Rossikki:


Attacking Iraq and slaughtering a million people, on the false grounds that that nation possessed WMDs, was evil. They suffer from 'zombiezm' too , because they rarely question decisions of war and slaughter made by their leaders. Hitler for instance turned all Germany into a zombie nation, using propaganda to engender hatred of the Jews, enough to cause the slaughter of 6 million people there.

That's based on self interest.

AfonjaConehead:


Thou hath answereth thy question thyself, they are WHITE.

Dummy, being ''white'' is as a result of the absence of melanin. Melanin is a chemical that is responsible for skin colour, and the more melanin you have, the darker your skin colour. Melanin is a naturally occurring PROTECTION from the rays of the sun, for God's creation living in tropical regions of the earth. The hotter the region, the darker the skin colour of its inhabitants. Dark skin is not a curse, but a BLESSING if you want to avoid skin cancer and other such diseases that come with being white (lacking melanin) in tropical conditions.

So everyday you wake up, thank your God for your Melanin dark skin, and stop being a colonized, brainless dullard who thinks white skin is a 'blessing' and dark skin a 'curse'.

enemybulldozer:
That's based on self interest.

Self interest of who? Their ruling elite! In the two major wars of the 20th century, over 100 million whites were slaughtered, while the elites lived the good life. In Russia, Stalin slaughtered over 30 million of his own people.

I mean, the white nations are only advanced because they've been independent longer than anyone else, and have had more time to direct their own affairs. There is nothing special about them. The same God that made you made them. All men are fallible.

tobechi20:
France exploit all african country

France exploited Africa yet many African countries are developed?

Of course Rossikki is here with his usual Afrocentrist bullshiit. There are many reasons why every whitey is doing much better than blacky. The simplest (and most controversial) one is that they are they're a smarter civilization. Period. The notion that all races of humans are perfectly equal in all qualities is a delusional fallacy. Take a look at any 100m sprint final in the Olympics and ask yourself why it is dominated by people of West African ancestry. Because it is proven that fast-twitch fibres in black people make them more explosive athletes that whitey - which means we are not equal. Same way the notion that all races have equal intelligence is patently false. Ashkenazi Jews for example have a freakishly high average IQ (far higher than the average white person) and this is reflected in their disproportionate representation in intellectual output and achievement (Jews are 0.2% of the world's population, but account for over 25% of Nobel prizes won). You could dump 1,000 British or German people in a spot in the Sahara Desert and in a few decades, they'll turn it to little Britain or little Germany - like European settlers did to Australia or New Zealand or America or Canada or South Africa or Rhodesia or wherever. You could dump sub-Saharan Africans anywhere in the world and like in Haiti, they'll often find a way to sow chaos and promote incompetence and end up blaming whitey for their problems. People like to cite slavery, colonialism, imperialism and all that bullshiit. Black Americans, who have long been emancipated and where every law discriminating against them was overturned in the 60's with the Civil Rights Act, and where even laws are passed that favor them over other races (like the so-called "affirmative action" ) continue to blame slavery for all their problems. They've never taken a look at Jews to understand how a small race of people who were almost completely wiped off the face of the earth in the Holocaust rebounded to become the most successful ethnicity in the world.

And things won't get better either. The rosy picture of a bright future is delusional. Global economists are in real terror about the future of many African enclaves like Nigeria which is hurtling towards a demographic disaster as we continue to breed and multiply like rats. The economic bright spots in the world are in Asia where education and a new knowledge economy goes hand-in-hand with lowered birth rates and expanded social welfare to drag hundreds of millions of Asians out of poverty. Sub-Saharan Africa has a few success stories, but most of the countries have a very long way to go to reverse their misery.

Honestly, the best thing Africa can do for the world is a population freeze. To just somehow get people to stop breeding like rats. The way things are going, million of desperate African migrants trying to cross into an already beleaguered Europe will cause a new World War.

Rossikki:


Dummy, being ''white'' is as a result of the absence of melanin. Melanin is a chemical that is responsible for skin colour, and the more melanin you have, the darker your skin colour. Melanin is a naturally occurring PROTECTION from the rays of the sun, for God's creation living in tropical regions of the earth. The hotter the region, the darker the skin colour of its inhabitants. Dark skin is not a curse, but a BLESSING if you want to avoid skin cancer and other such diseases that come with being white (lacking melanin) in tropical conditions.

So everyday you wake up, thank your God for your Melanin dark skin, and stop being a colonized, brainless dullard who thinks white skin is a 'blessing' and dark skin a 'curse'.

There are loads of bio-genetic differences between ethnic groups in the world, many of which were isolated from each other for tens of thousands of years. Melanin composition is not the only difference between us. Hell, the homo sapien ancestors of white people even bred with Neanderthals tens of thousands of years ago and our black ancestors didn't. We are similar, and we're all human obviously. That doesn't mean we are the same. I'd say humans are like dogs. All dogs are of the same specie of creature descended from wolf ancestors, but they have been bred over thousands of years by humans to manifest very different physical, mental and emotional traits.

Obi1kenobi:
Of course Rossikki is here with his usual Afrocentrist bullshiit. There are many reasons why every whitey is doing much better than blacky.

Here comes our resident White Supremacist with his usual Eurocentric bullshiit.

Not every white country is doing better than all black nations.

Botswana has higher living standards than Serbia, Azerbaijan, and Montenegro.

Trinidad has higher living standards than Portugal, Poland, Russia, Greece, Bulgaria, Turkey, Croatia, and Hungary.

Gabon has higher living standards than China, Belarus, Serbia, and many other 'white' nations.

Jamaica has higher living standards than Ukraine, Armenia, Belize, Serbia, India.

Nigeria has higher living standards than Moldova, Pakistan, Honduras, Nicaragua, Cambodia, Bangladesh etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita

So your quack idea that economic development is tied to SKIN COLOUR is dead in the water.

Can't be bothered responding to the rest of your satanic drivel.

Obi1kenobi:


There are loads of bio-genetic differences between ethnic groups in the world, many of which were isolated from each other for tens of thousands of years. Melanin composition is not the only difference between us. Hell, the homo sapien ancestors of white people even bred with Neanderthals tens of thousands of years ago and our black ancestors didn't. We are similar, and we're all human obviously. That doesn't mean we are the same. I'd say humans are like dogs. All dogs are of the same specie of creature descended from wolf ancestors, but they have been bred over thousands of years by humans to manifest very different physical, mental and emotional traits.

Was it the neanderthals they bred with that made them supposedly 'smarter'?

