Xisnin:

Illiterate dreamer, how many foreigners have ever been jailed by the US?
You guys are so gullible and sentimental.

you are a kid indeed

Do you know about president Noriega of Panama in the 80s

the ans is NO cos your where not born then,,listen to Elders

He spent over 25 yrs in jail,,, but for Buratai it will be life.

Xisnin:

Charles Taylor was not jailed by the US. The US has no jurisdiction over foreign countries
unless through illegal wars or if caught committing crimes inside the US.
Do your research and tell me just one, just one foreign leader or actor that have ever been jailed
by the US.

If those people have assets in the us they will have no other option but to attend court sessions and defend themselves. Otherwise it was a fruitful effort. But I know IPOB am sure those people will have property in the us

NtoAkwaIbom:
Its very shameful to see that all the idiots above do not know that the USA hv no jurisdiction whatsoever over Nigeria..
Even the United Nations have only as much jurisdiction dat the Nigerian government wishes to submit and surrender to it.

Can the United States govt compel Nigeria to pay reparations to Ipobians ? Even the US govt itself does not submit to the UN, as seen in the Guatamala case, and currently in the Jerusalem crisis, and yet these Ipobians bliv the same US will force us, to grant them their hrt desires..

you are a kid indeed

Do you know about president Noriega of Panama in the 80s

the ans is NO cos your where not born then,,listen to Elders

He spent over 25 yrs in jail,,, but for Buratai it will be life.

mbos:



you are a kid indeed

Do you know about president Noriega of Panama in the 80s

the ans is NO cos your where not born then,,listen to Elders

He spent over 25 yrs in jail,,, but for Buratai it will be life.

I knew you were an ignorant fellow. US have no jurisdiction over any foreign
leader unless through illegal wars. Now ask if your fellow delusional Ipob have
been promised a war against Nigeria?

The US has never tried nor jailed a foreign leader for alleged crimes in their
home countries. Whenever you think you found one just know that it a case of a loser
in war being punished for resisting invasion or foreign hegemony.

It is even more impossible with the dummy in the whitehouse who would rather commit
suicide than engage in war.

Now go back to google and do more research, just name 1 foreign politician that have ever
been jailed in the US because some delusional group brought a case against them.

yarimo:
This terrorist IPOBIANS are bunch of fools. Us court ko north Korea court NI

Still waiting for the "fruitful" result after "dragging" the Nigeria government to ECOWAS court.


Hehehe!


IPOB - Most popular group of comedians in Eastern Nigeria.


After US court, Sharia court loading.


Ezi Biafla!

africanman85:
If those people have assets in the us they will have no other option but to attend court sessions and defend themselves. Otherwise it was a fruitful effort. But I know IPOB am sure those people will have property in the us

There is no such law in the US mandating a foreigner to answer a court case for crimes
allegedly committed outside the US. The only body with such power is ICC which the US
does not subscribe to. Ipob are just wasting their time and enriching a smart lawyer.
In the US, everything is politics.

Xisnin:


I knew you were an ignorant fellow. US have no jurisdiction over any foreign
leader unless through illegal wars. Now ask if your fellow delusional Ipob have
been promised a war against Nigeria?

The US has never tried nor jailed a foreign leader for alleged crimes in their
home countries. Whenever you think you found one just know that it a case of a loser
in war being punished for resisting invasion or foreign hegemony.

It is even more impossible with the dummy in the whitehouse who would rather commit
suicide than engage in war.

Now go back to google and do more research, just name 1 foreign politician that have ever
been jailed in the US because some delusional group brought a case against them.

The suit was filed based on two US’ statutes; the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA or ATS – the Alien Tort Statute) and the Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA).
Both laws have extra-territorial reach, meaning they allow US federal courts to assert long-arm jurisdiction which extends beyond the borders of US...


Why did the US district court fail to throw away the matter? 1
Toture and killings in the war against IPOB is a war..

Now who is running mad now....ZOO Man?

Long Live Biafra
God Bless Biafra.

GO YOUr WAY ZOO Man

Xisnin:


There is no such law in the US mandating a foreigner to answer a court case for crimes
allegedly committed outside the US. The only body with such power is ICC which the US
does not subscribe to. Ipob are just wasting their time and enriching a smart lawyer.
In the US, everything is politics.

