I'd rather Sanchez comes to united than going to any of our rivals. The money ain't that much and there is absolutely nothing holding us from getting Mahrez if we want to. Sanchez deal has got nothing to do with us getting Mahrez or not.

codedguy1:
I'd rather Sanchez comes to united than going to any of our rivals. The money ain't that much and there is absolutely nothing holding us from getting Mahrez if we want to. Sanchez deal has got nothing to do with us getting Mahrez or not.

As simple as ABC...

kokaneprodigy:
a reputable link where it was stated that Arsenal wants him.
Stop disgracing your family and stop peddling beer parlour gossips

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.calciomercato.com/news/ouch-mkhitaryan-won-t-join-arsenal-because-they-re-low-level-46084

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/sport/football/904751/Henrikh-Mkhitaryan-Arsenal-Manchester-United-transfer-news-Sven-Mislintat/amp

https://www.google.com/amp/www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/man-utd-transfer-news-arsenal-14074069.amp


Like i told you before, you are a brainless troll revelling in stupidity and absolute ignorance. Your club is a disgrace to everything football stands for. Your fans have resigned to fate but cocain addicts refuse to have sense for once. I will cure you of your kwale cocaine addiction.

patrickmuf:
I have this got feeling people are only against this Sanchez deal because City and Pep have pulled out, if we had sat in the sidelines and watched City get Sanchez, I'm sure most folks will be here castigating Ed, Mou, the Glazers for not doing enough to get a player who would've seriously improved the team.
If Messi becomes available now, we y'all suggest we shouldn't go in cos he is 29/30? Dayo don make guys de write off players (30 and above) based on his well cooked excuse for Pep last season

Stop yarning dust. Another point is that Sanchez won't address our biggest problem, which is the right wing. He operates best from the left wing and that is the position Martial and Rashford favor, according to Mourinho. Bringing in Sanchez won't bode well for these talebts who are adjudged to be the future of United. This takes nothing from the quality he'll bring to the team irrespective of how long he'll continue to drop top performances though.

Moreover, other top teams in the EPL have wingers who are playing well. City's got Sane, G. Jesus and Sterling who can cause damage on the left wing. Chelsea has Oga One Corner. Liverpool have Mané and Oxade ( ) and I'm sure Kop isn't ready to splash the cash for another left winger aged 29. Maybe there's a position available for him at Tottenham.

Messi and Ozil are also quality players and unlike Sanchez we have positions where they can fill in the team.

My general point: Let's address the positions we need to upgrade first before buying someone who could be a surplus to requirements.

Leyqute:


Stop yarning dust. Another point is that Sanchez won't address our biggest problem, which is the right wing. He operates best from the left wing and that is the position Martial and Rashford favor, according to Mourinho. Bringing in Sanchez won't bode well for these talebts who are adjudged to be the future of United. This takes nothing from the quality he'll bring to the team irrespective of how long he'll continue to drop top performances though.

Moreover, other top teams in the EPL have wingers who are playing well. City's got Sane, G. Jesus and Sterling who can cause damage on the left wing. Chelsea has Oga One Corner. Liverpool have Mané and Oxade ( ) and I'm sure Kop isn't ready to splash the cash for another left winger aged 29. Maybe there's a position available for him at Tottenham.

Messi and Ozil are also quality players and unlike Sanchez we have positions where they can fill in the team.

My general point: Let's address the positions we need to upgrade first before buying someone who could be a surplus to requirements.

Sanchez is adept playing AM just behind the striker, a role presently occupied by Jesse Lingard and to be fair, Sanchez is easily better than Lingard...
Now, as regards the fact that we have other pressing areas in the team that needs attention, please refer to Mourinho's interview where he said at time you are forced in the market because a super player is available not just because he addresses your most pressing need. The RW will be addressed now or most likely in the summer. So, calma calma.

joeace2020:


https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.calciomercato.com/news/ouch-mkhitaryan-won-t-join-arsenal-because-they-re-low-level-46084

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/sport/football/904751/Henrikh-Mkhitaryan-Arsenal-Manchester-United-transfer-news-Sven-Mislintat/amp

https://www.google.com/amp/www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/man-utd-transfer-news-arsenal-14074069.amp


Like i told you before, you are a brainless troll revelling in stupidity and absolute ignorance. Your club is a disgrace to everything football stands for. Your fans have resigned to fate but cocain addicts refuse to have sense for once. I will cure you of your kwale cocaine addiction.