So if you fck an ape your resultant kids will be 'smarter' than normal humans? Ewu.

Rossikki:


George W Bush could barely string two sentences together without error. He reportedly visited Brazil on an official tour, and asked their president ''You have blacks here too?''

Really? It's Hard To Believe. Americans think that all Brazilians are black.

bjnorl:


Really? It's Hard To Believe. Americans think that all Brazilians are black.

More 'Bushisms':


"As yesterday's positive report card shows, childrens do learn when standards are high and results are measured." —on the No Child Left Behind Act, Washington, D.C., September 26, 2007

"I hear there's rumors on the Internets that we're going to have a draft." —presidential debate, St. Louis, Missouri, October 8, 2004

"I am here to make an announcement that this Thursday, ticket counters and airplanes will fly out of Ronald Reagan Airport." —Washington, D.C., October 3, 2001

"You teach a child to read, and he or her will be able to pass a literacy test." —Townsend, Tennessee, February 21, 2001

"They misunderestimated me." —Bentonville, Arkansas, November 6, 2000

"Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream." —LaCrosse, Wisconsin, October 18, 2000

"I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family." —Greater Nashua, New Hampshire, January 27, 2000

"Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?" —Florence, South Carolina, January 11, 2000


https://www.thoughtco.com/dumbest-bush-quotes-of-all-time-2734076

Rossikki:


Was it the neanderthals they bred with that made them supposedly 'smarter'?

So if you fck an ape your resultant kids will be 'smarter' than normal humans? Ewu.

That is not the point, you cretin. The point is that there are far more significant differences in human population that melanin composition. This should be apparent to even a 12-year-old.

.

Rossikki:


Here comes our resident Mr White Supremacist. What took you so long to appear?

Not every white country is doing better than all black nations.

Botswana has higher living standards than Serbia, Azerbaijan, and Montenegro.

Trinidad has higher living standards than Portugal, Poland, Russia, Greece, Bulgaria, Turkey, Croatia, and Hungary.

Gabon has higher living standards than China, Belarus, Serbia, and many other 'white' nations.

Jamaica has higher living standards than Ukraine, Armenia, Belize, Serbia, India.

Nigeria has higher living standards than Moldova, Pakistan, Honduras, Nicaragua, Cambodia, Bangladesh etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita

So your quack idea that economic development is tied to SKIN COLOUR is dead in the water.

Can't be bothered responding to the rest of your satanic drivel.

Gabon doesn't have higher living standards than China. Nigeria doesn't have higher living standards than any white nation on earth. Trinidad doesn't have higher living standards than Portugal and Trinidad has more Indians than black people. ANd I don't know when China, India, Pakistan etc turned to white nations. Next time quote less stats, so it's easier to debunk them. But the very fact you have to hand-pick Gabon and Botswana which are pretty much 2 of very few successful sub-Saharan African countries you can count on one hand only goes to demonstrate the utter failure of the black race. And when I say "white", frankly I'm referring to Western Europeans and their legacy settlements in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc - not Slavic people of Eastern Europe.

Nobody tied economic development to "skin color". The point is whitey has proven himself for several centuries to be more industrious, enterprising, innovative and intellectually curious than black people. These are behavioral qualities harnessed over thousands of years of civilization, not due to skin color.

The correlation of race and IQ is about as established as the correlation of race and athleticism. Again, this correlation is what makes Jewish people the most successful ethnicity in every country they find themselves, and black people at the bottom of every country they find themselves. Jews are the smartest ass modafuckers on the planet basically (you can google any number of a billion papers studying the remarkable Jewish IQ). Black people aren't. Facts don't care about your feelings. I'm not being "racist" or whatever. Facts are not racist.

Rossikki:


Here comes our resident White Supremacist with his usual Eurocentric bullshiit.

Not every white country is doing better than all black nations.

Botswana has higher living standards than Serbia, Azerbaijan, and Montenegro.

Trinidad has higher living standards than Portugal, Poland, Russia, Greece, Bulgaria, Turkey, Croatia, and Hungary.

Gabon has higher living standards than China, Belarus, Serbia, and many other 'white' nations.

Jamaica has higher living standards than Ukraine, Armenia, Belize, Serbia, India.

Nigeria has higher living standards than Moldova, Pakistan, Honduras, Nicaragua, Cambodia, Bangladesh etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita

So your quack idea that economic development is tied to SKIN COLOUR is dead in the water.

Can't be bothered responding to the rest of your satanic drivel.

Guy you are good....duff my cap for you

Obi1kenobi:


Gabon doesn't have higher living standards than China.

Yes it does. GDP Per Capita is the most widely used measure of living standards we have. Gabon's GDP per capita is 19,266 USD per annum, while China's is 16,624.

Botswana also has a higher standard of living than China, with a GDP per capita of 18,146 USD.

Nigeria doesn't have higher living standards than any white nation on earth.

YES IT DOES.

GDP per capita:

Moldova: 5,657 USD per annum

Nigeria: 5,927 USD per annum

Trinidad doesn't have higher living standards than Portugal

YES IT DOES.


GDP per capita:

Trinidad 31,154 USD

Portugal: 30,258 USD

and Trinidad has more Indians than black people.

Roughly equal populations of blacks and ethnic south Indians who are often darker than the blacks.

By your ''skin colour equals development'' quack theory, Trinidad should be far poorer than Portugal.

And I don't know when China, India, Pakistan etc turned to white nations. Next time quote less stats, so it's easier to debunk them. But the very fact you have to hand-pick Gabon and Botswana which are pretty much 2 of very few successful sub-Saharan African countries you can count on one hand only goes to demonstrate the utter failure of the black race.

No it doesn't. It points to the grand POSSIBILITIES of the black race. It also PUNCTURES your race-based QUACK theory that skin colour is the determinant of 'high IQ' and progress. By that theory there should be NO black country making progress. Or are you saying that Botswanans have a ''higher IQ'' than other Africans? Indeed are you saying that Botswanans have higher IQs than those many white nations they are doing better than?

See how your colour based QUACK theory lands you in trouble?

And when I say "white", frankly I'm referring to Western Europeans and their legacy settlements in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc - not Slavic people of Eastern Europe.

Why separate them? White is white. Don't just select the RICH white nations and use them to compare to all blacks. You must include the POOR white nations for a fair comparison. Why are you ashamed of your fellow white brothers? Because they are poor? What...do they contradict your white superiority thesis? Sorry o... Do you need Panadol?

Nobody tied economic development to "skin color". The point is whitey has proven himself for several centuries to be more industrious, enterprising, innovative and intellectual curious than black people.

