The productive Pedro is back

nateevs:
The productive Pedro is back

Meanwhile FBS is still dancing up and down the pitch.

Debroslink:


Why not show us Xavi in Euro 2004, World Cup 2006 stats

Is it Iniesta that entered Xavis mind like Dr Xavier and made him make all those assists in 2008, 2010 and 2012?

It's bad enough they had to carry him along by scoring and assisting where he failed to do so, now you want them to carry him along by even crediting their assists to him.

Xavi cook soup, Iniesta want chop. If Iniesta can control peoples mind to make them make sumptuous assists, why can't he make assists himself?

Debroslink:


Stop robbing Peter to pay Paul. Don't berate Iniesta just to score some points.

1. My time frame was 5 years. And that's from 1999/00 till 2004/05. I asked again, what did Xavi do during the period till Ronaldinho came up?

2. You said he wasn't a starter. I countered that to explain he played up to 200 games before Iniesta. You posted 103 league games, I added other competitions.

3. Golden era started in 2004/05 when Ronaldinho was delivering classics. Before then it was gloom. After then, it has been boom of trophies since.

4. Aragones, Guardiola, VDB and Enrique are no fools to play him to lead the tiki-taka for about a decade. All the years you mentioned, he was always in the team of the tournament and several MOTM awards.

5. 2006 UCL finals when Iniesta lifted the trophy, I didn't see Messi and Xavi on the field.


2009 UCL, 2010 WC, 2015 UCL finals are testaments to Iniesta's greatness when the ovation is loudest. No other has had more impact from midfield.

Nobody was robbing peter to pay paul. The arguement was between Lampard and Iniesta but somehow you brought Xavi into the argument, are you sure you are not arguing with yourself like this?

Xavi broke into the team in 1998 but you want us to skip the 1998/1999 season and we should start counting from 1999/2000 because that suit your narrative.

Now you have changed it to “Till Ronaldinho came up” before it was “When Iniesta came”. What exactly was Iniesta doing in all those years when Ronaldinho was providing those classics? Dancing shaku shaku as usual?

Are you talking about 2006 UCL final with Arsenal or did Barca play another team in 2006 UCL final? The same match that both Iniesta and Xavi started on the bench? Iniesta came on and had the same impact Xavi that was on the bench had which is ZERO. No goals or assist.

Xavi was the one leading the tiki taka and not Iniesta, XAVI was the system itself, XAVI made the system possible, no wonder Barca and Spain has not been able to replicate that tiki taka since Xavi left?

I ask you again, what was Iniesta contribution to UCL 2009, World Cup 2010 and UCL 2015? Show me the stats and not dribbles like hidden skaku shaku Hazard.

raumdeuter, you have not answered my question o. which one should we take? was Madrid a top team before their LA decima or not.

which one should we take, since you have already said both

larride:


Nobody was robbing peter to pay paul. The arguement was between Lampard and Iniesta but somehow you brought Xavi into the argument, are you sure you are not arguing with yourself like this?

Xavi broke into the team in 1998 but you want us to skip the 1998/1999 season and we should start counting from 1999/2000 because that suit your narrative.

Now you have changed it to “Till Ronaldinho came up” before it was “When Iniesta came”. What exactly was Iniesta doing in all those years when Ronaldinho was providing those classics? Dancing shaku shaku as usual?

Are you talking about 2006 UCL final with Arsenal or did Barca play another team in 2006 UCL final? The same match that both Iniesta and Xavi started on the bench? Iniesta came on and had the same impact Xavi that was on the bench had which is ZERO. No goals or assist.

Xavi was the one leading the tiki taka and not Iniesta, XAVI was the system itself, XAVI made the system possible, no wonder Barca and Spain has not been able to replicate that tiki taka since Xavi left?

I ask you again, what was Iniesta contribution to UCL 2009, World Cup 2010 and UCL 2015? Show me the stats and not dribbles like hidden skaku shaku Hazard.

We are talking real legends here, not that local legend in Drogba's shadow.

Ronaldinho's era kick started the trophy-laden era, not 2008 Aragones. An era that saw the emergence of Iniesta.

How come it was when Iniesta came up we started winning UCL, Euros and WC? Xavi's glorious career has Iniesta all over it. Pre-Iniesta, Xavi was just there.

You asked for stats, I go for goals, assists plus MOTM for Iniesta in those finals you mentioned.

raumdeuter:


Was Bale at his peak then or was Isco at his peak then? or was Asensio not playing more than Bale in the CL

Bale and Isco played well under Zidane. Injury hindered Bale but he was still world class. You saw his exploit with Wales all those years.

Smh Jorginho chaii

poor first half as usual

See FBS

willian chai

wilian smh

Willian

Na willian go kill that chainsmoker

Just look at FBS wearing 22.

Heywhizzy:
Godfatherism is deeply rooted in Nigeria, even on this thread.. so Ibime equated Iniesta to Kovacic and some mumu dey follow yarn am

okay, but there is no godfatherism when you barkabots Join raumdeuter to call hazard and Terry frauds?


FYI, majority of Chelsea fans here Rate Iniesta. what you are seeing today is Chelsea supporters trying to fight the double standard that you barkabots display.

if hazard is a shakushaku dancer for doing the same thing as Iniesta (even better), then iniesta is the rabbi of shakushaku

and sarri says Chelsea should keep willian

Difference between Iniesta and Lampard is there was no shakushaku in UCL 2006 final, UCL 2009, UCL 2015, and WC 2010 final. Iniesta carried his team's to glory via goal + assists in each of them, unlike Lampard who flopped in all the 5 finals he played.

Debroslink:

Difference between Iniesta and Lampard is there was no shakushaku in UCL 2006 final, UCL 2009, UCL 2015, and WC 2010 final. Iniesta carried his team's to glory via goal + assists in each of them, unlike Lampard who flopped in all the 5 finals he played.

Oga e Don do abeg. We dey watch ball.

Greatihex:
raumdeuter, you have not answered my question o. which one should we take? was Madrid a top team before their LA decima or not.

which one should we take, since you have already said both

Madrid was not a top team till they started making the semi

AC Milan is not currently a top team because they are not doing well, If Milan starts making CL semi consistently they will be called a top team back

Theuniverse:
and sarri says Chelsea should keep willian

he's joking with his job...leave him

raumdeuter:


Iniesta I won a world cup

Terry I was on the bench in a CL final

you have started your lies again. which ucl final was Terry on the bench

Greatihex:
you have started your lies again. which uncle final was Terry on the bench

Sorry he wasnt on the bench, he was in the stand dressed up in full kit and shin guard

hensben:
Bale and Isco played well under Zidane. Injury hindered Bale but he was still world class. You saw his exploit with Wales all those years.

So why didnt Zidane think of replacing Isco and Bale with Hidden Hazard instead will rather use Asensio or Vasquez

raumdeuter:


Sorry he wasnt on the bench, he was in the stand dressed up in full kit and shin guard

That was ridiculous, but he changed after the game was over.

and this man say we no need striker

FBSSSSS

Fbs

FBS scores!!!!! Finally we have 30 league goals in 6 seasons!!!!

willy!

Guess who recorded the assist?