ubunja:
women cheat for one reason: THEY LOVE D!CK.
coz women never take responsibility for anything they do in life; they will give u these reasons. do u know why all these reasons except Number 7 are not valid? COZ THEY PUT THE BLAME ON THE MAN.only Number 7 puts the blame on the woman squarely.and THAT is the only reason thats valid.
you can take the horse to a river but can never force it to drink.no matter what a man does to you, if you are not a cheat you will never cheat. and no matter how perfectly a man treats you, if you are a cheat you will cheat.regardless.
just like YOU CANT WIFE A HOE, YOU ALSO CANT HOE A WIFE. a woman of honour and intergrity will never betray her character based on your actions.but a woman of loose morals will betray her man no matter how perfect that man is to her. (and the mystery of life is that women who date players are the women who dont cheat. its a mystery. )
-material gain-MY MAN CANT PROVIDE. so im cheating. :blame the man.but he still has the same zero cents he had when you accepted his proposal.but its a problem NOW?
-boredom-MY MAN IS NOW BORING ME.like the man signed up to be a toy to keep u entertained and excited.
-wack sex-MY MAN CANT FVCK. and its his fault? how can he fvck u the way you want when you have fvcked 100 men before him?can he even begin to top that list?
distance-MY MAN IS FAR-but nothing is stopping you from going nearer to him.why did u accept his proposal when u knew he stayed/worked far and it was going to be a problem?why dont you break it off with him instead of cheating?
-to secure their heart-MY MAN WILL LEAVE ME ANY MOMENT BUT I WANA PROTECT MYSELF EMOTIONALLY TO BE READY WHEN HE DOES.what kind of bullsh!t mentality is that to entertain.the man is blamed for actions he hasnt even taken yet and punished for them.punished for a future crime he hasnt even committed.
-attention-MY MAN ACTS LIKE I NO LONGER EXIST.SO I CHEAT.how about you show him you still exist?how about you act your part as one part of a couple? love is not a river flowing one way.its a two way street.play your part too.be his GF.not his God.dont wait for worship while offering none to him.its love not religion .
number 7 is the only reason why women cheat. and number 1 to 6 are the cover women use not to reveal Number 7.

i dont care if women cheat. but atleast dont lie about your motivations. d!ck is irresistable we know. be real women and stop decieving yourselves.

Lmfao hahahaha ..this fuxcking guy. I just read the first paragraph and started laughing

Llanthony401:


Lmfao hahahaha ..this fuxcking guy. I just read the first paragraph and started laughing

LOOOL
as long as the man didnt bring a man home then forced her at gunpoint to fvck that man then she cant really blame him for her cheating.
she showered and dressed up on her own and went out to cheat.noone forced her.so noone must take the blame.except herself.

ubunja:

if u could make yourself orgasm and it was a no-brainer like you say then you wouldnt complain about it.would you? and even if u could make yourself orgasm thru toys ,remember women's intimacy gadgets are made by men.so you cant really claim independence on that .

women provide coz men allow it. there is a reason its called " winning the bread". you wont compete if government didnt force companies to make spaces for u. remember you are bad employees coz menstruation and pregnancy issues that make u unreliable.and u get tired easy.
even if u try to make your living directly from the earth mother nature deprived you the strength to till the land.
u cant hunt coz u cant run.
so self-suffiency goes out of the window fast.

Most women find it easier to climax through masturbation. Others may have hang-ups over it because masturbation has got a bad rap culturally. Masturbation is age old, and before the variety of toys at a girl's disposal today, the hand would suffice. intimacy gadgets made for women by men egoistically copy the dick. If the real one is not getting it done...... . The first dil.do wasn't even a toy, it was an object/symbol of worship in the old Stone Age before it became a unisex sex gadget. The electric vibrator was designed to induce orgasms in women for medical research. But intimacy gadgets designed by women are shaped and fitted for women's pleasure from the personal perspective of a woman who knows how to get the job done on herself: The Rabbit Habit by Shay Martin; The Nexus by Marilyn Bishara; Blueberry Buzz by Susan Colvin. So women don't depend on men for the design. If they did, they would probably still be caught up in a whorl of sexual frustration.

Women who masturbate get regular orgasms. They don't complain to anyone how difficult it is to flick it good, because it is not. But sexual intimacy is about more than the orgasm. It's about bonding with your partner. And it would be cool if he could save you the trouble of pulling out a "friend" from the drawers after a bout of (supposed) sex. So that's why there's the urge to complain.

"Women provide because men allow it". First I'd like this statement of yours to refute your later claim that women cannot provide due to ridiculous suppositions that they cannot hunt or farm because they do not have speed or strength. Human disadvantages over wildlife and the earth are overcome intellectually by invention. And now I'd like to point out that I said, if men were kept to the required minimum, then there will be no men to "disallow" a woman's quest to provide for herself and her offspring. Menstruation does not confine a woman to her home. That ritual was imposed by men who considered women unclean during her period. With medication and tampons women are up and about and you won't even know about it. A woman who chooses to take time off to be pregnant will naturally be replaced by another woman who isn't pregnant. The same concept adopted by companies when one employee takes a study leave, sick leave or his annual leave.