How come out of at least 50,000 years of human existence, these wonderful white qualities only showed themselves in the last 240 years starting with the Industrial Revolution? Heck, even as late as WW2, the US military still used cavalry! Why were people in London still sleeping 20 to a room just as recently as the Victorian era, with all these wonderful qualities you claim? Have you read Dickens? England was no better than any place in Africa or India just 120 years ago. I think thou dost bestow wayyyy too many undeserved qualities on your caucasian ilk.

The correlation of race and IQ is about as established as the correlation of race and athleticism. Again, this correlation is what makes Jewish people the most successful ethnicity in every country they find themselves, and black people at the bottom of every country they find themselves.

Your quack theory is rejected in ALL civilized and educated circles on this earth. The only people who peddle your type of garbage, even in the west, are discredited dredges of society whom nobody takes seriously, except thuggish, unschooled neo-nazi skinheads, and Ku Klux Klan pea brains. NOT ONE respected scholar on earth supports your quack theory. You cannot present it in any seminar on earth without being driven away in a hail of stones.

Jews are the smartest ass modafuckers on the planet basically (you can google any number of a billion papers studying the remarkable Jewish IQ). Black people aren't. Facts don't care about your feelings. I'm not being "racist" or whatever. Facts are not racist.

The entire concept of ''IQ studies'' is rejected by far too many scholars for you to present it as some sort of consensus. There are no ''billion papers'' on Jewish IQ, just a few from a few little-known quacks. Not a single one is peer-reviewed. MEANING THEY LACK SCHOLARLY MERIT AND ARE REJECTED BY THE GLOBAL INTELLECTUAL COMMUNITY.

As stated here:

''The concept of intelligence and the degree to which intelligence is measurable is a matter of debate. While there is some consensus about how to define intelligence, it is not universally accepted that it is something that can be unequivocally measured by a single figure. A recurring criticism is that different societies value and promote different kinds of skills and that the concept of intelligence is therefore culturally variable and cannot be measured by the same criteria in different societies. Consequently, some critics argue that proposed relationships to other variables are necessarily tentative....

Other psychometricians argue that, while there may or may not be a general intelligence factor, performance on tests rely crucially on knowledge acquired through prior exposure to the types of tasks that such tests contain. This view would mean that tests cannot be expected to reflect only the innate abilities of a given individual, because the expression of potential will always be mediated by experience and cognitive habits. It also means that comparison of test scores from persons with widely different life experiences and cognitive habits is not an expression of their relative innate potentials.''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence

Mr White Supremacist, Do you understand what you just read, or is your ''IQ'' too low to comprehend?

Obi1kenobi:


Gabon doesn't have higher living standards than China. Nigeria doesn't have higher living standards than any white nation on earth. Trinidad doesn't have higher living standards than Portugal and Trinidad has more Indians than black people. ANd I don't know when China, India, Pakistan etc turned to white nations. Next time quote less stats, so it's easier to debunk them. But the very fact you have to hand-pick Gabon and Botswana which are pretty much 2 of very few successful sub-Saharan African countries you can count on one hand only goes to demonstrate the utter failure of the black race. And when I say "white", frankly I'm referring to Western Europeans and their legacy settlements in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc - not Slavic people of Eastern Europe.

Nobody tied economic development to "skin color". The point is whitey has proven himself for several centuries to be more industrious, enterprising, innovative and intellectually curious than black people. These are behavioral qualities harnessed over thousands of years of civilization, not due to skin color.

The correlation of race and IQ is about as established as the correlation of race and athleticism. Again, this correlation is what makes Jewish people the most successful ethnicity in every country they find themselves, and black people at the bottom of every country they find themselves. Jews are the smartest ass modafuckers on the planet basically (you can google any number of a billion papers studying the remarkable Jewish IQ). Black people aren't. Facts don't care about your feelings. I'm not being "racist" or whatever. Facts are not racist.

The correlation between IQ and race has been debunked by so many experts.....
Environment, nutrition and education has a lot to do with IQ.....

Arabs were ascribed a IQ below whites....
Yet no European city/city state can rival dubai or qatar when it comes to futuristic infrastructure....
Say what u like, but people of low IQ cannot turn a freaking hot desert into a successful global tourist attraction within a short duration....
It's not only the white man that has the desert magic wand....
If it's about oil, Norway or Canada can also try to pull it off and let's see...
At least they have lots of uninhabited lands.....

The same Arabs invented algebra, geometry, telescope....
This was at a time the so called white were still wandering the forest of Europe in animal skin.....
I hope u know Arabic numerals of 01234... was invented in Baghdad and developed in north Africa.....
How some white supremacist will then say such race has an IQ below them is amazing....
And for your info, Steve jobs was an Arab from Syria, don't let his name confuse u....

Africa under development is very complex and not as straight as u think.....
A continent of over 3000 tribes will definitely have challenges when it comes to communal development....
But I don't believe Africans have lower IQ than any race....

The most educated race in America right now is the nigerian American commumity, not the jews...
And race with the highest household income in America is the American indian community, not the jews nor the whites....
Think about that....

And why are u separating eastern Europeans from the white race.....
Oh...because they are poor....
So what's their race since u've rejected them as white....
It's obvious u dont fully understand what u talking about....
Russians were the Pioneer of space travel....
A lot of present generation Americans can trace their ancestry to Slavic Europeans who travelled en masse to America during the early twentieth century.....
Sergey brin, the founder Google is a slav.....

Xzellentgraphic:


Guy you are good....duff my cap for you

Thanks bro.

Rossikki:


Actually her reading audience was the British people. The book, ''A Tropical Dependency'' was written in 1900, was not distributed in Nigeria, and was published in England several decades before Nigerians could read in English. Even as late as 1960, literacy rate here was 5% or thereabouts, thanks to colonial neglect of education. So the book was clearly not for us but for them.

You wouldn't have made this basic error if you read and researched things. Keep being an air head.

you still wont get it, will you. Just because you are a prof or Dr or u can swing 2 to 3 epistles together doesnt make you smart, you can have all that and still not get it. They ve always feeded you with what they know will dissuade and decieve you so they can rape the hell out of y'all like they are still doing till today. Very few races have come to be smart about your alleged european and arab illetrates but packed head like you still wont.

^^^ Adults are discussing now. Return to your playstation or weed or whatever you really know about.

SIRTee15:


Sergey brin, the founder of Google is a slav.....

Surely that cannot be! Slavs are poorer, so they have a lower IQ than other whites. How dare one of them invent Google? You sure Sergey Brin is not a closet Jew or Swiss?

