Onyiridike:


When I collect my appointment letter next year, I will look up to heaven and tell God "Father!! you have shown mercy to a poor sinner and blessed him with this job".

I don't want to bother myself anymore with the way the way the selection process is going to be.

keboxxerxes:
Good morning.
What I am about to say might be offensive to some candidates on this thread.
A lot of candidates here have raised some very interesting points as regards to the FCC factor. But before that, a lot of candidates by their actions already disqualified themselves from being successful in the interview.
Before the guys in DPR pick out the list of successful candidates as approved by the FCC, they have to firstly weed out the unsuccessful candidates from the ones that have a better chance of being successful.
1. They would probably weed out candidates that missed the interview outrightly.
2. They might also weed out candidates that were absent on the day that they were to be interviewed and instead went to other venues to be interviewed.
3. They might also weed out candidates that came with incomplete documentation, or fraudulent documentation with regards to age and qualification. (Check your interview invites, proper documentation was labelled as a requirement).
Putting these factors into consideration, more than half of the candidates invited fall under at least one or two of the aforementioned categories.
By time they might have reduced the numbers, factors like interview/ CBT test performance, quota system or stake holder slots might now play a role in who may or may not be successful.
In all, Gods grace is the ultimate, but come on, if you didn't do what was expected of you, like for instance, honoring the interview invite, then it would be unfair on other candidates that honored the invite, if God favoured someone who missed the interview outrightly.
My opinion by the way. Please guys, no insults.

keboxxerxes:
Good morning.
What I am about to say might be offensive to some candidates on this thread.
A lot of candidates here have raised some very interesting points as regards to the FCC factor. But before that, a lot of candidates by their actions already disqualified themselves from being successful in the interview.
Before the guys in DPR pick out the list of successful candidates as approved by the FCC, they have to firstly weed out the unsuccessful candidates from the ones that have a better chance of being successful.
1. They would probably weed out candidates that missed the interview outrightly.
2. They might also weed out candidates that were absent on the day that they were to be interviewed and instead went to other venues to be interviewed.
3. They might also weed out candidates that came with incomplete documentation, or fraudulent documentation with regards to age and qualification. (Check your interview invites, proper documentation was labelled as a requirement).
Putting these factors into consideration, more than half of the candidates invited fall under at least one or two of the aforementioned categories.
By time they might have reduced the numbers, factors like interview/ CBT test performance, quota system or stake holder slots might now play a role in who may or may not be successful.
In all, Gods grace is the ultimate, but come on, *if you didn't do what was expected of you, like for instance, honoring the interview invite, then it would be unfair on other candidates that honored the invite,* if God favoured someone who missed the interview outrightly.
My opinion by the way. Please guys, no insults.

qhuadry:


though ur analysis seems alluring but it doesn't holds water...
1.
ur claim that it won't be fair if those who doesn't honour the interview invite(including those who missed their date I presume) are successful and some of those who honour their invite are unsuccessful..now my question is this *will it be fair if those who didn't attend on their stipulated date but did very well in the CBT and interview altogether than those who honour their invite and didn't perform well enough are not successful?*
2. you didn't considered wat might be the problem that hindered those candidates who missed their date. using my own case as a case study and I think it happens to many people also. my portal was closed not until my schoolmate that was scheduled on the 4th(first day of the interview) told me that he heard them calling my name to come for accreditation and I wasn't in Lagos then, I had to travel from Kwara state to Lagos that day but unfortunately I missed the interview. I went there the next day and I explained to them, they reschedule me to 5th and I did the interview (the way they respond to me seems as if they are expecting that kind of issue to come up). immediately I finished my interview my portal becomes accessible.
3. but since u already mentioned that wat u want to say might be offensive, and I happen to fall in one of ur assumed unsuccessful candidates, I had to write this to correct ur assumptions because some people are starting to believe ur analysis because it favours them.

4. and lastly, myself and those that falls under those categories will hope and pray that the people in charge of the recruitment wud not THINK like u.
I rest my case

noble4lily:
Nlng sending medical invites already, missed dpr interview, didn't get mail, unknown to me that it was in d portal, but nlng Medicals clicked. GOD is great

makonko:


Congrats!