Women that love big and thick dicks are most definitely to cheat on their husband or boyfriend's with small dicks.

LadyMarionette:



Most women find it easier to climax through masturbation. Others may have hang-ups over it because masturbation has got a bad rap culturally. Masturbation is age old, and before the variety of toys at a girl's disposal today, the hand would suffice. intimacy gadgets made for women by men egoistically copy the dick. If the real one is not getting it done...... . The first dil.do wasn't even a toy, it was an object/symbol of worship in the old Stone Age before it became a unisex sex gadget. The electric vibrator was designed to induce orgasms in women for medical research. But intimacy gadgets designed by women are shaped and fitted for women's pleasure from the personal perspective of a woman who knows how to get the job done on herself: The Rabbit Habit by Shay Martin; The Nexus by Marilyn Bishara; Blueberry Buzz by Susan Colvin. So women don't depend on men for the design. If they did, they would probably still be caught up in a whorl of sexual frustration.

Women who masturbate get regular orgasms. They don't complain to anyone how difficult it is to flick it good, because it is not. But sexual intimacy is about more than the orgasm. It's about bonding with your partner. And it would be cool if he could save you the trouble of pulling out a "friend" from the drawers after a bout of (supposed) sex. So that's why there's the urge to complain.

"Women provide because men allow it". First I'd like this statement of yours to refute your later claim that women cannot provide due to ridiculous suppositions that they cannot hunt or farm because they do not have speed or strength. Human disadvantages over wildlife and the earth are overcome intellectually by invention. And now I'd like to point out that I said, if men were kept to the required minimum, then there will be no men to "disallow" a woman's quest to provide for herself and her offspring. Menstruation does not confine a woman to her home. That ritual was imposed by men who considered women unclean during her period. With medication and tampons women are up and about and you won't even know about it. A woman who chooses to take time off to be pregnant will naturally be replaced by another woman who isn't pregnant. The same concept adopted by companies when one employee takes a study leave, sick leave or his annual leave.

and this why u keep getting yourself confused. u keep running to google.and google will mess up your train of thought babygal.
there are 2 main types of s.ex toys.the vibrator and the dild* . those u mentioned dont matter.both the vibrator and the Love Machine were made by men.the d*ldo u claim was for worship was made by men coz men worshipped the God Mother at that time.that case is closed.
u seem unfamiliar with the Affirmitive Action and Gender Qoutas that force companies to have a set number of women working therein.
and u mention inventions of which 99% are by men. c'mon now.
WOMEN GAVE MEN LIFE.AND MEN GAVE WOMEN EVERYTHING ELSE
like u say mentruation gets u forced out coz men force u to keep seperate.which is true.and goes to show just how much men can fvck up your work experience if the gvt didnt intervene on your behalf to save u. the more cases u site of unfairness that men do against women the more u show that men have the power to do that.and only gvt can stop them.no one will hire a woman if a man is available who can do that job.only the Law forces men to.the same Law designed by men.you can not win bread if men fought you for that bread with no rules.
remember women got to vote coz men allowed it.not coz they went to war and beat men to it.
do u see?

ubunja:

and this why u keep getting yourself confused. u keep running to google.and google will mess up your train of thought babygal.
there are 2 main types of s.ex toys.the vibrator and the dild* . those u mentioned dont matter.both the vibrator and the Love Machine were made by men.the d*ldo u claim was for worship was made by men coz men worshipped the God Mother at that time.that case is closed.
u seem unfamiliar with the Affirmitive Action and Gender Qoutas that force companies to have a set number of women working therein.
and u mention inventions of which 99% are by men. c'mon now.
WOMEN GAVE MEN LIFE.AND MEN GAVE WOMEN EVERYTHING ELSE
like u say mentruation gets u forced out coz men force u to keep seperate.which is true.and goes to show just how much men can fvck up your work experience if the gvt didnt intervene on your behalf to save u. the more cases u site of unfairness that men do against women the more u show that men have the power to do that.and only gvt can stop them.no one will hire a woman if a man is available who can do that job.only the Law forces men to.the same Law designed by men.you can not win bread if men fought you for that bread with no rules.
remember women got to vote coz men allowed it.not coz they went to war and beat men to it.
do u see?

Says who? You? Why should I take your word for it over anyone else's. Have you lived through the ages to have witnessed these inventions first hand? Or do you get your information from books as well? You don't have a monopoly on the right to research things, so don't even try to criticize my due diligence. It is free.

The intimacy gadgets that matter to a woman are determined by the woman in question herself. You can claim all you want that she doesn't derive any pleasure from the The Nexus, but women will keep buying it. Your wishful thinking doesn't affect the economics of the product, and the fact that woman can mimic their hand movement during masturbation, to make an independent product. Men make intimacy gadgets that suit their purposes, but for obvious reasons, women may not derive the same utility from those products since men have different sexual needs.

And on your other claims, once again, you do not dispute the fact that women have the ability to be self sufficient but are only "forced out" and "limited" by men through old traditions because they are present. That's the point. If men were kept to the required minimum, they would not be present to provide any hindrance to women.

