Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,207,316 members, 7,998,561 topics. Date: Saturday, 09 November 2024 at 07:04 PM

My Thoughts And Questions About Religion - Religion (97) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / My Thoughts And Questions About Religion (241465 Views)

Questions About Religion For The Deep Thinker / Why Are Atheists Always Talking About Religion / Questions About Demon Possession - Nairaland Demonology Experts (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (94) (95) (96) (97) (98) (99) (100) ... (130) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by CAPSLOCKED: 8:41am On Mar 11, 2019
JUST SAW THAT VIDEO, AND NOT EVEN THE CRIES OF ALL THOSE INNOCENT LITTLE BABIES COULD CHANGE THE LOVING FATHER'S MIND, YET YOU BELIEVE YOU CAN CHANGE HIS MIND WHEN YOU PRAY TO PASS AN EXAM OR FOR NEPA TO GIVE YOU LIGHT?

THERE'S MORE EVIDENCE RIGHT NOW FOR THE INEXISTENCE OF THIS GUY THAN THERE HAS EVER BEEN FOR HIS EXISTENCE. YET, ADULT PEOPLE STILL CHOOSE TO BELIEVE IN NONSENSE. IT'S A SHAME, REALLY.

4 Likes

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 7:33am On Mar 12, 2019
COME BACK WHEN YOU ARE READY

People often rebuke me for not believing in their god, Yahweh. They will often quote a Bible verse and encourage me to take God seriously.

In reply, I say, "There are two possibilities, either Yahweh exists or it doesn't. If Yahweh was made up (like a multitude of other gods), then so was the Bible.

So your first task is to show that Yahweh is a real, living god. Let me know when you can do that. It will make me a believer. And, it will inevitably make you famous and rich because billions of people would love to know how to do that, and ten of thousands of extremely bright people have tried and failed over two thousand years.

Of course, that means the odds are against you, so I won't hold my breath. Until you succeed, posting appeals to the Bible are a waste of your time and mine. I hope you can see that."

11 Likes

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 11:32am On Mar 13, 2019
All theology is built on this faulty premise: God precedes the Universe and nothing precedes God.

The universe can never be evidence for the god that Abraham told us about. You must show that Abraham's god is real before you can claim it created the universe.

Fictional gods can't create anything. Obviously.

7 Likes

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 5:44pm On Mar 14, 2019
FAITH AND HOPE

1. Take a sentence that begins, "I have faith..." and add something you believe on faith.

For example,

"I have faith HEAVEN EXISTS."

2. Now, replace the words "have faith" with the word "know".

"I know HEAVEN EXISTS."

You'll immediately see the new sentence cannot be defended--you do not "know" heaven exists.

3. Take your original sentence and replace "have faith" with "hope".

"I hope HEAVEN EXISTS."

Now it makes perfect sense--you do indeed "hope that heaven exists".

When you have faith something is true, you do not know it is true, and you should not claim to be certain it is true. You simply HOPE it is true--nothing more. Hoping that something is true does not make it true.

Hoping that something is true tells us what you are like, not what the world is like.

13 Likes 2 Shares

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 7:23am On Mar 18, 2019
WISDOM FROM THE BIBLE

The Bible was inspired by God himself, so we can expect to find much wisdom within its weighty pages. Here are some things we've learnt from it:

Holding people as slaves is ok. So is passing your slaves to your children when you die. You can also sell your daughters as slaves with God's blessing.

Beating your slaves, even if you kill them is ok too, so long as they live for a few days after the beating. It's only fair, after all, they are your property.

Raping a virgin girl is a crime. But it's not a crime against the victim, it's a crime against her father because her value will be diminished if she's not a virgin.

The best way to punish a man who rapes an unmarried girl is to have him pay her father compensation, force him to marry the girl and never allow him to divorce her. That will teach him.

A bride who is thought not to be a virgin on her wedding night should be stoned to death. Obviously.

The Earth was created before the stars. Stars are lights in a dome covering the Earth. The dome has water above it with windows that open to allow it to rain. Suck on that science!

These are all things we learnt from the Bible... but had to unlearn. And there is much, much more where that came from.

I have shared these with some christians, only to be met with curious looks. Apparently, they didn't know these are all in the Bible.

Well. wisdom from the Bible is hard to find, but utter nonsense and appalling moral values are easy.