- Obi1kenobi

SIRTee15:


The correlation between IQ and race has been debunked by so many experts.....
Environment, nutrition and education has a lot to do with IQ.....

Arabs were ascribed a IQ below whites....
Yet no European city/city state can rival dubai or qatar when it comes to futuristic infrastructure....
Say what u like, but people of low IQ cannot turn a freaking hot desert into a successful global tourist attraction within a short duration....
It's not only the white man that has the desert magic wand....
If it's about oil, Norway or Canada can also try to pull it off and let's see...
At least they have lots of uninhabited lands.....

The same Arabs invented algebra, geometry, telescope....
This was at a time the so called white were still wandering the forest of Europe in animal skin.....
I hope u kmow Arabic numerals of 01234... was invented in Baghdad and developed in north Africa.....
How some white supremacist will then say such race has an IQ below them is amazing....

Africa under development is very complex and not as straight as u think.....
A continent of over 3000 tribes will definitely have challenges when it comes to communal development....
But I don't believe Africans have lower IQ than any race....

The most educated race in America right now is the nigerian American commumity, not the jews...
And race with the highest household income in America is the American indian community, not the jews nor the whites....
Think about that....

Errr.....no it hasn't. Except you haven't read the literature well. The environment, education, nutrition and all that are all factors discovered in a multivariate analysis to contribute to IQ, but the heritability of IQ is also undisputed.

Arabs do have a lower IQ than Caucasians. Qatar and the UAE are rich because Qatar produces more natural gas than Nigeria with a population of just over 2 million people, and the UAE produces far more crude oil than Nigeria with a population of just about 9 million people. They don't invent anything. There is no Qatari or UAE citizen winning any Nobel prizes for anything. They also have high expatriate populations. If Qatar and the UAE had no oil, they would probably be as impoverished as Yemen.
And yes, Arabs once contributed a lot to the flowering sciences, mathematics, medicine, astronomy etc. They don't anymore. My physics textbooks in secondary school, or my engineering textbooks in university had no Arab scientists. Fact remains Western civilization has driven the world in the last millennium regardless of what Arabs did thousands of years ago. I'm also not suggesting that these things are immutable traits. They are evolved traits, and to get to the level of Western nations, we have a lot of catching up to do that would take generations. The Western intellectual tradition is what saw them develop the intellectual curiosity to investigate and innovate and invent, and the culture has been nurtured for several generations over hundreds to thousands of years. Frankly, African countries aren't even at the level of Renaissance-era, or Enlightenment-era Europe, in terms of the progressive mentality to advance our civilization.
I also didn't say the only reason we're more backward than Western civilization is because of IQ. I simply said they it is one of the reasons and the most controversial one.

The most educated group in America might be Nigerians. But education doesn't necessarily correlate with IQ though. Many of Silicon Valley's greatest minds over the past few decades were university dropouts in the US. Nigerians acquire certificates to boost career prospects and employment opportunities. Two of my sisters did Masters degrees in the UK, and a third one did a Masters in Canada to help them get jobs. They just did it to help them get jobs in those countries, especially as degrees from Nigerian universities aren't valued internationally. This is why Nigerians kill themselves with a mountain of certificates abroad. It is not a true reflection of our level of expertise.

SIRTee15:


The correlation between IQ and race has been debunked by so many experts.....
Environment, nutrition and education has a lot to do with IQ.....

Arabs were ascribed a IQ below whites....
Yet no European city/city state can rival dubai or qatar when it comes to futuristic infrastructure....
Say what u like, but people of low IQ cannot turn a freaking hot desert into a successful global tourist attraction within a short duration....
It's not only the white man that has the desert magic wand....
If it's about oil, Norway or Canada can also try to pull it off and let's see...
At least they have lots of uninhabited lands.....

The same Arabs invented algebra, geometry, telescope....
This was at a time the so called white were still wandering the forest of Europe in animal skin.....
I hope u know Arabic numerals of 01234... was invented in Baghdad and developed in north Africa.....
How some white supremacist will then say such race has an IQ below them is amazing....
And for your info, Steve jobs was an Arab from Syria, don't let his name confuse u....

Africa under development is very complex and not as straight as u think.....
A continent of over 3000 tribes will definitely have challenges when it comes to communal development....
But I don't believe Africans have lower IQ than any race....

The most educated race in America right now is the nigerian American commumity, not the jews...
And race with the highest household income in America is the American indian community, not the jews nor the whites....
Think about that....

And why are u separating eastern Europeans from the white race.....
Oh...because they are poor....
So what's their race since u've rejected them as white....
It's obvious u dont fully understand what u talking about....
Russians were the Pioneer of space travel....
A lot of present generation Americans can trace their ancestry to Slavic Europeans who travelled en masse to America during the early twentieth century.....
Sergey brin, the founder Google is a slav.....

so.dubai and qatar single-handedly built there futuristic countries without the help and innovation from the west?

Obi1kenobi:


Arabs do have a lower IQ than Caucasians. Qatar and the UAE are rich because Qatar produces more natural gas than Nigeria with a population of just over 2 million people, and the UAE produces far more crude oil than Nigeria with a population of just about 9 million people. They don't invent anything. There is no Qatari or UAE citizen winning any Nobel prizes for anything. They also have high expatriate populations. If Qatar and the UAE had no oil, they would probably be as impoverished as Yemen.

But one could use the very same argument to dismiss white accomplishments. The west would be as poor as Afghanistan today if they hadn't gone around the world, killing, raping and looting others' lands. Committing vile acts of barbarity and theft is not ''intelligence''. It is ignorance and savagery.

Today, the west has all earth on the precipice of annihilation, having STUPIDLY built more than enough nuclear weapons to end all life on earth 300 times over! They even have the missiles pointed at each other as we speak. Quite frankly, half-nak.ed Amazon forest dwelling savages show more intelligence than that.

And yes, Arabs once contributed a lot to the flowering sciences, mathematics, medicine, astronomy etc. They don't anymore.

I guess their IQs witnessed a sudden, calamitous drop!

My physics textbooks in secondary school, or my engineering textbooks in university had no Arab scientists.

Because of the whitewashing of history by your ilk.

Fact remains Western civilization has driven the world in the last millennium regardless of what Arabs did thousands of years ago.

Stop misrepresenting facts. 'Western' civilization only took off in the last 200 odd years starting with the Industrial Revolution. Arabs did not contribute anything ''thousands of years ago''. They did it HUNDREDS of years ago. Stop stealing the achievements of Arabs and claiming them as yours.