LadyMarionette:


Says who? You? Why should I take your word for it over anyone else's. Have you lived through the ages to have witnessed these inventions first hand? Or do you get your information from books as well? You don't have a monopoly on the right to research things, so don't even try to criticize my due diligence. It is free.

The intimacy gadgets that matter to a woman are determined by the woman in question herself. You can claim all you want that she doesn't derive any pleasure from the The Nexus, but women will keep buying it. Your wishful thinking doesn't affect the economics of the product, and the fact that woman can mimic their hand movement during masturbation, to make an independent product. Men make intimacy gadgets that suit their purposes, but for obvious reasons, women may not derive the same utility from those products since men have different sexual needs.

And on your other claims, once again, you do not dispute the fact that women have the ability to be self sufficient but are only "forced out" and "limited" by men through old traditions because they are present. That's the point. If men were kept to the required minimum, they would not be present to provide any hindrance to women.

marionette
those sex t o y s u mentioned dont matter coz they are variations of the vibrator and d!ld*. they dont do any new thing that those two were not already doing.they just improved on what was already there.
and thats why i mentioned "bread winning" for a long time coz the nature of survival is sweating.and u cant outsweat a man.LOL. so u want nature to spoonfeed you food without a challange? thats never gona happen.man shall eat sweat.and men are best built for that challange.just sit back and let Daddy bring home the bacon
and who will keep men at a minimum for you? another man will do your dirty work and if men were at minimum who will build and feed u and keep u comfortable? angels?
LOOL.
dont feel bad thou. we are bad at cooking.
EDIT:
on the research issue
the difference between me and u is that u are cramming.going straight from study room to exam room.thats why your posts read like copy pastes from the internet. where u rely on research i rely on what i already know.coz this stuff is my life.its the air i breathe.
we call it the Red Pill. its being aware of how real life works.you debate me from a feminist angle .i debate u from the angle of common sense. im not even researching.
just throwing facts i learnt ages ago at u.no sweat.
i have had such arguements a hundred times already with other feminists on other platforms.
u cant bring anything new that can suprise me. coz im not even pushing an agenda for men. but Nature's Agenda of inter-dependability of the sexes.
i told u this already.

LadyMarionette:


Born to cheat? You're looking to nature to give you clues on what's to be done?  

I can twist anything to whatever I want too.

Yea! People twist anything to whatever they want to and only they TWISTED MINDS are going to accept such twisting because the lack TRUTH in themselves.

A LUCID MIND, can't get twisted because it has chosen TRUTH as its guide.

"Wisdom is found only in truth" (Wolfang Goethe)

MEN AND WOMEN CHEAT BECAUSE THEY CHOOSE TO CHEAT. IT IS AS SIMPLE AS 'A FOR ABSTAIN' BUT MOST CHOOSE 'C FOR CHEAT' AND GIVING THEIR REASONS FOR SUCH A CHOICE FROM THE LIST ABOVE BY THE OP. 

And do we know what our major problem is in the spheres of human affairs generally?! IT IS WHAT IS CALLED 'DOUBLE STANDARD'.

Ubunja is CHEATING good for men and not for women? How can you say "MEN ARE BORN TO CHEAT"? Head or tail cheating is a CRIME. Bru am not on your side on this?

Cheating of course is a crime and there is no justification for cheating. One of my major reasons for being on this platform is to teach and learn which is THE PATH TO ENLIGHTENMENT. To aid us to see how really we are in a very DEEP CRISIS of our own making. This crisis, a world in chaos a so called 'MODERN WORLD' is but the out-come of throwing away traditional WORTHY values that have been working maintaining STABILITY since primordial and with CERTAINTY of results are but today called  ARCHAIC by most FOOLS who pride themselves as 'MODERNS'.

Never ever in recorded human history has humans DEBASED themselves lower than low, lower than the WORST OF BEAST like it is our contemporary world. All kinds of fantasies keeps springing up creating all kinds of mental confussion because we keep deluding ourselves that we are 'FREE' to do as we like.

This word 'CHEAT' wasn't so hum drumed in the past like it is presently. Only tells us about our direction which is on the NEGATIVE.

THERE IS A MOVEMENT I RECENTLY DISCOVERED WHO ADVOCATE TODAY THAT "MEN ARE BORN TO CHEAT". AND WITH ALL KINDS OF ARTICLES FOR BRAINWASHING.

Where are we all heading to with such fallacies of compositions if not for the cliff and then tumble down and break to pieces?!

What kind of a fvcked up world are we even living, in which TRUST WORTHINESS is so an unfashionable thing. Be it business, relationship, politics, sports, school accademy...........e.t.c. e.t.c. Its so DIFFICULT to find people whose "YES" is "YES" and "NO" is "NO".

Now, to the crux of the matter, even though the healthy male may produce billions of sperm each time he ejaculates and a few minutes to an hour recovers to produce again another ready billions of sperm which he can use to impregnate as many women as possible. Does NOT support the assertion that men are BORN TO CHEAT. ARE WE A BARN YARD OF HE-GOATS?


