Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,211,204 members, 8,011,242 topics. Date: Saturday, 23 November 2024 at 07:02 PM

JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience (10411 Views)

Court Orders Interim Forfeiture Of Emefiele’s $4.7m, ₦‎830.8m, Properties / FG Takes 40 Ekweremadu’s Properties, Secures Interim Forfeiture Order / Court Orders Interim Forfeiture Of Mompha's Designer Glasses, Wristwatches (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (Reply) (Go Down)

JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by Omooba77: 11:45am On Mar 08, 2019
The Supreme Court on Friday affirmed an order of interim forfeiture made by the Lagos Division of the Federal High Court in respect of the sum of $8.4m linked to the wife of former President Goodluck Jonathan, Mrs. Patience Jonathan.



The five-man bench of the apex court led by Justice Dattijo Muhammad, in a unanimous judgment, dismissed the ex-First Lady’s appeal and directed her to return to the Federal High Court to show cause why the funds should not be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.



The court also rejected her prayer to strike down the provisions of section 17 of the Advanced Fee Fraud Act and other Fraud related offences Act, which was relied on by the Federal High Court to issue the order of interim forfeiture.

Upholding the decision of the Court of Appeal in Lagos, which had affirmed the Federal High Court’s interim order, Justice Kumai Aka’ahs, in the lead judgment of the apex court on Friday, held, “I do not find any reason to interfere with the decision of the lower court”.



Justice Aka’ahs added, ” Appellant is to go back to the trial court (the Federal High Court) to show cause why the interim order should not be made permanent.”

The lead judgment was read on behalf of Justice Aka’ahs by Justice Ejembi Eko, also a member of the panel.

Other members of the five-man panel, Justices Muhammad, John Okoro, Eko, and Sidi Bage, agreed with Justice Aka’ah’s lead judgment.

The EFCC had last year approached the Federal High Court in Lagos with an ex parte application seeking the forfeiture of the sum of $8,435,788.84 and other various sums in various bank accounts linked to the wife of the former President.

The anti-graft agency, in its application anchored on section 17 of AFFA, had urged the court to grant an order of interim forfeiture of the funds which they said were suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activities.



Patience Jonathan and others including some organisations were joined in the said ex parte application as respondents.

Justice Mojisola Olatoregun of the Federal High Court in Lagos had on April 20, 2018 granted the ex parte order.

She also ordered the EFCC to publish the court’s order in any major national newspaper to enable the respondents or anyone interested in the funds to appear before the court to show cause within 14 days why the final order of forfeiture of the said funds should not be made in favour of the Federal Government of Nigeria.

Instead of appearing before the court to show cause as directed by the court, she had filed an appeal before the Court of Appeal to challenge the competence of the ex parte application filed by the EFCC to request the order of interim forfeiture.

She also in her appeal challenged the validity of the order made by the trial court and the constitutionality of section 17 of AFFA.

The Court of Appeal in Lagos dismissed her appeal prompting her to approach the Supreme Court to rule in her favour.

Arguing her appeal on December 12, 2018, her lead counsel, Mr. Ifedayo Adedipe (SAN), urged the Supreme Court to quash section 17 of AFFA which he contended negated the principles of fair hearing and presumption of innocence prescribed in the Constitution.

He said section 17 of AFFA which allowed assets to be seized from an individual without conviction, a hearing or a criminal charge whether temporarily or permanently was unconstitutional.

He also said the ex parte application which the trial court granted failed to disclose the alleged “unlawful activities”, the funds were linked to.

Responding, EFCC’s lawyer, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, said the appellant’s appeal was based on a misconception about the provision of section 17 of AFFA.

He said there was nothing unconstitutional about the said provision which he said provides an opportunity to the affected person to be heard on the temporarily forfeited assets.

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed the appeal and upheld the decisions of the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal.

https://punchng.com/just-in-supreme-court-affirms-interim-forfeiture-of-patience-jonathans-8-4m/

7 Likes 2 Shares

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by Kyase(m): 11:50am On Mar 08, 2019
Good

15 Likes 2 Shares

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by StOla: 11:50am On Mar 08, 2019
Shameless PEJ!

The billionaire civil servant just like Atiku.

42 Likes 7 Shares

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by SillyMods: 11:55am On Mar 08, 2019
Imagine! Jonathan and his wife plus their gang of looters remain the worst thing to happen to Nigeria.

