MJBOLT:
.

iuwe:

DO YOU NOTICE THAT THE AUDIENCE SCORES FOR BOTH BLACK PANTHER AND AQUAMAN STANDS AT 79%?
THE AUDIENCE KNEW THAT BLACK PANTHER WAS OVERRATED, IF NOT THE SCORE WILL NOT BE THE SAME AS YOUR UNDER WATER WAKANDA.
DON'T QUOTE ME, I ONLY STATED WHAT I SAW

iuwe:

DO YOU NOTICE THAT THE AUDIENCE SCORES FOR BOTH BLACK PANTHER AND AQUAMAN STANDS AT 79%?
THE AUDIENCE KNEW THAT BLACK PANTHER WAS OVERRATED, IF NOT THE SCORE WILL NOT BE THE SAME AS YOUR UNDER WATER WAKANDA.
DON'T QUOTE ME, I ONLY STATED WHAT I SAW

iuwe:

DO YOU NOTICE THAT THE AUDIENCE SCORES FOR BOTH BLACK PANTHER AND AQUAMAN STANDS AT 79%?
THE AUDIENCE KNEW THAT BLACK PANTHER WAS OVERRATED, IF NOT THE SCORE WILL NOT BE THE SAME AS YOUR UNDER WATER WAKANDA.
DON'T QUOTE ME, I ONLY STATED WHAT I SAW

XxSabrinaxX:

There's a good reason they are called "Film Critics". Anybody can rate a movie, doesn't make them right. If i were you, when I check Rotten Tomatoes, i'd be looking at either the Tomatometer or the Critics Average Rating. Audience score isn't really an objective determinant of the film's overall quality. Better still, check Metacritic

Raalsalghul:
Dude, this is absolute rubbish.

Raalsalghul:
So you are saying film critics aren't biased but the audience are. Balderdash of the year

Raalsalghul:
Incase you don't know there is no educational path to becoming a film critic.

Raalsalghul:
[s]Anyone can claim to be so. Besides let me ask, are the critics not human like me and you. What makes their judgment special or take precedence of others. Anything flesh and blood is subject to bias including those film reviewers you worship.

Anyways guess this is what you say when you are paying them money to review your films positively. This is a new low even for you marvel fans.

Somebody help with spit meme.

Spits!

Cc: tonyspike, philfearon, blackmanta, eyedea, thekingishere, minemrys, xavier5
Make una come see rubbish[/s]

Raalsalghul:
[s]Who cares about the "f" in your moniker. I can affix same to my mine tomorrow. and claim to be a female. So bleep that.

Did you read my mention before?

Where the fucck did I say that audiences are less biased than critics. If I remember correctly, I said anything flesh and blood is subject to biased. Critics and audiences included.

In addition to that, you are saying an outlier critic can't judge a film objectively. Because their reviews are different from the crowd, we should hiss and pass. WTF are u saying dude? Accreted initial opinion: what does that mean anyway. Speak english horse.

Obviously, I didn't miss the point of your post. Guess you did seeing that you have back tracked on your initial statement.

True, imdb and rt scores can be rigged by any set of individuals including marvelites. Thanks for coming out clean on that. Guess you have multiple RT/IMDB accounts too. [/s]

XxSabrinaxX:

Your bias and intolerant attitude deserves no reply. Carry on with your nonsense. I've explained myself already. I don't breathe Marvel and DC like Oxygen the way you guys do here abi how often do you see me here? I'm just a casual fan so don't drag me into your pointless fanboy wars. I never backtracked. I simply responded to a fellow who implied that audience scores were more reliable than critic scores. So keep chasing your shadow here. You have literally no idea what the argument is about.

Raalsalghul:
You are anything but a casual fan. You reek of the marvel verse. Have fun

XxSabrinaxX:

You need to get off DC's d!ck before you get pregnant. I didn't even respond to you initially so I don't understand why you're on my neck. Look at my posts; my main domain on Nairaland is the religious sections. I only come here once a while, so don't flatter yourself.

Raalsalghul:
DC can ride me for all I care at least I've got the guts to accept the truth unlike you forming a casual when I can bet you are currently sniffing marvel's ass.

XxSabrinaxX:

E pain am . I've removed hand from your case, later you guys will be accusing Marvel fans of dickriding. I'm glad you've admitted your own sin .
Well, if you don't mind, I have other forums to be in. So feel free and respond with your last joke as I'm sure you butthurt comic fanboys are very fond of doing here. I know it helps with the low self-esteem .

Shittaakeem:

XxSabrinaxX:

E pain am . I've removed hand from your case, later you guys will be accusing Marvel fans of dickriding. I'm glad you've admitted your own sin .
Well, if you don't mind, I have other forums to be in. So feel free and respond with your last joke as I'm sure you butthurt comic fanboys are very fond of doing here. I know it helps with the low self-esteem .

Xavier5:


There is a breech I've seen in MCU and no one is saying anything about or they just chose to pay a blind eye to it.
At the end of Iron Man 3, Pepper had a super power with which she aided Tony Stark to defeat the villain, well that was the last time we saw a super powered pepper because the next pepper we saw was a non supe, so what happened, why wasn't pepper a super human after iron Man 3? Marvel needs to give an explanation for that. Can anyone explain that to me

XxSabrinaxX:

There's a good reason they are called "Film Critics". Anybody can rate a movie, doesn't make them right. If i were you, when I check Rotten Tomatoes, i'd be looking at either the Tomatometer or the Critics Average Rating. Audience score isn't really an objective determinant of the film's overall quality. Better still, check Metacritic

iuwe:

YES YOU ARE RIGHT THEY ARE CALLED "FILM CRITICS" FOR A GOOD REASON BUT THAT DOESN'T MAKE THEM GOD.