HE-GOAT smells a SHE-GOAT'S urine and goes RIOT...............BLEAT! BLEAT!! BLEAT!!! and BLEAT!!!! Becoming ERRATIC.

*something that is ERRATIC does not follow any pattern or plan but happens in a way that is NOT REGULAR.

Runs and jumps in Zig-Zag motion. 

HE-GOAT GOES BLAIR! PUFF! PUFF! BLAIR, PUFF! PUFF! BLAIR!. Hitting his feet on the ground, banging his head on the wall.

WELL, WE ALL KNOW OR SHOULD KNOW THAT, HE-GOATS (in plural) THINK ABOUT NOTHING BUT SEX......................A HE-GOAT could really, really become ERRATIC when it seeks to MATE a SHE-GOAT and the SHE-GOAT is just not in the FCCK MOOD.

Are men born to be HE-GOATS?!!! That is what it means that "MEN ARE BORN TO CHEAT"

 
You see, since from primodial the human society never ran its system like a BARN YARD OF ANIMALS as it is today.

There has been the institution called MARRIAGE which is CULTURE designed to accommodate SEX which is NATURE. If because man can impregnate as many as possible women hence have the right to impregnate as many as possible without any principles. Well just look around you, the disharmony we are beginning to witness of BABY MAMAS is and example of such an out-come. WE WILL KNOW NOT PEACE SECURITY EVENTUALLY.

Tieing the Knot as a symbolism of marriage means an accepted limitation has been set by two or more parties. To trangress this limitations in such a way that it beats others knowledge behind their backs is termed as CHEATING.
 
MAN IS NOT BORN TO CHEAT!!! NOT AT ALL. HE IS BORN TO MAINTAIN HARMONY. CHEATING IS A DISHAMONY AND BY CHEATING HE IS NOT A BONIFIDE HOMOSAPIEN MEANING WISE.

Ladymarionette ubunja's very FIRST post is a TRUISM. People cheat because the want to cheat and women of integrity will not follow such a path. Let our interest be only TRUTH. The act of chauvinism takes us to now where. DISTINCTION SHOULD NOT MEAN OPPOSITION. Because we are male and female doesnt mean we should be opposing one another but compliment each other, ubunja and us all.

ubunja:

marionette
those sex t o y s u mentioned dont matter coz they are variations of the vibrator and d!ld*. they dont do any new thing that those two were not already doing.they just improved on what was already there.
and thats why i mentioned "bread winning" for a long time coz the nature of survival is sweating.and u cant outsweat a man.LOL. so u want nature to spoonfeed you food without a challange? thats never gona happen.man shall eat sweat.and men are best built for that challange.just sit back and let Daddy bring home the bacon
and who will keep men at a minimum for you? another man will do your dirty work and if men were at minimum who will build and feed u and keep u comfortable? angels?
LOOL.
dont feel bad thou. we are bad at cooking.

I've noticed how hard you're now trying to sound blithe and unaffected. Usually that's an indication that you're not blithe and unaffected. The assumption that the Rabbit Habit does the exact thing that a regular dil.do does is why men have such difficulty pleasing women sexually. If a device has two "fingers" addressing two separate areas, wouldn't you ask yourself what the impact is on each area, instead of assuming that one doesn't matter as much as the other? Should you not? No dick is shaped like the devices women create anymore than the shape of a dil.do mimics a candlestick. The rabbit habit mimics sticking out the pinky and the pointer and middle finger - two in the pink, one in the stink (the shocker) hand gesture which forms the repertoire of male/female partners of women. And since you're a porn connoisseur, you'd notice that women stimulate their clits even when there's a dick in the vagina. So, all of these deficiencies in penile design, inform a woman in her quest to design a intimacy gadget suited for her. Because the dick seems to be generic. A pole for any hole. So if you think that because female intimacy gadgets include a penis shaped element the invention is irrelevant, we may as well render the invention of the dil.do irrelevant because it is an exact replica of a cucumber.

Now you're asking who'll limit the number of men? 'If' means in the event of. It signifies a hypothetical scenario. If I had said 'when', then your question would be relevant. The point is, in that hypothetical scenario: the world would survive for much longer without men (or five men), than without women. This is simply because we can freeze sperm for as long as possible (and because five men are enough to get millions pregnant). But we haven't yet been able to replicate the nurturing quality of the womb and developing a human fetus. Not yet. Don't feel bad for ME.

WORDWORLD:


Yea! People twist anything to whatever they want to and only they TWISTED MINDS are going to accept such twisting because the lack TRUTH in themselves.

A LUCID MIND, can't get twisted because it has chosen TRUTH as its guide.

"Wisdom is found only in truth" (Wolfang Goethe)

MEN AND WOMEN CHEAT BECAUSE THEY CHOOSE TO CHEAT. IT IS AS SIMPLE AS 'A FOR ABSTAIN' BUT MOST CHOOSE 'C FOR CHEAT' AND GIVING THEIR REASONS FOR SUCH A CHOICE FROM THE LIST ABOVE BY THE OP. 

