BlueAngel444:


was Lampard the only English player, Gerard, Beckham, Rooney, Owen, Ferdinand, Terry, Cole n co


or u want to tell me Spain's success is down to mainly iniesta

Bwhahahaha so carrier lampard couldn't carry England. Didn't ibime say iniesta was carry along and lampard was the ronaldo\ messi of his team. so why he didn't do what he does best for England. Carry them to win a trophy . even a spoon

Melvyn11:

Baba keep quiet. Very soon you will tell us England was filled with average players and lampard was carrying them lol.

Trying to let u knw dat ur personal brilliance is negligible 2 a team winning a trophy. ..ask Argentina's messi

BlueAngel444:


if iniesta can be respected for just that, then Hazard should be revered as a god n not disrespected by some self absorbed f.o.ools cus Hazard does that and more for Chelsea.

that is the double standard this barkabots display

hensben:
One of MSN will not be there if Hazard was there so there is no way he will sit on the bench. It would’ve been SMH instead of MSN.

randomperson:


individual awards are drawn from your role in your team's victories... if not, busquests would have made fifpro XI many times

That was why I used the term "to some extent" how many time has kane won the EFL best player?despite his goals year in and out

Segedinho:

Trophies boils down to d team u are playing for and it is logical iniesta's trophies are more. so such metric in this case is negligible...on the other hand personal accolades to some extent are also as a result from the team ur play for..cos recognition are mainly drawn from winners. ...the only personal contribution are player's stats in terms of outputs irrespective of the team u are playing for

That can also be decided by the type of team you are playing for, league, among other factors. Ronaldo scored 18 goals in 33 matches in his last season in epl. The season he joined laliga, he scored 26 in 29 matches. The following season, he banged in 40 goals in 34 matches. He went ahead to score 48 goals and 46 goals in laliga in two different seasons.

randomperson:


Hazard is an attacker, iniesta is a midfielder... not to even mention that iniesta is a better passer than hazard

can you prove that Iniesta is a better passer?

randomperson:


If hazard was in Barcelona while MSN was there, he would be sitting on the bench..

what if hens lay eggs.


















wait they do

Melvyn11:

Bwhahahaha so carrier lampard couldn't carry England. Didn't ibime say iniesta was carry along and lampard was the ronaldo\ messi of his team. so why he didn't do what he does best for England. Carry them to win a trophy . even a spoon

it is an insult to be comparing Lampard and iniesta, if the comparison was between Lampard and Xavi I will understand.


just look at Spain with Xabi Alonso and Xavi, n then without them.

Segedinho:
Trying to let u knw dat ur personal brilliance is negligible 2 a team winning a trophy. ..ask Argentina's messi

Lampard have the most shots in World Cup history without scoring. What do we call that....egbom shot merchant. Why was his brilliance missing in every competition for England.

hensben:
Hazard is been likened to Messi and cr7 talent wise by coaches and sport pundits. They should show me where any coach or sport pundit likened Zaha to Messi or cr7 or Hazard talent wise. This is what we all have been saying here, no one said Hazard is better than them.

When they are bereft of ideas to win an argument, they twist the topic.

If iniesta is a fraud then Zidane is one too.

He had only 4 assists in ucl for madrid in his career. If that's nit shakushaku, i wonder what is.

Melvyn11:

See joke. modric performed at the biggest competition in world football. Was the best player in his country going to the final shey it Was Ronaldo that carried him also. iniesta delivered his country in a world cup final . modric and iniesta has performed in the biggest football competition in the world. Carrier lampard only highlight in a world competition is his disallowed goal against Germany lol. Man flopped so bad

did u watch that match or were u too young to watch TV alone.

BlueAngel444:


it is an insult to be comparing Lampard and iniesta, if the comparison was between Lampard and Xavi I will understand.


just look at Spain with Xabi Alonso and Xavi, n then without them.

Bros even modric is better than lampard and has achieved more. He was a stand out perfomer with Croatia and contributed to them going to a world cup final while egbon lampard was flopping with every competition he went with England.

airmark:


That can also be decided by the type of team you are playing for, league, among other factors. Ronaldo scored 18 goals in 33 matches in his last season in epl. The season he joined laliga, he scored 26 in 29 matches. The following season, he banged in 40 goals in 34 matches. He went ahead to score 48 goals and 46 goals in laliga in two different seasons.

.yea u are right but a player's brilliance is more pronounced in his output irrespective of the team he plays for unlike the trophies and acknowledgement wch is almost 100% the teams he plays for... ...

hensben:
One of MSN will not be there if Hazard was there so there is no way he will sit on the bench. It would’ve been SMH instead of MSN.

bloody Mary SMH

Melvyn11:

See joke. modric performed at the biggest competition in world football. Was the best player in his country going to the final shey it Was Ronaldo that carried him also.

Modric was not the best player going into any final.

He was the best player in the group stage, peaking against Argentina.

Perisic saw them through the knockouts while Modric was missing penalties against Denmark and co which his teammates had to save him in penalty kicks.

They scraped past common Denmark and Russia on penalties, with England the only half-decent team they faced which Perisic saw them through before Pogba pocketed Modric in the final.

It was the big stage, but it was not big opposition until France disgraced them in the final. The stars aligned for Modric to have that good draw and penalty luck in WC combined with a year when Ronaldo saw him through UCL and then fell foul of a rãpe case which ruled him out of contention.