I'm also not suggesting that these things are immutable traits. They are evolved traits, and to get to the level of Western nations, we have a lot of catching up to do that would take generations.

GARBAGE. It took China under 30 years to ''catch up'' with the west. It will NOT take Africans ''generations''.

The Western intellectual tradition is what saw them develop the intellectual curiosity to investigate and innovate and invent, and the culture has been nurtured for several generations over hundreds to thousands of years.

GARBAGE. Nothing was nurtured over ''thousands of years'' in Europe. As late as the 11th to 16th centuries, Europe needed black African moors to pull them out of their Dark Ages and into their Renaissance.

Excerpts:

''Compared to Africa and East Asia.., Western and Eastern Europe, (excluding Rome & Greece) have very little history of great civilization and achievements before the Middle Ages. Africans and the Blacks of India, have had thousands of years of great contributions to world culture and civilizations. The British, French, Spanish, Dutch, Scandinavians, Germanics, Celts, Russians, Poles and many of these groups who claim "superiority" to Blacks and others, were from prehistoric times until the 1500's A.D., much less advanced economically, culturally, intellectually and scientifically as well as socially than most Black nations, kingdoms and empires during that period. From the time of the Roman conquest of Europe around 400 B.C. to about 1200 A.D., much of Northern and Western Europe was in a stage or barbarism and backwardness. The Roman settlements and cities built by the Romans were the only areas of advanced culture.''

http://letusbemoors..com/2009/05/achievemments-of-black-civilizations.html

The most educated group in America might be Nigerians. But education doesn't necessarily correlate with IQ though.

You are mentally sick. So a Nigerian PhD in Engineering from Harvard may have a low IQ in your estimate? How can you lack intelligence and have university degrees, which are synonymous with high analytical ability? I mean, you are a truly confused, sick person.

Many of Silicon Valley's greatest minds over the past few decades were university dropouts in the US.

THE MAJORITY WEREN'T.

Nigerians acquire certificates to boost career prospects and employment opportunities. Two of my sisters did Masters degrees in the UK, and a third one did a Masters in Canada to help them get jobs. They just did it to help them get jobs in those countries, especially as degrees from Nigerian universities aren't valued internationally. This is why Nigerians kill themselves with a mountain of certificates abroad. It is not a true reflection of our level of expertise.

You clearly have a ''VERY LOW IQ'' to advance an argument as specious and stupid as this. So if a Jew or white man acquires a degree, it is because they want to contribute to human knowledge, but if a Nigerian does same, it is because they just want a job? Your sickness ehn? Only Amadioha can cure it. Ignorant little dunce.

Rossikki:


Yes it does. GDP Per Capita is the most widely used measure of living standards we have. Gabon's GDP per capita is 19,266 USD per annum, while China's is 16,624.

Botswana also has a higher standard of living than China, with a GDP per capita of 18,146 USD.




YES IT DOES.

GDP per capita:

Moldova: 5,657 USD per annum

Nigeria: 5,927 USD per annum



YES IT DOES.


GDP per capita:

Trinidad 31,154 USD

Portugal: 30,258 USD

I guess you have not heard of UN HDI index, where countries like Portugal and Poland rank 44 and 31 respectively, while Trinidad ranks 69th, or where China ranks 86 and Gabon ranks 110 and Botswana 101 (the 2 local champions of Africa you're trying to hype). Anybody that knows anything about economics knows GDP and GDP per capita are often misleading stats. Nigeria's GDP stats for example have been severally dismissed by international economists as a fraud with no basis for the figures bandied about as sectorial analysis shows the inflation of a number of industries' output.

Roughly equal populations of blacks and ethnic south Indians who are often darker than the blacks.

By your ''skin colour equals development'' quack theory, Trinidad should be far poorer than Portugal.

Trinidad is not a black nation. Simple. About 34% of its citizens identify as black. For all I know, the Indians are the ones propping up the economy. Infact, I'm 100% sure that is the case. And Trinidad is considerably poorer than Portugal.
Also, only a window-licking mooron would interprete my comments as saying that "skin color equals development". The very thing I've been trying to knock into your head is that the notion that humans simply differ in melanin content is arrant nonsense. Racial groups become distinct by tens of thousands of years of geographical separation between them during which we acquire distinct traits both physical and otherwise due to environmental pressures.

No it doesn't. It points to the grand POSSIBILITIES of the black race. It also PUNCTURES your race-based QUACK theory that skin colour is the determinant of 'high IQ' and progress. By that theory there should be NO black country making progress. Or are you saying that Botswanans have a ''higher IQ'' than other Africans? Indeed are you saying that Botswanans have higher IQs than those many white nations they are doing better than?

See how your colour based QUACK theory lands you in trouble?

Our local champions, Botswana are still a poor country. I'd say its 2 million population has somewhat mitigated the complexities of running a bigger economy and this helps them maximize their resources for the few, just like our other local champion, Gabon.
In all this, the definition of the word "correlation" seems to be lost on you.

Why separate them? White is white. Don't just select the RICH white nations and use them to compare to all blacks. You must include the POOR white nations for a fair comparison. Why are you ashamed of your fellow white brothers? Because they are poor? What...do they contradict your white superiority thesis? Sorry o... Do you need Panadol?

Not really. Slavs are different from Germanic people or Nordic people. Same way Bantus in Africa are different from Berbers or Cushitic groups. Same way Jews are different from Arabs even though they are both "Semitic". My theory is simple: white people have a higher IQ than black people. IQ correlates strongly with economic success. Slavic nations don't rank particularly highly in IQ tests. Western Europeans do.

How come out of at least 50,000 years of human existence, these wonderful white qualities only showed themselves in the last 240 years starting with the Industrial Revolution? Heck, even as late as WW2, the US military still used cavalry! Why were people in London still sleeping 20 to a room just as recently as the Victorian era, with all these wonderful qualities you claim? Have you read Dickens? England was no better than any place in Africa or India just 120 years ago. I think thou dost bestow wayyyy too many undeserved qualities on your caucasian ilk.

Really? The last 240 years. Are you also now segregating white people when it suits you? So the Romans who built the Colosseum and a sprawling concrete city of Rome over 2,000 years ago are no more white? The Greeks are no more white?
England were no better than Africa 120 years ago? England had conquered much of the world over a number of continents over 120 years ago. You think the country of Isaac Newton and Shakespeare and James Watts etc was no different from Africa 120 years ago. The Africa were coastal dwellers couldn't even sail the oceans. Continue deceiving yourself.