And do we know what our major problem is in the spheres of human affairs generally?! IT IS WHAT IS CALLED 'DOUBLE STANDARD'.

Ubunja is CHEATING good for men and not for women? How can you say "MEN ARE BORN TO CHEAT"? Head or tail cheating is a CRIME. Bru am not on your side on this?

Cheating of course is a crime and there is no justification for cheating. One of my major reasons for being on this platform is to teach and learn which is THE PATH TO ENLIGHTENMENT. To aid us to see how really we are in a very DEEP CRISIS of our own making. This crisis, a world in chaos a so called 'MODERN WORLD' is but the out-come of throwing away traditional WORTHY values that have been working maintaining STABILITY since primordial and with CERTAINTY of results are but today called  ARCHAIC by most FOOLS who pride themselves as 'MODERNS'.

Never ever in recorded human history has humans DEBASED themselves lower than low, lower than the WORST OF BEAST like it is our contemporary world. All kinds of fantasies keeps springing up creating all kinds of mental confussion because we keep deluding ourselves that we are 'FREE' to do as we like.

This word 'CHEAT' wasn't so hum drumed in the past like it is presently. Only tells us about our direction which is on the NEGATIVE.

THERE IS A MOVEMENT I RECENTLY DISCOVERED WHO ADVOCATE TODAY THAT "MEN ARE BORN TO CHEAT". AND WITH ALL KINDS OF ARTICLES FOR BRAINWASHING.

Where are we all heading to with such fallacies of compositions if not for the cliff and then tumble down and break to pieces?!

What kind of a fvcked up world are we even living, in which TRUST WORTHINESS is so an unfashionable thing. Be it business, relationship, politics, sports, school accademy...........e.t.c. e.t.c. Its so DIFFICULT to find people whose "YES" is "YES" and "NO" is "NO".

Now, to the crux of the matter, even though the healthy male may produce billions of sperm each time he ejaculates and a few minutes to an hour recovers to produce again another ready billions of sperm which he can use to impregnate as many women as possible. Does NOT support the assertion that men are BORN TO CHEAT. ARE WE A BARN YARD OF HE-GOATS?


HE-GOAT smells a SHE-GOAT'S urine and goes RIOT...............BLEAT! BLEAT!! BLEAT!!! and BLEAT!!!! Becoming ERRATIC.

*something that is ERRATIC does not follow any pattern or plan but happens in a way that is NOT REGULAR.

Runs and jumps in Zig-Zag motion. 

HE-GOAT GOES BLAIR! PUFF! PUFF! BLAIR, PUFF! PUFF! BLAIR!. Hitting his feet on the ground, banging his head on the wall.

WELL, WE ALL KNOW OR SHOULD KNOW THAT, HE-GOATS (in plural) THINK ABOUT NOTHING BUT SEX......................A HE-GOAT could really, really become ERRATIC when it seeks to MATE a SHE-GOAT and the SHE-GOAT is just not in the FCCK MOOD.

Are men born to be HE-GOATS?!!! That is what it means that "MEN ARE BORN TO CHEAT"

 
You see, since from primodial the human society never ran its system like a BARN YARD OF ANIMALS as it is today.

There has been the institution called MARRIAGE which is CULTURE designed to accommodate SEX which is NATURE. If because man can impregnate as many as possible women hence have the right to impregnate as many as possible without any principles. Well just look around you, the disharmony we are beginning to witness of BABY MAMAS is and example of such an out-come. WE WILL KNOW NOT PEACE SECURITY EVENTUALLY.

Tieing the Knot as a symbolism of marriage means an accepted limitation has been set by two or more parties. To trangress this limitations in such a way that it beats others knowledge behind their backs is termed as CHEATING.
 
MAN IS NOT BORN TO CHEAT!!! NOT AT ALL. HE IS BORN TO MAINTAIN HARMONY. CHEATING IS A DISHAMONY AND BY CHEATING HE IS NOT A BONIFIDE HOMOSAPIEN MEANING WISE.

Ladymarionette ubunja's very post is a TRUISM. People cheat because the want to cheat and women of integrity will not follow such a path. Let our interest be only TRUTH. The act of chauvinism takes us to now where. DISTINCTION SHOULD NOT MEAN OPPOSITION. Because we are male and female doesnt mean we should be opposing one another but compliment each other, ubunja and us all.

its men's birth right to cheat
if a man never cheats he loves too much and becomes a simp.
i also believe cheating makes a man gain value in a woman's eyes. dont u agree? look around you all the women want Players. nice guys are friendzoned.

