chic2pimp:


Need to have a look at the match again because I think KDB simply had a below par game judging by His lofty standards. Sure the tight markings might not have helped but still KDB wasn't His usual self today.


Tbh I would loved to see a Brazil vs France Semi because I think they would have done more with ball than Belgium managed today.

A40:
Shaku shaku master

10 dribbles
1 chance created
15 shaku shakus completed
0 shot on target.

This Ikedia with Belgian passport suppose dey play Futsal walahi

Lana1:
Fúcking sore loser!!!! He can go back to Brussels with his L

Nihilstjnr:
how can a midget like umtiti beat Fellaini in the air?

airmark:
Mou : But I think the Belgium players they go home with a bad feeling. A feeling that we could do more and better, a feeling that probably Hazard was out of it, because he tried absolutely everything.

“Many of the other players they kept hiding, and a little bit more in the last 20-25 minutes. But they are much better than that. And for me, big occasions, big players, and many of the players they were not there in the big occasion.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZoXgBbqEbY

airmark:


What football should your useless burnthisleaguedown attackers, that couldn't get past those unknown asian midgets, play? Don't forget to name just one german player with at least 2 goals in Russia.

eph12:

Dead to sin bro

A40:
Lmaooo o dun oo! Bundesliga attackers dominated the last World cup so let others try their luck

Your shaku shaku Hidden Ikedia
10 dribbles
1 chance created
0 shot on target

Meanwhile a small boy like Mbappe.
7 dribbles
6 chances created

This is what we keep telling you and it's why he would never win a major international tournament. Small shaku shaku you guys would get carried away instead of praying he learns to play an effective game

monerozi5590:

Did you really watch the match or maybe you are the type that depends on statistics alone to analyse how a player performed in a match.

Hazard didn't have 0 shot on target in yesterday's match like you said up there. How about Hazard shot on target that Varane headed out for corner. Hadn't been that varane didn't head the ball, that would have been a goal.

The French Team sat deep and were defending in most part of the game . If you really watch the match, you will know that Hazard was the one trying to make things happen. His dribbles really opened up space for his teammates to exploit.

A40:

Stop asking me Jamb Questions bruv!

Its not a shot on target if it was blocked. Jeeez

How are you making things happen by endless dribbling with no end product? France sitting deep is not an excuse for Hazard to have 10 dribbles yet create just 1 chance the entire game!! I keep telling y'all whatever potential he has he is never going to fulfil if he doesn't evolve and change from this nonsense shaku shaku pattern of always hogging the ball unnecessarily. Its not FUTSAL

monerozi5590:



This is the definition of shot on target.

Shot on target
Any goal attempt that:
1. a) Goes into the net
2. b) Would have gone into the net but for being stopped by a goalkeeper's save
3. c) Would have gone into the net but for being stopped by a defender who is the last man.

monerozi5590:



This is the definition of shot on target.

Shot on target
Any goal attempt that:
1. a) Goes into the net
2. b) Would have gone into the net but for being stopped by a goalkeeper's save
3. c) Would have gone into the net but for being stopped by a defender who is the last man.

A40:
Lmaooo o dun oo! Bundesliga attackers dominated the last World cup so let others try their luck

Your shaku shaku Hidden Ikedia
10 dribbles
1 chance created
0 shot on target

Meanwhile a small boy like Mbappe.
7 dribbles
6 chances created

This is what we keep telling you and it's why he would never win a major international tournament. Small shaku shaku you guys would get carried away instead of praying he learns to play an effective game

monerozi5590:



Did you really watch the match or maybe you are the type that depends on statistics alone to analyse how a player performed in a match.

Hazard didn't have 0 shot on target in yesterday's match like you said up there. How about Hazard shot on target that Varane headed out for corner. Hadn't been that varane didn't head the ball, that would have been a goal.

The French Team sat deep and were defending in most part of the game . If you really watch the match, you will know that Hazard was the one trying to make things happen. His dribbles really opened up space for his teammates to exploit.

A40:
Oga argue with whoscored.com

They are not stupid for not adjudging that as a Shot on target

Nihilstjnr:
lets not forget that that umtiti goal was straight at tortoise and he flapped at it like flightless bird.

but if it's to run his mouth cho cho cho with inappropriate comments, his form never wavers.