Since 2015, I became one of those who hold the postulation that The Almighty God indeed loves Nigeria. The first reason is the triumph of PMB at the polls then. The most recent reason is also the outcome of the 2019 presidential election which Buhari won by almost 4 million votes.

Had PMB not won the 2015 election, our case would have been worse than that of Greece and Venezuela combined. And had Atiku found a way to rig the 2019 election, people like Diezani, Madam Patience, Dasuki and other high class looters and thieves would be walkng free and flaunting their looted wealth on our face.

The thought of FFK, Fayose, Diezani, Omokri and their likes becoming our ministers and leaders is nauseating!


Meanwhile, the millions of dollars seized by EFCC at Enugu Airport (?) which UBA claimed to be the owner has not been claimed till this day!


Thank God for Buhari. Thank you Buhari.

76 Likes 13 Shares

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by helinues: 11:57am On Mar 08, 2019
Better

1 Like 1 Share

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by ictjobber: 12:01pm On Mar 08, 2019
Not good
Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by faithfull18(f): 12:02pm On Mar 08, 2019
Your title though.
Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by greatiyk4u(m): 12:02pm On Mar 08, 2019
She will keep forfeiting till high BP finishes her

Thief

13 Likes 1 Share

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by famouscargo4u: 12:03pm On Mar 08, 2019
chaii, there is god ooo!!!

4 Likes 2 Shares

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by divicodefred: 12:03pm On Mar 08, 2019
Where are the pigs and flattrons

17 Likes 1 Share

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by NOHOLDSBAR: 12:04pm On Mar 08, 2019
Shameless hippo, the fat hippo needs to be locked up with her Jonadaf husband.

8 Likes

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by maberry(m): 12:04pm On Mar 08, 2019
Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by maberry(m): 12:04pm On Mar 08, 2019
Very misleading topic
Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by AfonjaBoston: 12:04pm On Mar 08, 2019
Idiotic illiterate Barren woman
Her fish pussssyyy and womb has been cursed

1 Like

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by Seetto: 12:05pm On Mar 08, 2019
If atiku had won the election , she will get the stolen money back.

14 Likes 1 Share

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by okadoo: 12:05pm On Mar 08, 2019
Holy Moses! Mama pachie u be thief

3 Likes

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by Kinikini: 12:06pm On Mar 08, 2019
Great job to the emminent Justices of the Supreme Court.

Omooba77:
The Supreme Court on Friday affirmed an order of interim forfeiture made by the Lagos Division of the Federal High Court in respect of the sum of $8.4m linked to the wife of former President Goodluck Jonathan, Mrs. Patience Jonathan.



The five-man bench of the apex court led by Justice Dattijo Muhammad, in a unanimous judgment, dismissed the ex-First Lady’s appeal and directed her to return to the Federal High Court to show cause why the funds should not be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.



The court also rejected her prayer to strike down the provisions of section 17 of the Advanced Fee Fraud Act and other Fraud related offences Act, which was relied on by the Federal High Court to issue the order of interim forfeiture.

Upholding the decision of the Court of Appeal in Lagos, which had affirmed the Federal High Court’s interim order, Justice Kumai Aka’ahs, in the lead judgment of the apex court on Friday, held, “I do not find any reason to interfere with the decision of the lower court”.



Justice Aka’ahs added, ” Appellant is to go back to the trial court (the Federal High Court) to show cause why the interim order should not be made permanent.”

The lead judgment was read on behalf of Justice Aka’ahs by Justice Ejembi Eko, also a member of the panel.

Other members of the five-man panel, Justices Muhammad, John Okoro, Eko, and Sidi Bage, agreed with Justice Aka’ah’s lead judgment.

The EFCC had last year approached the Federal High Court in Lagos with an ex parte application seeking the forfeiture of the sum of $8,435,788.84 and other various sums in various bank accounts linked to the wife of the former President.

The anti-graft agency, in its application anchored on section 17 of AFFA, had urged the court to grant an order of interim forfeiture of the funds which they said were suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activities.



Patience Jonathan and others including some organisations were joined in the said ex parte application as respondents.

Justice Mojisola Olatoregun of the Federal High Court in Lagos had on April 20, 2018 granted the ex parte order.