NLNG na koko

noble4lily:
Thanks man.. na God

noble4lily:
Nlng sending medical invites already, missed dpr interview, didn't get mail, unknown to me that it was in d portal, but nlng Medicals clicked. GOD is great

qhuadry:


though ur analysis seems alluring but it doesn't holds water...
1.
ur claim that it won't be fair if those who doesn't honour the interview invite(including those who missed their date I presume) are successful and some of those who honour their invite are unsuccessful..now my question is this *will it be fair if those who didn't attend on their stipulated date but did very well in the CBT and interview altogether than those who honour their invite and didn't perform well enough are not successful?*
2. you didn't considered wat might be the problem that hindered those candidates who missed their date. using my own case as a case study and I think it happens to many people also. my portal was closed not until my schoolmate that was scheduled on the 4th(first day of the interview) told me that he heard them calling my name to come for accreditation and I wasn't in Lagos then, I had to travel from Kwara state to Lagos that day but unfortunately I missed the interview. I went there the next day and I explained to them, they reschedule me to 5th and I did the interview (the way they respond to me seems as if they are expecting that kind of issue to come up). immediately I finished my interview my portal becomes accessible.
3. but since u already mentioned that wat u want to say might be offensive, and I happen to fall in one of ur assumed unsuccessful candidates, I had to write this to correct ur assumptions because some people are starting to believe ur analysis because it favours them.

4. and lastly, myself and those that falls under those categories will hope and pray that the people in charge of the recruitment wud not THINK like u.
I rest my case

noble4lily:
Nlng sending medical invites already, missed dpr interview, didn't get mail, unknown to me that it was in d portal, but nlng Medicals clicked. GOD is great

noble4lily:
Nlng sending medical invites already, missed dpr interview, didn't get mail, unknown to me that it was in d portal, but nlng Medicals clicked. GOD is great

noble4lily:
Nlng sending medical invites already, missed dpr interview, didn't get mail, unknown to me that it was in d portal, but nlng Medicals clicked. GOD is great

noble4lily:
Nlng sending medical invites already, missed dpr interview, didn't get mail, unknown to me that it was in d portal, but nlng Medicals clicked. GOD is great

noble4lily:
Nlng sending medical invites already, missed dpr interview, didn't get mail, unknown to me that it was in d portal, but nlng Medicals clicked. GOD is great

noble4lily:
Nlng sending medical invites already, missed dpr interview, didn't get mail, unknown to me that it was in d portal, but nlng Medicals clicked. GOD is great

noble4lily:
Thanks guys, yours will arrive soon. Amen

noble4lily:
Nlng sending medical invites already, missed dpr interview, didn't get mail, unknown to me that it was in d portal, but nlng Medicals clicked. GOD is great

successfulmike:
congrats bro... it is evident now that consideration is being given to the masses as opposed to our assumptions of godfatherism.

Sunnystooth:

That's NLNG, it's recruitments are almost always merit based, unlike DPR where the so-called "stakeholders" and top government officials do have say about who eventually get picked. Leaving very little slots for merit-based applicants.

babagy82:
so this dpr recruitment wont be on merit as we earlier thought?? there is God ooh

Sunnystooth:

That's NLNG, it's recruitments are almost always merit based, unlike DPR where the so-called "stakeholders" and top government officials do have say about who eventually get picked. Leaving very little slots for merit-based applicants.

Onyiridike:


Why do you people enjoy making baseless allegation.

NLNG is as juicy as DPR if not even better.

Why do you think your so-called stakeholders wouldn't influence NLNG recruitment?

If you don't have an evidence, do me a favour and keep quiet.
Exactly. May Allah in his infinite mercies, wisdom and power make us among the successful. Oh Allah we pray for success and joy, surely you are all-knowing, the wise. Ameen.
Many people here myself inclusive will testify very soon that they got this DPR job without knowing anybody.

Nobody is more influential than God Almighty. He owns everything on earth and in heaven and gives to whoever he pleases despite our sins.

He is that powerful and merciful.