olamil34:


Okay kindly share your white paper.

Sorry what's your profession and what tools do you use to come to this conclusion?

That is apart from watching cgi "research".

You are not under obligation to watch that video.

You can go about your business.

Solstar:


NASA is wrong on many fronts, a decoy from the reality of what our world is including the shape of the Plane of our existence. Einstein was wrong on many fronts including Gravity. But thankfully the scientific community is coming to that realization now but to change the text books will totally cause massive chaos in the academia. That is why our graduates can not fabricate a simple too, no design a simple integrated circuit. The whites have known these facts and they are learning something different. We do not even know how to produce something as basic as a battery storage system even though all that we require are in our kitchen and garage. These morons would have just googled simple searches like 'Was Einstein wrong about Gravity ?' they probably would have seen the answers, but they are so stupid that they do not even use google searches before countering assertions.

I have grown thick-skin against these ignorant fellows here. So, do not worry about them, let them continue to suffer in their ignorance waiting for a Sky Daddy to come and save them.

I just have to keep dropping a hint on the truth when I see posts that someone is looking for answers.

I know what this world is about, few people have the resources and bandwidth and even the time that I have to read, research even engage in Lucid Dreaming and OBEs to study the Cosmos. For them, who ever has such capability is a psychiatric case. I pity their ignorance, that is why there are so many poor people in the country, cos Religions have numbed their brains.

WATCH YOUR LANGUAGE AND TONE OF VOICE.
This is the last pleasant warning, I might not be so accommodating next time.

Solstar:


You are not under obligation to watch that video.

You can go about your business.

Again what white paper did you read that came about this "great idea" because I would like to read the scientific research.

What scientist backs up your theory.

olamil34:


Again what white paper did you read that came about this "great idea" because I would like to read the scientific research.

What scientist backs up your theory.

No scientist would publicly back some of these claims. They're mostly contracted and funded by Government and Big Pharma.

I still find it hard to believe that there are still flat-earthers out there even with all tthe evidences....pictures from cosmonauts and astronauts?

Flat earthers are pulling the same trick. They’re right that you don’t know the earth is round. But they’re only right in a context where testimonies of hundreds are disregarded, where widely accepted facts among the scientific community don’t count, where photographic evidence is inadmissible, and so on.

The flat earther’s argument is framed in a context where you can’t set aside the possibility that there’s a pervading global conspiracy – albeit one which somehow intermittently leaves glaring errors which give them away. In that context, you don’t know the earth is round. But in that context, nobody knows much at all and so this conclusion is simply unsurprising.

In the more everyday contexts that we care about, we can rely on testimony. We can rely on the fact that every educated physicist, cartographer and geographer never pauses to think the earth might be flat. And we are correct to rely on these things. If it was incorrect, we’d never get treated at hospitals – for in a context where we can’t trust the established laws of physics, how could we trust the judgements of medical science?

Belief in a flat Earth seems a bit like the attempt to eradicate polio – just when you think it’s gone, a pocket of resistance appears. But the “flat Earthers” have always been with us; it’s just that they usually operate under the radar of public awareness.

the rapper B.o.B has given the idea prominence through his tweets and the release of his single Flatline, in which he not only says the Earth is flat, but mixes in a slew of other weird and wonderful ideas.

Rejecting science and embracing an alternative view, such as the Earth being flat, moves the individual from the periphery of knowledge and understanding to a privileged position among those who know the “truth”.

In BoB’s lyrics, he calls himself “free thinking”. In this phrasing we see a glimpse of the warrant he gives himself to reject science, considering it a “cult”.

He appeals instead to his common sense to establish that the Earth must be flat. The appeal to common sense is a characteristic way of claiming to be rational while denying the collective rationality of the scientific community (and a typical argument in climate denial).

It’s also about recapturing a feeling of independence and control. We know from research that there is a correlation between feeling a lack of control in your life and belief in conspiracy theories.

Well for flat earthers lets do a tongue in cheek
No one has ever laid claim to Antarctica

Flat Earthers reckon the fact that no one has claimed Antarctica could mean the Earth is flat. They also argue it’s not a continent but a 360 degree landmass made up of ice that surrounds the planet and holds in the oceans.
Do you know any treaties that has lasted that long between any industrialised nations? Moreover, do you know any piece of real-estate that is owned by no one?

Earthbound:


No scientist would publicly back some of these claims. They're mostly contracted and funded by Government and Big Pharma.

So your research is based on hours of watching cgi right ?

Earthbound:


No scientist would publicly back some of these claims. They're mostly contracted and funded by Government and Big Pharma.

What about the white paper?

Or your scientific research comes from watching cgi videos.

kanayoNickel:
Well for flat earthers lets do a tongue in cheek
No one has ever laid claim to Antarctica

Flat Earthers reckon the fact that no one has claimed Antarctica could mean the Earth is flat. They also argue it’s not a continent but a 360 degree landmass made up of ice that surrounds the planet and holds in the oceans.
Do you know any treaties that has lasted that long between any industrialised nations? Moreover, do you know any piece of real-estate that is owned by no one?

u have very valid cogent points

olamil34:


So your research is based on hours of watching cgi right ?

No. Ex NASA, CIA, Nazi agents, also ex Freemasons. Go to www.whale.to there is a lot to learn there. Just be open minded, that's all.