12 Likes 4 Shares

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by hahn(m): 10:51am On Mar 18, 2019
joseph1013:
WISDOM FROM THE BIBLE

The Bible was inspired by God himself, so we can expect to find much wisdom within its weighty pages. Here are some things we've learnt from it:

Holding people as slaves is ok. So is passing your slaves to your children when you die. You can also sell your daughters as slaves with God's blessing.

Beating your slaves, even if you kill them is ok too, so long as they live for a few days after the beating. It's only fair, after all, they are your property.

Raping a virgin girl is a crime. But it's not a crime against the victim, it's a crime against her father because her value will be diminished if she's not a virgin.

The best way to punish a man who rapes an unmarried girl is to have him pay her father compensation, force him to marry the girl and never allow him to divorce her. That will teach him.

A bride who is thought not to be a virgin on her wedding night should be stoned to death. Obviously.

The Earth was created before the stars. Stars are lights in a dome covering the Earth. The dome has water above it with windows that open to allow it to rain. Suck on that science!

These are all things we learnt from the Bible... but had to unlearn. And there is much, much more where that came from.

I have shared these with some christians, only to be met with curious looks. Apparently, they didn't know these are all in the Bible.

Well. wisdom from the Bible is hard to find, but utter nonsense and appalling moral values are easy.

Add the bible verses please
Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 10:53am On Mar 20, 2019
joseph1013:
WISDOM FROM THE BIBLE

The Bible was inspired by God himself, so we can expect to find much wisdom within its weighty pages. Here are some things we've learnt from it:

Holding people as slaves is ok. (Exodus 21: 1-3) So is passing your slaves to your children when you die. (Leviticus 24:46) You can also sell your daughters as slaves with God's blessing. (Exodus 21:7)

Beating your slaves, even if you kill them is ok too, so long as they live for a few days after the beating. It's only fair, after all, they are your property. (Exodus 21:20-21)

Raping a virgin girl is a crime. But it's not a crime against the victim, it's a crime against her father because her value will be diminished if she's not a virgin.

The best way to punish a man who rapes an unmarried girl is to have him pay her father compensation, force him to marry the girl and never allow him to divorce her. That will teach him. (Deuteronomy 22:25-27)

A bride who is thought not to be a virgin on her wedding night should be stoned to death. Obviously. (Deuteronomy 22:13-21)

The Earth was created before the stars. Stars are lights in a dome covering the Earth. The dome has water above it with windows that open to allow it to rain. Suck on that science! (Genesis 1)

These are all things we learnt from the Bible... but had to unlearn. And there is much, much more where that came from.

I have shared these with some christians, only to be met with curious looks. Apparently, they didn't know these are all in the Bible.

Well. wisdom from the Bible is hard to find, but utter nonsense and appalling moral values are easy.
Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 10:56am On Mar 20, 2019
GOD, THE X FACTOR

When solving a problem using algebra it's common to refer to the unknown quantity as "x". It would save a huge amount of confusion if religious people would learn this simple principle.

For example, when theists consider the great problems of how humans came to be conscious, or how DNA came to encode the proteins necessary for life, or the granddaddy of all such problems, how the universe came to exist, they correctly conclude that we do not yet know the answers to these problems. But instead of saying, for example, "Let x = the cause of the universe", where x is an unknown process, force or agency, they say "God is the cause of the universe".

All but the dimmest theists know this is an attempt at sleight of hand. God ≠ an unknown process, force or agency. God refers to a specific agent (usually one the theist's mum believed in).

So theists, if you wish to use this argument, use it correctly. Conclude that x, an unknown process, force or agency, caused the universe. If you wish to pray to x, sing hymns to it, humble yourself before it and pay offerings in honour of it, that is your prerogative.

But don't be surprised if the rest of us shake our heads and roll our eyes in silent incredulity.

8 Likes 2 Shares

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 10:17am On Mar 21, 2019
WHEN FAITH SCORES AN OWN-GOAL

We know believers ultimately have to rely on faith to support their worldview and we know faith is utterly useless as a way of discovering what is true and what is false. But what really makes my eyes roll is when they make claims that no one could POSSIBLY know are true.

Take, for example, the claim that God is omniscient. How could anyone know that? Even God (if he existed) couldn't be sure of this--if there is something he doesn't know, he wouldn't know he doesn't know it!

This is faith playing football against itself--and losing!

