Stats: 3,184,291 members, 7,923,342 topics. Date: Saturday, 17 August 2024 at 12:15 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Career / Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? (33040 Views)
Amasa Firdaus: Why I Wore The Hijab Intentionally To Bar Ceremony / Firdaus Amasa Insulted Those Who Begged Her To Remove Her Hijab - Twitter User / Slay Queen Called To Bar Shares Her Experience At Nigerian Law School. Photos (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by omogidi234(m): 7:55pm On Dec 17, 2017 |
Kay17: Well then we wait for the court's pronouncement. |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Vivere: 7:58pm On Dec 17, 2017 |
oyb:Another derisive comment from your pained soul. Was I the one who said they do not wear hijabs under helmets? I only said the heat must be stifling for those who do so. I also pointed out that in Quebec and Ontario, safety concerns overrule religious preferences or dressing. Is that a lie? Obviously "pathetic, backward miseducated village cretins " must be your middle name. That is why you are stating it with relish. 2 Likes |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Nobody: 7:59pm On Dec 17, 2017 |
niceair: the hijab is only unacceptable to unexposed rubes such as yourself 1 Like |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Caseless: 7:59pm On Dec 17, 2017 |
Mynd44: Rule 36 (a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct in the Legal Profession Revised (2007) expressly decries the "wearing of apparel and ornament" that draws attention to a legal practitioner appearing before a judge, the hijab does not in anyway fall into such apparel ornament that can be decried upon, because it is a constitutional right that no bye-law can suppress on a permanent basis. Again, can a judgement in respect to an organization she's yet to be part of affect her? This is a blanket judgement. |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Guyman02: 8:01pm On Dec 17, 2017 |
oyb: They were niqab with their helmets and not hijab |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Nobody: 8:06pm On Dec 17, 2017 |
Vivere: care to post a link to this? none of you have been able to come up with anything other than empty conjecture. show me unequivolcally quebec safety standards that say specifically that a hijab should not be worn with a hard hat you see that? that is a female engineer in schlumberger , an international oil servicing firm with the same rigid safety standards across every continent ![]() this is one in halliburton ![]() these are companies with much more rigid safety standards than vivere and sons quebec oil company ![]() |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Nobody: 8:10pm On Dec 17, 2017 |
Guyman02: you see why i call most of you miseducated dolts? you don't bother to learn the simplest things about Islam, you just start talking BS ![]() if you are too daft to even tell the difference between a hijab and a niqab, you belong with your fellow ignoramus vivere who says a hijab is unsafe to wear |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Nobody: 8:38pm On Dec 17, 2017 |
babaskool: The case will be DOA . Like others before it. Pls see Balarabe Musa v. PRP for more info. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by JuicyStar: 9:11pm On Dec 17, 2017 |
armadeo:. My simple response is: “there is an automatic membership of the NBA upon being called to the Bar”. As long as one has elected to join and remain within the noble profession, he is a member and must comply with the regulations set by the body. In the light of the above, I would partially agree with u BUT u become a member of the NBA not when u decide but rather after u have met all the laid down requirements I.e passing the exams and observing certain ethics, customs and conventions. This lady has failed to comply with one of the traditions of the profession which from the induction ceremony was aware of. Whether the tradition is right or wrong is another argument but as it stands today that the norm. Why did she wait till the day of her call to bring up this issue? I would like to ask her how she appeared in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd term law dinners. Cos I'm sure she removed the hijab then. It's her choice to go in this direction but I'm very sure that if she like she should go to the Supreme Court, she would get no remedy because the Council of Legal education has the unfettered power to declare a person fit and proper to be called to the Nigerian Bar based on laid down rules. 5 Likes |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by histemple: 9:53pm On Dec 17, 2017 |
babaskool: My only conclusion in this case is that Miss Firdaus Amasa has decided not to be a lawyer. How can she be aspiring to become a lawyer and not ready to obey the rules? Why will she be contesting what she willingly subscribed to? Volenti non fit injuria. |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by niceair(m): 10:54pm On Dec 17, 2017 |
oyb:I guess rubes is the only word you know... Quick to say you work in oil n gas n u don't know whom you chatting with.... Peace be with you 1 Like |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Vivere: 12:23am On Dec 18, 2017 |
Caseless:The hijab definitely falls under the category of an apparel that draws attention to the legal practitioner, appearing before a judge. It is not an inconspicuous item of clothing, like a lapel pin, a pocket square or a handkerchief. 1 Like |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Caseless: 6:15am On Dec 18, 2017 |
Vivere:how can something you're given by constitution be taken away a rule? Hijab does not fall under the "apparel" the rule decried upon. |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Nobody: 6:25am On Dec 18, 2017 |
Caseless: hijab , an inconspicuous clothing item worn by millions of nigerian women in domestic, industrial, corporate environments, draws Vivire's attention ![]() ![]() ![]() i wonder why ![]() |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Vivere: 2:19pm On Dec 18, 2017 |
oyb: Surely you can express your obsession for the hijab, without mentioning my moniker? ![]() 1 Like |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Ayobami4u: 11:03am On Dec 19, 2017 |
that one can never be a successful lawyer. if she think she is greater than law of an institution that has been created before she was born. is she the only Muslim lady who has been called to bar before? is she the only Muslim lady there wit hijab? she has no point. good and successful lawyer like Gani had respect for laws. so who is she rubbish. if they amend the law of the institution because of her then that means that Nigeria is a useless nation. nobody should be greater than the law of an organization or institution. 3 Likes |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Ayobami4u: 11:37am On Dec 19, 2017 |
This people re so funny and unexposed what is the essence of wearing hijab when it does not make u holy or God fearing? re there not ladies who wear hijab and still kill for boko haram as female suicide bomber? What a blind argument. 1 Like |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by Vivere: 11:34pm On Dec 19, 2017 |
oyb: It does not say a hijab should not be worn underneath a hard hat, but if any item of religious clothing (e.g. hijab) conflicts or interferes with health and safety standards, then employers are not under an obligation to accommodate its use, by their employees. Here, read this: Safety considerations are often an issue raised when it comes to religious attire or comportment. If an accommodation is likely to cause significant health and safety risks, this could be considered “undue hardship.” |
Re: Is This Legal Precedence In The Firdaus' Hijab And Nigerian Law School Incident? by TundeHashim(m): 1:05am On Dec 22, 2017 |
oyb: Lol...are u minding him...sometimes, it's better u allow some people wallow in their stupidity than trying to explain things to 'em coz they are programmed not to see beyond their noses |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Reply)
Woman Sacked By Kaduna Electric Faints After Reading Sack Letter / Abubakar Aliyu, The Cooperate Pure Water Seller In Abuja Is Now A Student / ... Was Sacked For Not Dancing To 'shake Body'... Now An Employer Of Labour
Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 47 |