I said reputable sites stating “Arsenal wants him”, and u started posting mushroom blogs. One even clearly stated rumour up there, u went ahead to post it as reputable and verified.
U see, u ain’t just a scummy u are clearly a dunce as well keep embarrassing ur unborn generation.

patrickmuf:
Sanchez is adept playing AM just behind the striker, a role presently occupied by Jesse Lingard and to be fair, Sanchez is easily better than Lingard...
Now, as regards the fact that we have other pressing areas in the team that needs attention, please refer to Mourinho's interview where he said at time you are forced in the market because a super player is available not just because he addresses your most pressing need. The RW will be addressed now or most likely in the summer. So, calma calma.

Okay o. If you say so

I truly dont get pep and city's view in not going after sanchez may the cost hasn't really dropped and sanchez's performance is not what it used to be.

in august it would have been 60M with 300k per week and if he plays at least 3 or 4 years for city that would be 105M to 120M spent

but signing him now for 35M with 400k per week say he plays for 3 and half years at most that would be 103M.

assume say sanchez 32yrs is sold in 2021 for 20M to recover some cash. then is the question of game form and team moral, how is buying sanchez going to affect the team.

both city and united already have large wage structures, but city won't want to upset theirs. then the question of getting greizmann who i believe is just a younger more expensive sanchez.

this deal makes more sense for united than city, city are not in a desperate position whereas united have an immediate need for the in form sanchez if mou believes he can get him back to his best.

or united risk getting stuck with over paid out of form flops.

Sanchez can play in any position in the attack be it LWF, RWF, no 10, and even CF if necessary.

While he has not played RWF in some time he has played and thrived in that position before for Udinese, Barcelona and even Arsenal.

My opinion is that we get 2 out of Sanchez, Ozil, Mahrez. Any 2 of them will do, and the age should not be an issue cos all these guys will be relatively cheap if one considers that most top quality players now go for around 100m USD.

No be Una fault. Una probably don dey read too much junk from some pep arselicking journalists.

Imagine complaining about 35m for Sanchez. When batsuya cost 33m.
Sigurdson, 50M Abi 45M...

Someone that no one would have bated an eyelid had city ended up buying him for 80m just a few months ago

Y'all should pay no mind to those idiots who make it a point of duty to outline every single financial detail about any united purchase to push their agenda. Some of them dey even add money for plane tickets and cost of biros.

The whole total wage bla bla bla package amounting to 1 billion Zimbabwean dollars is nonsense, when being made to stand in isolation.
Check these things out for other big deals done in recent times and you will see there is nothing outrageous about it.

MoR2:
I truly dont get pep and city's view in not going after sanchez may the cost hasn't really dropped and sanchez's performance is not what it used to be.

in august it would have been 60M with 300k per week and if he plays at least 3 or 4 years for city that would be 105M to 120M spent

but signing him now for 35M with 400k per week say he plays for 3 and half years at most that would be 103M.

assume say sanchez 32yrs is sold in 2021 for 20M to recover some cash. then is the question of game form and team moral, how is buying sanchez going to affect the team.

both city and united already have large wage structures, but city won't want to upset theirs. then the question of getting greizmann who i believe is just a younger more expensive sanchez.

or united risk getting stuck with over paid out of form flops.

BBC Sport's Simon Stone:
"Manchester United are favourites to sign the Chile international after indicating they are willing to meet the Gunners' £35m asking price for the forward.

"Sources with knowledge of the situation say they understand Chelsea are also interested in the player.