10 Likes 2 Shares

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by MYJIST(m): 12:06pm On Mar 21, 2019
joseph1013:
[color=#550000]WHEN FAITH SCORES AN OWN-GOAL
Mr, I think you're not just gullible. I also think you're losing who you're and the ability to make sound judgement. You must have been aware that some of the scientists who made major discoveries practised religion. Now, you saying God does not exist... need to show us a concrete proof about your conviction. Unless you do that, you're more like, perhaps even worse than those who practice religion. At least they go to churches and watch miracles happen. And you dare not tell me it's always staged. You practice religion on a different platform. Gullibility have made you blind to see that you've been mocking yourself all along. Show us your proof, stop speculating and 'perhapsing' if you're so different from those who practice religion.
Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 1:23pm On Mar 22, 2019
MYJIST:
Mr, I think you're not just gullible. I also think you're losing who you're and the ability to make sound judgement. You must have been aware that some of the scientists who made major discoveries practised religion. Now, you saying God does not exist... need to show us a concrete proof about your conviction. Unless you do that, you're more like, perhaps even worse than those who practice religion. At least they go to churches and watch miracles happen. And you dare not tell me it's always staged. You practice religion on a different platform. Gullibility have made you blind to see that you've been mocking yourself all along. Show us your proof, stop speculating and 'perhapsing' if you're so different from those who practice religion.

What you have typed makes no sense.

I am gullible for requiring evidence before I believe in the god you serve?

Which of the gods do you believe in, and what evidence can you provide to substantiate your claim?

5 Likes

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 2:36pm On Mar 22, 2019
SCIENCE DOESN'T HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS

When people say, "Science doesn't have all the answers", I have to agree. Honestly, I don't even know what proportion of the answers science has. Could it be 50%, 1% or 0.0001%? I just don't know. Nor does anyone.

But people who say that usually have something else in mind. They usually mean there are realms, such as the supernatural, that science cannot investigate at all and, without science, it's OK to believe whatever you like.

My question is, without science, how can you arrive at reliable knowledge about the supernatural? I get four answers to that question:

1) Personal experience
2) Faith
3) Revelation
4) Intuition

These are all subjective ways of determining what is true (epistemologies). They all suffer from the same problem--they give different answers to different people. The answers you get are influenced by your mood, personality and culture, and they change over time. This is enough for you to know these methods are unreliable--they give you answers but you have no way of being sure your answers are correct.

Worse still, most of these epistemologies have a tendency to make you CERTAIN you have the correct answer. Being certain of something that is not true doesn't just make you wrong, it can make you dogmatic and dangerous too.

So science does not have all the answers but subjective epistemologies have no answers at all--they cannot even tell us if a supernatural realm exists, far less enable us to investigate it.

If you really want to believe only things that are true, give subjective epistemologies a wide berth--they can make you believe in fairy stories and absurdities. There is no truly solid ground when it comes to knowledge but science gets infinitely closer to it than anything else.

Right now, science is the only game in town.

12 Likes 5 Shares

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by Karleb(m): 6:23pm On Mar 23, 2019
I could remember when I read basically everything on this thread. These days I just want to be a low key unbeliever.

If I can't die for what I believe then I definitely can not die for what I "unbelieve".

That mean no arguments, but when my christian brethren start with their illogical talks, I just slowly disengage them most time.

I mean, many still believe you need to pray to pass.

4 Likes

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 7:42am On Mar 26, 2019
SOMETHING I AM PROUD OF

People PM me and tell me they have left their religion and they tell me how that has transformed their lives. They say they are happier, have fewer fears, more free time and see the world in a new light—one that, at last, makes complete sense.

Some of them thank me. They say my posts have helped them on their journey. Like karleb above, some of them prefer to be low-key unbelievers. And that's fine.

I am only happy that people have moved on from superstitions created by their long-deceased ancestors but that is not what makes me proud. What makes me proud is that I have never threatened anyone with torture if they don't become an atheist; I have never held a knife at a person's throat saying, "Repeat after me. There is no God, there is no God."

I have never used violence or threats of any kind. I use logic. I encourage people to think better and, sometimes, I use humour.

And I am proud of our species. Proud that, despite the most egregious childhood indoctrination, people can reach out to reason and change beliefs that are lodged in the deep recesses of their brains. That is one of the things that makes us great.

All religions use childhood indoctrination and some also use threats of eternal torture or, even, threats of physical violence or death. These methods are necessary to ensure ridiculous beliefs persist across the generations.

We do not need ridiculous beliefs, we do not need to use threats and violence against our children, and we do not need religions, especially as we presently have them in Africa. Let them go.

17 Likes 4 Shares

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 7:38am On Mar 28, 2019
UNDERSTANDING THE CHRISTIAN DEBATER

On Social media (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc), I have observed that Christian debaters have a language of their own. Here is an explanation of some of their popular idioms.