LET US TAKE AN EXAMPLE THOR-THE DARK WORLD AND ANT-MAN AND THE WASP SINCE THEY ARE BOTH CBM LIKE AQUAMAN. YOU AND I KNOW THAT THOSE TWO MOVIES ARE NOWHERE AS ENTERTAINING AS AQUAMAN BUT THEIR SO CALLED CRITICS AVERAGE RATING WERE HIGHER THAN AQUAMAN JUST BECAUSE THEY WERE UNDER "THE DISNEY-MARVEL" LOGO.

COUNTLESS NUMBER OF TIMES YOUR SO CALLED "FILM CRITICS" HAS RATED A GOOD MOVIE POORLY AND OUT PRAISED A BAD ONE. THERE IS A REASON NOWADAYS NO ONE GIVES A SH*T ABOUT THEIR RATING.

NOW FOR THE BOLDED, YOU ARE TOTALLY WRONG AND YOUR POINT BASICALLY BASELESS. I AM SURE YOU KNOW THAT DISNEY-MARVEL DIDN'T MAKE THOSE MOVIES FOR YOUR SO CALLED "FILM CRITICS" BUT THE AUDIENCE AND THEY ARE THE ONE THAT MAKES A BOX OFFICE HIT.

REMEMBER IN MOVIE INDUSTRY A GOOD WORD OF MOUTH IS BETTER THAN ANY CRITICAL ANALYSIS. ok

iuwe:

YES YOU ARE RIGHT THEY ARE CALLED "FILM CRITICS" FOR A GOOD REASON BUT THAT DOESN'T MAKE THEM GOD.

LET US TAKE AN EXAMPLE THOR-THE DARK WORLD AND ANT-MAN AND THE WASP SINCE THEY ARE BOTH CBM LIKE AQUAMAN. YOU AND I KNOW THAT THOSE TWO MOVIES ARE NOWHERE AS ENTERTAINING AS AQUAMAN BUT THEIR SO CALLED CRITICS AVERAGE RATING WERE HIGHER THAN AQUAMAN JUST BECAUSE THEY WERE UNDER "THE DISNEY-MARVEL" LOGO.

COUNTLESS NUMBER OF TIMES YOUR SO CALLED "FILM CRITICS" HAS RATED A GOOD MOVIE POORLY AND OUT PRAISED A BAD ONE. THERE IS A REASON NOWADAYS NO ONE GIVES A SH*T ABOUT THEIR RATING.

NOW FOR THE BOLDED, YOU ARE TOTALLY WRONG AND YOUR POINT BASICALLY BASELESS. I AM SURE YOU KNOW THAT DISNEY-MARVEL DIDN'T MAKE THOSE MOVIES FOR YOUR SO CALLED "FILM CRITICS" BUT THE AUDIENCE AND THEY ARE THE ONE THAT MAKES A BOX OFFICE HIT.

REMEMBER IN MOVIE INDUSTRY A GOOD WORD OF MOUTH IS BETTER THAN ANY CRITICAL ANALYSIS. ok

Raalsalghul:
Thanks for schooling her! Twas the same reason I quoted her. Who da Bleep says audience reviews are in consequential. I suggest you back out of this one bro. The horse is confused.

Raalsalghul:
Dude, this is absolute rubbish. So you are saying film critics aren't biased but the audience are. Balderdash of the year Incase you don't know there is no educational path to becoming a film critic.

Anyone can claim to be so. Besides let me ask, are the critics not human like me and you. What makes their judgment special or take precedence over others. Anything flesh and blood is subject to bias including those film reviewers you worship.

Anyways guess this is what you say when you are paying them money to review your films positively. This is a new low even for you marvel fans.

Somebody help with that spit meme.

Spits!

Cc: tonyspike, philfearon, blackmanta, eyedea, thekingishere, minemrys, xavier5
Make una come see rubbish

Raalsalghul:
Dude, this is absolute rubbish. So you are saying film critics aren't biased but the audience are. Balderdash of the year Incase you don't know there is no educational path to becoming a film critic.

Anyone can claim to be so. Besides let me ask, are the critics not human like me and you. What makes their judgment special or take precedence over others. Anything flesh and blood is subject to bias including those film reviewers you worship.

Anyways guess this is what you say when you are paying them money to review your films positively. This is a new low even for you marvel fans.

Somebody help with that spit meme.

Spits!

Cc: tonyspike, philfearon, blackmanta, eyedea, thekingishere, minemrys, xavier5
Make una come see rubbish

hulk616:
look at them calling themselves to see DCEU rubbish

TheKingIsHere:


Bro, you want to finish person pikin this night abi. You did well schooling dem fanboys.

I can see dem marvel fanboys in pain right now

Raalsalghul:
As usual, I don't expect you to make any useful contribution.
Afterall, the hulk in the comics/movies is a semi-zombie character

Raalsalghul:
Thanks for schooling her! Twas the same reason I quoted her. Who da Bleep says audience reviews are in consequential. I suggest you back out of this one bro. The horse is confused.

Raalsalghul:
Thanks for schooling her! Twas the same reason I quoted her. Who da Bleep says audience reviews are in consequential. I suggest you back out of this one bro. The horse is confused.

iuwe:
Who says I am arguing for you? You made it clear that audience score are inconsequential to a movie quality. So I ask, would you keep going to see a movie that reeks of mediocrity just because a group of people decides that it is a good movie? When I see a movie I have the rights to decide whether it is a good movie or not. Black panther and Aquaman had the same audience rating but defers in critical analysis just because of different factor.

Black panther capitalized on black power in the U.S and that was the only place it bested Aquaman in terms of box office earnings. Foreign box office tells a different tale because nobody gives a shit.