"They claim the overall package being negotiated is higher than the £60m for which Arsenal agreed to sell Sanchez to City in the summer.

"City still believe Sanchez would prefer to join them, given his past relationship with Guardiola and the fact he pushed to join them in the summer.

"However, they view it as highly unlikely Sanchez will drop his financial demands to a level that would allow them to resume talks."

Sanchez at 35m is a steal.
As mentioned earlier Sigurdsson cost 50m and players of Sanchez quality are going for 100-150m these days.
We don't need to buy unproven players for long term benefits now. We are not in that position, only City has that luxury these days.
We don't need geriatric players like Zlatan either.

We need to buy a few players at their peak i.e 25-30 (preferably EPL proven) and use the next 1-2 seasons to put a halt to City's progress.

Let us solve that gaping RW/AMF hole with 2 of Mahrez, Ozil, Sanchez this January and sort out the CM/FB issue in the summer.

City pull out and all of a sudden the scrutiny of the transfer increases to ridiculous levels.
The transfer was perfect for city up until united showed up.

"It is understood the wages being demanded by Sanchez would have put him ahead of all City's star men, something the club decided they would not do."

- Stone.

Leyqute:


BBC Sport's Simon Stone:
"Manchester United are favourites to sign the Chile international after indicating they are willing to meet the Gunners' £35m asking price for the forward.

"Sources with knowledge of the situation say they understand Chelsea are also interested in the player.

"They claim the overall package being negotiated is higher than the £60m for which Arsenal agreed to sell Sanchez to City in the summer.

"City still believe Sanchez would prefer to join them, given his past relationship with Guardiola and the fact he pushed to join them in the summer.

"However, they view it as highly unlikely Sanchez will drop his financial demands to a level that would allow them to resume talks."

in simplier terms united would pay more than 60M for sanchez

is that the 35 + mkhi

hmmm, it's not my money or my club but why is mahrez not even an option. sell mkhi add money buy mahrez, if he flops sell him in august.

Leyqute:
"It is understood the wages being demanded by Sanchez would have put him ahead of all City's star men, something the club decided they would not do."

- Stone.

Egbon Leyqute, are we City?... wetin concern us with them?

PietroRico:
City pull out and all of a sudden the scrutiny of the transfer increases to ridiculous levels.
The transfer was perfect for city up until united showed up.

it's likely united will blow chelsea out of the deal like they did with lukaku, more money to the club more money to the player.

MoR2:
in simplier terms united would pay more than 60M for sanchez

is that the 35 + mkhi

hmmm, it's not my money or my club but why is mahrez not even an option. sell mkhi add money buy mahrez, if he flops sell him in august.

Ogbeni Stop abeg!!!

Buying Sanchez doesn't in any way affect signing Mahrez, Dybala or Griezmann or any RW at all.

Y'all should calm your balls biko.

These people should not toy with our feelings biko, they either get the deal done or move on abeg.

elrony:
These people should not toy with our feelings biko, they either get the deal done or move on abeg.

Lol, I just taya

I have been hearing Deal agreed since on Sunday

afrodoc2:
Sanchez at 35m is a steal.
As mentioned earlier Sigurdsson cost 50m and players of Sanchez quality are going for 100-150m these days.
We don't need to buy unproven players for long term benefits now. We are not in that position, only City has that luxury these days.
We don't need geriatric players like Zlatan either.

We need to buy a few players at their peak i.e 25-30 (preferably EPL proven) and use the next 1-2 seasons to put a halt to City's progress.

Let us solve that gaping RW/AMF hole with 2 of Mahrez, Ozil, Sanchez this January and sort out the CM/FB issue in the summer.

Costa went for 70M Aubameyang is said to be 53M none in their last year or even 6 months of contract. those are his age mates of similiar quality if not more.

what I am reading now is 35M + mkhi, expect if the mkhi part is a loan deal not a full purchase.

afrodoc2:
Sanchez at 35m is a steal.
As mentioned earlier Sigurdsson cost 50m and players of Sanchez quality are going for 100-150m these days.
We don't need to buy unproven players for long term benefits now. We are not in that position, only City has that luxury these days.
We don't need geriatric players like Zlatan either.