“Your mind is closed. You don’t want to know the truth”
Really means: You understand this better than me, I need to read Answers In Genesis again.

“[Say nothing] ” then click the Block button (or the Delete button to delete a post or a thread)
Really means: Phew, I don’t think my friends have enough faith to see stuff like this.

“Jesus loves you” or “Amen...Thank you.”
Really means: I have no clue how to answer that point.

"I'll pray for you."
Really means: If you won't believe me, I'll report you to God.

“But what about .....?”
Really means: OK, I lost the last point so I'll try a different one.

"The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God."
Really means: Hahaha, you can't get out of this one!

“You have faith every time you sit on a chair”
Really means: Faith may be stupid but you use faith too so we're both stupid!

"You're going to hell!"
Really means: Hell scares the sh*t out of me so it should scare you too.

“The wisdom of men is foolishness to things of the spirit.”
Really means: The evidence does support your view but I just CANNOT believe I'm wrong.

“One day Jesus will open your heart so you can see the truth”
Really means: I hope someday you will get to be as crazy as I am.

7 Likes 2 Shares

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 8:57am On Mar 29, 2019
HOW INVINCIBLES DIE

Lehman Brothers, General Motors, Texaco, Global Crossing, and United Airlines are companies with two things in common; they were huge and successful, and they became bankrupt. From the inside, it must have seemed these businesses were invincible--too large and too good to fail but a couple of bad decisions, a changing business environment, a legal squabble, and they were gone.

In some cases, such as General Motors, failure came after months of desperate re-organisations, negotiations, and deals. In other cases, such as Lehman Brothers, collapse came in days and shocked the world.

The lesson here is no organisation is too big to fail. Being large certainly has advantages but all too often it carries the seed of self-destruction--complacency. I recall the time when IBM was the mammoth of the computer industry. It was so dominant that all its competitors looked like tiddlers. There was even a half-serious, half joking motto used by IT Directors everywhere, "No one ever got fired for buying IBM."

Arguably, IBM's downfall began in 1975 when 20-year-old Harvard dropout, Bill Gates, set up a two-man software company with his buddy Paul Allen. They called the company Micro-Soft. In 1980, Micro-Soft (by then re-named Microsoft) teamed up with the Goliath IBM to develop an operating system for the new IBM personal computer. With the clout of IBM behind it, sales of personal computers took off like a rocket. The effect of this was IBM set a hardware standard for PCs and Microsoft set a standard for the operating system. These standards allowed competitors to flood into the market with PCs that were compatible with all the software being produced for the IBM PC.

It was not this competition that damaged IBM though--it was an unforeseen consequence of it. Companies started to buy PCs for their employees and this created demand for networking them. IBM's fortune had been based on mainframe computers that people accessed using "dumb terminals"--display screens with a keyboard that were only able to display data sent to them by the mainframe computer that did all the work.

Once companies had networked their PCs, they found these small computers could do jobs they previously needed a mainframe computer to do, and at a fraction of the cost. It was this that IBM, from their dominant position in large computers, was blinded to. They saw personal computers as a nice little earner to add to their gigantic revenues from mainframes. In fact, personal computers were replacing mainframes in many situations. These tiny computers were eating mainframes for breakfast.

IBM's organisation and culture was suited to selling expensive, high margin mainframe computers in low volumes but the world was turning to cheap, low margin personal computers in high volumes. By 1979, the company's growth rate has stalled and by 1991 it was making heavy losses--it had accumulated losses of $16 billion by 1993.

In the end, IBM survived thanks to hiring an outside executive, Louis V. Gerstner Jr as CEO, and by becoming an entirely different business focusing on its strengths in research, software, consulting and specialist supercomputers.

Sometimes I reflect on these things when I think about the future of religions. The two biggest religions; Christianity and Islam may feel invincible to those on the inside. Well, maybe not Christianity. We can already see serious cracks in Christianity. Congregations are dropping fast in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Even in the religiously conservative USA, the 15 -35 age group has seen a significant move away from Christianity over the past 20 years. Some European countries can now be properly described as post-Christian.

Islam is still growing and must feel very secure to insiders. But stress cracks are appearing. The problem is, Islam partly retains it followers through threats of punishment, violence, and even death, so it is very hard to gauge how many Muslims have turned away from their religion. We have only anecdotal evidence which we cannot rely on.

