HellVictorinho:

I wasn't expecting any reply from someone like you.

You are abolutely right . Afterall, inteligence is a deasese to you..

kkins25:
oh now you're insulting billyonaire..

I belt my balls, he can never be billionaire.

vaxx:
You are abolutely right . Afterall, inteligence is a deasese to you..

Really?
I thought you could do better than that.

HellVictorinho:

Really?
I thought you could do better than that.

lol....pls don't purr.

vaxx:
I belt my balls, he can never be billionaire.

Unless those ETs finally formatted his memory cuz he knows too much...

kkins25:
oh now you're insulting billyonaire..

Yeah, I guess it would be an insult! This hell is just making me sin and have to apologise all the time. Except to him, lol.

Sorry billyonaire. I didn't mean to!

kkins25:

Unless those ETs finally formatted his memory cuz he knows too much...

i think his current moniker now is called humanoid.

vaxx:
lol....pls don't purr.

Alright, She(Vaxx) must be an interesting lady.
To pacify her,I will stop the argument for she must be a/an wonderful/exciting lady as well.

budaatum:

Yeah, I guess it would be an insult! This hell is just making me sin and have to apologise all the time. Except to him, lol.

Sorry billyonaire. I didn't mean to!

This is absurd.
I have stated that I am not Billyonaire.
Anyone that does this again must be insane/disturbed

HellVictorinho:

Alright, She(Vaxx) must be an interesting lady.
To pacify her,I will stop the argument for she must be a/an wonderful/exciting lady as well.

lady vaxx is not in anyway upset, so no need to pacify her. Just make her honey, by making this discussion impressive . Lets agree what you wrote there was a mistake. Lets start at fresh.

What do you mean when you say this existence doesn't have specify boundary?

kkins25:
oh now you're insulting billyonaire..

Billyonaire can't create this sort of thread. I still can't get its import.

gensteejay:

Lols. The thread looks Greek to me. The message he is trying to convey remains unclear

I was thinking its because I wasn't exposed enough. It seems the OP watched a Sci fi movie and memoried some big terminologies.

kkins25:
I was thinking its because I wasn't exposed enough. It seems the OP watched a Sci fi movie and memoried some big terminologies.

Lol

vaxx:
lady vaxx is not in anyway upset, so no need to pacify her. Just make her honey, by making this discussion impressive . Lets agree what you wrote there was a mistake. Lets start at fresh.

What do you mean when you say this existence doesn't have specify boundary?

The Plane,on which the 'Forming of Existence' takes place,is un-dimensional.
So,you can't get out of this Plane.
You can only move further.
Have you ever heard of a place where nothing exists ?
The most significant reason why scientists can't discover everything is because there is no 'everything'.

kkins25:
I was thinking its because I wasn't exposed enough. It seems the OP watched a Sci fi movie and memoried some big terminologies.

Who cares about what you believe?

HellVictorinho:

The Plane,on which the 'Forming of Existence' takes place,is un-dimensional.
So,you can't get out of this Plane.
You can only move further.
Have you ever heard of a place where nothing exists ?
The most significant reason why scientists can't discover everything is because there is no 'everything'.

scientific theories are all provisional. They are all potentially refutable given sufficient compelling evidence. So chill, science isn't meant to discover everything,

Newton's mechanics was modify by the observation of the orbit of mercury and now we have to apply Special Relativity to get a more correct answer.

No, science will never have the answer to everything which is good news for researchers!

"" if the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.”
- Albert Einstein.

vaxx:
scientific theories are all provisional. They are all potentially refutable given sufficient compelling evidence. So chill, science isn't meant to discover everything,

Newton's mechanics was modify by the observation of the orbit of mercury and now we have to apply Special Relativity to get a more correct answer.

No, science will never have the answer to everything which is good news for researchers!

"" if the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.”
- Albert Einstein.

You are actually diverting.
I am talking about the physical limits of 'Existence' which don't exist.

HellVictorinho:

You are actually diverting.
I am talking about physical limits of 'Existence' which doesn't exist.

Then make your words correlative, when you lumps two different topic together, that is what you get,.

Have you try to check and confirm absolutely it actually doesnt exist. As long as people insist on lingering in the comfort of not knowing and not wanting to progress you are righ. It doeant exist. But progressive mind are justify from that ignorance.

vaxx:
Then make your words correlative, when you lumps two different topic together, that is what you get,.

Have you try to check and confirm absolutely it actually doesnt exist. As long as people insist on lingering in the comfort of not knowing and not wanting to progress you are righ. It doeant exist. But progressive mind are justify from that ignorance.

I KNOW they don't exist because In-Existence is Impossible.

HellVictorinho:

I KNOW they don't exist because In-Existence is Impossible.

Provide a mathematical and physical formula that back up this assertion and justify it with satisfiable explanation.

vaxx:
Provide a mathematical and physical formula that back up this assertion and justify it with satisfiable explanation.

