Following Simple logic, the total accredited voters for the presidential election officially announced in any state should be equal to the sum of the total accredited voters for the senatorial elections officially announced in all the senatorial zones in the same state, and same thing should be the case for all the federal constituencies in the state. ,, since the accreditation for the presidential, senatorial, and house of representatives elections were done at the same time on each voter, and it was done just once.
...
(Since some voters might have declined to collect the three papers at once after they were accredited, but rather decided to collect only the ones they are interested in, it may not be the best to use “total votes cast” in this exercise.. But then, “total accredited voters” is the better tool for analysis and comparison)
...
Save for some few outright cancellations which were officially announced and documented by INEC and can also be added in order to make it tally, the figures from the three separate elections, under normal circumstances, are supposed to tally perfectly.
....
Now, it is time to catch INEC with their own officially announced figures.. The states with large differences are the States with the worst manipulation of results..
..

It is an exercise.
Let's measure the degree of manipulation by ourselves.

Oga save urself d stress... What exactly is d point of d exercise?

tk4rd:
Following Simple logic, the total presidential votes cast and officially announced in any state (total votes included voided votes, invalid votes, and rejected votes) should be equal to the sum of the total senatorial votes cast and officially announced in all the senatorial zones in the same state, and same thing should be the case for all the federal constituencies in the state. ,, since the presidential, senatorial, and house of representatives elections were held simultaneously at the same time by each voter.
...
Save for some few outright cancellations which were officially announced and documented by INEC and can also be added in order to make it tally, the figures from the three separate elections, under normal circumstances, are supposed to tally perfectly.
....
Now, it is time to catch INEC with their own officially announced figures.. The states with large differences are the States with the worst manipulation of results..
..
Lalasticlala, mynd44, let's do this.
It is an exercise.
Let's measure the degree of manipulation by ourselves.

so if i voted buhari for PRESIDENCY i must vote an APC for SENATORIAL... u r very funny...

espn:
so if i voted buhari for PRESIDENCY i must vote an APC for SENETORIAL... u r very funny...

Total senatorial votes for all parties

Which kind thing be this na? Nigerians are getting dumber by the day!!

dhestiney:
Which kind thing be this na? Nigerians are getting dumber by the day!!

He made sense. You probably didn't understand the post

Asshurbanipal:

He made sense. You probably didn't understand the post

What about the invalid votes....
Dullardeen

You better go and carry your books

Kyase:

What about the invalid votes....
Dullardeen

I didn't insult you. The invalid votes are also recorded and will be added

Asshurbanipal:

I didn't insult you. The invalid votes are also recorded and will be added

you are making sence. number of presidential balot paper should be equals to the number of senatorial balot paper.

These means all presidential balot paper(valid + invalid paper) should be the same thing with all green chember( valid + invalid)

This is because everybody was give three balot paper, therefore number of presidential balot paper should be equal to senatorial and national asymbly

espn:
so if i voted buhari for PRESIDENCY i must vote an APC for SENATORIAL... u r very funny...

I don't think you understood the logic..
Did you??
The logic said “Total Votes Cast...” Both APC , DPC, FRESH, PDP, VOID, INVALID, and also REJECTED..
The logic didn't say Total PDP Votes,, neither did it say Total APC Votes ..
...
(I'm seriously beginning to believe that some of the people I call Fellow Nigerians actually think with their anus or something.)

Nbote:
Oga save urself d stress... What exactly is d point of d exercise?

I don't know about you, but let me speak for myself here..
If someone tells me that “Orange as it is as a colour is now known and called as black”, I won't believe it just like that since I already knew it was called orange.. I will verify it by myself in any possible way I can... If it is the truth, then, I myself can join him in letting other people know too.. If it is not true, I will get back to him, and try to correct him. If he refuses to accept that he was wrong, then I will allow him to accept whatever he likes, but then, he should stop deceiving others..
...
This exercise is just a simple way of using INEC's official figures (since only INEC's figures are acceptable) to show them (and point it out to them succinctly) that the election was a big disgrace, and a total waste of the resources of the country..
...
It won't make me to reject their officially announced president, but at least, I can always be happy within myself to say that INEC shot themselves in the leg with their own “Officially Announced Results”.
Let this election be a big joke on them.
I am very ok with it..
So you can see that my frustration is not with Buhari..
NO.. Not at all.
It is with INEC..

dhestiney:
Which kind thing be this na? Nigerians are getting dumber by the day!!

You need Neurophlaxin tablets..
Your brain fluids are drained.

Asshurbanipal:

He made sense. You probably didn't understand the post

I'm happy you understood the logic here, and also accepted that the logic is valid.
Thanks..
(I'm appreciating you for understanding me.. From the baseless comments above you, I was beginning to believe that the logic was too hard to be understood, or that it was not valid, or totally flawed)

OP, I didn't read what you posted because I'm on the road as I see this post, what if somebody voted for president and didn't cast vote for senatorial one?

sleekdot:
You better go and carry your books

Which books again you cow??
Does one have to carry books to vote in an election??
Or carry books to analyse the results of elections he voted in??
Mista man, or whatever you are, are you really sure you're a human being with a good functional brain?

goodforme:
OP, I didn't read what you posted because I'm on the road as I see this post, what if somebody voted for president and didn't cast vote for senatorial one?