For what it's worth, there are reports of a significant number of atheists now in Saudi Arabia, online we see the number of ex-Muslim atheist groups growing and you can now find atheist bloggers from most Islamic countries. We also hear reports of young people in large numbers skipping Friday prayers in Iran. I have evidence of an increasing number of ex-Muslims contacting western organisations discussing their plight.

There is something else that is beginning to happen. Muslims are raised to believe their religion and their holy book, the Qur'an, are perfect, and the religion of submission tolerates no dissent. Consequently, very few Muslims hear open criticism of their religion--until now. Now, online, it is easy to find people criticising the Prophet Muhammad, finding flaws in the Qur'an and challenging the vacuous arguments for the existence of God so beloved by Muslims. If you've been told your religion is perfect, you need find only one flaw to know that you have been lied to. That is the fatal weakness of the doctrine of perfection. How many Muslims have realised it?

Islam is the most backward and oppressive major religion in the world. Its treatment of women, of gay people, of apostates and of Muslims who dare to speak out against it, have no place in the 21st century. Islam carries a thread of religious supremacy and domination that has inspired thousands of Muslims to sacrifice their lives in acts of war or terrorism and has killed thousands of others in the process.

Islam is not going anytime soon but it is not too big to fail. Its death will not come from outside but from within as its own supporters realise it is a religion that is not fit for purpose in the modern world, that it is a source of conflict and not harmony, and, ultimately, that it is just another Iron Age religion drawn from the imaginations of our long-dead ancestors.

7 Likes 2 Shares

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by Omooba224: 9:19am On Mar 29, 2019
MYJIST:
Mr, I think you're not just gullible. I also think you're losing who you're and the ability to make sound judgement. You must have been aware that some of the scientists who made major discoveries practised religion. Now, you saying God does not exist... need to show us a concrete proof about your conviction. Unless you do that, you're more like, perhaps even worse than those who practice religion. At least they go to churches and watch miracles happen. And you dare not tell me it's always staged. You practice religion on a different platform. Gullibility have made you blind to see that you've been mocking yourself all along. Show us your proof, stop speculating and 'perhapsing' if you're so different from those who practice religion.
Sorry bros! you are the gullible here. How on earth would you believe something (the supposed creator of the universe for crying out loud) without proof? Before spewing trash, make sure you are loaded with enough evidence. .

1 Like

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by gurusubai7(m): 10:10am On Mar 29, 2019

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fd8zzxpZdjA

I intend to focus on the most popular of all the spirits of nature, they are termed water spirits. Actually, I would have not called them spirits because of their composition, of a truth I tell you, they have flesh, blood and bone. They have their coral homes, where they live and have children. Not only that, they eat, talk, act and sleep and consequently they cannot be properly called spirits but because they are invisible to the human eyes, they can be termed sub-human beings. Of a truth I tell you, water spirits are held in high esteem and revered by pagans. Of a truth I tell you, water spirit is present wherever there is collection of water.


Don't forget to like Subscribe and share!
Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by Omooba224: 10:03pm On Mar 30, 2019
joseph1013:
HOW INVINCIBLES DIE

Lehman Brothers, General Motors, Texaco, Global Crossing, and United Airlines are companies with two things in common; they were huge and successful, and they became bankrupt. From the inside, it must have seemed these businesses were invincible--too large and too good to fail but a couple of bad decisions, a changing business environment, a legal squabble, and they were gone.

In some cases, such as General Motors, failure came after months of desperate re-organisations, negotiations, and deals. In other cases, such as Lehman Brothers, collapse came in days and shocked the world.

The lesson here is no organisation is too big to fail. Being large certainly has advantages but all too often it carries the seed of self-destruction--complacency. I recall the time when IBM was the mammoth of the computer industry. It was so dominant that all its competitors looked like tiddlers. There was even a half-serious, half joking motto used by IT Directors everywhere, "No one ever got fired for buying IBM."

Arguably, IBM's downfall began in 1975 when 20-year-old Harvard dropout, Bill Gates, set up a two-man software company with his buddy Paul Allen. They called the company Micro-Soft. In 1980, Micro-Soft (by then re-named Microsoft) teamed up with the Goliath IBM to develop an operating system for the new IBM personal computer. With the clout of IBM behind it, sales of personal computers took off like a rocket. The effect of this was IBM set a hardware standard for PCs and Microsoft set a standard for the operating system. These standards allowed competitors to flood into the market with PCs that were compatible with all the software being produced for the IBM PC.