LadyMarionette:



Wow! This is such quintessential hypocrisy, it's actually beautiful for effortlessly achieving its ambitions. Be real and stop deceiving yourselves. I wonder how you can walk into something like this without forethought, and weighing both sides of the argument. Have you not heard:
1. A man bangs the maid, he blames his wife for hiring a "bangable" maid.
2. A man bangs his colleague at work, he blames it on his wife. She's now a house wife and not sophisticated enough to get his dick hard.
3. A man bangs his secretary, he blames it on his wife. She nags too much so he'd rather stay late at the office.
4. A man bangs an old flame, he blames his wife. She's pregnant. Again .
5. A man bangs a dog, he blames it on his wife. She likes money too much so he must do money juju.
6. A man bangs some random stranger, he blames his wife. She's not prayerful enough, otherwise God would have made him a better person.
The reasons are endless: she has let herself go, she works too much, she knows only one style, yadayadayada......men have not been able to take responsibility for their actions since Adam ate the fruit in Eden. And when God asked about it........the man said, the woman who thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat. presenting him self as the victim of God's (poor?)judgement in putting Eve in the garden with him, and Eve's motives. And God only asked: have you eaten of the forbidden fruit? It was a "yes" or "no" question. But men are always looking for someone to blame. Why did YOU eat the fruit? I was deceived. It was the woman. It was the devil. That's all BS. You're evading the real issues which you actually have control over: I was weak. I was hungry. I wanted to please the woman. And now you're on about women not taking responsibility for anything they do? Please!

Bless up!

LadyMarionette:



I've noticed how hard you're now trying to sound blithe and unaffected. Usually that's an indication that you're not blithe and unaffected. The assumption that the Rabbit Habit does the exact thing that a regular dil.do does is why men have such difficulty pleasing women sexually. If a device has two "fingers" addressing two separate areas, wouldn't you ask yourself what the impact is on each area, instead of assuming that one doesn't matter as much as the other? Should you not? No dick is shaped like the devices women create anymore than the shape of a dil.do mimics a candlestick. The rabbit habit mimics sticking out the pinky and the pointer and middle finger - two in the pink, one in the stink (the shocker) hand gesture which forms the repertoire of male/female partners of women. And since you're a porn connoisseur, you'd notice that women stimulate their clits even when there's a dick in the vagina. So, all of these deficiencies in the penal design, inform a woman in her quest to design a intimacy gadget suited for her. Because the dick seems to be generic. A pole for any hole. So if you think that because female intimacy gadgets include a penis shaped element the invention is irrelevant we may as well render the invention of the dil.do irrelevant because it is an exact replica of a cucumber.

Now you're asking who'll limit the number of men? 'If' means in the event of. It signifies a hypothetical scenario. If I had said 'when', then your question would be relevant. The point is, in that hypothetical scenario: the world would survive for much longer without men (or five men), than without women. This is simply because we can freeze sperm for as long as possible (and because five men are enough to get millions pregnant). But we haven't yet been able to replicate the nurturing quality of the womb and developing a human fetus. Not yet. Don't feel bad for ME.

its clear to me and you that this "females can exist without men" point u are working so hard to establish is dead in the water.
u now are resorting to character assassinations that have zero bearing on the debate.thats a clear indicator you have run out of reasonable points and u are now using emotional points.
lets wrap this. any last words?
i have said mine and im not looking to shoot another bullet your way. so dont bait me .
oh and we are now going around in circles.

which kin thread b dis again.... God of mercy. women na women....dem too like d!ck, end of story.

.

ubunja:

its men's birth right to cheat
if a man never cheats he loves too much and becomes a simp.
i also believe cheating makes a man gain value in a woman's eyes. dont u agree? look around you all the women want Players. nice guys are friendzoned.

True when i look around all i see are HE-GOATS jumping up and down after smelling a she goats urine as if they just finished sniffing hot pepper. Ubunja why do you think the traditional old practiced mainly POLYGAMY? They were not cheating but function within an healthy principle. Our age is a residue of decay not even the decay it self.

WORDWORLD:


True when i look around all i see are HE-GOATS jumping up and down after smelling a she goats urine as if they just finished sniffing hot pepper. Ubunja why do you think the traditional old practiced mainly POLYGAMY? They were not cheating but function within an healthy principle. Our age is a residue of decay not even the decay it self.

true my niggar.
cheating has even been proven to cure Erectile Disfunction. when that d!ck is struggling to rise,sometimes time with a new female body gets the engine firing on all cylinders again.
true story.

cheating on your woman is OK as long as you dont give that side-chick money. leave only sperms. take all the money home to wifey

ubunja I am not disputing that today's women love players. Which only tells us how sick our world is today. DESPITE ALL THE STDS THEY STILL BE CHASING THAT GUY THAT IS MOST LIKELY TO INFECT THEM WITH ONE. Our age is the stupidiest of all. Now its good that you should know that the concept "its a man's right to cheat" is not part of perenial philosophy. THE LAW AGAINST ADULTERY DID NOT START TODAY BUT SINCE OF OLD BECAUSE THEY DO NOT SEE CHEATING AS A RIGHT, A VIRTUE.

ubunja:

its clear to me and you that this "females can exist without men" point u are working so hard to establish is dead in the water.
u now are resorting to character assassinations that have zero bearing on the debate.thats a clear indicator you have run out of reasonable points and u are now using emotional points.
lets wrap this. any last words?
i have said mine and im not looking to shoot another bullet your way. so dont bait me .
oh and we are now going around in circles.