Keep deceiving yourself?/

your eye will open soon

You will know the difference between Super Power and ZOO

oh

I see this as an intelligent move. The objective is not to enforce laws or orders against the Nigerian government, for all I know they can all boycott any summon during trials as Nigeria has sovereignty. Rather the objective is to paint and demonise Nigeria before the nations of the world for future purposes.
Think of what happens if the Nigerian government boycotts or refuses to honor the US court, the media ofcourse would be set ablaze. Can you imagine the case where the US court indicts the Nigerian government of murder and genocide of its citizens and issues an arrest warrant to FBI on arrival into US of the accused persons? Thus compelling by diplomacy United Kingdom and other nations to extradite the accused persons to US on arrival into their respective countries.
There is an objective here. IPOB needs sympathy and support for what is to come. It would be impossibe for Britain to lay behind Nigeria when what is to come comes since she would like to protect her moral values along the rest of the nations who already has enormous sympathy for IPOB. IPOB is playing this game intellectually in preparation of what is to come. They are not stupid. Of course they know US can't enforce Nigeria. They have foreign advicers so if u think they are being foolish better have a rethink. I insist that something is to come and that's what IPOB has been preparing for. Remember, Lai Muhamed admitted some days ago that they know not what IPOB's next line of action brings.

mbos:



you are a kid indeed

Do you know about president Noriega of Panama in the 80s

the ans is NO cos your where not born then,,listen to Elders

He spent over 25 yrs in jail,,, but for Buratai it will be life.

If this is the stark ignorance you want to base your Biafra on, you can gladly go on your way.

Go and read about the Panama invasion and see if it compares with the situation with iPob

You are calling Noriega as if you even know what happened, even though your ignorance is reeking through your post.

Two US soldiers were killed in Panama presumably on the orders of Noriega, but daft miniature mor0ns like you liken Nnamdi Kanu to that scenario

KanuJEWSarePIGS:



Still waiting for the "fruitful" result after "dragging" the Nigeria government to ECOWAS court.


Hehehe!


IPOB - Most popular group of comedians in Eastern Nigeria.


After US court, Sharia court loading.


Ezi Biafla!

I's funny that these flagella-brained Igbos are like this.

Their spiritual home of Israel is driving all sorts of African migrants away.

All their noise about Judaism isn't resonating to anything tangible.

At times I wonder if these goats are hell bent on making us laugh.

BushWickBill:


If this is the stark ignorance you want to base your Biafra on, you can gladly go on your way.

Go and read about the Panama invasion and see if it compares with the situation with iPob

You are calling Noriega as if you even know what happened, even though your ignorance is reeking through your post.

Two US soldiers were killed in Panama presumably on the orders of Noriega, but daft miniature mor0ns like you liken Nnamdi Kanu to that scenario

you most have browsed it little boy...but you did not mention drug....and panama canal treaty.. you are a kid indeed.

Xisnin:


There is no such law in the US mandating a foreigner to answer a court case for crimes
allegedly committed outside the US. The only body with such power is ICC which the US
does not subscribe to. Ipob are just wasting their time and enriching a smart lawyer.
In the US, everything is politics.

Did u read this "The suit was filed based on two US’ statutes; the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA or ATS – the Alien Tort Statute) and the Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA).
Both laws have extra-territorial reach, meaning they allow US federal courts to assert long-arm jurisdiction which extends beyond the borders of US ?

00

africanman85:
Did u read this "The suit was filed based on two US’ statutes; the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA or ATS – the Alien Tort Statute) and the Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA).
Both laws have extra-territorial reach, meaning they allow US federal courts to assert long-arm jurisdiction which extends beyond the borders of US ?

Dont Mind Them..

Everyday is for the thief but one day for the Landlord...

NtoAkwaIbom:
Its very shameful to see that all the idiots above do not know that the USA hv no jurisdiction whatsoever over Nigeria..

.

This is not about jurisdiction of the US court, this is about judgement.

Getting a judgement against someone like Burutai in a US court has worlwide rammifications, this is the greatest nation in the world. For Burutai to be convicted in a US court of human rights abuse snd extrer-judicial murder might not have much of an impact in Nigeria. But outside Nigeria, it has massive impact snd Burutai might very unfortunate that the next government might even take that Judgement serious and take Burutai up on it, APC wont be in power forever.

A negative judgement agsinst any of these men will only boost IPOB's international image. This case has nothing to do with jurisdiction

mbos:


you most have browsed it little boy...but you did not mention drug....and panama canal treaty.. you are a kid indeed.

no you are the little one here.

