For those who missed part 1-3, please click on my moniker.

I struggle with this third part because it was unlike the first two. I struggle with it partly because Paul reminds me of me with this teaching. And partly because he took a glory that belongs to someone else. So let me shoot.

Paul's teaching : Galatian 2:10-11

But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. For before certain men came from James, he was eating with the Gentiles; but when they came he drew back and separated himself, fearing the circumcision party.

Christ's teaching : Matthew 10:5-6

These twelve Jesus sent out, instructing them, “Go nowhere among the Gentiles and enter no town of the Samaritans but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel

Why did Paul's teaching reminds me of me? He indirectly challenge the teaching of Christ. Most Christians of today are cowards. They can't indirectly challenge their Pastor talkless of directly. If you can't challenge your Pastor then how can you challenge God?
If you can't challenge God, you are not ready for spiritual promotion.

So why did I accuse Paul of taking other people's glory? Before the coming of Paul, the disciples were already having relationship with the Gentiles. And Christ had instructed the disciples to go ye into the world.

What Paul and others did was to stop the circumcision of the Gentiles.

Paul was taking glory for something he didn't begin.

luvmijeje:
For those who missed part 1-3, please click on my moniker.

I struggle with this third part because it was unlike the first two. I struggle with it partly because Paul reminds me of me with this teaching. And partly because he took a glory that belongs to someone else. So let me shoot.

Paul's teaching : Galatian 2:10-11



Christ's teaching : Matthew 10:5-6



Why did Paul's teaching reminds me of me? He indirectly challenge the teaching of Christ. Most Christians of today are cowards. They can't indirectly challenge their Pastor talkless of directly. If you can't challenge your Pastor then how can you challenge God?
If you can't challenge God, you are not ready for spiritual promotion.

So why did I accuse Paul of taking other people's glory? Before the coming of Paul, the disciples were already having relationship with the Gentiles. And Christ had instructed the disciples to go ye into the world.

What Paul and others did was to stop the circumcision of the Gentiles.

Paul was taking glory for something he didn't begin.

The Scriptures is inerrant, and not subject to private interpretation

Oga you're misinterpreting the bible. Paul only frowned at a double standard and being bound by the law forgetting it is the era of grace. Christ simply gave a commission. First, the Jews then the gentiles. And no man can challenge God not even Job or Abraham could. STOP THE HERESY

You, just like Apollos, need an Aquila or a Priscila to expound the word more perfectly to you. Matter of fact, you need God's spirit to bring the knowledge of what you read in the scriptures to you.

luvmijeje:
For those who missed part 1-3, please click on my moniker.

I struggle with this third part because it was unlike the first two. I struggle with it partly because Paul reminds me of me with this teaching. And partly because he took a glory that belongs to someone else. So let me shoot.

Paul's teaching : Galatian 2:10-11



Christ's teaching : Matthew 10:5-6



Why did Paul's teaching reminds me of me? He indirectly challenge the teaching of Christ. Most Christians of today are cowards. They can't indirectly challenge their Pastor talkless of directly. If you can't challenge your Pastor then how can you challenge God?
If you can't challenge God, you are not ready for spiritual promotion.

So why did I accuse Paul of taking other people's glory? Before the coming of Paul, the disciples were already having relationship with the Gentiles. And Christ had instructed the disciples to go ye into the world.

What Paul and others did was to stop the circumcision of the Gentiles.

Paul was taking glory for something he didn't begin.

I love this luvmijeje, this is really good spiritual stuff.

Wow you could see this error.

And yet many of today's church say it is wrong to write about supposed Apostle Paul mistakes, yet this was Apostle Paul writing about the supposed Apostle Peter's mistake, even the first leader appointed by Jesus of the church, even before Paul was converted and became a part of the church.

So was it done out of hatred or malice? Nobody would say anything now because it was Apostle Paul their master and holy spirit that said it, but if it's someone's else now doing the same to Paul that he did to Peter, the person would become a faultfinder, an Antichrist, an heretic, a devil, a demon, a blasphemer, a disease, a false prophet, etc.

But it is said that "wisdom is justified of her children".

Gosh...i,a former christian refute your allegations as purely baseless. Why i have no knowledge of the exact books and their versus i will call this a cesspool.
When i saw the "revelations" in your post, i assumed it will be something better off than analysing with your carnal mind...i was wrong.
Mathew 28:18
Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of ALL NATIONS baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

Paul did not challenge the teaching of Christ.