This is very impressive, that you would recognize that we are going around in circles and volunteer to end the argument. I must have left my mark on you after all. . I'm not resorting to character assassinations. What's the evidence? That I said that your "LOLs" and forced sympathy did not seem genuine? Come on! They were there to be addressed. And "dead in the water"? If you were to write a paper, with real stakes hanging in the balance, whether the female species had an edge over men in sustaining the world population, given biological facts and scientific advancement, I really doubt you'd flunk it just for sentimental reasons.

You know, we almost had an agreeable day. But then you had to go and start playing "twist anything to whatever you want".

ubunja:

true my niggar.
cheating has even been proven to cure Erectile Disfunction. when that d!ck is struggling to rise,sometimes time with a new female body gets the engine firing on all cylinders again.
true story.

cheating on your woman is OK as long as you dont give that side-chick money. leave only sperms. take all the money home to wifey

"cheating has been proven to cure erectile dysfunction" this is another BRAINWASHING bro.

If a new female is what is needed to rise Mr. Ding-dong from Zero to Hero so as to be able to Hong-hong going by the principle of tradition a second wife is all that he needs. ubunja is it not funny that most of they ladies who castigate mean for cheating DESPISE the concept of him having second wife. Will rather prefer that he goes about cheating than being married lawfully to another? ANYWAY I HAVE STUDIED SO MUCH THE LIFE OF YORE AND THE PRESENT. Today's world as i once said is nothing but residue of decay not even the decay itself.

Purebeerry:
You sound so pained, are you gonna cry, I have hanky .

I have seen this post before. I know you! I know your other handle.

LadyMarionette:


This is very impressive, that you would recognize that we are going around in circles and volunteer to end the argument. I must have left my mark on you after all. . I'm not resorting to character assassinations. What's the evidence? That I said that your "LOLs" and forced sympathy did not seem genuine? Come on! They were there to be addressed. And "dead in the water"? If you were to write a paper, with real stakes hanging in the balance, whether the female species had an edge over men in sustaining the world population, given biological facts and scientific advancement, I really doubt you'd flunk it just for sentimental reasons.

You know, we almost had an agreeable day. But then you had to go and start playing "twist anything to whatever you want".

the debate ended when i showed you that the debate was not about "sustaining the world population" u keep bringing the wrong points to the wrong debate
thats why i told u NO ONE IS SAYING MEN ARE IMPORTANT THAN WOMEN.
but after every post u keep reverting to that arguement.
isnt it what i told you with my "balancing of equations" post ?
i will repeat
stop pushing points that women can sustain humanity better than men coz thats not the debate.
u keep going back to it like the compass neddle keeps pointing North.
i want this to End coz now u dont know what u arguing about.since hours ago i agreed that women push humanity ahead.and when u speak of freezing sperms we just going in circles coz sperms are from men and u havent really deleted men from earth. so its getting monotonous.u keep raising weak points even u see can be shot down based on what we gave talked about already.

BiafranBushBoy:


I have seen this post before. I know you! I know your other handle.

Know on....

ubunja:

the debate ended when i showed you that the debate was not about "sustaining the world population" u keep bringing the wrong points to the wrong debate
thats why i told u NO ONE IS SAYING MEN ARE IMPORTANT THAN WOMEN.
but after every post u keep reverting to that arguement.
isnt it what i told you with my "balancing of equations" post ?
i will repeat
stop pushing points that women can sustain humanity better than men coz thats not the debate.
u keep going back to it like the compass neddle keeps pointing North.
i want this to End coz now u dont know what u arguing about.since hours ago i agreed that women push humanity ahead.and when u speak of freezing sperms we just going in circles coz sperms are from men and u havent really deleted men from earth. so its getting monotonous.u keep raising weak points even u see can be shot down based on what we gave talked about already.

The first time you made the assertion that the debate (for you) was not about taking instruction from nature to determine the roles of men and women (which is what I assumed by your deductions from their biology to proclaim men "born cheats", to make the different deduction of men operating by numbers on a level of inefficiency) I opted not to pursue the debate any further. But when you mentioned me in your response to the OP to state how badly I'd missed the point, I felt compelled to explain how I arrived at the perspective I had chosen to debate. And since then you have stayed on my turf, trying to poke holes in my rationale. So it's fair to say that we have been debating my matter since then, so the argument was no longer irrelevant. You're trying to hide behind the dead argument now because you're not winning this one. At least, by not responding to that post, I showed enough respect for facts to know when my argument does not support the issue in focus.

ubunja:

we just going in circles coz sperms are from men and u havent really deleted men from earth.

When you want to eat your cake and still have it. ITS ALL DELUSION WHEN SOME WOMEN SAY THEY DONT NEED MEN. What an age we are living. Age of lying to ourselves! An age of SENSLESS rivalry bbetween the genders. Pathetic!