In the ball-Earth model Antarctica is an ice continent which covers the bottom of the ball from 78 degrees South latitude to 90 and is therefore not more than 12,000 miles in circumference. Many early explorers including Captian Cook and James Clark Ross, however, in attempting Antarctic circumnavigation took 3 to 4 years and clocked 50-60,000 miles around. The British ship Challenger also made an indirect but complete circumnavigation of Antarctica traversing 69,000 miles. This is entirely inconsistent with the ball model.
⛵ Practical distance measurements taken from “The Australian Handbook, Almanack, Shippers’ and Importers’ Directory” state that the straight line distance between Sydney and Nelson is 1550 statute miles. Their given difference in longitude is 22 degrees 2’14”. Therefore if 22 degrees 2’14” out of 360 is 1550 miles, the entirety would measure 25,182 miles. This is not only larger than the ball-Earth is said to be at the equator, but a whole 4262 miles greater than it would be at Sydney’s southern latitude on a globe of said proportions.
�From near Cape Horn, Chile to Port Philip in Melbourne, Australia the distance is 10,500 miles, or 143 degrees of longitude away. Factoring in the remaining degrees to 360 makes for a total distance of 26,430 miles around this particular latitude, which is over 1500 miles wider than Earth is supposed to be at the equator, and many more thousands of miles wider than it is supposed to be at such Southern latitudes.
✔Similar calculations made from the Cape of Good Hope, South Africa to Melbourne, Australia at an average latitude of 35.5 degrees South, have given an approximate figure of over 25,000 miles, which is again equal to or greater than the Earth’s supposed greatest circumference at the equator. Calculations from Sydney, Australia to Wellington, New Zealand at an average of 37.5 degrees South have given an approximate circumference of 25,500 miles, greater still! According to the ball-Earth theory, the circumference of the Earth at 37.5 degrees Southern latitude should be only 19,757 statute miles, almost six thousand miles less than such practical measurements.

Earthbound:


No. Ex NASA, CIA, Nazi agents, also ex Freemasons. Go to www.whale.to there is a lot to learn there. Just be open minded, that's all.

So you believe them more than N.A.S.A and the entire Space association, what proves do you have that this people are not cooking some random facts for you to read.

Earthbound:


No. Ex NASA, CIA, Nazi agents, also ex Freemasons. Go to www.whale.to there is a lot to learn there. Just be open minded, that's all.

I am open minded that's why I am asking questions.

So the sun moves up and down the earth right?

Leaving the rest of the solar system in total darkness.

My mind is blown

Earthbound:


No. Ex NASA, CIA, Nazi agents, also ex Freemasons. Go to www.whale.to there is a lot to learn there. Just be open minded, that's all.

I am open minded that's why i validate everything that's
goes into it.

olamil34:


So you believe them more than N.A.S.A and the entire Space association, what proves do you have that this people are not cooking some random facts for you to read.

I'm not asking you to believe it. I'm asking you to educate yourself. What you do with the knowledge learned is entirely your business.

Earthbound:


I'm not asking you to believe it. I'm asking you to educate yourself. What you do with the knowledge learned is entirely your business.

Neither am I asking you not to believe, I am just asking you why do you believe? Why did you accept that truth.

olamil34:


Neither am I asking you not to believe, I am just asking you why do you believe? Why did you accept that truth.

Where did you read that I believed? I'm curious and know that feeding my curiosity will provide answers seemingly. There are truths and half truths. Only you can discover for yourself.

Earthbound:


Where did you read that I believed? I'm curious and know that feeding my curiosity will provide answers seemingly. There are truths and half truths. Only you can discover for yourself.

You are flat earther right ?

Earthbound:


Where did you read that I believed? I'm curious and know that feeding my curiosity will provide answers seemingly. There are truths and half truths. Only you can discover for yourself.

So nasa is wrong and your research is right? The earth is not flat and this research dates back before nasa was formed, this research dates before Christ was born.

olamil34:


You are flat earther right ?

Hahaha no. The sun is round, the moon is round, I believe we're round BUT, there are A LOT of unanswered questions.

Did you visit the site? You can get lost in the information there, so tread carefully.

Earthbound:


Where did you read that I believed? I'm curious and know that feeding my curiosity will provide answers seemingly. There are truths and half truths. Only you can discover for yourself.

So how does the sun revolve around the earth, or does the earth spins around the sun.

Earthbound:


Hahaha no. The sun is round, the moon is round, I believe we're round BUT, there are A LOT of unanswered questions.

Did you visit the site? You can get lost in the information there, so tread carefully.

So we are on the same page? I too have questions.
Do you think aliens exist?
Are we alone?

olamil34:


So we are on the same page? I too have questions.
Do you think aliens exist?
Are we alone?

I would like to believe we cannot be the only form of intelligence considering the vastness of the universe.



There have been contacts but the world powers are spending so much money to cover it up.

Why is it the atmosphere fall off via "the ice what ever" after air has weight

And what do you thing NASA will gain from your so called "conspiracy"

Earthbound:


I would like to believe we cannot be the only form of intelligence considering the vastness of the universe.



There have been contacts but the world powers are spending so much money to cover it up.

Am 100% with you my brother.

I hope to one day meet one

Earthbound:


I would like to believe we cannot be the only form of intelligence considering the vastness of the universe.



There have been contacts but the world powers are spending so much money to cover it up.

I have met Extra Terrestrial before, and He called me by a native name that no one outside my family knows. That was my first meeting.

kakarott:
And what do you thing NASA will gain from your so called "conspiracy"

Money, NASA is a front for some other organization, even the leadership of NASA might be oblivious to this fact, but look closely at the private organizations that own NASA and you will see undisclosed bound by Non-Disclosure Agreement.

I cant make this stuff up. I have nothing to gain, not from nairalanders. This account is one month old, and I can disable when ever I feel like.

Solstar:


I have met Extra Terrestrial before, and He called me by a native name that no one outside my family knows. That was my first meeting.

How was it's appearance? Was it human-like in nature? I believe they are mostly reptilian hence the devil and demons are depicted as humanoids having tails