@OP Paul and other true Christians only taught and still teach only what Christ taught and laid the foundation. In essence, they(Paul and present day Pastors/founders) only amplify and re-echo Christ's teachings. What do you expect Paul to teach when he had said in 1Cor.3:10,11.?

Michellekabod1:
Gosh...i,a former christian refute your allegations as purely baseless. Why i have no knowledge of the exact books and their versus i will call this a cesspool.
When i saw the "revelations" in your post, i assumed it will be something better off than analysing with your carnal mind...i was wrong.
Mathew 28:18
Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
19 Therefore go and make disciples of ALL NATIONS baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”
albeit i dont buy muttleylaff idea of your fairytale book being inerrant, i find this allegation baseless

MuttleyLaff:
I will go as far with you and stretch my neck
that it is therefore fair comment that all translations available today or before, whether OT or NT are not inspired
and therefore as have always being pointed out, now and then, here and there, arent and/or cant have the claim of being inerrant

I havent had time to address this other bale of false bullshit luvmijeje keeps shoving and ramming down people's throat but will soon. I just only wanted to bring the above quote of mine to Michellekabod1 attention, as I dont know how, where and when Michellekabod1 read me commenting that the bible is inerrant. I'll be back to respond to this another false accusation of Paul by luvmijeje

MuttleyLaff:


I havent had time to address this other bale of false bullshit luvmijeje keeps shoving and ramming down people's throat but will soon. I just only wanted to bring the above quote of mine to Michellekabod1 attention, as I dont know how, where and when Michellekabod1 read me commenting that the bible is inerrant. I'll be back to respond to this another false accusation of Paul by luvmijeje

I guess responding to the false accusation by luvmijeje is more urgent than responding to mine

Michellekabod1:
I guess responding to the false accusation by luvmijeje is more urgent than responding to mine

If it was, I wouldnt have responded to yours first. luvmijeje's slander on Paul is DOA, and so doesnt merit urgency

I dont know what made you make this "i dont buy muttleylaff idea of your fairytale book being inerrant, i find this allegation baseless" though. You have mistaken me for another moniker. Unless you have evidence of me making that remark, I think you need to retract attributing that remark to me. I dont need an apology for the mix up.

MuttleyLaff:
If it was, I wouldnt have responded to yours first. luvmijeje's slander on Paul is DOA, and so doesnt merit urgency

I dont know what made you make this "i dont buy muttleylaff idea of your fairytale book being inerrant, i find this allegation baseless" though. You have mistaken me for another moniker. Unless you have evidence of me making that remark, I think you need to retract attributing that remark to me. I dont need an apology for the mix up.

Ok, I meant to type mutleylaff not muttleylaff

Michellekabod1:
Ok, I meant to type mutleylaff not muttleylaff

Nope, you posted:
"i dont buy muttleylaff idea of your fairytale book being inerrant, i find this allegation baseless""

So, when and where did I say the bible is inerrant?

MuttleyLaff:
Nope, you posted:
"i dont buy muttleylaff idea of your fairytale book being inerrant, i find this allegation baseless""

So, when and where did I say the bible is inerrant?

It was my former account that i deactivated....bury the hatchet!

Michellekabod1:
It was my former account that i deactivated....bury the hatchet!

https://www.nairaland.com/4938787/how-teaching-paul-differs-teaching#74425064

SMH. It is by Michellekabod1(f): 9:35pm On Jan 03. I guess you're to big to lose face and so won't admit your guilt

Op read Acts 10



Check my signature

MuttleyLaff:
https://www.nairaland.com/4938787/how-teaching-paul-differs-teaching#74425064

SMH. It is by Michellekabod1(f): 9:35pm On Jan 03. I guess you're to big to lose face and so won't admit your guilt

Gosh...am getting irritated. It was in my deactivated account that i claimed you said so not my current one...

Michellekabod1:
Gosh...am getting irritated. It was in my deactivated account that i claimed you said so not my current one...

[img]https://s2/images/deny.jpg[/img]
How do you think I am feeling.

You claim it was done with a deactivated account, meanwhile that's evidence in the above screenshot that you made that comment with your current moniker, just 3 days ago this brand 2019 New Year

MuttleyLaff:
[img]https://s2/images/deny.jpg[/img]
How do you think I am feeling.