Your quack theory is rejected in ALL civilized and educated circles on this earth. The only people who peddle your type of garbage, even in the west, are discredited dredges of society whom nobody takes seriously, except thuggish, unschooled neo-nazi skinheads, and Ku Klux Klan pea brains. NOT ONE respected scholar on earth supports your quack theory. You cannot present it in any seminar on earth without being driven away in a hail of stones.

Oh, of course, white supremacists love IQ studies. This doesn't make it any less true. There a million and one scientists who recognize the correlation between race and IQ. All that is under dispute is the level to which such a correlation holds. Consoling yourself with blatant falsehoods doesn't negate reality. Facts don't care about your feelings.

The entire concept of ''IQ studies'' is rejected by far too many scholars for you to present it as some sort of consensus. There are no ''billion papers'' on Jewish IQ, just a few from a few little-known quacks. Not a single one is peer-reviewed. MEANING THEY LACK SCHOLARLY MERIT AND ARE REJECTED BY THE GLOBAL INTELLECTUAL COMMUNITY.

As stated here:

''The concept of intelligence and the degree to which intelligence is measurable is a matter of debate. While there is some consensus about how to define intelligence, it is not universally accepted that it is something that can be unequivocally measured by a single figure. A recurring criticism is that different societies value and promote different kinds of skills and that the concept of intelligence is therefore culturally variable and cannot be measured by the same criteria in different societies. Consequently, some critics argue that proposed relationships to other variables are necessarily tentative....

Other psychometricians argue that, while there may or may not be a general intelligence factor, performance on tests rely crucially on knowledge acquired through prior exposure to the types of tasks that such tests contain. This view would mean that tests cannot be expected to reflect only the innate abilities of a given individual, because the expression of potential will always be mediated by experience and cognitive habits. It also means that comparison of test scores from persons with widely different life experiences and cognitive habits is not an expression of their relative innate potentials.''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence

Mr White Supremacist, Do you understand what you just read, or is your ''IQ'' too low to comprehend?

It's amusing that you actually read all that and actually think it supports your denial of reality. If the emboldened can't help you understand what you regurgitated here, you are beyond my help. Funny enough the evil white man is filled with bleeding heart liberals who want to protect the precious sensibilities of people like you. IQ studies are highly controversial for obvious reasons. What the liberals try to do is:
1) Portray "race" as a "social construct" rather than a biological one, just because of a lack of perfect homogeneity within races.
2) Portray intelligence as something that can't be quantified seeing as it is not some physical attribute.

If you have any real intellectual curiosity, you might read excerpts of "the Bell Curve" and all the controversy it invoked and the opposing sides of the debate and the critiques of the work, and the consensus areas of agreement. To claim that IQ's correlation with race has been "debunked" is some hilarious shiit.

Rossikki:


But one could use the very same argument to dismiss white accomplishments. The west would be as poor as Afghanistan today if they hadn't gone around the world, killing, raping and looting others' lands. Committing vile acts of barbarity and theft is not ''intelligence''. It is ignorance and savagery.

Today, the west has all earth on the precipice of annihilation, having STUPIDLY built more than enough nuclear weapons to end all life on earth 300 times over! They even have the missiles pointed at each other as we speak. Quite frankly, half-nak.ed Amazon forest dwelling savages show more intelligence than that.

The West built nuclear weapons because they were smart enough to do so and had the resources to do so. They also build nuclear power plants. And explore space. And cure diseases. And invent platforms like the internet for people like you to spew your delusions. They are the salvation of the earth. Sub-saharan Africans just breed like rats really and contribute little of worth.

I guess their IQs witnessed a sudden, calamitous drop!

No. They were just eclipsed by superior civilizations from the West.

Because of the whitewashing of history by your ilk.

Delusion is all this is. Except you can show me which work was "whitewashed" by Isaac Newton, or Galileo, or Neils Bohr, or Einstein, or Max Planck, James Maxwell or Werner Heisenberg who were all in my Physics or Chemistry books, you're talking out of your arse.

Stop misrepresenting facts. 'Western' civilization only took off in the last 200 odd years starting with the Industrial Revolution. Arabs did not contribute anything ''thousands of years ago''. They did it HUNDREDS of years ago. Stop stealing the achievements of Arabs and claiming them as yours.

You think Western civilization took off 200 years ago? Or that Western civilization didn't exist before the Industrial revolution? I have no words for this level of ignorance and the sheer confident idiocy. So the Romans or Greeks didn't exist until 200 years ago?

GARBAGE. It took China under 30 years to ''catch up'' with the west. It will NOT take Africans ''generations''.

China was a great civilization in itself. The basis in education and technical know-how for a successful economy has been there for millennia. My ancestors in 1900 were probably more primitive than China 2000 years earlier.

GARBAGE. Nothing was nurtured over ''thousands of years'' in Europe. As late as the 11th to 16th centuries, Europe needed black African moors to pull them out of their Dark Ages and into their Renaissance.

Excerpts:

''Compared to Africa and East Asia.., Western and Eastern Europe, (excluding Rome & Greece) have very little history of great civilization and achievements before the Middle Ages. Africans and the Blacks of India, have had thousands of years of great contributions to world culture and civilizations. The British, French, Spanish, Dutch, Scandinavians, Germanics, Celts, Russians, Poles and many of these groups who claim "superiority" to Blacks and others, were from prehistoric times until the 1500's A.D., much less advanced economically, culturally, intellectually and scientifically as well as socially than most Black nations, kingdoms and empires during that period. From the time of the Roman conquest of Europe around 400 B.C. to about 1200 A.D., much of Northern and Western Europe was in a stage or barbarism and backwardness. The Roman settlements and cities built by the Romans were the only areas of advanced culture.''

http://letusbemoors..com/2009/05/achievemments-of-black-civilizations.html

Except Greece and Rome? I like the way that was put as if Greece and Rome weren't greater than all African civilizations combined. Please, if you want to be taken seriously, avoid quoting some obscure post from people with no credibility or renowned scholarship. The ravings of deluded loons don't interest me.

You are mentally sick. So a Nigerian PhD in Engineering from Harvard may have a low IQ in your estimate? How can you lack intelligence and have university degrees, which are synonymous with high analytical ability? I mean, you are a truly confused, sick person.

THE MAJORITY WEREN'T.

You clearly have a ''VERY LOW IQ'' to advance an argument as specious and stupid as this. So if a Jew or white man acquires a degree, it is because they want to contribute to human knowledge, but if a Nigerian does same, it is because they just want a job? Your sickness ehn? Only Amadioha can cure it. Ignorant little dunce.

