the law comes before anything else
As for the one who refused to obey instructions that's her cup of tea

And you would still need to remix this rubbish you wrote when you hear she has been called to bar.

tibaonnet:

Mr man, read verse 5 of the book of Corinthians you recommended, you will see that bible mentioned the condition in which women are mandated to cover their heads, it says when praying. Now ask yourself is that place a place of prayers?. Don't quote bible to suite your hypothetical stance.

just the reverend sisters only cover themselves like they do in times of prayer.

cooljoe:
sound argument and authority albeit d osun state court pronouncement will only draw water in osun state. bt dat of d court off appeal becums judicial precedent, and remains so except it's upturned by d court of appeal or the supreme Court. Very sound

Thank you, brother. #respect

Elthugnificent:

Why so hostile? I never said I was against there wear, to be sincere I care less. The reason for the question is to prove that the hijab was never instructed in the Quran.

really? have you studied the Qur'an or you just speaking like one told by a pastor about imagery Jesus as son of God who died for your sin

Caseless:
Thank you, brother. #respect

I'm gona go check 4 superior argument/authority to counter u. lawyer don't know ol d laws, he should jst know wia to find d law *winks

Mynd44:

Every religion is always want to control women, control their sexuality, control their thoughts, dont travel alone, cover your hair, dont lead prayers, cant wear trousers, cant be a leader, cant be a pastor, bla bla bla.

Of course, we can deny it all day but does that make it false

Islam gives women every right. The use of hijab can't be attributed to the reasons you stated here.

Caseless:

Give them an acidic verse from the Bible, and they'll deflect by telling you it's for a certain group of people or say "that's in old testament" , as if the Bible did not command them to follow everything contained in it irrespective of the testament.

No mind dos babies wey wan use Nairaland start dia "calling".

Some even believe say hating muslEMS( as dey call it) is the automatic tickets to heaven.

tibaonnet:

Mr man, read verse 5 of the book of Corinthians you recommended, you will see that bible mentioned the condition in which women are mandated to cover their heads, it says when praying. Now ask yourself is that place a place of prayers?. Don't quote bible to suite your hypothetical stance.

u said WHEN praying. so wat if dey want to pray during c2b?