You claim it was done with a deactivated account, meanwhile that's evidence in the above screenshot that you made that comment with your current moniker, just 3 days ago this brand 2019 New Year

I don't see this argument going anyway ...you made the statement that implied that the Bible is inerrant while I was using my previous account is that hard to comprehend? You nag alot;as a man,marrying a woman like you will be suicide

Michellekabod1:
I don't see this argument going anyway ...you made the statement that implied that the Bible is inerrant while I was using my previous account is that hard to comprehend? You nag a lot;as a man, marrying a woman like you will be suicide

You see what the problems are:
1/ You can't own up to your mistake.
2/ You like apportioning blame to others except yourself.
3/ You'll lie to wriggle out of when cornered and/or when caught with hand in the cookie jar.
4/ You are an attention seeker and easily turn irritable when this isn't forthcoming.
5/ You feel, basing it on conjecture, it is OK to fabricate comments that misrepresents other people's position.

Have you read from my posts, where I have explicitly said the bible is inerrant? No! but you still think it is OK to leave that comment posted with your current moniker even after I've challenged and queried you over it. Please dont smile or laugh, it isnt funny.

MuttleyLaff:
You see what the problems are:
1/ You can't own up to your mistake.
2/ You like apportioning blame to others except yourself.
3/ You'll lie to wriggle out of when cornered and/or when caught with hand in the cookie jar.
4/ You are an attention seeker and easily turn irritable when this isn't forthcoming.
5/ You feel, basing it on conjecture, it is OK to fabricate comments that misrepresents other people's position.

Have you read from my posts, where I have explicitly said the bible is inerrant? No! but you still think it is OK to leave that comment posted with your current moniker even after I've challenged and queried you over it. Please dont smile or laugh, it isnt funny.

Am done with you

Michellekabod1:
Am done with you

Good riddance.

MuttleyLaff:
You see what the problems are:
1/ You can't own up to your mistake.
2/ You like apportioning blame to others except yourself.
3/ You'll lie to wriggle out of when cornered and/or when caught with hand in the cookie jar.
4/ You are an attention seeker and easily turn irritable when this isn't forthcoming.
5/ You feel, basing it on conjecture, it is OK to fabricate comments that misrepresents other people's position.

Have you read from my posts, where I have explicitly said the bible is inerrant? No! but you still think it is OK to leave that comment posted with your current moniker even after I've challenged and queried you over it. Please dont smile or laugh, it isnt funny.

Don't ever quote me in God forsaking life

Michellekabod1:
Don't ever quote me in God forsaking life

Good riddance to bad rubbish

MuttleyLaff:
Good riddance to bad rubbish

That shows your level of progress in life...thought I would find one or two sane theists on NL...but no,you are fool..

Michellekabod1:
That shows your level of progress in life...thought I would find one or two sane theists on NL...but no, I you are fool..

Until you finally come to your senses, you will never find half, talkless find one or two sane theists on NL
Casting aspersions on others and calling them fools, is what you're best at doing. It takes a fool to think shes recognised her kind

MuttleyLaff:
Until you finally come to your senses, you will never find half, talkless find one or two sane theists on NL
Casting aspersions on others and calling them fools, is what you're best at doing. It takes a fool to think shes recognise her kind

Shut your bouche jor. ..hurl blames and castigation without comprehension of any other perspective than yours...the fact I refuse to keep up arguments with you for peace sake will make me someone trying to dodge or run because of my alleged mistake . . too bad I once thought you were different from the mainstream...spits

Michellekabod1:
Shut your bouche jor. ..hurl blames and castigation without comprehension of any other perspective than yours...the fact I refuse to keep up arguments with you for peace sake will make me someone trying to dodge or run because of my alleged mistake . . too bad I once thought you were different from the mainstream...spits

I just drop my 2 cents post and move on, I never held you to anything and I have never hounded you for a response until now when I asked you to withdraw a post you made with your current moniker stating that I had said the bible is inerrant. It is a lie, the remark is misrepresenting my position, but you dont want to hear of it, ducking and diving, shielding yourself from the guilt responsibility, even when I asked to readdress or retract the comment. I even added that I dont need or want an apology for the mistake

You've got 99 problems, you have enough on your plate, to want to add me to be your 100th. She that spits against the wind, spits in her own face