You spit out so much rubbish and make me want to believe that you are intelligent.

I managed to look it up, and I find no common lines between this nonsense case and the Noriega you are attempting to appear smart with.

You are as daft as the average iPOb yoot on the street.


Kindly explain the correlation between the Noriega you are trumpeting aimlessly about and this case in short simple sentence.

gartamanta:


This is not about jurisdiction of the US court, this is about judgement.

Getting a judgement against someone like Burutai in a US court has worlwide rammifications, this is the greatest nation in the world. For Burutai to be convicted in a US court of human rights abuse snd extrer-judicial murder might not have much of an impact in Nigeria. But outside Nigeria, it has massive impact snd Burutai might very unfortunate that the next government might even take that Judgement serious and take Burutai up on it, APC wont be in power forever.

A negative judgement agsinst any of these men will only boost IPOB's international image. This case has nothing to do with jurisdiction

They will send special BOKO HARAM forces to pick him like all those Serbian war criminals

sarrki:
What is Igbos ?

Do us court have jurisdiction over Nigeria ?

I thought they are educated ?

It shows they are not

mumu

solid3:
If they refuse to appear in the US court, will the US judge order their arrest in Nigeria?

That will be contempt of court. The US will assume they're guilty and will confiscate all their properties and cash in the States.

The assets will be converted to cash and proceeds will be used to compensate the victims and their families.

They will also be banned from stepping their feet in America. IPOB will then use the verdict as a precedence when they get to the ICC.

Lol
These iPOBian amphibians won't kill me with their ignorance.

See what I found under TVPA:

Although both the TVPA and ATS may be used to pursue claims for torture and extrajudicial killing, they are distinct statutes with their own limitations. First, unlike the ATS, claims under the TVPA may only be brought against persons who acted under the actual or apparent authority of a foreign nation. Second, TVPA claimants must exhaust all “adequate and available” remedies in the country where the offense occurred, but it is not settled whether this same requirement applies to ATS claimants

http://iradvocates.org/about-torture-victims-prevention-act-tvpa


See what I found under the TATS

In 2004 the U.S. Supreme Court issued the first of two decisions that significantly limited the scope of lawsuits that could be brought under the ATCA. In Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, the court held that the ATCA applies only to violations of international norms that are “specific, universal, and obligatory,” and it determined that general prohibitions against arbitrary arrest and detention did not meet that standard. And in 2013 the court ruled in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, regarding a foreign petroleum corporation’s alleged complicity in human rights abuses in Nigeria, that the ATCA generally does not apply to torts committed in foreign countries—though exceptions are possible in cases “where the claims touch and concern the territory of the United States” with “sufficient force.”

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Alien-Tort-Claims-Act

africanman85:
Did u read this "The suit was filed based on two US’ statutes; the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA or ATS – the Alien Tort Statute) and the Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA).
Both laws have extra-territorial reach, meaning they allow US federal courts to assert long-arm jurisdiction which extends beyond the borders of US ?

mbos:


Dont Mind Them..

Everyday is for the thief but one day for the Landlord...

Keep enriching US lawyers and fanning the embers of your collective ignorance.
Any monkey knows that courts only entertain cases where their jurisdiction can reach.

It is apparent that you lot have not done any serious study into the two acts under which you are rejoicing over.

frankmoney:
so if found guilty they will be arrested in naija ? Really bro ?

why will a Court permit the initiation of a case that she can't punish the guilty. ...

Xisnin:


I knew you were an ignorant fellow. US have no jurisdiction over any foreign
leader unless through illegal wars. Now ask if your fellow delusional Ipob have
been promised a war against Nigeria?

The US has never tried nor jailed a foreign leader for alleged crimes in their
home countries. Whenever you think you found one just know that it a case of a loser
in war being punished for resisting invasion or foreign hegemony.

It is even more impossible with the dummy in the whitehouse who would rather commit
suicide than engage in war.

Now go back to google and do more research, just name 1 foreign politician that have ever
been jailed in the US because some delusional group brought a case against them.

NtoAkwaIbom:
Its very shameful to see that all the idiots above do not know that the USA hv no jurisdiction whatsoever over Nigeria..
Even the United Nations have only as much jurisdiction dat the Nigerian government wishes to submit and surrender to it.