She also ordered the EFCC to publish the court’s order in any major national newspaper to enable the respondents or anyone interested in the funds to appear before the court to show cause within 14 days why the final order of forfeiture of the said funds should not be made in favour of the Federal Government of Nigeria.

Instead of appearing before the court to show cause as directed by the court, she had filed an appeal before the Court of Appeal to challenge the competence of the ex parte application filed by the EFCC to request the order of interim forfeiture.

She also in her appeal challenged the validity of the order made by the trial court and the constitutionality of section 17 of AFFA.

The Court of Appeal in Lagos dismissed her appeal prompting her to approach the Supreme Court to rule in her favour.

Arguing her appeal on December 12, 2018, her lead counsel, Mr. Ifedayo Adedipe (SAN), urged the Supreme Court to quash section 17 of AFFA which he contended negated the principles of fair hearing and presumption of innocence prescribed in the Constitution.

He said section 17 of AFFA which allowed assets to be seized from an individual without conviction, a hearing or a criminal charge whether temporarily or permanently was unconstitutional.

He also said the ex parte application which the trial court granted failed to disclose the alleged “unlawful activities”, the funds were linked to.

Responding, EFCC’s lawyer, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, said the appellant’s appeal was based on a misconception about the provision of section 17 of AFFA.

He said there was nothing unconstitutional about the said provision which he said provides an opportunity to the affected person to be heard on the temporarily forfeited assets.

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed the appeal and upheld the decisions of the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal.

https://punchng.com/just-in-supreme-court-affirms-interim-forfeiture-of-patience-jonathans-8-4m/

5 Likes 1 Share

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by Afamed: 12:06pm On Mar 08, 2019
divicodefred:
Where are the pigs and flattrons
They will not comment, you can see them viewing the thread in their numbers

9 Likes

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by mechanics(m): 12:10pm On Mar 08, 2019
Nice one.

2 Likes

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by Kingjames(m): 12:10pm On Mar 08, 2019
The online platform opened to raise funds to pursue the court case initiated by the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, Atiku Abubakar, has been shut down

5 Likes 1 Share

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by Jaypop22: 12:12pm On Mar 08, 2019
Good! Nobody can convince me that Jonathan is not aware of this rape of our treasury by Patience, his wife.
Patience Jonathan 's case of looting is worse than than Imalde Marcos, former Philippinos first Lady.

16 Likes 3 Shares

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by SultanYoung(m): 12:12pm On Mar 08, 2019
I wonder how human can be such greedy and heartless how can you gather such huge amount of illigal money at your disposal when you really have a short life span to live on earth what do you intend to do with it huh? May be she and diezini are planning to build a new country. On a serious not how can you give account of all that money in the present of the lord how?

10 Likes 1 Share

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by Pavore9: 12:19pm On Mar 08, 2019
$8.4m no be beans!

If about N150m can set up a rural community health centre, then that amount seized can set up 20 health centres that would provide health care to thousands of Nigerians. angry

6 Likes 1 Share

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by rottennaija(m): 12:19pm On Mar 08, 2019
Kingjames:
The online platform opened to raise funds to pursue the court case initiated by the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, Atiku Abubakar, has been shut down
how
Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by zabuur: 12:21pm On Mar 08, 2019
Even with 8.4m usd that's been seized, she's still a multi billionaire and her likes her so many.

How much have they stolen from this country sef

4 Likes

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by RexTramadol1: 12:21pm On Mar 08, 2019
Forfeiture of Patience




No be small o

1 Like

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by Dansiki1: 12:24pm On Mar 08, 2019
Eleribu ni awon people yii sa.

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by seyigiggle: 12:31pm On Mar 08, 2019
forfeiture of patience?
misleading tittle
Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by seyigiggle: 12:33pm On Mar 08, 2019
imagination is not always a reality.
please be objective in your reasoning.

SillyMods:
Imagine! Jonathan and his wife plus their gang of looters remain the worst thing to happen to Nigeria.

Since 2015, I became one of those who hold the postulation that The Almighty God indeed loves Nigeria. The first reason is the triumph of PMB at the polls then. The most recent reason is also the outcome of the 2019 presidential election which Buhari won by almost 4 million votes.

Had PMB not won the 2015 election, our case would have been worse than that of Greece and Venezuela combined. And had Atiku found a way to rig the 2019 election, people like Diezani, Madam Patience, Dasuki and other high class looters and thieves would be walkng free and flaunting their looted wealth on our face.