That was what made me to consider “unforseen circumstances”..
Three papers were given to you for you to vote simultaneously.. If you voted only one and left others blank, then, this logic is still valid., because they would still count as “void”.., and be counted as “total votes cast”.
Now, you can't leave the booth without casting them, you can't just take the rest of the ballot papers out of the booth under normal circumstances. But, should it be that violence erupted, then you can run away with the rest of the papers in your hand.. That is where the “unforseen circumstances” comes into play.

nabiz:
you are making sence. number of presidential balot paper should be equals to the number of senatorial balot paper.

These means all presidential balot paper(valid + invalid paper) should be the same thing with all green chember( valid + invalid)

This is because everybody was give three balot paper, therefore number of presidential balot paper should be equal to senatorial and national asymbly

Thanks for understanding..

The mods won't push this topic to the front page and get Nigerians thinking..
Lalasticlala, if you dey find snake inside this thread, they are the ones wearing green reflective jackets with tags of “INEC Official” pinned on them..
cc. Mynd44

@ op you are wrong.

Some people only voted for presidency, some Senate and some Rep.. It all depends on where there interest lies..

So how about in SE where people voted massively for Senate and Reps position for Apc but only few voted for Buhari.. How about that?

In Senatorial district where Buhari come from, he won Pdp in presidential with big marging but the senate seats when to ApGa or so not even Pdp. How about that?

Omo-Agege of APC pulled more votes as APC than The president and HOR combined in most LGA...

So

OP is wrong. It is not a most a voter will collect the 3. If I want, I can just for my Senatorial candidate and walk away. Nobody will force you to vote for President and HoR.

Óp is %100 on point in fact this is only way to test INEC credibility, I wonder how inec would record 50000 total vote cast in a particular senatorial zone for national assembly and at the same time record 200000 in the same zone for presidential election

helinues:
@ op you are wrong.

Some people only voted for presidency, some Senate and some Rep.. It all depends on where there interest lies..

So how about in SE where people voted massively for Senate and Reps position for Apc but only few voted for Buhari.. How about that?

In Senatorial district where Buhari come from, he won Pdp in presidential with big marging but the senate seats when to ApGa or so not even Pdp. How about that?

The óp is talking about total vote cast both valid and invalid

gratiaeo:

The óp is talking about total vote cast both valid and invalid

Still it cant be the same. Considering the parties are listed Alphabetically

It's is not compulsory you collect all the ballot papers. I can decide to collect for Senatorial and leave the rest. The argument is not real.

helinues:
@ op you are wrong.

Some people only voted for presidency, some Senate and some Rep.. It all depends on where there interest lies..

So how about in SE where people voted massively for Senate and Reps position for Apc but only few voted for Buhari.. How about that?

In Senatorial district where Buhari come from, he won Pdp in presidential with big marging but the senate seats when to ApGa or so not even Pdp. How about that?

Now tell me..
You were accredited only ONCE, to vote for three posts..
One Accreditation.. Not Twice..
Now, after the results were called, the number of accredited voters pulled together varied so widely for the three elections, for which accreditation was done just ONCE..
My brother, can you explain that too??
Why did Number of Accredited Voters in a state so different from the sum of the Accredited Voters in the senatorial zones of the same state?

Na olodo full nairaland sha, then when you extrapolate you go understand why we are where we are as a country.

Simple analysis that OP initiated some people will not pause to analyse the logic, they just start speaking in dumbo tongues.

@helinues,
You're the only antagonist who has made sense but let me submit that even based on your own points, the difference shouldn't exceed +/- 5% in extreme circumstances as explained by the OP. Every voter was handed three different ballot papers and each MUST be submitted (majority of which might, in worst case, be void votes assuming they just thumbprinted to fulfill all righteousness since they don't have any candidate in mind for that part)

tk4rd:
Now tell me..
You were accredited only ONCE, to vote for three posts..
Once Accreditation.. Not Twice..
Now, after the results were called, the number of accreditation pulled together varied so widely..
My brother, can you explain that too??

In that scenario, manipulations happened somehow..

But that's not the case nationwide right?

helinues:


In that scenario, manipulations happened somehow..

But that's not the case nationwide right?

That's just the aim of this thread..
I just want to establish the fact that there were gross manipulations in all the states..
And, let us analyse INEC by ourselves and discover the states with the most manipulations..
...
Are We Together??
..
(Please, Read The Original Post Again)

KunleyY19:
Omo-Agege of APC pulled more votes as APC than The president and HOR combined in most LGA...

So

So, was that the reason the “Number of Accredited Voters” varied too??
Senseless defence.

jojomario:
It's is not compulsory you collect all the ballot papers. I can decide to collect for Senatorial and leave the rest. The argument is not real.

With your comment in mind, please, can you also explain the huge differences in the “Number of Accredited Voters” for the three separate elections,, since every voter was accredited just Once for the three separate elections, and not differently??