Can the United States govt compel Nigeria to pay reparations to Ipobians ? Even the US govt itself does not submit to the UN, as seen in the Guatamala case, and currently in the Jerusalem crisis, and yet these Ipobians bliv the same US will force us, to grant them their hrt desires..

It so funny, the set calling others ignorant display ignorance. Did you people shouting that USA have no jurisdiction over Nigeria even bothered to research the case.

Your Nigerian government have already played the card you lots are screeching and the USA court rejected that argument. The case isn't something new, they've been filed it. It is now your media decided to report it.

However, the defence lawyers had in a counter motion asked the court to dismiss the suit based on “the act of state doctrine, lack of jurisdiction and sovereign immunity,” district court rejected.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanguardngr.com/2018/02/biafran-suit-america-us-rejects-nigerias-defence-immunity/amp/

As long as the Nigerian government is ridiculously dependent on the west for your survival and daily activity, they indeed have control over una.
Keep thinking they don't.
You honestly thought all those aids they give una was for free.
Nigga please!

voicelez:
Biafra 'the sun must set at dawn '

GBAM

brookz:
A Pained Pig from Potor Republic Spotted. Ma Bloda how market?

Oga Burundu, I no dey follow you mine skull and sell human parts for Jankara so how I wan take sabi 'how market'dey?

BushWickBill:
Lol
These iPOBian amphibians won't kill me with their ignorance.

See what I found under TVPA:

Although both the TVPA and ATS may be used to pursue claims for torture and extrajudicial killing, they are distinct statutes with their own limitations. First, unlike the ATS, claims under the TVPA may only be brought against persons who acted under the actual or apparent authority of a foreign nation. Second, TVPA claimants must exhaust all “adequate and available” remedies in the country where the offense occurred, but it is not settled whether this same requirement applies to ATS claimants

http://iradvocates.org/about-torture-victims-prevention-act-tvpa


See what I found under the TATS

In 2004 the U.S. Supreme Court issued the first of two decisions that significantly limited the scope of lawsuits that could be brought under the ATCA. In Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, the court held that the ATCA applies only to violations of international norms that are “specific, universal, and obligatory,” and it determined that general prohibitions against arbitrary arrest and detention did not meet that standard. And in 2013 the court ruled in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, regarding a foreign petroleum corporation’s alleged complicity in human rights abuses in Nigeria, that the ATCA generally does not apply to torts committed in foreign countries—though exceptions are possible in cases “where the claims touch and concern the territory of the United States” with “sufficient force.”

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Alien-Tort-Claims-Act








Keep enriching US lawyers and fanning the embers of your collective ignorance.
Any monkey knows that courts only entertain cases where their jurisdiction can reach.

It is apparent that you lot have not done any serious study into the two acts under which you are rejoicing over.

You are contradicting yourself the more. Check your writeup very well.

sarrki:
What is Igbos ?

Do us court have jurisdiction over Nigeria ?

I thought they are educated ?

It shows they are not

You are so scared of IPOB more than the herdsmen. Haba mallam

It's not over until it's over. Oji ihe nwata weli ya elu aka roba'ya iro owetua ya.

Truth must prevailed and the rising sun will surely set dawn.

africanman85:
Did u read this "The suit was filed based on two US’ statutes; the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA or ATS – the Alien Tort Statute) and the Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA).
Both laws have extra-territorial reach, meaning they allow US federal courts to assert long-arm jurisdiction which extends beyond the borders of US ?

It doesn't matter if the case was filed under a million statues, nothing, I repeat nothing would
come out of it. Unless the US government is the one suing those individuals, Ipob are just being
delusional because even if a dumb judge issues a guilty verdict to trend, the judgement will have no effect
because international relations is 100% politics.

mbos:



The suit was filed based on two US’ statutes; the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA or ATS – the Alien Tort Statute) and the Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA).
Both laws have extra-territorial reach, meaning they allow US federal courts to assert long-arm jurisdiction which extends beyond the borders of US...


Why did the US district court fail to throw away the matter? 1
Toture and killings in the war against IPOB is a war..

Now who is running mad now....ZOO Man?

Long Live Biafra
God Bless Biafra.

GO YOUr WAY ZOO Man

Don't be a fool for Ipob emotional games. There are many dumb judges in the Us who would
entertain any case just to be in the news. A country can fight terrorists using whichever method
it deems fit.