We need to buy a few players at their peak i.e 25-30 (preferably EPL proven) and use the next 1-2 seasons to put a halt to City's progress.

Let us solve that gaping RW/AMF hole with 2 of Mahrez, Ozil, Sanchez this January and sort out the CM/FB issue in the summer.

Thank you very much, I don't know why people just look at what city does, as if they are the standard. if Costa and auba, age mates with Alexis can go for 50+millions, then why can't we just give arsenal 35m for Sanchez. I have be praying for more than a year for the guy, he is somebody that will obviously improve any side he joined.

90mil for POGBOOM is outrageous,we should've used the money to sign barkley [AM] bakayoko [CM] and drinkwater [DM]

elrony:


Ogbeni Stop abeg!!!

Buying Sanchez doesn't in any way affect signing Mahrez, Dybala or Griezmann or any RW at all.

Y'all should calm your balls biko.

stop what did i say you cant sign mahrez or dybala

are you guys in the market for mahrez.

is greizmann even a right winger, is it cause he is left footed.
you know greizmann was rumored to want the same 400k per week.

even psg and barca wage structure is not that silly, you guys spend about 260M per year abi on wages now add 20M for sanchez and another 20M for greizmann..

Last season many people were labelling the 89m we paid for pogba as too much, but look at today, that fee for a player of Pogba's quality and age is an absolute steal. Martial went for 36m + add ons 2 years ago, now that fee looks like a fling. nobody will remember the figure paid, if Sanchez blast us into the CL business end and win us one or two titles before his decline. fergie bought RVP for 24m at 29, he was just good for about 1 and half year, but people still look at the deal with nostalgia. Get Sanchez for me, we need him.

Anyone publicly or in secrecy who is against this alexis sanchez deal is an award winning enemy of the state! And thunder will surely eventually fire you....not your family or friends but just YOU solo! I guarantee it!

MoR2:
stop what did i say you cant sign mahrez or dybala

are you guys in the market for mahrez.

is greizmann even a right winger, is it cause he is left footed.
you know greizmann was rumored to want the same 400k per week.

even psg and barca wage structure is not that silly, you guys spend about 260M per year abi on wages now add 20M for sanchez and another 20M for greizmann..

Greizmann may not succeed in EPL

MoR2:
Costa went for 70M Aubameyang is said to be 53M none in their last year or even 6 months of contract. those are his age mates of similiar quality if not more.

what I am reading now is 35M + mkhi, expect if the mkhi part is a loan deal not a full purchase.

It is hard to place a price on quality. We are in a fight to make the top 4 this season and hopefully compete for the title next season.

If JM believes Mikki has no place in the team and he believes Sanchez will give us an edge then he should go for it.

Your main concern should be about Sanchez's quality and ability to fit in with the team.

Just out of curiousity what price will you be happy with? Mikki for Sanchez straight swap, 15m + Mikki, 25m + Mikki?

funlord:


Anyone publicly or in secrecy who is against this alexis sanchez deal is an award winning enemy of the state! And thunder will surely fire you....not your family or friends but just YOU solo! I guarantee it!

As in eeh, Imagine A front 3 of Sanchez, Martial and Ukaku against Seville. with pogba Matic and Mata behind.
if you ask me sef I will get Mahrez, Ozil and Sanchez

weedtaker:
90mil for POGBOOM is outrageous,we should've used the money to sign barkley [AM] bakayoko [CM] and drinkwater [DM]

very funny, because pogba is their ave age and plays all three positions as a roam > random offensive attacking midfielder.

pogba was not bought in an overprized market, those three were. neither did they have the hype he had.

and those three performed better than pogba last season. barkley as an AM created more chances than pogba, and contributed to 13goals.

bakayoko beat psg to the league and make ucl semis, his defensive stats better than pogba, so also drinks.