It is a deduction.
And I want you to answer this question:Can you get to a location where nothing is ?

HellVictorinho:

It is a deduction.
And I want you to answer this question:Can you get to a location where nothing is ?

You don't deduce while sitting on your chair pressing your phone. Deduction is about establishing fact base on what you already know. So what are this things you already know is a fact before coming up with this conclusion. You may provide a working formula to justify your point.

And to answer your question, nothing don't exist, but we know for sure we don't know everything. e.g dark energy. So little is known about it.

vaxx:
Provide a mathematical and physical formula that back up this assertion and justify it with satisfiable explanation.

Mathematical and statistical? Won't that be complicated? Remember our table discussion?

Just let him hit his head against a wall and come and tell me if the wall or his head or the ache he feels in it does not exist!

budaatum:

Mathematical and statistical? Won't that be complicated? Remember our table discussion?

Just let him hit his head against a wall and come and tell me if the wall or his head or the ache he feels in it does not exist!

i think he is working with some junk of philosophy that he might not properly understand. Well, i might be wrong too. But to be fair, i want to give him the benefit of the doubt. He may not even used any mathematical model. All i need is explanation, even if not compelling. I will take it as knowledge that can be modify.

vaxx:
i think he is working with some junk of philosophy that he might not properly understand. Well, i might be wrong too. But to be fair, i want to give him the benefit of the doubt. He may not even used any mathematical model. All i need is explanation, even if not compelling. I will take it as knowledge that can be modify.

Trust me. You are doing a wonderful job, as usual!

vaxx:
You don't deduce while sitting on your chair pressing your phone. Deduction is about establishing fact base on what you already know. So what are this things you already know is a fact before coming up with this conclusion. You may provide a working formula to justify your point.

And to answer your question, nothing don't exist, but we know for sure we don't know everything. e.g dark energy. So little is known about it.

Goodness!!!! Are you assuming that I don't have access to information?
And you didn't answer my yes/no question.
In fact, if 'nothing' doesn't exist,which I indicated by saying In-Existence is impossible, there is no need to assume that there is a location where nothing exists.
It also means what we call 'everything' doesn't exist.
'The Plane' which describes where the 'Forming of Existence' takes place is mathematically un-dimensional.
So,if you are thinking of discovering 'everything',you are simply wasting your time.
You can only go further but that is simply because you started from somewhere which is not your fault.
After all,you are just Existence in Human Form.

budaatum:

Mathematical and statistical? Won't that be complicated? Remember our table discussion?

Just let him hit his head against a wall and come and tell me if the wall or his head or the ache he feels in it does not exist!

This is abysmal, you want me to use numbers that don't exist.
Oh,I guess I am wrong on that one as well.

HellVictorinho:

This is abysmal, you want me to use numbers that don't exist.
Oh,I guess I am wrong on that one as well.

No, I don't want you to use numbers. I want you to use your head and a wall, or can't you read?

HellVictorinho:

Goodness!!!! Are you assuming that I don't have access to information?
And you didn't answer my yes/no question.
In fact, if 'nothing' doesn't exist,which I indicated by saying In-Existence is impossible, there is no need to assume that there is a location where nothing exists.
It also means what we call 'everything' doesn't exist.
'The Plane' which describes where the 'Forming of Existence' takes place is mathematically un-dimensional.
So,if you are thinking of discovering 'everything',you are simply wasting your time.
You can only go further but that is simply because you started from somewhere which is not your fault.
After all,you are just Existence in Human Form.

Your question is simply answered. I said nothing don't exist as it is even wrong to used that word scientifically.

The scope and boundary of science has never been designated as “everything . So why lumping what does not belong to human to human. Human will certainly not have amswer to everything but our science will grow to the lenght that it would provide sufficient information that will be so much compelling to what can be empirically deduced.

Any questions firmly within the realm of science will be adequately dealt with in the future , if past experience is of any use, there is no question to which the answer will not be discoverable through hard work and persistence.
And as existence continue, more question will be revealed and so shall it be.

Speaking about the plane of existence that has no mathemathicalr dimension. You may need to justify this answer. No ones have travelled over the universe to come up with this theory but if you do. You may need to justify it. Or perharps there is a model you used to come with this conclusion. Share it.

HellVictorinho:


So,if you are thinking of discovering 'everything',you are simply wasting your time.

No one is thinking of "discovering 'everything'"! I can't even discover everything in my own home, not to talk of on my street!

Not everyone has so much time to waste! A "little bit of something" satisfies many of us.

budaatum:

No, I don't want you to use numbers. I want you to use your head and a wall, or can't you read?

Now,you are implying absurdity.
If you don't have anything to type in reply, just keep your absurdities to yourself!!!!

HellVictorinho:

Now,you are implying absurdity.
If you don't have anything to type in reply, just keep your absurdities to yourself!!!!

On your forum? Make me please! And continue to refuse to see your own absurdity, why don't you!