It was not this competition that damaged IBM though--it was an unforeseen consequence of it. Companies started to buy PCs for their employees and this created demand for networking them. IBM's fortune had been based on mainframe computers that people accessed using "dumb terminals"--display screens with a keyboard that were only able to display data sent to them by the mainframe computer that did all the work.

Once companies had networked their PCs, they found these small computers could do jobs they previously needed a mainframe computer to do, and at a fraction of the cost. It was this that IBM, from their dominant position in large computers, was blinded to. They saw personal computers as a nice little earner to add to their gigantic revenues from mainframes. In fact, personal computers were replacing mainframes in many situations. These tiny computers were eating mainframes for breakfast.

IBM's organisation and culture was suited to selling expensive, high margin mainframe computers in low volumes but the world was turning to cheap, low margin personal computers in high volumes. By 1979, the company's growth rate has stalled and by 1991 it was making heavy losses--it had accumulated losses of $16 billion by 1993.

In the end, IBM survived thanks to hiring an outside executive, Louis V. Gerstner Jr as CEO, and by becoming an entirely different business focusing on its strengths in research, software, consulting and specialist supercomputers.

Sometimes I reflect on these things when I think about the future of religions. The two biggest religions; Christianity and Islam may feel invincible to those on the inside. Well, maybe not Christianity. We can already see serious cracks in Christianity. Congregations are dropping fast in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Even in the religiously conservative USA, the 15 -35 age group has seen a significant move away from Christianity over the past 20 years. Some European countries can now be properly described as post-Christian.

Islam is still growing and must feel very secure to insiders. But stress cracks are appearing. The problem is, Islam partly retains it followers through threats of punishment, violence, and even death, so it is very hard to gauge how many Muslims have turned away from their religion. We have only anecdotal evidence which we cannot rely on.

For what it's worth, there are reports of a significant number of atheists now in Saudi Arabia, online we see the number of ex-Muslim atheist groups growing and you can now find atheist bloggers from most Islamic countries. We also hear reports of young people in large numbers skipping Friday prayers in Iran. I have evidence of an increasing number of ex-Muslims contacting western organisations discussing their plight.

There is something else that is beginning to happen. Muslims are raised to believe their religion and their holy book, the Qur'an, are perfect, and the religion of submission tolerates no dissent. Consequently, very few Muslims hear open criticism of their religion--until now. Now, online, it is easy to find people criticising the Prophet Muhammad, finding flaws in the Qur'an and challenging the vacuous arguments for the existence of God so beloved by Muslims. If you've been told your religion is perfect, you need find only one flaw to know that you have been lied to. That is the fatal weakness of the doctrine of perfection. How many Muslims have realised it?

Islam is the most backward and oppressive major religion in the world. Its treatment of women, of gay people, of apostates and of Muslims who dare to speak out against it, have no place in the 21st century. Islam carries a thread of religious supremacy and domination that has inspired thousands of Muslims to sacrifice their lives in acts of war or terrorism and has killed thousands of others in the process.

Islam is not going anytime soon but it is not too big to fail. Its death will not come from outside but from within as its own supporters realise it is a religion that is not fit for purpose in the modern world, that it is a source of conflict and not harmony, and, ultimately, that it is just another Iron Age religion drawn from the imaginations of our long-dead ancestors.
This is so apposite! I like your analogy of the "Too Big to Fail" companies and our major religions. Though nothing is perpetual in life but religion is one of the things that shows its power of being relevant since time immemorial owing to the fact that people love to hold on to some higher powers and beliefs. They link such beliefs to their existence. I am pretty sure their numbers will definitely crumble, however, this our generation might not witness the total fall of religions because we are deeply indoctrinated but religion is likely not be able to survive another 200 years.

1 Like

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 9:09am On Mar 31, 2019
Charles Uzor wrote:

If it's beautiful verse, like: "blessed are the kind and generous",

then God inspired it, and it must be interpreted literally;

... if it's unsettling verse, like: "slaves, obey your earthly masters, even those who are cruel",

then we must invoke classic theology and anthropology, taking into account the culture of a dark period in history.

And yet the book is inerrant.
Blame it on cognitive dissonance.

5 Likes

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by Omooba224: 11:19am On Mar 31, 2019
joseph1013:
Charles Uzor wrote:

If it's beautiful verse, like: "blessed are the kind and generous",

then God inspired it, and it must be interpreted literally;

... if it's unsettling verse, like: "slaves, obey your earthly masters, even those who are cruel",

then we must invoke classic theology and anthropology, taking into account the culture of a dark period in history.