The thought of FFK, Fayose, Diezani, Omokri and their likes becoming our ministers and leaders is nauseating!


Meanwhile, the millions of dollars seized by EFCC at Enugu Airport (?) which UBA claimed to be the owner has not been claimed till this day!


Thank God for Buhari. Thank you Buhari.

1 Like

Re: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Interim Forfeiture Of Patience by wink2015(m): 12:34pm On Mar 08, 2019
Omooba77:
The Supreme Court on Friday affirmed an order of interim forfeiture made by the Lagos Division of the Federal High Court in respect of the sum of $8.4m linked to the wife of former President Goodluck Jonathan, Mrs. Patience Jonathan.



The five-man bench of the apex court led by Justice Dattijo Muhammad, in a unanimous judgment, dismissed the ex-First Lady’s appeal and directed her to return to the Federal High Court to show cause why the funds should not be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.



The court also rejected her prayer to strike down the provisions of section 17 of the Advanced Fee Fraud Act and other Fraud related offences Act, which was relied on by the Federal High Court to issue the order of interim forfeiture.

Upholding the decision of the Court of Appeal in Lagos, which had affirmed the Federal High Court’s interim order, Justice Kumai Aka’ahs, in the lead judgment of the apex court on Friday, held, “I do not find any reason to interfere with the decision of the lower court”.



Justice Aka’ahs added, ” Appellant is to go back to the trial court (the Federal High Court) to show cause why the interim order should not be made permanent.”

The lead judgment was read on behalf of Justice Aka’ahs by Justice Ejembi Eko, also a member of the panel.

Other members of the five-man panel, Justices Muhammad, John Okoro, Eko, and Sidi Bage, agreed with Justice Aka’ah’s lead judgment.

The EFCC had last year approached the Federal High Court in Lagos with an ex parte application seeking the forfeiture of the sum of $8,435,788.84 and other various sums in various bank accounts linked to the wife of the former President.

The anti-graft agency, in its application anchored on section 17 of AFFA, had urged the court to grant an order of interim forfeiture of the funds which they said were suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activities.



Patience Jonathan and others including some organisations were joined in the said ex parte application as respondents.

Justice Mojisola Olatoregun of the Federal High Court in Lagos had on April 20, 2018 granted the ex parte order.

She also ordered the EFCC to publish the court’s order in any major national newspaper to enable the respondents or anyone interested in the funds to appear before the court to show cause within 14 days why the final order of forfeiture of the said funds should not be made in favour of the Federal Government of Nigeria.

Instead of appearing before the court to show cause as directed by the court, she had filed an appeal before the Court of Appeal to challenge the competence of the ex parte application filed by the EFCC to request the order of interim forfeiture.

She also in her appeal challenged the validity of the order made by the trial court and the constitutionality of section 17 of AFFA.

The Court of Appeal in Lagos dismissed her appeal prompting her to approach the Supreme Court to rule in her favour.

Arguing her appeal on December 12, 2018, her lead counsel, Mr. Ifedayo Adedipe (SAN), urged the Supreme Court to quash section 17 of AFFA which he contended negated the principles of fair hearing and presumption of innocence prescribed in the Constitution.

He said section 17 of AFFA which allowed assets to be seized from an individual without conviction, a hearing or a criminal charge whether temporarily or permanently was unconstitutional.

He also said the ex parte application which the trial court granted failed to disclose the alleged “unlawful activities”, the funds were linked to.

Responding, EFCC’s lawyer, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, said the appellant’s appeal was based on a misconception about the provision of section 17 of AFFA.

He said there was nothing unconstitutional about the said provision which he said provides an opportunity to the affected person to be heard on the temporarily forfeited assets.

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed the appeal and upheld the decisions of the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal.

https://punchng.com/just-in-supreme-court-affirms-interim-forfeiture-of-patience-jonathans-8-4m/


PATIENCE JONATHAN LOOT THE BASTARD SHIT OUT OF OUR NATIONAL TREASURY

4 Likes 1 Share

(1) (2) (Reply)

Telecom Service Disruption Imminent As States Threaten Base Station Shutdown / FG Reviews Recruitment Guidelines To Accommodate 35% Women In Four Agencies / Onanuga’s Claim That FG Budgeted 97% Of Revenue For Debt Service In 2023 False

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 73
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.