Purebeerry:
Know on....

ok Ma'am

LadyMarionette:



The first time you made the assertion that the debate (for you) was not about taking instruction from nature to determine the roles of men and women (which is what I assumed by your deductions from their biology to proclaim men "born cheats", to make the different deduction of men operating by numbers on a level of inefficiency) I opted not to pursue the debate any further. But when you mentioned me in your response to the OP to state how badly I'd missed the point, I felt compelled to explain how I arrived at the perspective I had chosen to debate. And since then you have stayed on my turf, trying to poke holes in my rationale. So it's fair to say that we have been debating my matter since then, so the argument was no longer irrelevant. You're trying to hide behind the dead argument now because you're not winning this one. At least, by not responding to that post, I showed enough respect for facts to know when my argument does not support the issue in focus.

and u decided to keep missing the point for hours.
good work.
but have u finally got it now?
that its about genders being gifted differently NOT about which gender can survive without the other?and do u see how your "perspective" on female self-suffiency really is dead in the water.i have shown u how u cant hunt or even compete at work without gvt polices backing u up.if u still think u have a point u are being a liar to yourself.and u need to stop.
like i told OP dont feel pained biology supports male cheating.
coz nature balances that equation by making sure your biology supports species continuity. equations balanced.

now swallow that pride and let the issue sleep.coz u didnt pick up this debate to bring points but just coz u hated how i qouted u.and u didnt bring any points that proved my post to OP was wrong .did you??

Na use and throway sure pass. They can never accept responsibility of there stupid actions. They will always blame the guys . Boring relationship, whack sex, material reason! What have they done to correct it or spice up the relationship? Nothing. It's always the guys fault.

ubunja:

and u decided to keep missing the point for hours.
good work.
but have u finally got it now?
that its about genders being gifted differently NOT about which gender can survive without the other?

I feel I should repeat myself.......The first time you made the assertion that the debate (for you) was not about taking instruction from nature to determine the roles of men and women (which is what I assumed by your deductions from their biology to proclaim men "born cheats", to make the different deduction of men operating by numbers on a level of inefficiency) I opted not to pursue the debate any further. But when you mentioned me in your response to the OP to state how badly I'd missed the point, I felt compelled to explain how I arrived at the perspective I had chosen to debate. And since then you have stayed on my turf, trying to poke holes in my rationale. So it's fair to say that we have been debating my matter since then, so the argument was no longer irrelevant. You're trying to hide behind the dead argument now because you're not winning this one. At least, by not responding to that post, I showed enough respect for facts to know when my argument does not support the issue in focus.

and do u see how your "perspective" on female self-suffiency really is dead in the water.i have shown u how u cant hunt or even compete at work without gvt polices backing u up.if u still think u have a point u are being a liar to yourself.and u need to stop.

And here you come again arguing my point which you claim isn't the point in contention. When I stay on this course and you're beat, you begin to claim we are arguing another matter. I'm sure there's something I've said to address this, since we are obviously going around in circles....

Oh, here it is......

"Women provide because men allow it". First I'd like this statement of yours to refute your later claim that women cannot provide due to ridiculous suppositions that they cannot hunt or farm because they do not have speed or strength. Human disadvantages over wildlife and the earth are overcome intellectually by invention. And now I'd like to point out that I said, if men were kept to the required minimum, then there will be no men to "disallow" a woman's quest to provide for herself and her offspring. Menstruation does not confine a woman to her home. That ritual was imposed by men who considered women unclean during her period. With medication and tampons women are up and about and you won't even know about it. A woman who chooses to take time off to be pregnant will naturally be replaced by another woman who isn't pregnant. The same concept adopted by companies when one employee takes a study leave, sick leave or his annual leave.

like i told OP dont feel pained biology supports male cheating.
coz nature balances that equation by making sure your biology supports species continuity. equations balanced.

now swallow that pride and let the issue sleep.coz u didnt pick up this debate to bring points but just coz u hated how i qouted u.and u didnt bring any points that proved my post to OP was wrong .did you??

And here you go again sneaking the first point in contention into the argument. I should reiterate to this.....

The first time you made the assertion that the debate (for you) was not about taking instruction from nature to determine the roles of men and women (which is what I assumed by your deductions from their biology to proclaim men "born cheats", to make the different deduction of men operating by numbers on a level of inefficiency) I opted not to pursue the debate any further. But when you mentioned me in your response to the OP to state how badly I'd missed the point, I felt compelled to explain how I arrived at the perspective I had chosen to debate. And since then you have stayed on my turf, trying to poke holes in my rationale. So it's fair to say that we have been debating my matter since then, so the argument was no longer irrelevant. You're trying to hide behind the dead argument now because you're not winning this one. At least, by not responding to that post, I showed enough respect for facts to know when my argument does not support the issue in focus.


If it were pride I was required to swallow, I would gladly shove it down my throat, just like I showed earlier by letting the earlier matter rest. But on this issue, you cannot expect me to accept an inferior argument without stating what I think of it. And this switching between issues is just ridiculous.

coolestofall:
They cheat simple because every opening has 2 b fiĺled. If u fill in d gap as much as possible, there wld b no need 4 outsourcing. Works 4 me like magic.

Then, how many gaps will the said woman fill for you? Is it really worth it, dedicating your whole life to filling a woman's gap. Truth is, most of them are very insatiable.

Ubunja you have serious internal issues. I think I've told you before. Sort it out.