And yet the book is inerrant.
Blame it on cognitive dissonance.
Cherry Picking at its peak. They will even go as far as saying'Christianity doesn't follow the OT'. They leave themselves with some mental gymnastics. It sounds preposterous.

3 Likes

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 9:21am On Apr 01, 2019
Omooba224:
Cherry Picking at its peak. They will even go as far as saying'Christianity doesn't follow the OT'. They leave themselves with some mental gymnastics. It sounds preposterous.

It's preposterous. They say they agree that all scriptures is inspired by God, yet when Paul says women should not speak in the Church, they say it is Paul's opinion and not binding on believers.

Let's pick whatever verse we want and leave all else.

6 Likes 3 Shares

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by Omooba224: 2:38pm On Apr 01, 2019
joseph1013:


It's preposterous. They say they agree that all scriptures is inspired by God, yet when Paul says women should not speak in the Church, they say it is Paul's opinion and not binding on believers.

Let's pick whatever verse we want and leave all else.
LMAO!
grin
grin
grin
grin
grin
grin
grin
grin
grin
grin
grin
grin
grin

2 Likes

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by 9inches(m): 10:35am On Apr 02, 2019
joseph1013:
WHO ARE THEY KIDDING?

Ask a god-believer why they believe in their god and there's a good chance they will start explaining how the universe could not create itself, so there must be a creator.

BULLS...IT!! This is horribly dishonest. Let's imagine how a believer might pray if it were true.

"Hello creator. I don't know if you can hear me or if you want to hear me but I'm reaching out to you. You might know I exist or you might not. Or you might not care anyway. You might be able to communicate with me or you might not or you might not want to. I don't know.

I don't know if you are male or female or both or neither. I don't know if you are huge, small, subatomic or look like an octopus. I don't know if you are a lone creator or whether you were a member of a team of dozens or billions of creators.

I don't know if you are wise or stupid, loving or hateful, kind or wicked or maybe you are none of these things. Or perhaps these ideas are utterly incomprehensible to you.

I don't know if you care how I live or what I wear or how I cut my hair or what I should do with my prepuce. And if you do care, I don't know what you would like.

I don't know if you are alive or dead or if you have moved on to other universes and lost interest in us. I don't know where you came from or even if you were ever alive. Perhaps you never were. Perhaps, you were no more than a glitch in quantum time that made all hell break lose.

The truth is, I don't know anything about you at all. But I would like to. Honestly I would. And that's why I'm praying to you today."
.

But this is not how god believers pray. They pray to specific gods, with specific prophets and specific holy scriptures with specific rules and rituals.

They do not pray to whatever being/force/entity/process might have created the universe. That is just the excuse they give to salvage some dignity, when none is deserved.
You're mostly right. This is because we know who God is. Your prayer is that of a skeptic; serious Christians don't pray that way. I'm not in doubt of who I pray to. I know him and he knows me. It's like a perfect father and son relationship.
Not every believer can logically explain the object of his /her belief, but that does not make such belief false. Rather, it means such a believer is unable to articulate his/her belief. In other words, if you are a trustworthy person, it's almost irrelevant if I trust you blindly or I'm capable of explaining away your trustworthiness. What matters is that I get the benefit that comes from trusting you.

There's limit to what I could be able to know about you unless I am in a sort of a relationship with you. The deeper the relationship, the better understanding I obtain of you.

PS: Your prayer is beautiful at this stage of your conviction. Keep musing in that direction and you will surely find the ultimate TRUTH itself, GOOD itself, JUSTICE itself - God.

1 Like 1 Share

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by 9inches(m): 5:22pm On Apr 02, 2019
Omooba224:
Cherry Picking at its peak. They will even go as far as saying'Christianity doesn't follow the OT'. They leave themselves with some mental gymnastics. It sounds preposterous.
Christians follow Christ. How's that hard for you to understand?

1 Like

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by 9inches(m): 5:33pm On Apr 02, 2019
joseph1013:
Charles Uzor wrote:

If it's beautiful verse, like: "blessed are the kind and generous",

then God inspired it, and it must be interpreted literally;

... if it's unsettling verse, like: "slaves, obey your earthly masters, even those who are cruel",

then we must invoke classic theology and anthropology, taking into account the culture of a dark period in history.

And yet the book is inerrant.
Blame it on cognitive dissonance.