What is exhausting with arguing with your ilk is the constant need to set them straight when they inevitable miscomprehend arguments. There is nowhere I have said you can get a PhD without intelligence (and very few Nigerians get into Ivy league schools, so stop throwing around "Harvard" anyhow). I said Nigerians obsess over certificates to improve their career prospects. Anybody that knows anything about the Nigerian mentality abroad knows this as a fact. Nigerians are not at the cutting edge of anything with all their certificates. If you go to high-tech spaces in the US, it is dominated by Asian immigrants. Nigerians couldn't tie the shoe laces of Korean or Japanese engineers, or Indian software developers and computer scientists. Nigerians being the most "educated" group in the US is a fallacy. If you mean they acquire more certificates than other people, that might be true. That has little to do though with the contribution Nigerians make to the US.

Rossikki:


Surely that cannot be! Slavs are poorer, so they have a lower IQ than other whites. How dare one of them invent Google? You sure Sergey Brin is not a closet Jew or Swiss?

- Obi1kenobi

I didn't even see this one. Oh, so you don't know that Sergey Brin is a Jew? Google is your friend. I know you're highly jealous of the Jews (I remember you portraying Ashkenazi Jews as fake Jews and trying to portray Ndigbo as "real Jews" which was funny as hell). But some groups are just smarter than others - such is life. There are only 12 million Jews in the world and wherever they find themselves, they just excel and take over the intellectual space. They're truly remarkable people. If I believed in "God", I would truly believe that they are the "chosen people".

Obi1kenobi:


I guess you have not heard of UN HDI index, where countries like Portugal and Poland rank 44 and 31 respectively, while Trinidad ranks 69th, or where China ranks 86 and Gabon ranks 110 and Botswana 101 (the 2 local champions of Africa you're trying to hype). Anybody that knows anything about economics knows GDP and GDP per capita are often misleading stats. Nigeria's GDP stats for example have been severally dismissed by international economists as a fraud with no basis for the figures bandied about as sectorial analysis shows the inflation of a number of industries' output.

You wanna go by UN HDI? Ok. Let's go!

SOURCE:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

Barbados, a black country, is higher on the HDI than China, Turkey, Serbia, Albania, Georgia, Moldova, Mexico among others.

Bahamas, a black country, is higher on the HDI than Barbados.

Jamaica, a black country, is higher on the HDI than Indonesia, Moldova, Paraguay, Uzbekistan, Belize.

Gabon, a black country, is higher on the HDI than Moldova, Paraguay, Philippines, India, Bolivia, East Timor, Honduras.

The Republic of CONGO is higher on the HDI than Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar, Pakistan, Nepal.

Your racist theories place blacks at the bottom of intelligence. In fact those 'studies' place Asians as smarter than whites! So how come on both UN HDI and GDP Per Capita measurements, we have BLACK COUNTRIES SURPASSING WHITE AND ASIAN COUNTRIES?

ANSWER THAT QUESTION. Mumu.

Trinidad is not a black nation. Simple. About 34% of its citizens identify as black. For all I know, the Indians are the ones propping up the economy. Infact, I'm 100% sure that is the case. ...Also, only a window-licking mooron would interprete my comments as saying that "skin color equals development".

Erm...that's what you just did there. You must be on drugs.

Not really. Slavs are different from Germanic people or Nordic people. Same way Bantus in Africa are different from Berbers or Cushitic groups.

Different HOW? Your so-called Bantu nations in Africa are doing better than the 'Berbers/Cushitic groups', or can you compare Kenya, Ghana, Gabon, and Nigeria to Somalia, Eritrea or Sudan? The SLAVS are WHITE EUROPEANS. If they were rich you would have had no problem including them in your crowd.

Same way Jews are different from Arabs even though they are both "Semitic". My theory is simple: white people have a higher IQ than black people.

And, according to your racist theory, Asians have a higher IQ than whites, yet some black nations surpass Asian nations in living standards (as shown above). EXPLAIN THE MASSIVE CONTRADICTION THERE.

IQ correlates strongly with economic success. Slavic nations don't rank particularly highly in IQ tests. Western Europeans do.

But Slavic nations rank much higher in ''IQ tests'' than blacks. So why do we have black nations with greater economic success than Slavic nations?

Really? The last 240 years. Are you also now segregating white people when it suits you? So the Romans who built the Colosseum and a sprawling concrete city of Rome over 2,000 years ago are no more white? The Greeks are no more white?

They weren't the only ones building big things in that era. Thousands of years before Rome and Greece existed, Africans and Asians had been building even more impressive structures. The whites are NEWCOMERS to civilization. Babies in fact. Which was why they had no morals guiding them in their mad drive to loot these older civilizations just to enrich themselves and claim 'superiority' based on theft and massacres of innocent people across the world.

England were no better than Africa 120 years ago? England had conquered much of the world over a number of continents over 120 years ago. You think the country of Isaac Newton and Shakespeare and James Watts etc was no different from Africa 120 years ago.

''England'' conquered nothing. It was the thieving elite that used gun technology stolen from the Chinese to go around robbing nations to enrich themselves while the masses of ENGLAND starved. Go and read Dickens.

The Africa were coastal dwellers couldn't even sail the oceans. Continue deceiving yourself.

The coastal dwellers of Africa were small villages. How the hell did you expect them to ''sail the oceans''?

The odd time an African empire of old was near to the ocean, OF COURSE THEY SAILED.

Excerpts:

An overwhelming body of new evidence is emerging which proves that Africans had frequently sailed across the Atlantic to the Americas, thousands of years before Columbus and indeed before Christ. The great ancient civilizations of Egypt and West Africa traveled to the Americas, contributing immensely to early American civilization by importing the art of pyramid building, political systems and religious practices as well as mathematics, writing and a sophisticated calendar.

The strongest evidence of African presence in America before Columbus comes from the pen of Columbus himself. In 1920, a renowned American historian and linguist, Leo Weiner of Harvard University, in his book, Africa and the discovery of America, explained how Columbus noted in his journal that Native Americans had confirmed that “black skinned people had come from the south-east in boats, trading in gold-tipped spears.”

One of the first documented instances of Africans sailing and settling in the Americas were black Egyptians led by King Ramses III, during the 19th dynasty in 1292 BC. In fact, in 445 BC, the Greek historian Herodotus wrote of the Ancient Egyptian pharaohs’ great seafaring and navigational skills. Further concrete evidence, noted by Dr. Imhotep and largely ignored by Euro-centric archaeologists, includes “Egyptian artifacts found across North America from the Algonquin writings on the East Coast to the artifacts and Egyptian place names in the Grand Canyon.”

