A40:

[s]Shut up your smelling mouth you old phool! Belgium would have stood a better chance if Hazard looked up, dribbled less and played the way sensible #10's should

If France did not have a wasteman of a striker like Giroud, Belgium would have lost with a far more disgraceful scoreline

10 dribbles yet only created one paltry chance. Pathetic[/s]

airmark:


Show me any site that rated Hazard as the flop of the match, you blind salamander.

Segedinho:
Jorginho en route 2 Chelsea fc. ..wat z ur take house?

Unlimited22:

Na so we hear Golovin, Mahrez.
Abeg till he's unveiled make he dey there.

airmark:


Hazardfan1, don't you think your uncle's memory loss, has degenerated due to the Ls he has collected in this world cup?

Segedinho:


It has been confirmed by Napoli .....

raumdeuter:


That's why many sensible coaches will be wary of hazard. He got his football education upside down. He wasn't thought that the reason an attacker is on the field is to score, create chances and make assists. A footballer in his late twenties that doesn't know why he's on the field.

When he has tools like airmark hailing his monkey post plays

A40:
Alailojuti ni yin Sir

Two games
19 dribbles
1 chance created
0 shot on target

Weluya the L biko

Unlimited22:

Screenshot or link, please....
Meanwhile where you pop up from?

Hazardfan1:


0 shot on target, really?

Why una dey do like ds sef.

The goal-bound shot dt Varane nodded to corner, who took it?

raumdeuter:


Hazard was responsible for the lack of chances for Belgium attackers because he was more concerned with dribbles and take on. [s]He saw the ball more than others but didn't produce much from it. Maybe he thought world cup football is too count dribbles. [/s]

[s]Anyone who watched France 98 will remember that this was exactly what Okocha did vs. Denmark Completing senseless take on without providing services to attackers

It's only football novices that will be deceived by those amateur moves.[/s]

A40:
[s]Alailojuti ni yin Sir

Two games
19 dribbles
1 chance created
0 shot on target

Weluya the L biko[/s]

airmark:


Show me any site that rated Hazard as the flop of the match, you blind salamander.

A40:
Oga argue with whoscored.com

They are not stupid for not adjudging that as a Shot on target

A40:
Its not recorded as a shot on target anywhere. Don't blame me I don't make the rules

madrid5:
if hazard comes to Madrid I hope those two idiots up there don't disturb our thread oh,we don't have time for Bayern fools the barca ones are enough

madrid5:
if hazard comes to Madrid I hope those two idiots up there don't disturb our thread oh,we don't have time for Bayern fools the barca ones are enough

airmark:


Since those are not the only parameters used to measure a player's performance, let's put it to rest:

airmark:


I remember you used independent.co.uk ratings to tell us how Boathand did well in world cup final, can you bring their rating on Hazard vs Brazil and Hazard vs France for us to see. I don't even need to quote Mourinho's view.

airmark:


Since those are not the only parameters used to measure a player's performance, let's put it to rest:

raumdeuter:

[s]It's only a stark illiterate that will delegate his thinking to a website which is why you've been shouting about whoscored and independent.

You have your own eyes to lookand also video to check for contribution. Just because a website said it doesn't make it right when your own halogen eyeball tells you different.

Boateng at the world cup final can show with videos his tackles, interceptions and blocks in that final which are the job of a defender.
What are the jobs of hazard as an attacker and how did he achieve them with figures and videos. So show gifs of hazard shots chances, assists and goals in the games like I showed for Boateng[/s]

Hazardfan1:


Baba don dey old, free am.

airmark:


Only you and your ajakaja40 saw something else. Even Mou singled out Hazard and criticised other players. Is Mou also a stark illiterate?

If you want to troll, you can do it in a sensible way.

raumdeuter:


Please tell us the parameters used to measure an attackers performance. Let's put it to rest

madrid5:
if hazard comes to Madrid I hope those two idiots up there don't disturb our thread oh,we don't have time for Bayern fools the barca ones are enough

raumdeuter:

It's only a stark illiterate that will delegate his thinking to a website which is why you've been shouting about whoscored and independent.

You have your own eyes to lookand also video to check for contribution. Just because a website said it doesn't make it right when your own halogen eyeball tells you different.

Boateng at the world cup final can show with videos his tackles, interceptions and blocks in that final which are the job of a defender.
What are the jobs of hazard as an attacker and how did he achieve them with figures and videos. So show gifs of hazard shots chances, assists and goals in the games like I showed for Boateng

Hazardfan1:


I know you guys have been waiting for Belgium to fail after Neymar disgraced himself last week with his stupid dives....

Most of these sites y'all are praising now rated Hazard as one of the best performers.

You lot are free to choose whatever y'all want.

Neymar is home, Hazard's team dumped him out, Hazard is still in Russia and his country could be the 3rd best in the world.

He had shot on target against France. Agree or not.Na u sabi.

All I know is that with Hazard, you and Rumdeuter have never been consistent, the season he was creating lots of chances for Chelsea,y'all didn't consider Chances created as a strong point.

It's funny how y'all are not yapping about chances created.

As good as you want us to rate Neymar, he had a worse WC showing than Hazard had but no, let's crucify Hazard.

Hazardfan1:
So, ur own halogen eyes did not tell u that, the shot Varane cleared was a shot on target..... U had to depend on what a website said.

Hazardfan1:


I know you guys have been waiting for Belgium to fail after Neymar disgraced himself last week with his stupid dives....

Most of these sites y'all are praising now rated Hazard as one of the best performers.

You lot are free to choose whatever y'all want.

Neymar is home, Hazard's team dumped him out, Hazard is still in Russia and his country could be the 3rd best in the world.

He had shot on target against France. Agree or not.Na u sabi.

All I know is that with Hazard, you and Raumdeuter have never been consistent, the season he was creating lots of chances for Chelsea,y'all didn't consider Chances created as a strong point.

It's funny how y'all are not yapping about chances created.

As good as you want us to rate Neymar, he had a worse WC showing than Hazard had but no, let's crucify Hazard.

airmark:


Google is your friend. .

A40:
Forget club beef or banter

19 dribbles and 1 chance created. In 180 mins!! Can't believe people are actually defending this crap