Tiffbuxas:
like I insisted earlier this is not a matter of court... It's matter of moral and conscience

naijapips04:


Imagine taking me to court because i wrote "i'm a murderer' in my bio....and a judge convict me of murder because I wrote i'm a murderer.

You must be sick in the head, I swear.

kevoh:

Seriously, a two years old kid who can barely string words will consent to sex? hope all is well with you?..

doctorkush:
what of we that are attracted to sugar mummies

what name can we call ourselves

NOATRM(Non offensively attracted to rich mamas)

sanpipita:


Using your logic and since two homosexual adults consenting to sex is perversion to you, how about we label heterosexuality a sexual perversion? they rape, they are into pedophilla, even bdsm? you really need to learn to separate issues

Zither:


Any aspect of critical reasoning that plunges the society down the path of sexual perversion where every form of sexual perversion is given free rein of expression is injurious to the moral health and life of the society.

Every form of sexual preference that is a deviation from the generally accepted and approved method of deriving sexual pleasure which is naturally and biologically designed for humanity to be able to reproduce life on earth is nothing but sexual perversion. In this definition, there is the unwritten understanding that they should be of age and should be consenting individuals. Much the same way as there are written laws and unwritten regulations guiding the conducts of individuals in every society. The unwritten understanding that they should be of age and should be consenting individuals is paramount as a moral law complementing the definition of what is considered a generally accepted and approved notion of sexual preference by nature. The issue of citing consent as a parameter to define what is or what is not sexual perversion is bogus and lame since you have carefully ignored and excluded other parameters such as biological design, general acceptability, and the force of nature which separates and groups species to the class they belong. A deviation from any of these is perversion.

What correlation does technological and scientific advancement have with sexual preference as it relates to culture? Please explain that part.

kevoh:

Please stop talking and digging deeper into this hole you have already put yourself!

EVarn:
What makes a phenomenon "generally accepted" or "natural", is it that some higher power appeared to us all in a dream and lectures us on how to put our phallus into a woman?.


Natural principles governing human activities are not pre-ordained by some metaphysical force of nature, instead, they exist as a result of human cultural evolutionary adaptations that accumulated to become social myths or social norms.


For example, the first man saw the first woman, either serendipitously or intentionally, he discovers that his manhood gets erect due to the woman's proximity or unclothedness (a function of his hormones), he ends up grabbing her, somehow, he inserts his manhood and notices how pleasurable it is. The rest is history. Babies are born, but they (the primitive humans) probably can't understand the correlation between sex and conception at that stage, so they chalk it up as a norm that the women are to birth out babies at a stage. Later, after a while, they suspect and confirm that sex is indeed the cause of babies, and thus, it is agreed that sex can only be had with the opposite sex and the purpose is to make new little humans.


The above is one stage of human social and cultural evolution. Now we have found out that sex can also be had between same sex, and that sex is not just for procreation alone. That is another stage of human cultural evolution.



So, what is considered "natural", can be subjected to change as the human society progresses into history. It was still natural that blacks were considered sub-human barely 200 years ago, today it is no longer normal. So, humanity collectively agrees on what is natural, when we don't agree, then the subject is not natural.




As for science and technological advancement, these are manifestation of the human sociocultural evolution. Evolution is not just about science and technology, it covers everything from biological evolution to social evolution.

jesmond3945:
what are you saying, who told you those children don't consent? If a woman can consent to sleeping with another woman and it is acceptable then by all standards a pedo has the right as far as a child consents to it. A time would when bestals and inbreeding preverts would be accorded the same right infact the business you want to involve in would come knocking at your door.

Zither:


One, I have never cited any religious text or authority backing my opinion as what constitutes sexual perversion. You might want to reread this part of my reply to you Your biological and natural design to derive sexual pleasure from the opposite sex is what constitutes "generally acceptable" sexual preference.

I find it a difficult task to convince myself you actually made this post. Baffling. Weird analysis on so many levels. Before I proceed with any further reply I want to ask you a question. You said



It means different things in different subjects. However, as regards this subject of sexual perversion you are implying that sexual perversions like pedophilia seen as unnatural, wrong, wicked and evil in today's society will be embraced tomorrow as normal through the agent of - social evolution?

Daeylar:
A child can give consent
Something is wrong with you

Trash pedophile

[s][/s]

Omudia11:
Not in Africa or at least Nigeria. Us being highly traditional/cultural and religious at the same time has helped us in that aspect. Also, Islam has helped put this madness in check in the middle East and all the other areas where muslims are majority. I'm against Islam but that is true.
America and the rest of Europe and Australia has already accepted the filthy lifestyle save for the middle east and Africa. Asia has largely accepted them too. How tragic!

BluntBoy:
Even guys who sleep with minors will be condemning these guys.

Anyway, to the topic. I don't think it is a crime to identify as a pedophile. It only becomes a crime if you act on your pedophilic urges (or maybe, not in all jurisdictions).

Psychologists and psychiatrists however see pedophilia as a mental or psychosexual disorder.

Zither:


One, I have never cited any religious text or authority backing my opinion as what constitutes sexual perversion. You might want to reread this part of my reply to you Your biological and natural design to derive sexual pleasure from the opposite sex is what constitutes "generally acceptable" sexual preference.

I find it a difficult task to convince myself you actually made this post. Baffling. Weird analysis on so many levels. Before I proceed with any further reply I want to ask you a question. You said



It means different things in different subjects. However, as regards this subject of sexual perversion you are implying that sexual perversions like pedophilia seen as unnatural, wrong, wicked and evil in today's society will be embraced tomorrow as normal through the agent of - social evolution?