gentyholar:



Refund chisom cause you the phone was not as described, it is none of chisoms fault. Either he refund completely and chisom return the phone to him or chisom keeps the phone and tolu pays him a fee agreed by both parties to cover the loss.

lionlee216:
[size=10pt]

6. Items picked up on pickup sites are not refundable as they offer no buyer protection. Its only Cash and Carry.

Rangis0:
I have a similar case. Samsung s8 cracked glass but recieved a phone with dead/flickering screen now phone has to be sold as scrap.
Truth be told deal finders and buyers should bear the costs of such mistakes, cos you cant pay for what you have not physically seen and not be prepared for the risks.

nymphomaniac:
As a lawyer, I must say that the seller had a legal duty to sell the phone in good condition deviod of any issues except full and fair disclosure of any defects to that effect were disclosed to the buyer before purchase. This is irrespective of whether he knew or didn't know of a factory or purchase defect prior to selling to buyer.

On the part of the buyer, he had the duty to test the phone for any physical faults immediately discoverable however he should have asked for indemnity should he discover latent defects later. This doesn't vitiate his right to a refund or a remedy for the later discovered latent defect if discovered within a reasonable time and through no fault of his

To sum it all up, seller should fix completely for buyer or split the cost of repair, and then get a refund from deal hunter who didn't do due diligence before advertising the deal. If there was no way deal advertiser would have known, then he must still refund seller as it is the risk associated with business

khalazi:
We all know shipping is a risk. U get a deal of iphone 70k which normally sells in naija 120k or higher depending on u.
Then You buy off. It's a risk taken.

If Chisom had sold out the phone let's say with a profit of 60k, will he come back and say 'I sold off for so and so amt, come let's share the profit'?

U ask seller phone good, he say yes. Lion goes to pick and checks to the best of his abilities. no issues.

some here may have landed phones that was not good. still yet they landed madddd deals. So it's 50:50

We lose, we gain

nymphomaniac:
As a lawyer, I must say that the seller had a legal duty to sell the phone in good condition deviod of any issues except full and fair disclosure of any defects to that effect were disclosed to the buyer before purchase. This is irrespective of whether he knew or didn't know of a factory or purchase defect prior to selling to buyer.

On the part of the buyer, he had the duty to test the phone for any physical faults immediately discoverable however he should have asked for indemnity should he discover latent defects later. This doesn't vitiate his right to a refund or a remedy for the later discovered latent defect if discovered within a reasonable time and through no fault of his

To sum it all up, seller should fix completely for buyer or split the cost of repair, and then get a refund from deal hunter who didn't do due diligence before advertising the deal. If there was no way deal advertiser would have known, then he must still refund seller as it is the risk associated with business

dragnet:
In the scenario described by omicpet and other related scenarios, a deal finder or a deal hunter has the job to search for "deals", advertises them and gets paid a commission which is determined by him or agreed upon by he and whoever "buys his deal and apart from searching for a deal, I believe he has the responsibility of giving full disclosure of all information in his possession about the deal to the deal buyer and also help the deal buyer in getting any other information the deal buyer requires from the real seller of the item, if he defaults in this, he may have some faults but not liable, he can only be liable when the deal buyer tries to source for more information about the item but he doesn't help in that regard. But if a deal hunter surrenders all information including the contact of the original seller to the deal buyer, then he has zero responsibility and can't be blamed or liable.

This is what I think is the responsibility of a deal hunter

twinskenny:
What if seller lied? Or refused to give complete information..: we are all dealing in blackmarket

dragnet:
In the scenario described by omicpet and other related scenarios, a deal finder or a deal hunter has the job to search for "deals", advertises them and gets paid a commission which is determined by him or agreed upon by he and whoever "buys his deal and apart from searching for a deal, I believe he has the responsibility of giving full disclosure of all information in his possession about the deal to the deal buyer and also help the deal buyer in getting any other information the deal buyer requires from the real seller of the item, if he defaults in this, he may have some faults but not liable, he can only be liable when the deal buyer tries to source for more information about the item but he doesn't help in that regard. But if a deal hunter surrenders all information including the contact of the original seller to the deal buyer, then he has zero responsibility and can't be blamed or liable.

This is what I think is the responsibility of a deal hunter

twinskenny:
What if seller lied? Or refused to give complete information..: we are all dealing in blackmarket

Seehydee:

You still got phone

khalazi:


And deal buyers should share the profits they make on items with deal finders also. Agreed?

ChisomK9:
Mint iPhone 7 plus 32GB (sprint)

Can be worldwide unlocked

Phone only

TLC 89,000

Let me know if you need

dragnet:
That's why it is important that a deal hunter has knowledge of what he is "deal hunting" for, so you don't go and hunt pussycat and tell deal buyer that you hunt lion. You're the first and maybe only point of contact with the original seller, your proficiency matters, even though picker too.may help as a last point of contact during pick up.

perezuche:
HP Omen Gaming Laptop
12gb RAM
128SSD + 1TB HDD
Core i7 8th Gen
NVIDIA GEForce GTX 1050 Ti
15" Screen
With complete box

280k, landing cost to Lagos...

dragnet:
In the scenario described by omicpet and other related scenarios, a deal finder or a deal hunter has the job to search for "deals", advertises them and gets paid a commission which is determined by him or agreed upon by he and whoever "buys his deal and apart from searching for a deal, I believe he has the responsibility of giving full disclosure of all information in his possession about the deal to the deal buyer and also help the deal buyer in getting any other information the deal buyer requires from the real seller of the item, if he defaults in this, he may have some faults but not liable, he can only be liable when the deal buyer tries to source for more information about the item but he doesn't help in that regard. But if a deal hunter surrenders all information including the contact of the original seller to the deal buyer, then he has zero responsibility and can't be blamed or liable.

This is what I think is the responsibility of a deal hunter

ChisomK9:
Mint iPhone 7 plus 32GB (sprint)

Can be worldwide unlocked

Phone only

TLC 89,000

Let me know if you need