MuttleyLaff:
I just drop my 2 cents post and move on, I never held you to anything and I have never hounded you for a response until now when I asked you to withdraw a post you made with your current moniker stating that I had said the bible is inerrant. It is a lie, the remark is misrepresenting my position, but you dont want to hear of it, ducking and diving, shielding yourself from the guilt responsibility, even when I asked to readdress or retract the comment. I even added that I dont need or want an apology for the mistake

You've got 99 problems, you have enough on your plate, to want to add me to be your 100th. She that spits against the wind, spits in her own face

You can imagine how i slapped my thighs in laughter as i read your post.
You made a post that gave me the impression that you believed the bible is errant...i made a post about your "perceived view" of the bible accuracy.
You saw it,flared up and started querying and throwing tantrums. A simple "i have never made such claim" will have halted it. Would it be hard for me to comprehend you didnt imply the bible was inerrant and then modify my post?
I have known you theists to be hungry for unnecessary feuds and arguments that will lead no where but rather cause enmity . You value discord more than peace. I foresaw an argument sprouting from our conversatiin thus i shooed off the discussion for peace to reign, you started your nagging and trying to force words of my mouth. I told you to focus on a discussion more relevant than that of ours. You kept on hitting and pouting and i still made an attempt to avert a quarrel by sidelining an issue that i knew would herald an arguement. Then you pushed further, i even told you that it was while i was using my previous account you made a statement relating to the bible been inerrant and then you mistook it for me saying it was while using my previous account that i made claims of you saying the bible is inerrant and proceeded to accusing me of lying in a jiffy. You still were blood thirsty to castigation and hurling blames so you went on to conceive a new argument of me using my previous account versus old account. I sensed the mix up and sent you a screen shot of the post. You were dire hard on the notion that i am wrong and shielding myself.
I called you a nag because you dragged over an issue that would profit neither of us and then you wrote four or five allegations about me (i am saying four or five because if i say four and it is five you will call me a liar and starting pouncing on me and if i say five and its four you will attack me with all ferrociousness like a wild beast attacking its prey).
You are more interested in painting someone black and vehemently wanting the person to see how black the person is as you see him/her than yielding a fruitful conversation with them.
The fact i have no energy for epic clap backs and e-wars and a roller coaster of arguments for peace sake doesnt mean that i have nothing to say or am shielding from blame. For peace sake i'd rather sideline or sweep some conversations under the carpet but people like you will accuse me of dodging the blame imposed by the almighty muttleylaff.
Please you never told me to modify the post,that wasnt important to you as to paint and prove me black as the devil.
I am an attention seeker? I will let that pass; would not start querying and pouting like you.

You are definitely jubilating around a bonfire as your aim of quarreling is achieved.
I have got 99 problems? Wow prophet muttleylaff now knows what is bugging me...lols
Muttley,you are right, you are a saint and would make heaven , i am a sinner and would go to hell...satisfied??

Michellekabod1:
You can imagine how i slapped my thighs in laughter as i read your post.
You made a post that gave me the impression that you believed the bible is errant...i made a post about your "perceived view" of the bible accuracy.
You saw it,flared up and started querying and throwing tantrums. A simple "i have never made such claim" will have halted it. Would it be hard for me to comprehend you didnt imply the bible was inerrant and then modify my post?
I have known you theists to be hungry for unnecessary feuds and arguments that will lead no where but rather cause enmity . You value discord more than peace. I foresaw an argument sprouting from our conversatiin thus i shooed off the discussion for peace to reign, you started your nagging and trying to force words of my mouth. I told you to focus on a discussion more relevant than that of ours. You kept on hitting and pouting and i still made an attempt to avert a quarrel by sidelining an issue that i knew would herald an arguement. Then you pushed further, i even told you that it was while i was using my previous account you made a statement relating to the bible been inerrant and then you mistook it for me saying it was while using my previous account that i made claims of you saying the bible is inerrant and proceeded to accusing me of lying in a jiffy. You still were blood thirsty to castigation and hurling blames so you went on to conceive a new argument of me using my previous account versus old account. I sensed the mix up and sent you a screen shot of the post. You were dire hard on the notion that i am wrong and shielding myself.
I called you a nag because you dragged over an issue that would profit neither of us and then you wrote four or five allegations about me (i am saying four or five because if i say four and it is five you will call me a liar and starting pouncing on me and if i say five and its four you will attack me with all ferrociousness like a wild beast attacking its prey).
You are more interested in painting someone black and vehemently wanting the person to see how black the person is as you see him/her than yielding a fruitful conversation with them.
The fact i have no energy for epic clap backs and e-wars and a roller coaster of arguments for peace sake doesnt mean that i have nothing to say or am shielding from blame. For peace sake i'd rather sideline or sweep some conversations under the carpet but people like you will accuse me of dodging the blame imposed by the almighty muttleylaff.
Please you never told me to modify the post,that wasnt important to you as to paint and prove me black as the devil.
I am an attention seeker? I will let that pass; would not start querying and pouting like you.