Collection of books! We say "books of the bible." The Bible contents span more than a thousand years in their composition. It is a very complex piece of work. There are many literary styles contained in the bible. Something you could easily search for yourself, smarty.
Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by 9inches(m): 7:07pm On Apr 02, 2019
Omooba224:
Sorry bros! you are the gullible here. How on earth would you believe something (the supposed creator of the universe for crying out loud) without proof? Before spewing trash, make sure you are loaded with enough evidence. .
Does a lack of evidence of something diminish that something? Have you thought deeply where the world that you know and barely understand emanated from?
Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by 9inches(m): 7:20pm On Apr 02, 2019
Karleb:
I could remember when I read basically everything on this thread. These days I just want to be a low key unbeliever.

If I can't die for what I believe then I definitely can not die for what I "unbelieve".

That mean no arguments, but when my christian brethren start with their illogical talks, I just slowly disengage them most time.

I mean, many still believe you need to pray to pass.

You still believe there is truth out there even though you aren't sure what it is, don't you? The truth that explains the realities you and I experience in this complex universe. The truth that makes logical sense when you assimilate to it. The truth that puts every darn thing in clear cut perspective....

If there is such truth out there, would you not want to know it?
Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by 9inches(m): 7:27pm On Apr 02, 2019
joseph1013:
UNDERSTANDING THE CHRISTIAN DEBATER

On Social media (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc), I have observed that Christian debaters have a language of their own. Here is an explanation of some of their popular idioms.

“Your mind is closed. You don’t want to know the truth”
Really means: You understand this better than me, I need to read Answers In Genesis again.

“[Say nothing] ” then click the Block button (or the Delete button to delete a post or a thread)
Really means: Phew, I don’t think my friends have enough faith to see stuff like this.

“Jesus loves you” or “Amen...Thank you.”
Really means: I have no clue how to answer that point.

"I'll pray for you."
Really means: If you won't believe me, I'll report you to God.

“But what about .....?”
Really means: OK, I lost the last point so I'll try a different one.

"The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God."
Really means: Hahaha, you can't get out of this one!

“You have faith every time you sit on a chair”
Really means: Faith may be stupid but you use faith too so we're both stupid!

"You're going to hell!"
Really means: Hell scares the sh*t out of me so it should scare you too.

“The wisdom of men is foolishness to things of the spirit.”
Really means: The evidence does support your view but I just CANNOT believe I'm wrong.

“One day Jesus will open your heart so you can see the truth”
Really means: I hope someday you will get to be as crazy as I am.

Are all Christians the same in your view?
Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by joseph1013: 6:40am On Apr 03, 2019
WE WANT A CURE!

When I berate religious beliefs for the harm they cause, especially for violence and killing, I can be sure someone will try to rebut me by saying there are other causes of violence to worry about, like greed, anger, and envy.

This is like a doctor who announces a cure for HIV being shouted down by fellow doctors because he hasn't found the cure for heart disease!

Let's be clear. Religious beliefs are the root cause of much violence, killing, and conflict. Religious beliefs can divide families and lead to the neglect and abuse of children. Religious beliefs underpin systemic discrimination against minorities and women, and they promote superstitions that take us back thousands of years and make us gullible and vulnerable.

Despite all these things, there is not a single god that can be shown to exist or a single religion that can be shown to be true. Religion is truly the human disease.

We don't need to accommodate religion, we need to cure it.

5 Likes 4 Shares

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by Karleb(m): 5:50pm On Apr 03, 2019
9inches:
You still believe there is truth out there even though you aren't sure what it is, don't you? The truth that explains the realities you and I experience in this complex universe. The truth that makes logical sense when you assimilate to it. The truth that puts every darn thing in clear cut perspective....

If there is such truth out there, would you not want to know it?

No! I've read, listened and seen a lot of things people consider as "the truth" and trust me what you have to offer is just another repackaged "the truth" package. So my answer again is NO!

The truth is, there is no truth.

2 Likes

Re: My Thoughts And Questions About Religion by 9inches(m): 9:45pm On Apr 03, 2019
Karleb:


No! I've read, listened and seen a lot of things people consider as "the truth" and trust me what you have to offer is just another repackaged "the truth" package. So my answer again is NO!

The truth is, there is no truth.

This is laughable. You just made a self-defeating (self-refuting) statement. Is the highlighted statement a mistake? You can honestly take it back no problem, because you are clearly making a truth claim while trying to say truth doesn't exist.

(1) (2) (3) ... (94) (95) (96) (97) (98) (99) (100) ... (130) (Reply)

Scandal: Pastor Chris Oyakhilome In South African Trouble! / Rhapsody Of Realities: A Daily Devotional / Jesus is coming soon. This thread is for faithful watchmen

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 152
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.