In 1311 AD, another major wave of African exploration to the New World was led by King Abubakari II, the ruler of the fourteenth century Mali Empire, which was larger than the Holy Roman Empire. The king sent out 200 ships of men, and 200 ships of trade material, crops, animals, cloth and crucially African knowledge of astronomy, religion and the arts.


https://www.globalresearch.ca/before-columbus-how-africans-brought-civilization-to-america/5407584



.................................................
African Olmec Heads dated to Pre Columbian era, two of several hundreds found in Mexico

If you have any real intellectual curiosity, you might read excerpts of "the Bell Curve" and all the controversy it invoked and the opposing sides of the debate and the critiques of the work, and the consensus areas of agreement. To claim that IQ's correlation with race has been "debunked" is some hilarious shiit.

The Bell Curve is a fraudulent work that has been DEBUNKED by scholars. The writers were a bunch of racist scumbags and crooks who avoided a peer review of the book before publication.

''Herrnstein and Murray were criticized for not submitting their work to peer review before publication, an omission many have seen as incompatible with their presentation of it as a scholarly text.''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve

If they had so much confidence in their work, why did they run and hide when time came to assess the validity of their so-called research?

Rossikki:


Dummy, being ''white'' is as a result of the absence of melanin. Melanin is a chemical that is responsible for skin colour, and the more melanin you have, the darker your skin colour. Melanin is a naturally occurring PROTECTION from the rays of the sun, for God's creation living in tropical regions of the earth. The hotter the region, the darker the skin colour of its inhabitants. Dark skin is not a curse, but a BLESSING if you want to avoid skin cancer and other such diseases that come with being white (lacking melanin) in tropical conditions.

So everyday you wake up, thank your God for your Melanin dark skin, and stop being a colonized, brainless dullard who thinks white skin is a 'blessing' and dark skin a 'curse'.

Have you finished talking to your parents?

What a BLACK hearted m.....!

Rossikki:
^^^ Erm.....Maggot, sneak back under the rock you crawled out of.

B.... M..K..

[s]

Rossikki:


You wanna go by UN HDI? Ok. Let's go!

SOURCE:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

Barbados, a black country, is higher on the HDI than China, Turkey, Serbia, Albania, Georgia, Moldova, Mexico among others.

Bahamas, a black country, is higher on the HDI than Barbados.

Jamaica, a black country, is higher on the HDI than Indonesia, Moldova, Paraguay, Uzbekistan, Belize.

Gabon, a black country, is higher on the HDI than Moldova, Paraguay, Philippines, India, Bolivia, East Timor, Honduras.

The Republic of CONGO is higher on the HDI than Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar, Pakistan, Nepal.

Your racist theories place blacks at the bottom of intelligence. In fact those 'studies' place Asians as smarter than whites! So how come on both UN HDI and GDP Per Capita measurements, we have BLACK COUNTRIES SURPASSING WHITE AND ASIAN COUNTRIES?

ANSWER THAT QUESTION. Mumu.





Erm...that's what you just did there. You must be on drugs.




Different HOW? Your so-called Bantu nations in Africa are doing better than the 'Berbers/Cushitic groups', or can you compare Kenya, Ghana, Gabon, and Nigeria to Somalia, Eritrea or Sudan? The SLAVS are WHITE EUROPEANS. If they were rich you would have had no problem including them in your crowd.



And, according to your racist theory, Asians have a higher IQ than whites, yet some black nations surpass Asian nations in living standards (as shown above). EXPLAIN THE MASSIVE CONTRADICTION THERE.




But Slavic nations rank much higher in ''IQ tests'' than blacks. So why do we have black nations with greater economic success than Slavic nations?




They weren't the only ones building big things in that era. Thousands of years before Rome and Greece existed, Africans and Asians had been building even more impressive structures. The whites are NEWCOMERS to civilization. Babies in fact. Which was why they had no morals guiding them in their mad drive to loot these older civilizations just to enrich themselves and claim 'superiority' based on theft and massacres of innocent people across the world.



''England'' conquered nothing. It was the thieving elite that used gun technology stolen from the Chinese to go around robbing nations to enrich themselves while the masses of ENGLAND starved. Go and read Dickens.



The coastal dwellers of Africa were small villages. How the hell did you expect them to ''sail the oceans''?

The odd time an African empire of old was near to the ocean, OF COURSE THEY SAILED.

Excerpts:

An overwhelming body of new evidence is emerging which proves that Africans had frequently sailed across the Atlantic to the Americas, thousands of years before Columbus and indeed before Christ. The great ancient civilizations of Egypt and West Africa traveled to the Americas, contributing immensely to early American civilization by importing the art of pyramid building, political systems and religious practices as well as mathematics, writing and a sophisticated calendar.

The strongest evidence of African presence in America before Columbus comes from the pen of Columbus himself. In 1920, a renowned American historian and linguist, Leo Weiner of Harvard University, in his book, Africa and the discovery of America, explained how Columbus noted in his journal that Native Americans had confirmed that “black skinned people had come from the south-east in boats, trading in gold-tipped spears.”

One of the first documented instances of Africans sailing and settling in the Americas were black Egyptians led by King Ramses III, during the 19th dynasty in 1292 BC. In fact, in 445 BC, the Greek historian Herodotus wrote of the Ancient Egyptian pharaohs’ great seafaring and navigational skills. Further concrete evidence, noted by Dr. Imhotep and largely ignored by Euro-centric archaeologists, includes “Egyptian artifacts found across North America from the Algonquin writings on the East Coast to the artifacts and Egyptian place names in the Grand Canyon.”

In 1311 AD, another major wave of African exploration to the New World was led by King Abubakari II, the ruler of the fourteenth century Mali Empire, which was larger than the Holy Roman Empire. The king sent out 200 ships of men, and 200 ships of trade material, crops, animals, cloth and crucially African knowledge of astronomy, religion and the arts.


https://www.globalresearch.ca/before-columbus-how-africans-brought-civilization-to-america/5407584



.................................................
African Olmec Heads dated to Pre Columbian era, two of several hundreds found in Mexico




The Bell Curve is a fraudulent work that has been DEBUNKED by scholars. The writers were a bunch of racist scumbags and crooks who avoided a peer review of the book before publication.

''Herrnstein and Murray were criticized for not submitting their work to peer review before publication, an omission many have seen as incompatible with their presentation of it as a scholarly text.''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve

If they had so much confidence in their work, why did they run and hide when time came to assess the validity of their so-called research? [/s]

Thrash