Ronaldo has taken carryalong blessings to Turin, Modric can't carry himself no more.

Still, Modric > Iniesta!

Carryalong beat Carryalong, God no go vex.

BlueAngel444:


bloody Mary SMH

Yes Suarez, Messi and Hazard. we will be shaking our head for Barcelona opponent cos the compbination of Hazard and Messi for too destroy opponent.

Iniesta and lampard fight don start again

Melvyn11:

Bros even modric is better than lampard and has achieved more. He was a stand out perfomer with Croatia and contributed to them going to a world cup final while egbon lampard was flopping with every competition he went with England.

.guy u just come here they make the matter English vs Spain.


Modric is a ballon d'or winner congrats to him, he has my respect, Modric is a now a Madrid legend. awards change.


but Lampard is Premier league legend. as long as English football exists he will never be forgotten. before any midfielder will achieve what Lampard as personal achieved it will be very hard.

BlueAngel444:


it is an insult to be comparing Lampard and iniesta, if the comparison was between Lampard and Xavi I will understand.


just look at Spain with Xabi Alonso and Xavi, n then without them.

Xavi is greater than Lampard. I say that any day.

It is an insult to compare an impotent AM on par with John Terry attacking contribution to Lampard. I say that any day.

Iniesta is no different in game from Kovacic. If he come to this current Chelsea team, some people will not mind if RLC and Barkley bench him at times, just like Kovacic.

Ibime:


Modric was not the best player going into any final.

He was the best player in the group stage, peaking against Argentina.

Perisic saw them through the knockouts while Modric was missing penalties against Denmark and co which his teammates had to save him from in penalty kicks.

They scraped past common Denmark and Russia on penalties, with England the only half-decent team they faced which Perisic saw them through before Pogba pocketed Modric in the final.

It was the big stage, but it was not big opposition until France disgraced them in the final. The stars aligned for Modric to have that good draw and penalty luck in WC combined with a year when Ronaldo saw him through UCL and then fell foul of a rãpe case which ruled him out of contention.

Ronaldo had taken carryalong blessings to Turin, Modric can't carry himself no more.

Still, Modric > Iniesta!

Carryalong beat Carryalong, God no go vex.

so when ronaldo was not carrying him it was the star's aligning lol. Very pitful excuse. ronaldo saw him through ucl so how many goals did ronaldo score from the semi final to the final? since You want to smart?. so we can say ronaldo only carried them to the quarter final and stopped as per your logic lol. Lampard the carrier couldn't carry England to any final lol.


Modric > lampard.

simonjassy:


in 4-3-3 playing with 3 flat CMFs would be problematic.so most coaches stick with either 2 DMs and an AMF.or 1 dmf and 2 amfs but the most optimal would be 1 dmf, a cmf and an amf.

Who is the AM for Chelsea 433 currently

Ibime:


Xavi is greater than Lampard. I say that any day.

It is an insult to compare an impotent AM on par with John Terry attacking contribution to Lampard. I say that any day.

Iniesta is no different in game from Kovacic. If he come to this current Chelsea team, some people will not mind if RLC and Barkley bench him at times, just like Kovacic.

Same way Modric is better than lampard. Bullying the epl is one thing but why did your mcm flop at every world cup with England.

raumdeuter:


Who is the AM for Chelsea 433 currently

Kovacic, another unproductive dribbler with game which is almost the exact same as Iniesta.

Put Lampard in Kovacic position in this same team, 20 to 30 goals and double digits assist is guaranteed just like under Ancelotti possession system. Chelsea would be neck and neck with Liverpool and City now just from the extra returns which Kovacic is not producing despite getting in interesting positions.

Swap Iniesta for Kovacic, no difference. Some people will even see more profit in RLC or Barkley starting ahead of him, just like Kovacic.

Kova is the CAM but he is not productive attacking wise, one of the reason Sarri like to try Barkley sometimes cos Barkley can score or spot a run but he is average so kova is still preferable in that role for now

raumdeuter:


Who is the AM for Chelsea 433 currently

Ibime:


Lampard attacking contribution to Euro 2004 is greater than Iniesta polling booth in 2012, or any attacking return in any tournament Iniesta has ever played.

Iniesta had the highest assist in the CL 2011 when Barca won

unlike Lampard

hensben:
This is Poch on Hazard.
Later ramdeuter and his blind follower go say Na Chelsea fan on here talk am

You know poch is not a trophy winning manager so he will appreciate shakushaku players who cant win you things just dance

raumdeuter:


Iniesta had the highest assist in the CL 2011 when Barca won

unlike Lampard

Lampard 28 UCL assist in 105 games
Iniesta 29 UCL assists in 130 games playing for a freescoring team.

Nigga I can't divide

lampard the carrier

108 appearance for England 29 goals. none at the world cup.
his 37 shots without a goal at the World Cup was a record for any player since 1966.

Segedinho:
using award's metrics
Hazard went head 2 head wt Neymar in the just concluded Worldcup and hazard was the 2nd best in the tournament even with an award 2 show for it....can we conveniently say that hazard is better than Neymar? ?

Mbappe went against Messi at the last world cup and won the tournament So shekpe fans will say Mbappe is better

raumdeuter:

Iniesta had the highest assist in the CL 2011 when Barca won
unlike Lampard

Unlike Lampard Iniesta is a one season wonder







na joke o