You are definitely jubilating around a bonfire as your aim of quarreling is achieved.
I have got 99 problems? Wow prophet muttleylaff now knows what is bugging me...lols
Muttley,you are right, you are a saint and would make heaven , i am a sinner and would go to hell...satisfied??

"I dont know what made you make this "i dont buy muttleylaff idea of your fairytale book being inerrant, i find this allegation baseless" though. You have mistaken me for another moniker. Unless you have evidence of me making that remark, I think you need to retract attributing that remark to me. I dont need an apology for the mix up."
- by MuttleyLaff: 12:35pm

Michellekabod1:
You can imagine how i slapped my thighs in laughter as i read your post.
You made a post that gave me the impression that you believed the bible is errant...i made a post about your "perceived view" of the bible accuracy.
You saw it, flared up and started querying and throwing tantrums. A simple "i have never made such claim" will have halted it. Would it be hard for me to comprehend you didnt imply the bible was inerrant and then modify my post?

I have known you theists to be hungry for unnecessary feuds and arguments that will lead no where but rather cause enmity. You value discord more than peace. I foresaw an argument sprouting from our conversatiin thus i shooed off the discussion for peace to reign, you started your nagging and trying to force words of my mouth. I told you to focus on a discussion more relevant than that of ours. You kept on hitting and pouting and i still made an attempt to avert a quarrel by sidelining an issue that i knew would herald an arguement. Then you pushed further, i even told you that it was while i was using my previous account you made a statement relating to the bible been inerrant and then you mistook it for me saying it was while using my previous account that i made claims of you saying the bible is inerrant and proceeded to accusing me of lying in a jiffy. You still were blood thirsty to castigation and hurling blames so you went on to conceive a new argument of me using my previous account versus old account. I sensed the mix up and sent you a screen shot of the post. You were dire hard on the notion that i am wrong and shielding myself.
I called you a nag because you dragged over an issue that would profit neither of us and then you wrote four or five allegations about me (i am saying four or five because if i say four and it is five you will call me a liar and starting pouncing on me and if i say five and its four you will attack me with all ferrociousness like a wild beast attacking its prey).
You are more interested in painting someone black and vehemently wanting the person to see how black the person is as you see him/her than yielding a fruitful conversation with them.
The fact i have no energy for epic clap backs and e-wars and a roller coaster of arguments for peace sake doesnt mean that i have nothing to say or am shielding from blame. For peace sake i'd rather sideline or sweep some conversations under the carpet but people like you will accuse me of dodging the blame imposed by the almighty muttleylaff.
Please you never told me to modify the post, that wasnt important to you as to paint and prove me black as the devil.
I am an attention seeker? I will let that pass; would not start querying and pouting like you.

You are definitely jubilating around a bonfire as your aim of quarreling is achieved.
I have got 99 problems? Wow prophet muttleylaff now knows what is bugging me...lols
Muttley,you are right, you are a saint and would make heaven , i am a sinner and would go to hell...satisfied??

[img]https://s2/images/deny.jpg[/img]

"I dont know what made you make this "i dont buy muttleylaff idea of your fairytale book being inerrant, i find this allegation baseless" though. You have mistaken me for another moniker.
Unless you have evidence of me making that remark, I think you need to retract attributing that remark to me. I dont need an apology for the mix up."
- by MuttleyLaff: 12:35pm today On Jan 06.

MuttleyLaff:

[img]https://s2/images/deny.jpg[/img]

"I dont know what made you make this "i dont buy muttleylaff idea of your fairytale book being inerrant, i find this allegation baseless" though. You have mistaken me for another moniker.
Unless you have evidence of me making that remark, I think you need to retract attributing that remark to me. I dont need an apology for the mix up."
- by MuttleyLaff: 12:35pm today On Jan 06.

Modified!