Let Pickford just make mistake to win WC first...

raumdeuter:

Basically hazard didn't create any shot that the keeper had to save yesterday and vs. Brazil. I can't even remember if he did vs. Japan

World cup as an attacker 2 goals against Panama 1 of them being a penalty

Yet the neymar you and your friends were laughing at had 2 goals from open play

airmark:


Since you are standing by whoscored's numbers, can you tell us who whoscored rated as the best player in that Belgium team?

raumdeuter:

Basically hazard didn't create any shot that the keeper had to save yesterday and vs. Brazil. I can't even remember if he did vs. Japan

World cup as an attacker 2 goals against Panama 1 of them being a penalty

Yet the neymar you and your friends were laughing at had 2 goals from open play

A40:
[s]You're just a daft and obtuse egret. We are talking of actual tangible contributions but a simp like you is talking about arbitrary stuff like ratings!

Mugu! A supposed #10 created just 1 chance, 10 dribbles, 15 shaku shakus and ZERO shots on target and you're yarning megedefegede[/s]

Greatihex:
that is a seasoned coach talking, nt the nairaland analysts.


France planned to man mark hazard, bt martinez overpacking the midfield made it impossible for them. Instead, they turned to zonal marking and nt leaving spaces in between the channels. They tightly marked their area and tried to block the passing lane to hazard. He then had to come deep to pick the ball and drive it forward. Unfortunately, the distance from goal was too much to cover before he could cause much problem. Chadli could nt beat his man to put in crosses, and that was a minus 4 them in attack. If lukaku had been a little bit more useful with chadli and kdb at their best, maybe, the result would hv been different.

airmark:


This is a stupid line and i believe you know it. Can you say Hazard flopped or blame him for Belgium's loss yesterday, if you actually watched the match?



Thanks bro. You really don't know this dude bearing a40. We didn't name him ajakaja40 (mad dog) for no reason.

A40:
Since I've been watching football almost 30 years I never see #10 wey no dey create chance like Hidden

vs Brazil 9 dribbles, 0 shots on target, 0 chances created, 12 shaku shakus completed

Even the Neymar dem dey yab created 7 chances

He is a disgrace to Pele, Maradona, Platini, Zidane and everybody who has ever worn the #10 shirt

airmark:


Now the rating is arbitrary, because it exposes you as a fool. Sensible people that watched the match saw Hazard tried his best, unlike some of his colleagues that didn't up their games.

Saying Hazard was the reason Belgium lost, reconfirmed our view about you being a foolish football fan.

airmark:

Exactly bro. We saw how France tried to close spaces around him and despite that he still managed to make things happen. France defence was awesome and Belgium missed Muneir a lot and Dembele really disappointed me.

airmark:


This is a stupid line and i believe you know it. Can you say Hazard flopped or blame him for Belgium's loss yesterday, if you actually watched the match?

raumdeuter:


Na then you go dey hear shameful things like he completed the most dribbles in world cup history. Without shots on target, what kind of unproductive player is that. With hazard you don't even need a keeper. Cos shooting or scoring isn't in his agenda

airmark:

Exactly bro. We saw how France tried to close spaces around him and despite that he still managed to make things happen.

raumdeuter:

Basically hazard didn't create any shot that the keeper had to save yesterday and vs. Brazil. I can't even remember if he did vs. Japan

World cup as an attacker 2 goals against Panama 1 of them being a penalty

Yet the neymar you and your friends were laughing at had 2 goals from open play

A40:
In two matches (QF and SF)

19 dribbles
0 shots on target
1 chance created

Still on still that foolish village oso known as airmark would be chatting nonsense.

Someone that claims to have brain would see such numbers and still be talking about Whoscored rating. Can you see madness on display?

monerozi5590:



I am not doing Neymar and Hazard debate. I have never laughed at Neymar. Neymar is a top top player so also Hazard.

Football evolving. Most teams now sit deep and allow the big boys to come at them. Sometimes, you need those dribbles to open up space for your teammates to exploit. Even at that, yesterday, i saw Hazard with passes to his teammates from the left flank to the right flank and vise versa when his teammates is free to receive the ball.

Hazard was the only one that was trying to take the game to the French Team.


Just look at the German and Spanish Teams. They were just passing the ball round and round and round without without causing any serious damage to their opponents. Sometimes, you need those dribbles to cause damage not only passes.




To me, Hazard is a top top footballer. A rare talent in this present generation of players.